Conventional versus alternative pig production assessed by multicriteria decision analysis (original) (raw)

References

• AFNOR (1994) Dictionnaire de l’environnement, Les termes normalisés, Association française de normalisation, 307 p.
• Basset-Mens C., van der Werf H.M.G. (2004) Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 105, 1-2, 127–144.
  Article Google Scholar
• Beccali M., Cellura M., Mistretta M. (2003) Decision making in energy planning, Application of the Electra method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology, Renew. Energ. 28, 2063–2087.
  Article Google Scholar
• Béline F. (1998) Étude des transferts d’azote par nitrification-dénitrification au cours du traitement aérobie et du stockage du lisier de porc, Essai avec 15N, Université de Perpignan, Thèse de doctorat, 153 p.
• Béline F., Martinez J. (2002) Nitrogen transformation during biological aerobic treatment of pig slurry: effect of intermittent aeration on nitrous oxide emission, Bioresource Technol. 83, 225–228.
  Article Google Scholar
• Berger A. (1992) Le climat de la Terre, Bruxelles, Belgique, De Boeck Université, 472 p.
  Google Scholar
• Bockman O.C., Kaarstad O., Lie O.H., Richards I. (1990) Agriculture and fertilizers, Norsk Hydra as Agricultural Group.
• Bousson E. (2003) Gestion forestière intégrée, Approche basée sur l’analyse multicritère, Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux, 303 p.
• Carey P.D., Short C., Morris C., Hunt J., Priscott A., Davis M., Finch C., Curry N., Little W., Winter M., Parkin A., Firbank L.G. (2003) The multi-disciplinary evaluation of a national agri-environment scheme, J. Environ. Manage. 69, 71–91.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Castellini C., Bastianoni S., Granai C., Dal Bosco A., Brunetti M. (2006) Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. (in press).
• Cooper J.S. (2003) Specifying functional units and reference flows for comparable alternatives, Int. J. LCA 8, 337–349.
  Article Google Scholar
• Debouche C., Lambin J. (1999) Écobilan de l’exploitation agricole, Manuel d’utilisation, Faculté des Sciences agronomiques de Gembloux, Direction Générale de l’Agriculture de la Région wallonne, 132 p. + annexes.
• Debouche C., Lambin J. (2002) L’écobilan de l’exploitation agricole, 7e colloque international des spécialistes francophones en évaluation d’impacts, Liège, 10–14 juin 2002. www.fsagx.ac.be/mf.
• Degré A., Debouche C., Verheve D. (2004) Importance relative des impacts sur l’atmosphère des élevages porcins : les arbitrages des experts, 4e journée Productions porcines et avicoles, 20.10.04, pp. 42–52.
• EC (1999) Council regulation 1804/1999 of 19 July 1999 supplementing regulation EEC 2092/91on organic production of agricultural products and indication refeering thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production, JO L222 of 24.08.99.
• EEC (1991) Council directive 91/676/EEC of 12 december 1991 concerning the protection of water against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, JO L375 of 31.12.91.
• EEC (1994) Council regulation 40/94 of 20 december 1994 on community trademarks, JO LOU of 14.01.94.
• Ghyym S.H. (1999) A semi-linguistic fuzzy approach to multi-actor decision making: application to aggregation of experts judgments, Ann. Nucl. Energy 26, 1097–1112.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Groot Koerkamp P.W.G., Uenk G.H. (1997) Climatic conditions and aerial pollutants in and emission from commercial animal production systems in the Netherlands, in: Ammonia and odour emission from animal production facilities, 6–10 October 1997, Vinkerloord, The Netherlands, pp. 139–144.
• Guillou D., Dourmad J.-Y., Noblet J. (1993) Journées de la recherche porcine en France 25, 307–314.
  Google Scholar
• Haas G., Wetterich F., Geier U. (2000) Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level, J. LCA. 5, 345–348.
  Article Google Scholar
• Halberg N., van der Werf H.M.G., Basset-Mens C., Dalgaard R., de Boer U.M. (2005) Environmental assessment tools for the evaluation and improvement of European livestock production systems, Livest. Prod. Sci. 96, 33–50.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haeussermann A., Hartung E., Gallmann E., Jungbluth T. (2006) Influence of season, ventilation strategy and slurry removal on the methane emission from pig houses, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 115–121.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hayes E.T., Curran T.P., Dodd V.A. (2006) Odour and ammonia emission from intensive pig units in Ireland, Bioresource Technol. 97, 940–948.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hokkanen J., Salminen P. (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98, 19–36.
  Article Google Scholar
• ISO (1997) Environmental management, Life cycle assessment, Principles and framework, Norme ISO 14040 1997-06-15, 12 p.
• Ivanova-Peneva S.G., Aarnink A.J.A., Verstegen M.W.A. (2006) Ammonia and mineral losses on dutch organic farms with pregnant sows, Biosyst. Eng. (in press).
• Kermarrec C. (2000) Bilan et transformation de l’azote en élevage intensif de porcs sur litière, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Rennes, 185 p.
• Lansink A.O., Reinhard S. (2004) Investigating technical efficiency and potential technological change in Dutch pig farming, Agr. Syst. 79, 353–367.
  Article Google Scholar
• Marggraf R. (2003) Comparative assessment of agri-environmental programmes in federal states of Germany, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2100, 1–10.
  Google Scholar
• Maystre L.Y., Pictet J., Simos J. (1994) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRA, Description, conseils pratiques et cas d’application à la gestion environnementale, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Collection gérer l’environnement, 323 p.
• Mohorjy A.M., Aburizaiza O.S. (1997) Impact assessment of an improper effluent control system: a delphi approach, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 17, 205–217.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mousseau V. (1992) Analyse et classification de la littérature traitant de l’importance relative des critères en aide multicritère à la décision, Operations Res. 26, 367–389.
  Google Scholar
• Mousseau V. (1993) Problèmes liés à l’évaluation de l’importance relative des critères en aide multicritère à la décision : réflexions théoriques, expérimentations et implémentations informatiques, Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Dauphine.
• MRW (1999) Décret du 11 mars 1999 relatif au permis d’environnement, Ministère de la Région wallonne M.B. 08.06.1999.
• MRW (2002) Arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 10 octobre 2002 relatif à la gestion durable de l’azote en agriculture, Ministère de la Région wallonne M.B. 29.11.02.
• Murry J.W., Hammons J.O. (1995) Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research, Rev. Higher Educ. 18, 424–436.
  Google Scholar
• Ni J., Berckmans D., Vinckier C. (1996) Influence of contaminated floor on ammonia emission from pig house, in: Proceeding of the Agricultural-Engineers 1996 congress, Madrid 96B-062.
• Nicks B. (2004) Aspects environnementaux et zootechniques de l’élevage de porcs charcutiers et de porcelets sevrés sur litières accumulées de paille et de sciure, Liège, ULg, Thèse de Doctorat, 202 p.
• Nicks B., Laitat M., Vandenheede M., Désiron A., Verhaeghe C., Canart B. (2003) Emission of ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide and water vapour in the raising of weaned pigs on straw-based and sawdust-based deep litters, Anim. Res. 52, 299–308.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nicks B., Laitat M., Farnir F., Vandenheede M., Désiron A., Verhaeghe C., Canart B. (2004) Gaseous emission from deep litters pens with straw or sawdust for fattening pigs, Anim. Sci. 78, 99–107.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Nicolas J. (2002) Étude comparative entre les différentes méthodes d’estimation de la distance minimum d’implantation pour des bâtiments d’élevage par rapport aux zones d’habitat et aux habitations isolées, Fondation universitaire luxembourgeoise, mai 2002, 92 p.
• Norese M.F. (2005) ELECTRA III as a support for participatory decision-making on localisation of waste-treatment plants, Land Use Policy (in press).
• Okoli C., Pawlowski S.D. (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Inform. Manage. 42, 15–29.
  Google Scholar
• Oliver I. (2002) An expert-panel based approach to the assessment of vegetation condition within the context of biodiversity conservation Stage 1: the identification of conditions indicators, Ecol. Indicators 27, 1–15.
  Google Scholar
• Petersen S.O., Regina K., Pollinger A., Rigler E., Valli L., Yamulki S., Esala M., Fabbri C., Syvasalo E., Vinther F.P. (2006) Nitrous oxide emission from organic and conventional crop rotations in five European countries, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 200–206.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Petit J., van der Werf H.M.G. (2003) Perception of the environmental impacts of current and alternative modes of pig production by stakeholder groups, J. Environ. Manage. 68, 377–386.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Philippe E.L., Laitat M., Vandenheede M., Canart B., Nicks B. (2006) Comparaison des performances zootechniques et du contenu en azote de 1’effluent lors de l’élevage de porcs charcutiers sur caillebotis ou sur litière de paille accumulée, Ann. Med. Vet. 150, 137–144.
  Google Scholar
• Philippe F.X., Laitat M., Canart B., Vandenheede M., Nicks B. (2007) Comparison of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during the fattening of pigs, kept either on fully slatted floor or on deep litter, Livest. Sci. (in press).
• Roy B. (1985) Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision, éditions Economica, 423 p.
• Roy B., Bouyssou D. (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et cas, Éditions Economica, 695 p.
• Schärlig A. (1985) Décider sur plusieurs critères : Panorama de l’aide à la décision multicritère. Collection Diriger l’entreprise 1. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne, 304 p.
• Schauberger G., Piringer M., Pertz E. (2001) Separation distance to avoid odour nuisance due to livestock calculated by the austrian odour dispersion model (AODM), Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 87, 13–28.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schmidt R.C., Lyytinen K., Keil M., Cule P. (2001) Identifying software project risks: an international Delphi study, J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 17, 5–36.
  Google Scholar
• Tamura H., Fujita S.-L, Koi H. (1994) Decision analysis for environmental impact assessment and consensus formation among conflicting multiple agents — including case studies for road traffic, Sci. Total Environ. 153, 203–210.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Van Calker K.J., Berentsen P.B.M., Romero C., Giesen G.W.J., Huirne R.B.M. (2005) Development and application of a multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems, Ecol. Econ. (in press).
• Van Diepeningen A.D., de Vos O.J., Korthals G.W., van Bruggen A.H.C. (2006) Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and biological parameters in agricultural soils, Appl. Soil Ecol. 31, 120–135.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wolter M., Prayitno S., Schuchardt F. (2004) Greenhouse gas emission during storage of pig manure on a pilot scale, Bioresource Technol. 95, 235–244.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wood R., Lenzen M., Dey C., Lundie S. (2006) A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia, Agr. Syst. 89, 324–348.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references