The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Random Drift | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

We distinguish dynamical and statistical interpretations of evolutionary theory. We argue that only the statistical interpretation preserves the presumed relation between natural selection and drift. On these grounds we claim that the dynamical conception of evolutionary theory as a theory of forces is mistaken. Selection and drift are not forces. Nor do selection and drift explanations appeal to the (sub-population-level) causes of population level change. Instead they explain by appeal to the statistical structure of populations. We briefly discuss the implications of the statistical interpretation of selection for various debates within the philosophy of biology—the ‘explananda of selection’ debate and the ‘units of selection’ debate.

References

Ariew, André (1998), “Are Probabilities Necessary for Evolutionary Explanations?”, Are Probabilities Necessary for Evolutionary Explanations? 13:245–253.Google Scholar

Beatty, John (1984), “Chance and Natural Selection”, Chance and Natural Selection 51:183–211.Google Scholar

Beatty, John (1992), “Random Drift”, in Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 273–281.Google Scholar

Cain, Arthur J. (1951), “So-called Non-adaptive or Neutral Characters in Evolution”, So-called Non-adaptive or Neutral Characters in Evolution 168: 424.Google ScholarPubMed

Crow, James, and Kimura, Mooto (1970), An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Minneapolis: Burgess Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard (1982), The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky Theodosius, Francisco Ayala, and Stebbins, G. Ledyard (1977), Evolution. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Endler, John A. (1986), “Natural Selection in the Wild”, Princeton Ecological Monographs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd et al. (1989), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewens, Tim (2001), “Sex and Selection: A Reply to Matthen”, Sex and Selection: A Reply to Matthen 52:589–598.Google Scholar

Lewens, Tim (2001), Organisms and Artefacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere. PhD. Dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lewontin, Richard C. (1970), “The Units of Selection”, The Units of Selection 1:1–14.Google Scholar

Lewontin, Richard C. (1983), “Darwin’s Revolution”, Darwin’s Revolution 30:21–27.Google Scholar

Lewontin, Richard C. (1974), “The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change”, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Matthen, Mohan (1999), “Evolution, Wisconsin Style: Selection and the Explanation of Individual Traits”, Evolution, Wisconsin Style: Selection and the Explanation of Individual Traits 50:143–150.Google Scholar

Matthen, Mohan, and Ariew, André (2002), “Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness”, Two Ways of Thinking about Fitness 49(2): 55–83.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, John (1986), Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, Susan, and Beatty, John (1979), “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness”, The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness 46:263–286.Google Scholar

Millstein, Roberta (1996), “Random Drift and the Omniscient Viewpoint”, Random Drift and the Omniscient Viewpoint 63 (suppl.): S10–S18.Google Scholar

Neander, Karen (1995), “Explaining Complex Adaptations: A Reply to Sober’s Reply to Neander”, Explaining Complex Adaptations: A Reply to Sober’s Reply to Neander 46:583–587.Google Scholar

Pust, Joel (2001), “Natural Selection Explanation and Origin Essentialism”, Natural Selection Explanation and Origin Essentialism 31:201–220.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander (1994), Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander (2001), “Discussion Note: Indeterminism, Probability, and Randomness in Evolutionary Theory”, Discussion Note: Indeterminism, Probability, and Randomness in Evolutionary Theory 68:536–544.Google Scholar

Sklar, Lawrence (1999), “The Reduction(?) of Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics”, The Reduction(?) of Thermodynamics to Statistical Mechanics 95:187–202.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (1993), Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (1995), “Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation: A Reply to Neander”, Natural Selection and Distributive Explanation: A Reply to Neander 46:384–397.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (2001), “The Two Faces of Fitness”, in Singh, R., Paul, Diane, Crimbas, Costas, and Beatty, John (eds.), Thinking about Evolution: Historical, Philosophical and Political Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–321.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott, and Lewontin, Richard C. (1982), “Artifact, Cause and Genic Selection”, Artifact, Cause and Genic Selection 49:157–180.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott and Wilson, David Sloan (1994), “A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem”, A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem 61:534–555.Google Scholar

Sterelny, Kim, and Kitcher, Philip (1988), “The Return of the Gene”, The Return of the Gene 85:339–360.Google Scholar

Walsh, Denis (1998), “The Scope of Selection: Neander and Sober on What Natural Selection Explains”, The Scope of Selection: Neander and Sober on What Natural Selection Explains 76:250–264.Google Scholar

Walsh, Denis (2000), “Chasing Shadows: Natural Selection and Adaptation”, Chasing Shadows: Natural Selection and Adaptation 31:135–153.Google Scholar

Waters, C. Kenneth (1991), “Tempered Realism about the Forces of Selection”, Tempered Realism about the Forces of Selection 58:553–573.Google Scholar

Williams, George C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Yablo, Steven (1992), “Mental Causation”, Mental Causation 101:245–280.Google Scholar