Metabolism of riboflavine in germ-free and conventional rabbits | British Journal of Nutrition | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Article contents

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

1. Isoalloxazines were characterized and measured in the caecum of two conventional rabbits kept on an adequate diet, two rabbits on the same diet from which vitamin B2 (ribo-flavine) had been omitted and five germ-free rabbits which were also on the adequate diet.

2. Riboflavine (up to 12mg) unaccompanied by any of its degradation products was found in the caecum of germ-free rabbits and 8–9 μg per ml were found in their urine.

3. Hydroxyethylflavine (4–5 mg) accompanied only by traces of riboflavine was found in the caecum of conventional rabbits.

4. There was about 1% ash in the contents of each of five germ-free and two conventional caecums.

5. The five germ-free caecal contents averaged 22.4% of the animal's body-weight. For four conventional animals this figure was only 10.5%.

6. In the caecum of each of two conventional rabbits kept on a diet deficient in riboflavine neither riboflavine nor hydroxyethylflavine was found but there was somewhat less than 1 mg of a yellow-fluorescing material of low RF value in each caecum.

7. The results are discussed in relation to the authors' previous reports on metabolites of riboflavine.

Information

Type

Research Article

Copyright

Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1970

References

Coates, M. E., Ford, J. E. & Harrison, G. F. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 493.Google Scholar

Fuller, R. (1968). In The Germfree Animal in Research, p. 37. [Coates, M. E., editor.] London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gershoff, S. N., Andrus, S. B. & Hegsted, D. M. (1959). J. Nutr. 68, 75.Google Scholar

Hobson, P. N., Summers, R., Owen, E. C., Spencer, J. C. & West, D. W. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 53 A.Google Scholar

Hopkins, F. G. & Leader, V. R. (1945–1946). J. Hyg., Camb. 44, 149.Google Scholar

Koyanagi, J. & Oikawa, K. (1965). Tohoku J. exp. Med. 86, 19.Google Scholar

Kulwich, R., Struglia, L. & Pearson, P. B. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 639.Google Scholar

Moore, J. H. &Williams, D. L. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 253.Google Scholar

Olcese, O., Pearson, P. B. & Schweigert, B. S. (1948). J. Nutr. 35, 577.Google Scholar

Owen, E. C. (1962 a). Proc. int. Congr. Fd Sci. Technol. 1. London. Vol. 3, p. 669.Google Scholar

Owen, E. C. & West, D. W. (1968). J. chem. Soc. (C) p. 34.Google Scholar

Thacker, E. J. & Brandt, C. S. (1955). J. Nutr. 55, 375.Google Scholar

West, D. W., Owen, E. C. & Taylor, M. M. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, 17.Google Scholar