The Use of Spatial Analysis in the Control and Risk Assessment of Vector-Borne Diseases (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Search for other works by this author on:

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

Dana A. Focks, Richard J. Brenner, Dace D. Chadee, James H. Trosper, The Use of Spatial Analysis in the Control and Risk Assessment of Vector-Borne Diseases, American Entomologist, Volume 45, Issue 3, Fall 1999, Pages 173–183, https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/45.3.173
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Two case studies, one from Hawaii involving pest populations of mosquitoes and one from Trinidad looking at dengue, are presented to demonstrate the usefulness of spatial statistics in the study and control of vector-borne disease; we focus on monitoring methodologies, risk assessment, and mitigation. In Hawaii, the spatial distribution of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) oviposition within a small military facility located on a forest preserve indicated that the source of adult, biting mosquitoes was the untreatable sylvan areas surrounding the base where breeding occurred. A simple spatial analysis of oviposition during weeks with and without insecticide aerosol applications indicated that treatments were ineffective. From these analyses we concluded that if source reduction was not a viable alternative, then, without a tangible threat of A. albopictus -borne illness, no insecticide control measures should be attempted on the base; alternatively, the spatial analysis would be beneficial in directing the extent of a source reduction (e.g., deforestation) effort designed to eliminate migration into the base. In the Trinidad study, spatial visualization demonstrated dramatically that the traditional Stegomyia indices no longer should be considered viable surrogates of dengue transmission risk because they did not correlate spatially within themselves nor with the absolute densities of the vector Aedes aegypti (L.). Concerning risk assessment, spatial visualization of the number of pupae per person indicated that the threat of dengue was not distributed uniformly throughout the island. Regarding mitigation, spatial analysis of site differences in the types, frequencies, and productivities of water-holding domestic and trash containers indicated that targeted source reduction programs would have outcomes that varied spatially, perhaps justifying tailoring control efforts on a site-by-site basis. These studies also demonstrated the utility of combining spatial analysis with computer models in vector-borne disease systems. Finally, this report presents initial estimates of dengue transmission thresholds in terms of pupae per person as a function of herd immunity in the human population for the average annual ambient air temperature in Trinidad.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© 1999 Entomological Society of America

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 1,069

36 Pageviews

1,033 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 2
February 2017 1
March 2017 2
April 2017 3
May 2017 3
June 2017 1
July 2017 1
August 2017 5
September 2017 4
October 2017 3
November 2017 3
December 2017 7
January 2018 18
February 2018 23
March 2018 28
April 2018 25
May 2018 23
June 2018 22
July 2018 27
August 2018 28
September 2018 21
October 2018 18
November 2018 36
December 2018 9
January 2019 13
February 2019 16
March 2019 22
April 2019 21
May 2019 22
June 2019 18
July 2019 14
August 2019 16
September 2019 14
October 2019 22
November 2019 17
December 2019 21
January 2020 20
February 2020 16
March 2020 54
April 2020 26
May 2020 16
June 2020 28
July 2020 15
August 2020 33
September 2020 20
October 2020 13
November 2020 19
December 2020 11
January 2021 11
February 2021 13
March 2021 10
April 2021 11
May 2021 4
June 2021 8
July 2021 4
August 2021 2
September 2021 4
October 2021 6
November 2021 4
December 2021 9
February 2022 6
March 2022 1
April 2022 12
May 2022 9
June 2022 8
July 2022 4
August 2022 1
September 2022 16
October 2022 22
November 2022 4
December 2022 3
January 2023 4
February 2023 6
March 2023 2
April 2023 1
May 2023 6
June 2023 3
July 2023 1
August 2023 4
September 2023 7
October 2023 5
November 2023 5
December 2023 2
January 2024 6
February 2024 7
March 2024 7
April 2024 5
May 2024 6
June 2024 5
July 2024 8
August 2024 1
September 2024 6

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic