Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Search for other works by this author on:
,
1 Huck Institute for the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16803, 2 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Watson School of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 and 3 Departments of Biology and Mathematics and Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Search for other works by this author on:
Search for other works by this author on:
† The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.
Associate Editor: John Quackenbush
Revision received:
20 May 2010
Cite
Daniel Blankenberg, Assaf Gordon, Gregory Von Kuster, Nathan Coraor, James Taylor, Anton Nekrutenko, the Galaxy Team, Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy, Bioinformatics, Volume 26, Issue 14, July 2010, Pages 1783–1785, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq281
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Summary: Here, we describe a tool suite that functions on all of the commonly known FASTQ format variants and provides a pipeline for manipulating next generation sequencing data taken from a sequencing machine all the way through the quality filtering steps.
Availability and Implementation: This open-source toolset was implemented in Python and has been integrated into the online data analysis platform Galaxy (public web access: http://usegalaxy.org; download: http://getgalaxy.org). Two short movies that highlight the functionality of tools described in this manuscript as well as results from testing components of this tool suite against a set of previously published files are available at http://usegalaxy.org/u/dan/p/fastq
Contact: james.taylor@emory.edu; anton@bx.psu.edu
Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
1 INTRODUCTION
The proliferation of next generation sequencing technologies has created numerous data management and analysis issues. The most troubling of these issues stems from the lack of standardized sequencer output and tools. The de facto standard, FASTQ, comes in a number of distinct variants (Cock et al., 2009), causing much of the difficulty experienced by biologists when working with next generation sequencing data.
The first steps following data acquisition involve preparing and quality checking the produced sequencing data. These steps typically follow the workflow: (i) parsing sequencer output; (ii) calculating and (iii) visualizing summary statistics on quality scores and nucleotide distributions; (iv) trimming reads if necessary; and (v) filtering reads by quality score and other various manipulations. Here, we describe a set of tools, able to handle all known FASTQ variants, that has been integrated into the online data analysis platform Galaxy (http://usegalaxy.org), allowing experimental biologists without any programming experience to easily manipulate sequencing data using a point and click interface. This open-source toolkit has no known data size limitations and was implemented in Python, allowing true cross platform availability. All of the following tools, unless mentioned otherwise, are found under the next generation sequencing (NGS): quality check (QC) and manipulation section within Galaxy. Furthermore, by integrating this toolset into Galaxy, researchers have access to a plethora of other genome analysis software as well as a fully customizable workflow (pipeline) system. Blankenberg et al. (2007, 2010), Taylor et al. (2007) and http://galaxycast.org are recommended for users to familiarize themselves with genome analysis using Galaxy.
2 A SUITE OF TOOLS FOR PREPARING NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING READS FOR MAPPING AND ANALYSIS
2.1 FASTQ from FASTA and quality score files
Some sequencing technologies will produce separate files containing sequences and quality scores. These two separate files can be merged together to create a single FASTQ file. For this purpose, the combine FASTA and QUAL into FASTQ tool was developed. Specifying a quality score file is optional and, when not specified, quality score values will be filled with the maximal allowed quality value.
2.2 FASTQ Groomer
The FASTQ Groomer tool is used to verify and convert between the known FASTQ variants. The data created by this tool is guaranteed to conform to the target variant specified by the user, including the enforcement of quality score minimums and maximums. After grooming, the user is presented with some information about the input such as ASCII character and decimal value ranges and a list of FASTQ variants for which the input data is actually valid. Although the output created by this tool is now valid, if the user has selected the wrong presumed input variant, it is possible for the resultant score values not to reflect the values intended by the sequencing technology. Users should utilize the provided summary information as a sanity check before continuing with their analysis; for example, if a user provides a Sanger encoded variant (with ASCII values <59), but specifies the input variant as Solexa, this summary information would state that the input was valid only for Sanger (a direct contradiction of the user's selection).
2.3 Quality statistics
As quality scores can vary along the length of sequencing reads, determining how to trim and filter read data involves calculating summary statistics on a per column (base position) basis. The FASTQ Summary Statistics by column tool accomplishes this task. The output of this tool contains read counts, minimums, maximums, sums, means, quartiles with ranges, outliers and nucleotide counts for each base position in a FASTQ file. This statistical summary can be graphed by using the Boxplot tool, found under the Graph/Display Data tool section.
2.4 Read Trimmer
To prevent otherwise high-quality reads from being rejected during quality filtering or from influencing mapping or assembly processes, it can be beneficial to trim bases from poor-quality ends of reads. The FASTQ Trimmer by column tool allows trimming either end of a set of reads by using absolute offsets or by specifying percentage of read length based offsets. Offsets begin at 0 for each end and increase towards the opposing end of the read. For example, to trim the outer 3 bases from each end of a 36 length sequencing read, a user can specify absolute 5′ and 3′ offsets of 3 or percentage-based offsets of 8.33 (0.0833 × 36 = 2.9988, rounded to the nearest integer = 3).
2.5 Quality filter
The Filter FASTQ reads by quality score and length tool allows filtering by minimum and maximum read lengths and by minimum and maximum quality score values over the entire read while allowing a configurable number of deviant bases. Complex filters can also be constructed that allow the user to set offsets, just like with the trimmer tool, to use as bounds for performing a selected aggregation action that is compared to a user specified value. Any number of complex filters can be designed and applied to a set of sequencing reads. For example, to only include reads which have no quality score values less than 28 in the first half of a read, a user can use percentage-based offsets of 0 and 50, select the minimum score aggregation and the greater-than-or-equal-to operator (≥) and set a quality score threshold of 28.
2.6 FASTQ Manipulation
Highly configurable complex manipulations can be performed on selected FASTQ reads by using the Manipulate FASTQ reads on various attributes tool. This tool allows the user to define a set of matching criteria to be used to select the reads in a FASTQ file on which to perform a set of manipulations; any number of match directives can be defined and a read must match each directive to be considered for manipulation. Matching is currently limited to user-specified pattern matching (regular expressions) on sequence identifier/name, sequence content and quality score strings, with defaults set to match all (.*); however, additional matching and manipulation options can be easily implemented as needed. When a read does not match, it will be transferred to the output in an unmodified fashion. Reads that pass all matching criteria are subjected to any number of user-specified manipulations. Manipulations are available that act upon sequence identifier/name, sequence content or quality score strings. Beyond allowing the user to remove matching reads or to perform string translations on any of these attributes, additional manipulations are available for sequence content, including: reverse complementing, reversing (without complementing), complementing (without reversing), trimming, in silico transcription of DNA to RNA and vice-versa, as well as changing the adapter base within color space sequences. Additionally, separate tools exist that can convert FASTQ files to-and-from a tabular format; this allows FASTQ data to be modified using any of the powerful text manipulation tools, which are prepackaged with Galaxy.
2.7 Paired-end read splitting and joining
FASTQ formatted paired-end sequencing data can come in two common forms, one that utilizes a separate file for each paired-end component or another where a single FASTQ file is used and the two paired-end reads ends have been concatenated together to form a single entry. Two tools exist to facilitate the use of these data: FASTQ Joiner on paired-end reads and FASTQ Splitter on joined paired-end reads. The Joiner tool takes two separate FASTQ files that contain paired-end reads and creates a single file. The Splitter tool does the opposite of the Joiner tool and takes a single FASTQ file and splits each read in half, creating two separate FASTQ files. When splitting, an identifier suffix is added to each paired end; when joining, these differences in identifiers are taken into account.
3 CONCLUSIONS
Although the differences between the FASTQ variants will likely continue to cause difficulty for researchers, it is our hope that the adoption of this toolset will alleviate many of these problems by providing facilities that allow verification and interconversion of these variants and which are available alongside a comprehensive collection of tools. Although this toolset aims to be both simple to use and functionally powerful, ultimately the user is responsible for understanding the analytical requirements of their data; e.g. the difference between fixed read length and variable read length platforms. To help biologists overcome the nominal learning curve associated with this toolset, onscreen help is displayed within each tool interface and a series of screencasts, which demonstrate a typical analysis with this toolset as it appears on a user's screen, is available at http://galaxycast.org.
A description of the results of running this toolset against test files provided in Cock et al. (2009) is available in the Supplementary Material. To prevent potential problems from occurring as future enhancements are made to the toolset, these files have been incorporated as functional test cases that are automatically executed whenever the source code is updated. As always, users are encouraged to send comments, suggestions, feature requests and bug reports to galaxy-bugs@bx.psu.edu.
Funding: Beckman Foundation Young Investigator Award (to A.N.); NSF grant DBI 0850103 and NIH grant HG004909 (to A.N. and J.T.); Penn State University and the Huck Institutes for the Life Sciences (to A.N.); Emory University (to J.T.); grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Funds (in part). The Department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions.
Conflict of Interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
et al.
A framework for collaborative analysis of ENCODE data: making large-scale analyses biologist-friendly
,
Genome Res.
,
2007
, vol.
17
(pg.
960
-
964
)
et al.
Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists
,
Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol.
,
2010
Chapter 19, Unit 19.10.1-21
et al.
The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants
,
Nucleic Acids Res.
,
2009
, vol.
38
(pg.
1767
-
1771
)
et al.
Using galaxy to perform large-scale interactive data analyses
,
Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics
,
2007
Chapter 10, Unit 10.5
Author notes
† The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.
Associate Editor: John Quackenbush
© The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 9,340
7,300 Pageviews
2,040 PDF Downloads
Since 11/1/2016
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
November 2016 | 2 |
December 2016 | 16 |
January 2017 | 32 |
February 2017 | 61 |
March 2017 | 49 |
April 2017 | 57 |
May 2017 | 47 |
June 2017 | 26 |
July 2017 | 26 |
August 2017 | 41 |
September 2017 | 28 |
October 2017 | 58 |
November 2017 | 48 |
December 2017 | 102 |
January 2018 | 109 |
February 2018 | 120 |
March 2018 | 142 |
April 2018 | 118 |
May 2018 | 102 |
June 2018 | 87 |
July 2018 | 85 |
August 2018 | 87 |
September 2018 | 92 |
October 2018 | 139 |
November 2018 | 162 |
December 2018 | 116 |
January 2019 | 73 |
February 2019 | 111 |
March 2019 | 132 |
April 2019 | 160 |
May 2019 | 132 |
June 2019 | 77 |
July 2019 | 129 |
August 2019 | 101 |
September 2019 | 95 |
October 2019 | 81 |
November 2019 | 87 |
December 2019 | 60 |
January 2020 | 88 |
February 2020 | 106 |
March 2020 | 91 |
April 2020 | 87 |
May 2020 | 63 |
June 2020 | 83 |
July 2020 | 87 |
August 2020 | 80 |
September 2020 | 98 |
October 2020 | 86 |
November 2020 | 115 |
December 2020 | 121 |
January 2021 | 121 |
February 2021 | 90 |
March 2021 | 114 |
April 2021 | 86 |
May 2021 | 108 |
June 2021 | 132 |
July 2021 | 101 |
August 2021 | 99 |
September 2021 | 156 |
October 2021 | 74 |
November 2021 | 110 |
December 2021 | 115 |
January 2022 | 99 |
February 2022 | 104 |
March 2022 | 110 |
April 2022 | 137 |
May 2022 | 133 |
June 2022 | 111 |
July 2022 | 116 |
August 2022 | 103 |
September 2022 | 142 |
October 2022 | 64 |
November 2022 | 113 |
December 2022 | 91 |
January 2023 | 129 |
February 2023 | 126 |
March 2023 | 110 |
April 2023 | 131 |
May 2023 | 103 |
June 2023 | 98 |
July 2023 | 91 |
August 2023 | 123 |
September 2023 | 98 |
October 2023 | 97 |
November 2023 | 104 |
December 2023 | 107 |
January 2024 | 106 |
February 2024 | 104 |
March 2024 | 122 |
April 2024 | 123 |
May 2024 | 110 |
June 2024 | 119 |
July 2024 | 73 |
August 2024 | 88 |
September 2024 | 77 |
October 2024 | 92 |
November 2024 | 85 |
Citations
502 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic