Small‐Signal Analysis of Internal (Coupling‐Type) Modulation of Lasers (original) (raw)

Skip Nav Destination

Article navigation

Issue Cover

Research Article| October 01 1964

M. DiDomenico, Jr.

Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated, Murray Hill, New Jersey

Search for other works by this author on:

Crossmark: Check for Updates

J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2870–2876 (1964)

The internal modulation of lasers by a variation of cavity losses is analyzed in terms of the normal modes of the system. Time‐dependent perturbation theory is used to describe the results of resistive mode coupling when the losses are modulated with small signals. For the single‐mode oscillator, an expression is obtained for the amplitude distortion in the modulation index of the light produced by a coupling‐type internal modulator when the losses are modulated at a frequency commensurate with the separation between longitudinal modes of the laser cavity. Low distortion is obtained when the modulating frequency is noncommensurate with the longitudinal‐mode frequency separation. The internal coupling‐type modulator in its present form can provide small amounts of modulation over bandwidths limited to the separation between adjacent interferometer cavity normal modes.

For a multimode oscillator, modulation of the internal losses at a frequency equal to the separation between adjacent longitudinal modes produces a pulse‐modulated output wave. The average intensity is unchanged and the peak intensity is increased over the intensity of the unmodulated laser by a factor equal to the number of oscillating modes.

REFERENCES

I. P.

Kaminow

,

Phys. Rev. Letters

6

,

528

(

1961

).

W. W.

Rigrod

and

I. P.

Kaminow

,

Proc. IEEE

51

,

137

(

1963

).

M.

DiDomenico

, Jr., and

L. K.

Anderson

,

Bell System Tech. J.

42

,

2621

(

1963

).

C. J.

Peters

,

Proc. IEEE

51

,

147

(

1963

).

R. M.

White

and

C. E.

Enderby

,

Proc. IEEE

51

,

214

(

1963

).

E. I.

Gordon

and

J. D.

Rigden

,

Bell System Tech. J.

42

,

155

(

1963

).

K.

Gürs

and

R.

Müller

,

Phys. Letters

5

,

179

(

1963

).

G.

Grau

and

D.

Rosenberger

,

Phys. Letters

6

,

129

(

1963

).

By a single‐mode oscillator, we mean an arrangement where the frequency separation between adjacent cavity modes exceeds the inhomogeneous linewidth of the active medium. Such oscillators have been constructed recently using the 6328‐Å transition of the He‐Ne system. For details see,

E. I.

Gordon

and

A. D.

White

,

Proc. IEEE

52

,

206

(

1964

).

It should be mentioned in this connection that by introducing dispersion or mode suppression in the interferometer cavity it should be possible to reduce the deleterious effects of mode coupling on the modulator performance. The problem of mode suppression in interferometers has been treated by

D. A.

Kleinman

and

P. P.

Kisliuk

,

Bell System Tech. J.

41

,

453

(

1962

);

also see,

H.

Kogelnick

and

C. K. N.

Patel

,

Proc. IRE

50

,

2365

(

1962

).

J. C. Slater, Microwave Electronics (D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York, 1950).

I. P. Kaminow, Appl. Opt. (to be published).

P. Grivet and A. Blaquiere in Proceedings of the Symposium on Optical Masers (Polytechnic Press, New York, 1963).

E. I.

Gordon

,

Bell System Tech. J.

43

,

507

(

1964

).

The series of cosine terms in Eq. (32) is a sum of harmonic terms whose phases are in arithmetic progression. This type of function is very similar to those obtained in the analysis of diffraction gratings. Accordingly, it is expected that Eq. (32) will give rise to interference phenomena with the result that Et will peak periodically with time. By summing the series given in Eq. (32), one can show that the intensity I given by EtEt* becomes

I/Ip = {[sin(N+1)φm−(−1)m sinNφm]/sinφm}2

, in which Ip = EpEp* is the intensity of any one mode and φm = ωmt+θm.

Recent independent experimental work performed by

L. E.

Hargrove

,

R. L.

Fork

, and

M. A.

Pollack

,

Appl. Phys. Letters

5

,

4

(

1964

) give data which are consistent with the general features of this theory.

We point out in this regard that the two principal indices of refraction in a crystal of symmetry D2d such as KDP have identical induced electro‐optic effects but of different sign. Hence the phase retardation φ is directly proportional to the electro‐optic effect, whereas the phase factor ψ is independent of this effect. We conclude therefore that no first‐order phase changes occur as the light propagates through the KDP crystal.

K. Gürs and R. Müller, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Optical Masers (Polytechnic Press, New York, 1963).

This content is only available via PDF.

© 1964 The American Institute of Physics.

1964

The American Institute of Physics

You do not currently have access to this content.

Sign in

Sign In

You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.

Username ?

Password

Pay-Per-View Access

$40.00