Evaluation of protein multiple alignments by SAM-T99 using the BAliBASE multiple alignment test set (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 59064, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 59064, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

02 February 2001

Revision received:

11 April 2001

Published:

01 August 2001

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Motivation: SAM-T99 is an iterative hidden Markov model-based method for finding proteins similar to a single target sequence and aligning them. One of its main uses is to produce multiple alignments of homologs of the target sequence. Previous tests of SAM-T99 and its predecessors have concentrated on the quality of the searches performed, not on the quality of the multiple alignment. In this paper we report on tests of multiple alignment quality, comparing SAM-T99 to the standard multiple aligner, CLUSTALW.

Results: The paper evaluates the multiple-alignment aspect of the SAM-T99 protocol, using the BAliBASE benchmark alignment database. On these benchmarks, SAM-T99 is comparable in accuracy with ClustalW.

Availability: The SAM-T99 protocol can be run on the web at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/HMM-apps/T99-query.html and the alignment tune-up option described here can be run at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/HMM-apps/T99-tuneup.html. The protocol is also part of the standard SAM suite of tools. http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam/

This content is only available as a PDF.

© Oxford University Press 2001

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 476

43 Pageviews

433 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 4
January 2017 2
March 2017 6
May 2017 3
June 2017 6
July 2017 3
August 2017 3
October 2017 4
November 2017 1
December 2017 16
January 2018 7
February 2018 10
March 2018 14
April 2018 8
May 2018 9
June 2018 3
July 2018 3
August 2018 9
September 2018 8
October 2018 6
November 2018 13
December 2018 10
January 2019 5
February 2019 6
March 2019 7
April 2019 16
May 2019 15
June 2019 3
July 2019 10
August 2019 5
September 2019 7
October 2019 5
November 2019 9
December 2019 11
January 2020 5
February 2020 5
March 2020 11
April 2020 10
May 2020 2
June 2020 2
July 2020 4
August 2020 3
September 2020 6
October 2020 3
November 2020 1
December 2020 4
January 2021 4
February 2021 2
March 2021 5
April 2021 3
May 2021 5
June 2021 7
July 2021 3
August 2021 2
September 2021 3
October 2021 5
November 2021 6
December 2021 9
January 2022 3
February 2022 1
March 2022 3
April 2022 8
May 2022 4
June 2022 4
July 2022 2
August 2022 3
September 2022 28
October 2022 9
November 2022 3
December 2022 7
January 2023 4
February 2023 3
June 2023 1
July 2023 1
September 2023 1
October 2023 2
December 2023 3
February 2024 1
March 2024 9
April 2024 2
June 2024 5
July 2024 5
August 2024 3
September 2024 2
October 2024 2

Citations

67 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic