Historical Perspectives on Studies of Clostridium difficile and C. difficile Infection (original) (raw)

Journal Article

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

,

Baltimore, Maryland

Reprints or correspondence: Dr. John G. Bartlett, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 Monument St. #437, Baltimore, MD 21205 (jb@jhmi.edu).

Search for other works by this author on:

Published:

15 January 2008

Cite

John G. Bartlett, Historical Perspectives on Studies of Clostridium difficile and C. difficile Infection, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 46, Issue Supplement_1, January 2008, Pages S4–S11, https://doi.org/10.1086/521865
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

The initial period of studies on Clostridium difficile (published during 1978–1980) appeared to provide a nearly complete portfolio of criteria for diagnosing and treating C. difficile infection (CDI). The putative pathogenic role of C. difficile was established using Koch's postulates, risk factors were well-defined, use of a cell cytotoxicity assay as the diagnostic test provided accurate results, and treatment with oral vancomycin was highly effective and rapidly incorporated into practice. During the next 10 years, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were introduced as diagnostic tests and became the standard for most laboratories. This was not because EIAs were as good as the cell cytotoxicity assay; rather, EIAs were inexpensive and yielded results quickly. Similarly, metronidazole became the favored treatment because it was less expensive and quelled fears of colonization with vancomycin-resistant organisms, not because it was better than vancomycin therapy. Cephalosporins replaced clindamycin as the major inducers of CDI because they were so extensively used, rather than because they incurred the same risk. Some serious issues remained unresolved during this period: the major challenges were to determine ways to treat seriously ill patients for whom it was not possible to get vancomycin into the colon and to find methods that stop persistent relapses. These concerns persist today.

Antibiotic-associated colitis due to Clostridium difficile has been under intense investigation since 1974. This article reviews studies on C. difficile infection (CDI) that were published between 1974 and the mid-1990s and set the stage for more-recent work.

Early Studies

Three separate lines of study fostered initial knowledge of C. difficile and CDI: initial work on the organism, investigation of antibiotic-associated typhlitis in rodents, and anatomic studies of pseudomembranous colitis (PMC).

Initial work. C. difficile was originally described by Hall and O'Toole [1] in 1935 as a component of the normal intestinal flora of newborn infants. These investigators also showed that this organism produced a toxin that was highly lethal to mice. In fact, the toxin was only 10–100-fold less toxic than botulinum toxin, but subsequent studies by the famous authority on clostridia, L. D. S. Smith, showed that C. difficile was not biologically important in extraintestinal infections. A review by Smith and King [2] indicated that C. difficile infection had no unique features that suggested a histotoxic clostridial syndrome.

The rodent model. Work on the rodent model was first performed by Hambre et al. [3] during World War II to investigate the potential benefit of penicillin for treatment of gas gangrene. They found that penicillin caused typhlitis, which actually proved to be more lethal than _Clostridium perfringens_–induced gas gangrene. Subsequent studies showed that multiple rodent species were susceptible to the development of typhlitis and that many types of antibiotics were associated with this complication; however, the cause was elusive. Relevance of this work to CDI in humans lies in the fact that the hamster model eventually proved to be the source of nearly all of the clinically important early data on this complication. Furthermore, Green et al. [4], who were studying penicillin-induced death in guinea pigs, found that stool specimens contained cytopathic changes, which they attributed to the activity of a latent virus. This, in retrospect, appears to be the first identification of C. difficile cytotoxin.

Anatomic studies of PMC. J. M. T. Finney performed the first anatomic studies of PMC. In 1893, Finney [5] reported pseudomembranous changes in the intestinal tract of a 22-year-old postoperative patient being treated by William Osler. PMC became a commonly recognized complication of antibiotic use in the early 1950s and was primarily encountered by surgeons, who reported rates as high as 14%–27% among postoperative patients [6, 7]. Staphylococcus aureus was the suspected pathogen, and vancomycin given orally became standard treatment for this condition [8].

The “C. difficile era” began in 1974, when Tedesco et al. [9] reported high rates of PMC among patients at Barnes Hospital (St. Louis, MO) who were receiving clindamycin. This study was the first in which endoscopy was a routine diagnostic procedure for patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Of 200 patients given clindamycin, diarrhea developed in 42 (21%). Twenty clindamycin recipients (10%) had PMC at the time of endoscopy. Although not stated in the article, stool cultures were negative for S. aureus, despite the ease of growing this organism on selective media. This article crystallized interest in this adverse drug reaction and spawned studies to define the cause, pathophysiological characteristics, and management of “clindamycin colitis.”

Detection of **C. difficile.**The early work on C. difficile detection involved clinical specimens and hamster models and was performed primarily by Keighley et al. [10] at a hospital in Birmingham, England, where C. difficile was endemic on a surgical ward; by the group headed by Bob Fekety and Joe Silva in Ann Arbor, Michigan [11]; and by my group in Boston, Massachusetts [12]. In most of the early studies, the hamster model turned out to be pivotal in establishing methods for detection of C. difficile [13], confirming the diagnostic role of the “cell cytotoxicity assay” [13], detecting toxin B produced by C. difficile [14], confirming that antibiotics (including oral vancomycin and metronidazole) are inducers of PMC [15, 16], and confirming the efficacy of oral vancomycin for treatment of CDI [17].

The initial work on the cell cytotoxicity assay was by Te-Wen Chang, who demonstrated that stool specimens from hamsters with antibiotic-associated typhlitis and from patients with PMC contained a potent cytopathic toxin that was neutralized with Clostridium sordellii antitoxin [18]. However, because cultures of stool specimens from hamsters did not yield C. sordellii, my colleagues and I [12] analyzed other clostridial species recovered from hamster stool specimens to determine which species could produce the cytopathic toxin that was neutralized by C. sordellii antitoxin. C. difficile satisfied this criterion. C. difficile antitoxin was not available, so the standard test for detection of C. difficile was to demonstrate the presence of a cytotoxin neutralized by C. sordellii antitoxin. The first person with a positive test result was a postoperative patient in California with cephalothin-induced “clindamycin colitis.” This patient had a cytotoxin titer of 106, which remains the highest titer I have measured in a patient [13]. (Of note, Tedesco sent some stool specimens to Upjohn, which sponsored the study at Barnes Hospital [9]. In 1978, I received 6 stool specimens from Upjohn with a note indicating that they had “been stored in unspecified conditions for 4 to 5 years”; all of the specimens were positive for C. difficile cytotoxin.)

Studies from the Late 1970s through the Early 1990s

Pathologic characteristics of PMC. Like most enteric bacterial pathogens, C. difficile causes disease with a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from mild “nuisance” diarrhea with a normal colonic mucosa to PMC, the most characteristic and severe form of CDI. PMC lesions are nearly always limited to the through 1992 only 7 cases involving the small bowel had been reported [19]. The prior reports of S. aureus enterocolitis showed that the small bowel was commonly involved, suggesting a distinction between “S. aureus enterocolitis” and “C. difficile colitis” [6, 7]; recent work has supported this distinction [20]. Of practical importance, oral vancomycin would be appropriate treatment for both conditions, but metronidazole would not.

PMC in the great majority of patients seen since 1978 has been caused by C. difficile, and a subset of patients have histologic lesions most characteristic of PMC. Anatomic studies of these lesions revealed that the pseudomembrane is composed of fibrin, mucin, sloughed mucosal epithelial cells, and acute inflammatory cells. There are various differences between lesions in different persons, but lesions in the same person appear to be uniform [21, 22]. The initial lesion has focal necrosis and inflammation, as well as the characteristic “summit” (figure figure 1A and figure 1B). The most advanced disease involves complete structural necrosis with extensive involvement of the lamina propria, which is overlaid by a thick, confluent pseudomembrane. There are multiple other causes of PMC, including intestinal obstruction, colon cancer, leukemia, severe burns, shock, uremia, heavy metal poisoning, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, Crohn disease, shigellosis, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, ischemic colitis, and Hirschsprung disease. Nevertheless, the vast majority of PMC cases seen since 1978 have been attributed to C. difficile.

Typical summit lesions associated with pseudomembranous colitis. A, Pseudomembranous colitis with typical raised lesions (diameter, 0.2–1 cm). The appearance is light yellow against a hyperemic bowel mucosa. B, Microscopic pathologic characteristics of a mushroom-shaped pseudomembrane.

Figure 1

Typical summit lesions associated with pseudomembranous colitis. A, Pseudomembranous colitis with typical raised lesions (diameter, 0.2–1 cm). The appearance is light yellow against a hyperemic bowel mucosa. B, Microscopic pathologic characteristics of a mushroom-shaped pseudomembrane.

Anatomic lesions are best detected by colonoscopy; in 20%–30% of cases, PMC is limited to the proximal colon and therefore may be missed by sigmoidoscopy [23, 24]. Characteristic lesions may also be detected by CT scan [25]. Nevertheless, because of stool toxin assays, demonstration of anatomic findings is now seldom necessary, although imaging or endoscopy may sometimes be performed for other reasons.

Risk factors for CDI. The major risk factors for CDI are hospitalization, older age (i.e., β65 years), and antibiotic exposure. Use of nearly any antibiotic with a spectrum of antibacterial activity has been implicated as a risk factor in people and hamsters. The initial attention was on clindamycin. The connection between this agent and PMC was the source of concern in the 1970s and was the subject of the report by Tedesco et al. [9], the findings of which showed that “clindamycin colitis” is synonymous with “antibiotic-associated colitis.” However, most of the studies done in the 1980s showed that cephalosporins had become by far the most frequently implicated agents [26–29]. Broad-spectrum penicillins, including amoxicillin, were the second-most frequently implicated drugs.

Care in the interpretation of these data is important. Clindamycin was associated with the greatest risk of CDI; cephalosporins and broad-spectrum penicillins were associated with the greatest number of CDI cases because of their extensive use. Macrolides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, rifampin, and tetracyclines were far less commonly associated with CDI. Ciprofloxacin was the first fluoroquinolone created and was approved for human use in 1987, but fluoroquinolones did not seem to figure prominently in cases of CDI until recently [30]. The only other class of drugs recognized to induce CDI comprised antineoplastic agents, primarily methotrexate [31, 32]. There were additional cases of CDI that were not associated with antibiotic exposure, but these were described in anecdotal case reports. Attempts to identify C. difficile in other diseases, such as neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, sudden infant death syndrome, Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, and chronic enigmatic diarrhea, were uniformly unsuccessful (table 1) [33].

Results of Clostridium difficile cell cytotoxicity assays, 1978–1980.

Table 1

Results of Clostridium difficile cell cytotoxicity assays, 1978–1980.

Early studies on the association between age and CDI showed that neonates had high rates of both C. difficile colonization and positive results of a stool toxin assay without clinical symptoms. This is the only age group with a high prevalence of C. difficile toxin and no clinical expression of disease [34]. The postulated but unproven mechanism for this finding is the lack of receptors for C. difficile toxins in the infant colon. The disease is recognized in children aged >1 year but is relatively rare considering the frequency of antibiotic exposure [35]. CDI is an occasional cause of diarrhea in older children, and a recent study observed that C. difficile toxin was detected in 46 (7%) of 688 patients with diarrhea who were seen in a pediatric emergency department. Vulnerability appears to increase with age, especially in elderly persons. Population-based studies in Sweden for the early 1980s showed that rates of CDI among persons >65 years of age were 20-fold higher than rates among persons aged 65 years [36, 37].

The role of the hospital in CDI was not clearly recognized in the early stages of C. difficile studies. It was noted that hamsters in a new facility would not get this disease unless they were fed C. difficile; however, once the pathogen was established in the animal facility, such feeding was not necessary. It was clearly logical to assume that the hospital was a nidus of infection, because of patient clustering, a greater likelihood of antibiotic use (30%–40% of patients), and the large proportion of patients who are elderly. The same logic applies to long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and both hospitals and LTCFs have been common sources of C. difficile: the pathogen was associated with an epidemic of antibiotic-associated colitis at the long-term care facility of Barnes Hospital in 1974 [9] and was found to be endemic in the surgical ward at General Hospital in Birmingham, England, in 1978 [38]. Particularly important and relevant to this issue are studies showing high rates of environmental contamination by C. difficile in hospitals [39, 40] and high rates of colonic colonization associated with hospitalization [41]. The rates of colonization are as high as 40%–60% for neonates but are usually only 2%–3% for individuals aged >1 year [34]. These rates increase to 20%–30% with hospitalization and increased even further with the duration of hospital stay [42, 43].

Clinical expression of CDI. Symptoms of CDI are highly variable, ranging from nuisance diarrhea to life-threatening colitis. Typical features include watery diarrhea, with as many as 15–30 bowel movements per day [9, 44–47]. Most patients complain of abdominal pain or cramps, and they often have lower quadrant tenderness in association with fever and leukocytosis. Fever, when present, is usually low grade but may involve a temperature as high as 40.6°C. The peripheral leukocyte count is usually 10,000–20,000 leukocytes/mm3 but may be in the leukemoid range, a feature more commonly recognized now than in the past [48, 49]. A leukemoid reaction is also observed in patients with C. sordellii infection, which is of interest because the toxins of the 2 clostridial species are antigenically related [50–52]. Hypoalbuminemia is a common feature because CDI is a protein-losing enteropathy, and some patients present with anasarca during the late stages of disease [9]. Extraintestinal symptoms are rare, except for occasional cases of polyarthritis involving large joints [53, 54]. Some patients develop ileus or toxic mega colonic perforation is rare.

Diagnosis of CDI. The first diagnostic test for C. difficile involved neutralization of the cytotoxin by C. sordellii or C. difficile antitoxin. Both toxin A and toxin B are cytopathic toxins, but toxin B is ∼1000-fold more potent in nonintestinal cell lines [14]. This is probably the best test that is currently available in terms of sensitivity and specificity. However, it requires a 24–48-h turnaround time and is relatively work intensive and expensive, and many laboratories do not perform tissue cultures. These problems led to the development of multiple alternative tests including latex particle agglutination [55–57], dot immunoblot [58], PCR [59, 60], stool culture on selective media [61–64], and EIA [61, 62, 65–68]. The technique that emerged as most commonly used in the United States was EIA. Studies in the early 1980s showed that this assay could detect both toxin A and toxin B but that for toxin B, it was at least 10-fold less sensitive than cell cytotoxicity assays [69]. Nevertheless, EIA was easy to perform, results were available in 4 h, and commercialization with multiple suppliers of reagents came rapidly. On the basis of results of ileal loop challenges in rodents, it was originally thought that toxin B was simply a marker of C. difficile toxin production and that only toxin A was important in human disease [14, 70]. Thus, early test development emphasized the detection of toxin A, with little regard for toxin B. More-recent studies with human intestinal cells (T84 cells) in Ussing chambers have shown that the potency of toxin B is actually 10 times that of toxin A in inducing increased permeability and morphologic changes [70]. The relevance of this observation has been the demonstration that occasional strains of C. difficile produce toxin B only and, consequently, give false-negative results of EIA tests that detect only toxin A [71–74]. To my knowledge, all toxigenic strains of C. difficile produce toxin B.

Perhaps more concerning was the observation by many that the sensitivity of the EIA was only ∼75% for the first stool sample, compared with the cell cytotoxicity assay [75]. At Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD), the EIA was only 40% sensitive, compared with the cell cytotoxicity assay, leading to use of a screening test for C. difficile (i.e., EIA for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase or “common antigen”) followed by cell cytotoxicity assay for stool specimens that test positive for common antigen [76]. This method appears to have a good sensitivity and a specificity approaching 100% but requires 24–48 h for a final report [77]. An alternative to detection of common antigen is stool culture on selective media, which has the potential advantage of recovering the implicated strain for epidemiologic investigation or to detect the BI/NAP1 strain (restriction-endonuclease analysis group BI/North American PFGE type 1) [78].

The terms used to denote CDI have changed during 3 decades of study. In the initial period, endoscopy was often done in addition to the cell cytotoxin assay, and commonly used terms, which included “C. difficile_–associated diarrhea,” “_C. difficile colitis,” and “PMC,” were derived from cell cytotoxicity assay results and endoscopy findings. Although there are at least 14 reported causes of PMC, the great majority involve C. difficile. As a result, many physicians came to view “PMC” as synonymous with “C. difficile infection,” although this is technically incorrect. Growth of C. difficile in stool culture or detection of common antigen via EIA indicates C. difficile colonization, whereas in vivo production of toxin indicates CDI. Nevertheless, laboratory findings need to be considered in light of symptoms, because some adults and many neonates harbor C. difficile toxins without clinical expression of disease. The term “C. difficile_-associated disease” (often abbreviated as “CDAD”) emerged in the 1980s as a favored term for symptomatic patients who tested positive for C. difficile toxin. The term now favored is “_C. difficile infection (CDI),” which includes enteric disease caused by C. difficile toxins.

Treatment of CDI. The initial use of oral vancomycin for treatment was based on favorable experience with S. aureus enterocolitis [8] and favorable experience in the hamster model [79]. Then came a highly successful experience in early clinical trials [80] and approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of results of a placebo-controlled trial for this indication in the early 1980s. This remains the only drug that is approved by the FDA for treatment of CDI. Oral vancomycin has ideal pharmacologic properties for treatment of a universally susceptible pathogen that is retained within the colonic lumen. It is not absorbed, so colon levels are usually >100-fold higher than the highest MIC ever recorded.

Subsequent studies indicated that metronidazole compared favorably with vancomycin as an effective treatment for CDI [81, 82], although metronidazole has the theoretic disadvantage that the colonic level of C. difficile is virtually nil except in the presence of diarrhea. Occasional strains are resistant in vitro, although the significance of this is questioned, because it is levels in the colonic lumen and not serum levels that count. Despite theoretic disadvantages, metronidazole is currently favored in guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America [83] on the basis of cost and the concern that oral vancomycin promotes colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus [43]. Other drugs that also work well are fusidic acid, teicoplanin, and bacitracin, all of which are given orally [82, 84].

Metronidazole and vancomycin therapy have worked well in the majority of cases, but there are 2 problems with these treatments. First, some patients, particularly those with ileus or toxic megacolon, simply do not respond. This is presumably because of difficulty in getting the oral agent to the colonic lumen. Desperation measures of administering vancomycin involve delivery by retention enema or by a long tube via gravity. Alternative treatments have been tried, such as intravenous metronidazole and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The published experience of using these alternative methods has been anecdotal with variable success rates. For patients who are seriously ill, total colectomy may be required. The frequency of this intervention at Johns Hopkins Hospital in the early 1990s was 0.5% of all cases [85].

The second complication of treatment has been relapse following discontinuation of therapy. Relapse is reported in 22%–26% of cases (table 2) [82, 86–89]. The frequency of relapse after metronidazole appears to be nearly equal to frequency after initial treatment with vancomycin. Relapse is invariable after vancomycin administration to hamsters and to C. difficile growing in a chemostat [90]. Some patients have multiple relapses that are incredibly debilitating and extremely difficult to stop without continuous oral vancomycin therapy. Various treatments for such patients have included probiotics (i.e., Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, and Lactobacillus acidophilus) [91–94], IVIG [95, 96], anion-exchange resins (i.e., cholestyramine and colestipol) that bind to C. difficile toxins [97–99], feces administered by nasogastric tube or by enema [100, 101], or vancomycin given by a tapered dose or a pulsed dose of 125 mg every other day for 6 weeks. All of these interventions work some of the time, and none work all of the time.

Efficacy of oral vancomycin (Van) in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

Table 2

Efficacy of oral vancomycin (Van) in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

Conclusion

Clinicians working to prevent and treat CDI have made much progress over the past 30 years. However, continued research, improved preventive measures, and better treatments are still in great demand.

The articles that follow review and provide insight about the more recent experience with CDI, including the substantial concern about the BI/NAP1 strain [102–105]. These studies emphasize the factors that should alert physicians to the diagnosis of CDI. There are also treatment algorithms to help guide patient management. The ultimate goal is disease prevention, which can be accomplished by means of rigorous antibiotic stewardship efforts, enhanced infection control, and improved education of health care workers. The goal for all of these treatments is to reestablish a normal colonic flora to control C. difficile growth dynamics, and the most predictably successful therapy is fecal replacement.

Acknowledgments

Financial support. This program is supported by an educational grant from PriCara (a unit of Ortho-McNeil), administered by Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs.

Supplement sponsorship. This article was published as part of a supplement entitled “Understanding Antimicrobial Exposure and Clostridium difficile Infection: Implications of Fluoroquinolone Use,” sponsored by the University of South Florida College of Medicine and SynerMed Communications.

Manuscript preparation. SynerMed Communications provided assistance in preparing and editing this article.

Potential conflicts of interest. J.G.B. has served on an advisory board or panel for Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and GlaxoSmithKline.

References

1

, .

Intestinal flora in newborn infants with a description of a new pathogenic anaerobe, Bacillus difficilis

,

Am J Dis Child

,

1935

, vol.

49

(pg.

390

-

402

)

2

, .

Occurrence of Clostridium difficile in infections of man

,

J Bacteriol

,

1962

, vol.

84

(pg.

65

-

7

)

3

, , , .

The toxicity of penicillin as prepared for clinical use

,

Am J Med Sci

,

1943

, vol.

206

(pg.

642

-

52

)

4

.

The association of viral activation with penicillin toxicity in guinea pigs and hamsters

,

Yale J Biol Med

,

1974

, vol.

47

(pg.

166

-

81

)

5

.

Gastroenterology for cicatrizing ulcer of the pylorus

,

Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp

,

1893

, vol.

4

(pg.

53

-

5

)

6

, , .

Iatrogenic staphylococcal enterocolitis

,

Ann Surg

,

1964

, vol.

160

(pg.

551

-

60

)

7

, , .

Staphylococcal enterocolitis following antibiotic therapy

,

Ann Surg

,

1963

, vol.

157

(pg.

847

-

58

)

8

, .

Staphylococcal enterocolitis—treatment with oral vancomycin

,

Ann Intern Med

,

1966

, vol.

65

(pg.

1

-

8

)

9

, , .

Clindamycin-associated colitis: a prospective study

,

Ann Intern Med

,

1974

, vol.

81

(pg.

429

-

33

)

10

, , , et al.

Randomised controlled trial of vancomycin for pseudomembranous colitis and postoperative diarrhoea

,

Br Med J

,

1978

, vol.

2

(pg.

1667

-

9

)

11

, , , et al.

Gastrointestinal side effects of clindamycin and ampicillin therapy

,

J Infect Dis

,

1977

, vol.

135

Suppl

(pg.

111

-

9

)

12

, , , .

Clindamycin-associated colitis due to a toxin-producing species of Clostridium in hamsters

,

J Infect Dis

,

1977

, vol.

136

(pg.

701

-

5

)

13

, , , , .

Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia

,

N Engl J Med

,

1978

, vol.

298

(pg.

531

-

4

)

14

, , .

Comparison of two toxins produced by Clostridium difficile

,

Infect Immun

,

1981

, vol.

34

(pg.

1036

-

43

)

15

, , , .

Evaluation of eight cephalosporins in hamster colitis model

,

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

,

1981

, vol.

19

(pg.

980

-

6

)

16

, , , et al.

Antibiotic-associated colitis: effects of antibiotics on Clostridium difficile and the disease in hamsters

,

Rev Infect Dis

,

1979

, vol.

1

(pg.

386

-

97

)

17

, , , , , .

The protective effect of vancomycin on clindamycin-induced colitis in hamsters

,

Johns Hopkins Med J

,

1977

, vol.

141

(pg.

183

-

92

)

18

, , , .

Clindamycin-induced enterocolitis in hamsters as a model of pseudomembranous colitis in patients

,

Infect Immun

,

1978

, vol.

20

(pg.

526

-

9

)

19

, , , .

Extracolonic manifestations of Clostridium difficile infections: presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature

,

Medicine (Baltimore)

,

2001

, vol.

80

(pg.

88

-

101

)

20

, , , , , .

Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile cause distinct pseudomembranous intestinal diseases

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2004

, vol.

39

(pg.

747

-

50

)

21

, .

Rectal biopsy in clindamycin-associated colitis: an analysis of 23 cases

,

Arch Pathol

,

1975

, vol.

99

(pg.

237

-

41

)

22

, .

Pseudomembranous colitis

,

J Clin Pathol

,

1977

, vol.

30

(pg.

1

-

12

)

23

, , .

Rectal sparing in antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis: a prospective study

,

Gastroenterology

,

1982

, vol.

83

(pg.

1259

-

60

)

24

, .

Antibiotic-associated colitis with normal-appearing rectum

,

Dis Colon Rectum

,

1981

, vol.

24

(pg.

198

-

200

)

25

, , .

Pseudomembranous colitis: spectrum of imaging findings with clinical and pathologic correlation

,

Radiographics

,

1999

, vol.

19

(pg.

887

-

97

)

26

.

Antimicrobial agents implicated in Clostridium difficile toxin-associated diarrhea of colitis

,

Johns Hopkins Med J

,

1981

, vol.

149

(pg.

6

-

9

)

27

, , .

Relative frequency of Clostridium difficile in patients with diarrheal disease

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1981

, vol.

14

(pg.

26

-

31

)

28

.

Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis: pathogenesis and management

,

Drugs

,

1980

, vol.

20

(pg.

49

-

56

)

29

, , , , .

Epidemiology of community-acquired _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

J Infect Dis

,

1994

, vol.

169

(pg.

127

-

33

)

30

, , , , .

Ciprofloxacin and _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhoea

,

J Antimicrob Chemother

,

1992

, vol.

30

(pg.

141

-

7

)

31

, , , , .

Clostridium difficile colitis associated with cancer chemotherapy

,

Arch Intern Med

,

1982

, vol.

142

(pg.

333

-

5

)

32

, .

Clostridium difficile infection associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: a review

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1993

, vol.

17

(pg.

109

-

13

)

33

, , , .

Clinical and laboratory observations in Clostridium difficile colitis

,

Am J Clin Nutr

,

1980

, vol.

33

11 Suppl

(pg.

2521

-

6

)

34

, , .

Isolation rates and toxigenic potential of Clostridium difficile isolates from various patient populations

,

Gastroenterology

,

1981

, vol.

81

(pg.

5

-

9

)

35

, , , , .

Chronic diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile in children

,

Am J Dis Child

,

1983

, vol.

137

(pg.

275

-

8

)

36

, , .

Diagnosis and epidemiology of Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in Sweden

,

J Antimicrob Chemother

,

1984

, vol.

14

Suppl D

(pg.

85

-

95

)

37

, , , et al.

Diarrhea etiology in a children's hospital emergency department: a prospective cohort study

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2006

, vol.

43

(pg.

807

-

13

)

38

, , , et al.

Diarrhoea and pseudomembranous colitis after gastrointestinal operations: a prospective study

,

Lancet

,

1978

, vol.

2

(pg.

1165

-

7

)

39

, , , et al.

Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the environment and contacts of patients with antibiotic-associated colitis

,

J Infect Dis

,

1981

, vol.

143

(pg.

42

-

50

)

40

, , , , , .

Epidemiology of antibiotic-associated colitis: isolation of Clostridium difficile from the hospital environment

,

Am J Med

,

1981

, vol.

70

(pg.

906

-

8

)

41

, , , .

Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection

,

N Engl J Med

,

1989

, vol.

320

(pg.

204

-

10

)

42

, .

_Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1998

, vol.

26

(pg.

1027

-

36

)

43

.

Is there a relationship between vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection and Clostridium difficile infection?

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1997

, vol.

25

Suppl 2

(pg.

206

-

10

)

44

, , , et al.

Antibiotic-associated colitis— review of 66 cases

,

Br J Surg

,

1979

, vol.

66

(pg.

738

-

42

)

45

.

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1992

, vol.

15

(pg.

573

-

81

)

46

, , .

Clostridium difficile colitis

,

N Engl J Med

,

1994

, vol.

330

(pg.

257

-

62

)

47

, , .

_Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea: a review

,

Arch Intern Med

,

2001

, vol.

161

(pg.

525

-

33

)

48

, , , .

Clostridium difficile infection in patients with unexplained leukocytosis

,

Am J Med

,

2003

, vol.

115

(pg.

543

-

6

)

49

, , , .

Leukocytosis as a harbinger and surrogate marker of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients with diarrhea

,

Am J Gastroenterol

,

2000

, vol.

95

(pg.

3137

-

41

)

50

, , , et al.

Fatal toxic shock syndrome associated with Clostridium sordellii after medical abortion

,

N Engl J Med

,

2005

, vol.

353

(pg.

2352

-

60

)

51

, .

Positive Clostridium difficile stool assay in a patient with fatal C. sordellii infection

,

N Engl J Med

,

2006

, vol.

355

(pg.

1284

-

5

)

52

, , .

Will the real Clostridium species responsible for antibiotic-associated colitis please step forward?

,

Lancet

,

1978

, vol.

1

pg.

338

53

, .

Reactive arthritis associated with Clostridium difficile pseudomembranous colitis

,

Semin Arthritis Rheum

,

1993

, vol.

22

(pg.

420

-

6

)

54

, .

_Clostridium difficile_-associated reactive arthritis in an HLA-B27 positive female: report and literature review

,

J Rheumatol

,

1989

, vol.

16

(pg.

133

-

5

)

55

, , , , , .

Latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in stool samples

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1984

, vol.

20

(pg.

339

-

41

)

56

, , , .

Characterization of cross-reactive proteins detected by Culturette Brand Rapid Latex Test for Clostridium difficile

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1988

, vol.

26

(pg.

397

-

400

)

57

, , .

Identification of the latex test-reactive protein of Clostridium difficile as glutamate dehydrogenase

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1991

, vol.

29

(pg.

2639

-

42

)

58

, , , .

Evaluation of C. diff.-CUBE test for detection of _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

,

1992

, vol.

15

(pg.

493

-

8

)

59

, , , et al.

Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool specimens by the polymerase chain reaction

,

J Infect Dis

,

1993

, vol.

167

(pg.

455

-

8

)

60

, , , , .

Diagnosis and monitoring of Clostridium difficile infections with the polymerase chain reaction

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1993

, vol.

16

Suppl 4

(pg.

234

-

8

)

61

, , , , .

Enzyme immunoassays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in fecal specimens

,

J Infect Dis

,

1984

, vol.

149

(pg.

781

-

8

)

62

, , , et al.

Comparison of culture, cytotoxicity assays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for toxin A and toxin B in the diagnosis of _Clostridium difficile_-related enteric disease

,

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

,

1986

, vol.

5

(pg.

61

-

9

)

63

, , , , .

Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile: a comparison of media and incubation systems

,

Am J Clin Pathol

,

1995

, vol.

103

(pg.

52

-

6

)

64

, , , .

Community-acquired _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1995

, vol.

20

Suppl 2

(pg.

263

-

5

)

65

, , , , , .

Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of _C. difficile_-associated disease

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1991

, vol.

29

(pg.

2724

-

30

)

66

, .

Comparison of a dot immunobinding assay, latex agglutination, and cytotoxin assay for laboratory diagnosis of _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1990

, vol.

28

(pg.

855

-

7

)

67

, , , .

Comparison of three enzyme immunoassays, a cytotoxicity assay, and toxigenic culture for diagnosis of _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1993

, vol.

31

(pg.

963

-

7

)

68

, , , et al.

Comparison of four commercially available rapid enzyme immunoassays with cytotoxin assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin(s) from stool specimens

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1994

, vol.

32

(pg.

1142

-

7

)

69

, , , .

Enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibody to toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1983

, vol.

18

(pg.

242

-

7

)

70

, , , et al.

Clostridium difficile toxin B is more potent than toxin A in damaging human colonic epithelium in vitro

,

J Clin Invest

,

1995

, vol.

95

(pg.

2004

-

11

)

71

, , , .

Pseudomembranous colitis caused by a toxin A−B+ strain of Clostridium difficile

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

2000

, vol.

38

(pg.

1696

-

7

)

72

, , , et al.

Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

1998

, vol.

36

(pg.

2178

-

82

)

73

, , , , .

Characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile

,

Infect Immun

,

1992

, vol.

60

(pg.

4633

-

9

)

74

, , , et al.

Molecular, immunological, and biological characterization of a toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strain of Clostridium difficile

,

Infect Immun

,

1992

, vol.

60

(pg.

4192

-

9

)

75

, , , , , .

Clostridium difficile colitis: an efficient clinical approach to diagnosis

,

Ann Intern Med

,

1995

, vol.

123

(pg.

835

-

40

)

76

, , .

Frequency of sample submission for optimal utilization of the cell culture cytotoxicity assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

2005

, vol.

43

(pg.

2994

-

5

)

77

, , , , , .

Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin

,

J Clin Microbiol

,

2006

, vol.

44

(pg.

1145

-

9

)

78

, , , , .

Laboratory diagnosis of _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture

,

J Med Microbiol

,

2005

, vol.

54

(pg.

187

-

91

)

79

, , , , , .

Clindamycin-induced enterocolitis in hamsters

,

J Infect Dis

,

1978

, vol.

137

(pg.

464

-

75

)

80

, , , et al.

Therapeutic trials of antibiotic associated colitis

,

Scand J Infect Dis Suppl

,

1980

Suppl 22

(pg.

41

-

5

)

81

, , , et al.

Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhoea and colitis

,

Lancet

,

1983

, vol.

2

(pg.

1043

-

6

)

82

, , , , .

Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of _Clostridium difficile_-associated diarrhea

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1996

, vol.

22

(pg.

813

-

8

)

83

.

Clinical practice: antibiotic-associated diarrhea

,

N Engl J Med

,

2002

, vol.

346

(pg.

334

-

9

)

84

, , , .

Bacitracin treatment of antibiotic-associated colitis and diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile toxin

,

Gastroenterology

,

1980

, vol.

78

(pg.

1584

-

6

)

85

, , , , .

Pseudomembranous colitis: a surgical disease?

,

Surgery

,

1994

, vol.

116

(pg.

491

-

6

)

86

.

Treatment of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis

,

Rev Infect Dis

,

1984

, vol.

6

Suppl 1

(pg.

235

-

41

)

87

.

Treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis

,

Gastroenterology

,

1985

, vol.

89

(pg.

1192

-

5

)

88

, , , , .

Symptomatic relapse after oral vancomycin therapy of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis

,

Gastroenterology

,

1980

, vol.

78

(pg.

431

-

4

)

89

, , , , , .

Recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhea: characteristics of and risk factors for patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

1997

, vol.

24

(pg.

324

-

33

)

90

, , .

Effect of environmental stress on Clostridium difficile toxin levels during continuous cultivation

,

Appl Environ Microbiol

,

1979

, vol.

38

(pg.

637

-

41

)

91

, , .

Biotherapeutic agents: a neglected modality for the treatment and prevention of selected intestinal and vaginal infections

,

JAMA

,

1996

, vol.

275

(pg.

870

-

6

)

92

, .

Suppression by Saccharomyces boulardii of toxigenic Clostridium difficile overgrowth after vancomycin treatment in hamsters

,

Antimicrob Agents Chemother

,

1987

, vol.

31

(pg.

129

-

31

)

93

, , , et al.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in combination with standard antibiotics for Clostridium difficile disease

,

JAMA

,

1994

, vol.

271

(pg.

1913

-

8

)

94

, , , , , .

Survival of Lactobacillus species (strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract

,

Dig Dis Sci

,

1992

, vol.

37

(pg.

121

-

8

)

95

, , , , , .

Treatment with intravenously administered gamma globulin of chronic relapsing colitis induced by Clostridium difficile toxin

,

J Pediatr

,

1991

, vol.

118

(pg.

633

-

7

)

96

, , , et al.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for severe Clostridium difficile colitis

,

Gut

,

1997

, vol.

41

(pg.

366

-

70

)

97

, .

Treatment of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis with cholestyramine resin

,

Johns Hopkins Med J

,

1978

, vol.

143

(pg.

67

-

72

)

98

, , , , .

Therapy of antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis

,

J Clin Gastroenterol

,

1979

, vol.

1

(pg.

51

-

4

)

99

, .

Binding of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin and vancomycin by anion-exchange resins

,

J Infect Dis

,

1980

, vol.

141

(pg.

92

-

7

)

100

, , .

Pseudomembraneous enterocolitis: mechanism for restoring floral homeostasis

,

Am Surg

,

1981

, vol.

47

(pg.

178

-

83

)

101

, , , .

Relapsing Clostridium difficile enterocolitis cured by rectal infusion of normal faeces

,

Scand J Infect Dis

,

1984

, vol.

16

(pg.

211

-

5

)

102

, .

Clinical recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2008

, vol.

46

Suppl 1

(pg.

12

-

8

)

(in this supplement)

103

, , , , .

Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2008

, vol.

46

Suppl 1

(pg.

19

-

31

)

(in this supplement)

104

, , .

Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2008

, vol.

46

Suppl 1

(pg.

32

-

42

)

(in this supplement)

105

, , .

Measures to control and prevent Clostridium difficile infection

,

Clin Infect Dis

,

2008

, vol.

46

Suppl 1

(pg.

43

-

9

)

(in this supplement)

© 2008 Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Topic:

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 13,147

11,731 Pageviews

1,416 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 10
January 2017 13
February 2017 51
March 2017 35
April 2017 20
May 2017 18
June 2017 20
July 2017 29
August 2017 25
September 2017 32
October 2017 27
November 2017 69
December 2017 321
January 2018 308
February 2018 421
March 2018 538
April 2018 520
May 2018 463
June 2018 466
July 2018 367
August 2018 361
September 2018 402
October 2018 335
November 2018 307
December 2018 110
January 2019 76
February 2019 146
March 2019 164
April 2019 204
May 2019 136
June 2019 82
July 2019 97
August 2019 63
September 2019 146
October 2019 132
November 2019 161
December 2019 105
January 2020 72
February 2020 110
March 2020 114
April 2020 113
May 2020 61
June 2020 54
July 2020 70
August 2020 62
September 2020 60
October 2020 87
November 2020 145
December 2020 115
January 2021 71
February 2021 77
March 2021 106
April 2021 96
May 2021 103
June 2021 114
July 2021 92
August 2021 61
September 2021 65
October 2021 93
November 2021 141
December 2021 86
January 2022 94
February 2022 98
March 2022 137
April 2022 164
May 2022 121
June 2022 73
July 2022 111
August 2022 94
September 2022 133
October 2022 162
November 2022 144
December 2022 124
January 2023 97
February 2023 128
March 2023 188
April 2023 192
May 2023 121
June 2023 82
July 2023 97
August 2023 75
September 2023 120
October 2023 112
November 2023 184
December 2023 121
January 2024 136
February 2024 150
March 2024 170
April 2024 237
May 2024 200
June 2024 96
July 2024 107
August 2024 55
September 2024 76

Citations

134 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

More on this topic

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic