Equal partnership: two trematode species, not one, manipulate the burrowing behaviour of the New Zealand cockle, Austrovenus stutchburyi | Journal of Helminthology | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Metacercariae of the trematode Curtuteria australis (Echinostomatidae) accumulate in the foot of the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi, severely impairing the cockle's ability to burrow under the sediments. This results in increased predation by birds on cockles, and thus enhanced transmission rates of the parasite to its bird definitive hosts. This host manipulation by the trematode is costly: fish regularly crop the tip of the foot of cockles stranded on the sediment surface, killing any metacercariae they ingest. A second, previously undetected trematode species (characterized by 23 collar spines) co-existing with C. australis, has been found in the foot of cockles in the Otago Harbour, South Island, New Zealand. The relative abundance of the two species varies among localities, with the identity of the numerically dominant species also changing from one locality to the next. Both C. australis and the new species have a strong preference for encysting in the tip of the cockle's foot, where their impact on the burrowing ability of the host is greatest, and where they both face the risk of cropping by fish. Results indicate that these two species are ecological equivalents, and their combined numbers determine how the cockle population is affected.

References

Adema, C.M. & Loker, E.S. (1997) Specificity and immunobiology of larval digenean–snail associations. pp. 230–253 in Fried, B. & Graczyk, T.K. (Eds) Advances in trematode biology. Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar

Allison, F.R. (1979) Life cycle of Curtuteria australis n. sp. (Digenea: Echinostomatidae: Himasthlinae), intestinal parasite of the South Island pied oystercatcher. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansell, A.D. (2001) Dynamics of aggregations of a gastropod predator/scavenger on a New Zealand harbour beach. Journal of Molluscan Studies 67, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, A.O., Heard, R.W. & Overstreet, R.M. (1993) Intermediate hosts as source communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71, 1358–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combes, C. (1991) Ethological aspects of parasite transmission. American Naturalist 138, 866–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combes, C. (2001) Parasitism: the ecology and evolution of intimate interactions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Irwin, S.W.B. (1997) Excystation and cultivation of trematodes. pp. 57–86 in Fried, B. & Graczyk, T.K. (Eds) Advances in trematode biology. Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar

Irwin, S.W.B., McKerr, G., Judge, B.C. & Moran, I. (1984) Studies on metacercarial excystment in Himasthla leptosoma (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) and newly emerged metacercariae. International Journal for Parasitology 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafferty, K.D., Thomas, F. & Poulin, R. (2000) Evolution of host phenotype manipulation by parasites and its consequences. pp. 117–127 in Poulin, R., Morand, S. & Skorping, A. (Eds) Evolutionary biology of host-parasite relationships: theory meets reality. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar

Lauckner, G. (1983) Diseases of Mollusca: Bivalvia. pp. 477–961 in Kinne, O. (Ed.) Diseases of marine animals, vol. 2. Hamburg, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland.Google Scholar

Lepitzki, D.A.W., Scott, M.E. & McLaughlin, J.D. (1994) Influence of storage and examination methods on the recovery and size of metacercariae of Cyathocotyle bushiensis and Sphaeridotrema pseudoglobulus (Digenea). Journal of Parasitology 80, 454–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mcfarland, L.H., Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003) From first to second and back to first intermediate host: the unusual transmission route of Curtuteria australis (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Journal of Parasitology 89, 625–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moore, J. (2002) Parasites and the behavior of animals. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouritsen, K.N. (2001) Hitch-hiking parasite: a dark horse may be the real rider. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 1417–1420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mouritsen, K.N. (2002) The parasite-induced surfacing behaviour in the cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi: a test of an alternative hypothesis and identification of potential mechanisms. Parasitology 124, 521–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003a) The risk of being at the top: foot-cropping in the New Zealand cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 497–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003b) Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare. International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mouritsen, K.N. & Poulin, R. (2003c) The mud flat anemone–cockle association: mutualism in the intertidal zone? Oecologia 135, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poulin, R. (1995) "Adaptive" changes in the behaviour of parasitized animals: a critical review. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 1371–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poulin, R. (1998) Evolutionary ecology of parasites: from individuals to communities. 212 pp. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Thomas, F. & Poulin, R. (1998) Manipulation of a mollusc by a trophically transmitted parasite: convergent evolution or phylogenetic inheritance? Parasitology 116, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thomas, F., Mete, K., Helluy, S., Santalla, F., Verneau, O., de Meeüs, T., Cézilly, F. & Renaud, F. (1997) Hitch-hiker parasites or how to benefit from the strategy of another parasite. Evolution 51, 1316–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thomas, F., Renaud, F. & Poulin, R. (1998) Exploitation of manipulators: ‘hitch-hiking’ as a parasite transmission strategy. Animal Behaviour 56, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed