Position measurement with a resolution and noise‐limited instrument (original) (raw)
Research Article| June 01 1986
Thomas J. Watson Research Center, IBM Corp., Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Search for other works by this author on:
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57, 1152–1157 (1986)
A common problem in experimental data analysis is to locate the position of a signal to an accuracy which is substantially less than the actual signal width. By applying maximum likelihood estimation to this problem, this paper derives theoretical limits on the ability to locate signal position. The limiting error in position measurement is shown to be a simple function of the instrument resolution, the density of sample points, and the signal‐to‐noise ratio of the data. An interesting conclusion is that position information on a much finer scale than the minimum instrument sampling interval is contained in data of modest signal‐to‐noise ratio. The common procedure of excluding the portion of the data lying below an amplitude threshold to guard against background fluctuations is incorporated in the maximum likelihood analysis. It is shown that selection of the optimum amplitude threshold level depends on the type of noise present in the data, and can be an important factor in position accuracy. The analytical results exhibit close agreement with Monte Carlo simulations of position accuracy in the presence of noise.
REFERENCES
J. Matthews and R. L. Walker, Mathematical Methods of Physics, 2nd ed. (Benjamin, New York, 1970).
P. R. Bevington, Data Reduction for the Physical Sciences (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1969).
M.
Lampton
,
B.
Margon
, and
S.
Bowyer
,
Astrophys. J.
208
,
177
(
1976
).
R. W. Boyd, Radiometry and the Detection of Optical Radiation (Wiley, New York, 1983).
P. Lee, Ph.D thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1974.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1986 American Institute of Physics.
1986
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Username ?
Password
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00