Effects of early-life undernutrition in artificially reared rats: subsequent body and organ growth | British Journal of Nutrition | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Four groups of rat pups were reared: mother-reared (MR) control (well-fed) and undernourished (MRC and MRU respectively) and artificially reared (AR) control and undernourished (ARC and ARU respectively). Pups for artificial rearing were fitted with a gastric cannula on postnatal day 5 and were fed, by intermittent gastric infusion, expressed rats′ milk (days 5–7), mixtures of rats′ milk and milk-substitute (days 8–16), and milk-substitute only (days 17–20). Solid food was available to MR pups throughout and to AR pups from day 14. Undernutrition, imposed from postnatal days 5 to 25, was effected initially by underfeeding the mother (MRU) or by infusing restricted quantities of milk (ARU). Weaning was at 21 d and undernutrition from day 21 to day 25 was by restricting the supply of solid food. All rats were fed ad lib. from 25 d.

2. The developmental milestone, eye-opening, was delayed by undernutrition but unaffected by artificial rearing.

3. Growth curves in body-weight during the refeeding phase were influenced most by previous undernutrition and to a lesser extent (also negatively) by artificial rearing.

4. Fourteen measures of body and organ growth were taken at autopsy at 39 weeks. Twelve measures were affected by nutrition and only four by rearing (weight of whole body, epididymal fat pads, renal fat pads and adrenals).

5. AR rats had lighter epididymal and renal fat pads than MR rats perhaps due to the low fat content of the expressed milk they received early in artificial rearing.

Type

Clinical and Human Nutrition papers: Other Studies Relevant to Human Nutrition

References

Dobbing, J. (1981). In The Molecular Basis of Neuropathology, pp. 221–233 [Thompson, R. H. S. and Davison, A. N., editors]. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Dobbing, J. & Sands, J. (1971). Biology of the Neonate 19, 363–378.Google Scholar

Keen, C. L., Lönnerdal, B., Clegg, M. & Hurley, L. S. (1981). Journal of Nutrition 111, 226–236.CrossRef Google Scholar

Messer, M., Thoman, E. B., Terrasa, A. G. & Dallman, P. R. (1969). Journal of Nutrition 98, 404–410.CrossRef Google Scholar

Naismith, D. J., Mittwoch, A. & Platt, B. S. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 23, 683–693.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smart, J. L., Adlard, B. P. F. & Dobbing, J. (1974). Biology of the Neonate 25, 135–150.Google Scholar

Smart, J. L., Dobbing, J., Adlard, B. P. F., Lynch, A. & Sands, J. (1973). Journal of Nutrition 103, 1327–1338.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smart, J. L., Stephens, D. N. & Katz, H. B. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 497–506.Google Scholar

Smart, J. L., Stephens, D. N., Tonkiss, J., Auestad, N. S. & Edmond, J. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 52, 227–237.Google Scholar

Smart, J. L. & Tonkiss, J. (1985). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 100A.Google Scholar

Smart, J. L., Tonkiss, J. & Massey, R. F. (1987). Neuroscience Letters Supplement 29 S105.Google Scholar

Tonkiss, J., Smart, J. L., Auestad, N. S. & Edmond, J. (1985). Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 4, 818–825.Google Scholar

Tonkiss, J., Smart, J. L. & Massey, R. F. (1987). British Journal of Nutrition 57, 3–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

University of Manchester Regional Computer Centre (1982). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Additional Procedures, 5. Version 8 on the CDC 7600.Google Scholar

Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1960). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 152, 188–206.Google Scholar

Williams, J. P. G., Tanner, J. M. & Hughes, P. C. R. (1974). Pediatric Research 8, 149–156.CrossRef Google Scholar