Rapid Detection of the Staphylococcal mecA Gene from BACTEC Blood Culture Bottles by the Polymerase Chain Reaction (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

1 From the Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah

2 From the Deparlment of Pathology, University of Utah Medical Center, 50 N. Medical Drive. Salt Lake City, Utah.

Search for other works by this author on:

,

1 From the Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other works by this author on:

,

Patricia L. Newcomb-Gayman, MT(ASCP)

1 From the Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other works by this author on:

1 From the Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc., 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah

2 From the Deparlment of Pathology, University of Utah Medical Center, 50 N. Medical Drive. Salt Lake City, Utah.

Search for other works by this author on:

Published:

01 November 1996

Cite

Karen C. Carroll, Rebecca B. Leonard, Patricia L. Newcomb-Gayman, David R. Hillyard, Rapid Detection of the Staphylococcal _mec_A Gene from BACTEC Blood Culture Bottles by the Polymerase Chain Reaction, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Volume 106, Issue 5, 1 November 1996, Pages 600–605, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/106.5.600
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

A rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the direct detection of the staphylococcal mecA gene from BACTEC blood culture bottles (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) was developed. Published primer sequences and sample preparation using Achromopeptidase for cell lysis were adapted to the use of the Idaho Technology Air Thermocycler 1605 (Idaho Technologies, Idaho Falls, ID).

The method was validated with 80 strains of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative geographically diverse methicillin-resistant and susceptible isolates of staphylococci. There was a 100% correlation between the PCR results and the results of standard susceptibility testing methods.

From BACTEC 9240 blood cultures, mixed aliquots of blood and broth containing gram-positive cocci in clusters were centrifuged at low speed to sediment red blood cells. After additional centrifugation and wash steps, PCR was performed on the resuspended pellet. The turnaround time from initial Gram stain detection of positive BACTEC bottles to PCR amplicon detection by agarose gel electrophoresis is less than 3 hours.

In a clinical evaluation of 181 blood culture isolates, there was a 99% correlation with standard susceptibility results for Staphylococcus aureus. Discrepant results for Staphylococcus aureus isolates were verified by a Mueller Hinton plate supplemented with 6 μg/mL of oxacillin and 2% sodium chloride. For coagulase-negative staphylococci, the PCR method detected an additional seven resistant isolates that were reported by the Vitek as susceptible. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal susceptibility results that were in disagreement with the PCR assay were confirmed by the disk-diffusion method.

This procedure is accurate, rapid and fits well into laboratory work flow. Rapid detection of the mecA gene on positive blood culture vials has become a routine test in the authors’ clinical microbiology laboratory.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© American Society for Clinical Pathology

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 588

54 Pageviews

534 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 1
February 2017 4
March 2017 2
May 2017 2
June 2017 2
September 2017 8
October 2017 3
December 2017 5
January 2018 21
February 2018 10
March 2018 11
April 2018 14
May 2018 8
June 2018 6
July 2018 17
August 2018 4
September 2018 4
October 2018 6
November 2018 10
December 2018 22
January 2019 3
February 2019 8
March 2019 9
April 2019 15
May 2019 7
June 2019 4
July 2019 6
August 2019 5
September 2019 5
October 2019 7
November 2019 10
December 2019 10
January 2020 16
February 2020 5
March 2020 13
April 2020 6
May 2020 8
June 2020 9
July 2020 13
August 2020 10
September 2020 13
October 2020 5
November 2020 10
December 2020 4
January 2021 4
February 2021 4
March 2021 4
April 2021 9
May 2021 5
June 2021 4
July 2021 1
August 2021 5
September 2021 4
October 2021 4
November 2021 5
December 2021 2
January 2022 6
February 2022 3
March 2022 4
April 2022 6
May 2022 5
June 2022 3
July 2022 8
August 2022 3
September 2022 40
October 2022 3
November 2022 4
December 2022 3
January 2023 11
February 2023 3
March 2023 5
May 2023 6
July 2023 5
August 2023 1
September 2023 4
October 2023 3
November 2023 6
December 2023 1
January 2024 9
February 2024 9
March 2024 3
April 2024 5
May 2024 2
June 2024 2
July 2024 6
August 2024 2
September 2024 5

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic