Sex Dimorphism of the Brain in Male-to-Female Transsexuals (original) (raw)

,

1Stockholm Brain Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience

Search for other works by this author on:

2Department of Medicine Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for other works by this author on:

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Gender dysphoria is suggested to be a consequence of sex atypical cerebral differentiation. We tested this hypothesis in a magnetic resonance study of voxel-based morphometry and structural volumetry in 48 heterosexual men (HeM) and women (HeW) and 24 gynephillic male to female transsexuals (MtF-TR). Specific interest was paid to gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) fraction, hemispheric asymmetry, and volumes of the hippocampus, thalamus, caudate, and putamen. Like HeM, MtF-TR displayed larger GM volumes than HeW in the cerebellum and lingual gyrus and smaller GM and WM volumes in the precentral gyrus. Both male groups had smaller hippocampal volumes than HeW. As in HeM, but not HeW, the right cerebral hemisphere and thalamus volume was in MtF-TR lager than the left. None of these measures differed between HeM and MtF-TR. MtF-TR displayed also singular features and differed from both control groups by having reduced thalamus and putamen volumes and elevated GM volumes in the right insular and inferior frontal cortex and an area covering the right angular gyrus.The present data do not support the notion that brains of MtF-TR are feminized. The observed changes in MtF-TR bring attention to the networks inferred in processing of body perception.

Introduction

Transsexuality is defined as a gender-identity disorder, characterized by the firm conviction of belonging to the opposite sex, which often leads to a request for sex-reassignment surgery (Blanchard 1993; Cohen-Kettenis and Gooren 1999). Most of the current hypotheses for this condition presume a sex atypical differentiation of the brain, due to genetic, and/or an early organizational effect of testosterone during the fetal development (Giedd et al. 1997; Green and Keverne 2000; van Goozen et al. 2002; Bentz et al. 2007; Swaab 2007). These hypotheses also presume that the perception of the own sex is linked to sexual differentiation of the brain and that in transsexuals this perception differs from the body phenotype. Such a discrepancy is believed to be possible because sex differentiation of the brain occurs later in development than sex differentiation of genitals (Swaab 2007). This scenario is supported by several postmortem studies showing that male to female (MtF-TR) transsexuals, like females, have a smaller volume, and number of neurons in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc) compared with male controls—differences, which seem not to be influenced by sex hormone levels in adulthood (Zhou et al. 1995; Kruijver et al. 2000). Recently, Garcia-Falgueras and Swaab (2008) also found “feminized” size of INAH3 in MTF-TR (Berglund et al. 2008). While being intriguing, these findings are limited by the inherent pitfalls of postmortem studies. Our group recently employed in vivo investigations and found that smelling of 2 putative pheromones, which in heterosexual subjects normally leads to a sex differentiated activation of the hypothalamus, causes a sex atypical activation in estrogen naïve MtF-TR (Berglund et al. 2008). This observation corroborated with previous anatomical findings in transsexuals but provided no information as to whether and how the hypothalamic networks, which in animal studies are shown to be involved in “sexual behavior,” would be also engaged in the perception of “sexual identity.” Understanding the biology of gender dysphoria requires consideration of additional cerebral networks identified as sexually dimorphic than the hypothalamus. Considering that the sense of discomfort with sex characteristics of the own body is the main feature of gender dysphoria, it is important to also investigate the cerebral networks reported to be involved in own body perception and perception of self. Luders et al. recently addressed some of these issues by an explorative voxel-based morphological (VBM) analysis of the gray matter (GM) fractions. They found that GM volume in the putamen was more pronounced in MtF-TR than in male and female controls, particularly on the right side (Luders, Sanchez, et al. 2009). While the GM in the putamen did not differ significantly between male and female controls, these data, nevertheless, emphasized the possibility that gender dysphoria could be associated with an altered anatomy also in brain regions located outside the hypothalamus.

Previous studies with magnetic resonance (MR) have shown sex dimorphic features in several brain regions. In general, women are reported to have larger volumes of the hippocampus (Filipek et al. 1994), caudate nucleus (Filipek et al. 1994; Murphy et al. 1996; Giedd et al. 1997, 2006), and the anterior cingulate gyrus (Paus et al. 1996). In contrast, the relative volumes of the amygdala (Raz et al. 1995; Giedd et al. 1997, 2006; Neufang et al. 2009) are found to be larger in men. Studies with VBM indicate that sex dimorphism exists also in regional GM and white matter (WM) volumes. With some exceptions (Goldstein et al. 2001; Carne et al. 2006), men are reported to have larger GM volumes in the mesial temporal lobe, the cerebellum, and lingual gyrus (Good et al. 2001; Carne et al. 2006), whereas several authors detected larger GM volumes in the precentral gyrus, the right inferior parietal, and orbitofrontal cortex in women (Nopoulos et al. 2000; Good et al. 2001; Luders et al. 2005; Luders, Gaser, et al. 2009). There are also reports of larger GM volumes in women in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Schlaepfer et al. 1995). Finally, sex differences have been found in hemispheric asymmetry. In general, the asymmetry in adults is rightward in the frontal and temporal lobe and leftward in the posterior temporal and occipito-parietal regions (Toga and Thompson 2003). Among studies explicitly comparing the entire hemispheres most, although not all, suggest that the right hemisphere is larger in men (Filipek et al. 1994; Yucel et al. 2001; Kovalev et al. 2003; Carne et al. 2006; Savic and Lindstrom 2008).

Whereas VBM provides explorative analyses of regional gray and WM volumes in the cortex, volumes of the subcortical nuclei are more reliably evaluated with MR volumetry. The 2 methods are, thus, complementary. In the present study, they were employed in tandem to investigate whether cerebral gray and WM fractions, as well as the volume of structures previously suggested to be sex dimorphic may differ between MtF-TR, male, and female controls. Three issues were addressed specifically:

Only nonhomosexual, transsexual subjects were included. The rationale was the following; Although there is still an ongoing discussion about the classification of transsexual individuals (Blanchard et al. 1987, 1989; Lawrence 2005; Smith et al. 2005), the general view is that there are 2 fundamentally different types of transsexualism: homosexual and nonhomosexual (Blanchard et al. 1987). Homosexual MtF-TR are erotically attracted to the same biological sex and denoted as “androphilic” MtF-TR in the literature. They differ from those attracted to the opposite biological sex (“gynephillic” MtF-TR) and those who are not sexually attracted to other persons; The 2 latter groups are referred to as autogynephillic by the so called Blanchard’s classification (Blanchard 1989; Smith et al. 2005). Blanchard reported that homosexual transsexuals as usually younger at initial presentation and with more pronounced and frequent childhood femininity (Blanchard 1989). Homosexual transsexuals have also been found to be shorter, lighter, and lighter in proportion to their height, also in relation to men in the general population, whereas nonhomosexual transsexuals have been found to be similar in height as controls (Blanchard et al. 1995).

In a previous study, we found that homosexual healthy men differ in certain aspects of cerebral anatomy and function from heterosexual male controls (Savic et al. 2005; Berglund et al. 2006; Savic and Lindstrom 2008). Considering that homosexuality and transsexuality are two different phenomena with presumably different underlying neurobiology, and positing that MtF-TR would have feminized brain, we deemed it relevant to first investigate only nonhomosexual MtF-TR and avoid possible confounds related to homosexuality.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Twenty-four heterosexual male controls (HeM, age 33 ± 6 years, range 26–48 years), 24 heterosexual female controls (HeW, age 35 ± 6 years, range 32–46 years), and 24 MtF-TR (age 32 ± 7 years, range 21–51 years), were investigated with MRI. Only right-handed (Oldfield 1971), unmedicated, and healthy subjects were included. Exclusion criteria were history of severe systemic disease, any psychiatric (other than gender dysphoria), or neurological disorder, drug abuse including anabolic steroids or psychiatric medication, and use of hormonal contraceptives in women and hormone supplement in MtF-TR. All subjects provided written informed consent and received reimbursement after participation. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board at the Karolinska Institute, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Transsexual subjects were recruited from the Karolinska University Hospital. Diagnostic assessment of gender identity disorder followed the International Classification of Disorders 10th edition A plus criteria for transsexualism (F64.0), American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV 1994, and was made after several semistructured interviews with two mental health professionals (psychologist and psychiatrist) according to the clinical routine at the Karolinska University Hospital. The diagnostic criteria were as follows:

MtF transsexuals were evaluated to be free of psychosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th Edition (DSM–IV; 13) by a specially trained psychiatrist and included a Structured Questionnaire for DSM-IV Axis I and II Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I and II) (American Psychiatric Publishing Inc, Arlington, 1997). Chromosome analysis (karyotyping), clinical examination, and testosterone assessment confirmed that the MtF-TR were genetically and phenotypically males.

Sexual orientation was assessed using the Kinsey Heterosexual/Homosexual scale (0 = exclusively heterosexual, 6 = exclusively homosexual) for the type of sexual contacts, sexual fantasies, and attraction (Kinsey et al. 2003). In addition to scoring themselves on the Kinsey scale (which is based on self-identification), the subjects also participated in interviews regarding 3D of sexual orientation (fantasy, romantic attraction, and sexual behavior) over consecutive 5-year historical time periods, from age 16 to the present (Chung 1996). All decisions about subjects’ sexual orientation were made in ignorance of the subjects’ MR data as described previously (Berglund et al. 2006, 2008; Savic and Lindstrom 2008).

Seventeen of the recruited MtF-TRs conveyed at the time of the scan experienced of only female sexual partners (and rated Kinsey 0–2), the remaining 7 reported that they never had a sexual partner but stated clear attraction to women and not men. The MtF-TR were, thus, nonhomosexual, attracted to women, and will throughout the manuscript be referred to as gynephillic (Smith et al. 2005) (autogynephillic according to Blanchard’s classification). All reported a relatively early (usually at puberty) awareness of gender dysphoria.

None of the subjects had a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders (other than gender dysphoria) or brain injury. Before inclusion, a detailed history was obtained from each subject, including possible use of unregulated hormone supplements and synthetic steroids not prescribed by a physician. All the subjects declared that they had never received hormonal treatment nor were they on any medication at the time of the study. Their statement was deemed reliable and confirmed by repeated tests of hormonal levels, which were significantly lower than those of HeW and not significantly altered compared with the values of HeM (Table 1).

Group S-testosterone, active (nmol/L) S-testosterone total (nmol/L) S-prolactin (mg/L) S-FSH (U/L) S-LH (U/L) S-oestradiol (pmol/L)
MtF-TR 9.3 ± 1.0 15.2 ± 5.7 7.8 ± 2.5 4.3 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 2.1 69 ± 50
HeM 7.8 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 3.2 8.4 ± 5.7 4.4 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 2.3 49 ± 37
HeW 1.0 ± 3.2 2.9 ± 3.8 9.6 ± 3.6 13.6 ± 26.1 10.4 ± 11.8 141 ± 3
Group S-testosterone, active (nmol/L) S-testosterone total (nmol/L) S-prolactin (mg/L) S-FSH (U/L) S-LH (U/L) S-oestradiol (pmol/L)
MtF-TR 9.3 ± 1.0 15.2 ± 5.7 7.8 ± 2.5 4.3 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 2.1 69 ± 50
HeM 7.8 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 3.2 8.4 ± 5.7 4.4 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 2.3 49 ± 37
HeW 1.0 ± 3.2 2.9 ± 3.8 9.6 ± 3.6 13.6 ± 26.1 10.4 ± 11.8 141 ± 3

Note: FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone. Plasma oestradiol level in the transsexual patients ranged between 12 and 120 pmol/L, in HeW between 31 and 382 pmol/L, and in HeM between 4 and 93 pmol/L. Plasma oestradiol was significantly higher and testosterone significantly lower in HeW in relation to both HeM and MtF-TR and HeM (one-way ANOVA with Scheffe’s post hoc test. F = 16–51; P < 0.0001 for all the comparisons). Values are expressed as means and standard deviations. Hormone values were measured with appropriate Coat-A-Count RIA (Diagnostics Product Corporation), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Group S-testosterone, active (nmol/L) S-testosterone total (nmol/L) S-prolactin (mg/L) S-FSH (U/L) S-LH (U/L) S-oestradiol (pmol/L)
MtF-TR 9.3 ± 1.0 15.2 ± 5.7 7.8 ± 2.5 4.3 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 2.1 69 ± 50
HeM 7.8 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 3.2 8.4 ± 5.7 4.4 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 2.3 49 ± 37
HeW 1.0 ± 3.2 2.9 ± 3.8 9.6 ± 3.6 13.6 ± 26.1 10.4 ± 11.8 141 ± 3
Group S-testosterone, active (nmol/L) S-testosterone total (nmol/L) S-prolactin (mg/L) S-FSH (U/L) S-LH (U/L) S-oestradiol (pmol/L)
MtF-TR 9.3 ± 1.0 15.2 ± 5.7 7.8 ± 2.5 4.3 ± 3.1 3.9 ± 2.1 69 ± 50
HeM 7.8 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 3.2 8.4 ± 5.7 4.4 ± 1.9 5.1 ± 2.3 49 ± 37
HeW 1.0 ± 3.2 2.9 ± 3.8 9.6 ± 3.6 13.6 ± 26.1 10.4 ± 11.8 141 ± 3

Note: FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone. Plasma oestradiol level in the transsexual patients ranged between 12 and 120 pmol/L, in HeW between 31 and 382 pmol/L, and in HeM between 4 and 93 pmol/L. Plasma oestradiol was significantly higher and testosterone significantly lower in HeW in relation to both HeM and MtF-TR and HeM (one-way ANOVA with Scheffe’s post hoc test. F = 16–51; P < 0.0001 for all the comparisons). Values are expressed as means and standard deviations. Hormone values were measured with appropriate Coat-A-Count RIA (Diagnostics Product Corporation), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

The 3 groups were matched for educational level (number of school years) (14 ± 2 years HeM, 15 ± 3 years HeW, and 15 ± 2 years MtF-TR).

MR Acquisition

Structural images were acquired on a GE 1.5-T Sigma 5.X scanner (General Electric), including 3D-weighted _T_1 Spoiled GRASS sequence (SPGR) images with 1-mm sections as described previously (Ciumas and Savic 2006). Briefly, the MRI protocol consisted of axial _T_2-weighted fast spin echo images (effective time echo [TE] = 56 ms, time repetition [TR] = 2500 ms, field of view [FOV] = 24 cm, 23 slices of 3-mm thickness), and axial _T_1-weighted 3D spoiled GRASS images (SPGR, TE = 7 ms, TR = 23 ms, FOV = 24 cm, flip angle = 50°, 124–156 slice partitions of 1-mm thickness, 2 NEX).

Voxel-Based Morphometry

Voxel-based morphometry (Ashburner 2007) was performed using the Gaser toolbox (http://dbm.neuro.uni-jena.de/vbm/) with SPM 5 (The Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) and Matlab 7.3 (Math Works). The VBM preprocessing included 5 steps:

Delineation of Volumes of Interest

Homologous volumes of interest (VOIs) were delineated manually in the hippocampus, caudate, and putamen—regions, which in previous studies have been suggested to be sexually dimorphic. Furthermore, the thalamus volume was delineated post hoc to the VBM analysis because it showed a significant group difference in this region (see Results). The set of VOIs also included the right and left cerebral hemisphere to allow evaluation of possible hemispheric asymmetries.

All the volumes were delineated on original, unreformatted _T_1 images using MRIcro software (www.sph.sc.edu/comd/rorden/mricro.html) by 2 investigators, who were uninformed about the identity of the subjects, their sex, and their sexual identity. Values presented in Results and Table 2 were generated by investigator 1, who analyzed all the data (investigator 2 analyzed structural volumes from 15 randomized subjects in each study group). VOIs were outlined according to previously described protocols (Ciumas and Savic 2006; Helms et al. 2006; Savic and Lindstrom 2008).

Table 2

Structural volumes

Region Female controls, N = 24 Male controls, N = 24 MTF transsexuals, N = 23
R Caudate 4.2 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6
L Caudate 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.6
R Putamen 4.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6a
L Putamen 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.6b
R Hippocampus 3.1 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.6c
L Hippocampus 3.2 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.6d
R Thalamus 6.6 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.9 6.9 ± 0.8e
L Thalamus 6.4 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 0.8 6.5 ± 0.7f
Total tissue volume 1201 ± 89g 1384 ± 101 1335 ± 122
Total brain volume 1425 ± 146g 1657 ± 123 1654 ± 165
Total GM volume 675 ± 44g 785 ± 61 780 ± 44
Total WM volume 442 ± 45g 520 ± 46 506 ± 72
Right hemisphere 557 ± 36g 621 ± 33 598 ± 33
Left hemisphere 558 ± 35g 613 ± 38 592 ± 33
Region Female controls, N = 24 Male controls, N = 24 MTF transsexuals, N = 23
R Caudate 4.2 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6
L Caudate 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.6
R Putamen 4.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6a
L Putamen 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.6b
R Hippocampus 3.1 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.6c
L Hippocampus 3.2 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.6d
R Thalamus 6.6 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.9 6.9 ± 0.8e
L Thalamus 6.4 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 0.8 6.5 ± 0.7f
Total tissue volume 1201 ± 89g 1384 ± 101 1335 ± 122
Total brain volume 1425 ± 146g 1657 ± 123 1654 ± 165
Total GM volume 675 ± 44g 785 ± 61 780 ± 44
Total WM volume 442 ± 45g 520 ± 46 506 ± 72
Right hemisphere 557 ± 36g 621 ± 33 598 ± 33
Left hemisphere 558 ± 35g 613 ± 38 592 ± 33

Note: Structural volumes in the respective subject group. Numbers express cm3 (mean and standard deviation). Significance levels for the caudate, putamen, hippocampus, and thalamus are calculated on the basis of VOI/total brain tissue ratios. a–h indicate group difference.

a

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.03 and HeW P = 0.006.

b

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.003 and HeW P = 0.02.

c

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeW, P = 0.002.

d

Higher in HeW in relation to MtF-TR P < 0.0001 and HeM P = 0.0006.

e

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.016 and to HeW P = 0.04.

f

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.03 and to HeW P = 0.013.

g

Lower in HeW in relation to both HeM and MtF-TR, P < 0.0001.

Table 2

Structural volumes

Region Female controls, N = 24 Male controls, N = 24 MTF transsexuals, N = 23
R Caudate 4.2 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6
L Caudate 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.6
R Putamen 4.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6a
L Putamen 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.6b
R Hippocampus 3.1 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.6c
L Hippocampus 3.2 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.6d
R Thalamus 6.6 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.9 6.9 ± 0.8e
L Thalamus 6.4 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 0.8 6.5 ± 0.7f
Total tissue volume 1201 ± 89g 1384 ± 101 1335 ± 122
Total brain volume 1425 ± 146g 1657 ± 123 1654 ± 165
Total GM volume 675 ± 44g 785 ± 61 780 ± 44
Total WM volume 442 ± 45g 520 ± 46 506 ± 72
Right hemisphere 557 ± 36g 621 ± 33 598 ± 33
Left hemisphere 558 ± 35g 613 ± 38 592 ± 33
Region Female controls, N = 24 Male controls, N = 24 MTF transsexuals, N = 23
R Caudate 4.2 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6
L Caudate 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.6 4.8 ± 0.6
R Putamen 4.4 ± 0.4 5.0 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6a
L Putamen 4.3 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.6b
R Hippocampus 3.1 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.6c
L Hippocampus 3.2 ± 0.4 3.2 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.6d
R Thalamus 6.6 ± 0.7 7.6 ± 0.9 6.9 ± 0.8e
L Thalamus 6.4 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 0.8 6.5 ± 0.7f
Total tissue volume 1201 ± 89g 1384 ± 101 1335 ± 122
Total brain volume 1425 ± 146g 1657 ± 123 1654 ± 165
Total GM volume 675 ± 44g 785 ± 61 780 ± 44
Total WM volume 442 ± 45g 520 ± 46 506 ± 72
Right hemisphere 557 ± 36g 621 ± 33 598 ± 33
Left hemisphere 558 ± 35g 613 ± 38 592 ± 33

Note: Structural volumes in the respective subject group. Numbers express cm3 (mean and standard deviation). Significance levels for the caudate, putamen, hippocampus, and thalamus are calculated on the basis of VOI/total brain tissue ratios. a–h indicate group difference.

a

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.03 and HeW P = 0.006.

b

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.003 and HeW P = 0.02.

c

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeW, P = 0.002.

d

Higher in HeW in relation to MtF-TR P < 0.0001 and HeM P = 0.0006.

e

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.016 and to HeW P = 0.04.

f

Lower in MtF-TR in relation to HeM P = 0.03 and to HeW P = 0.013.

g

Lower in HeW in relation to both HeM and MtF-TR, P < 0.0001.

The Hippocampus

In summary, the hippocampus was traced according to the protocol of Watson et al. (1992). The posterior boundary of the hippocampus was defined as the first image in which the crus of the fornix became visible. The superior boundary consisted of the alveus; the lateral boundary was the inferior corn of the lateral ventricle; the ambient cistern was the medial boundary, whereas the WM of the parahippocampal gyrus represented the inferior boundary. The hippocampus VOI included the tail of the hippocampus.

The Caudate Nucleus

The caudate nuclei were traced separately according to Raz et al. (2005). The lateral ventricle was used as the medial boundary; the subcallosal fasciculus served as the anterior boundary, the stria terminalis was the posterior boundary (identified by a change in signal intensity relative to the caudate nucleus), and the anterior limb of the internal capsule served as the lateral boundary. The region of interest included the head, the body of the caudate, and the tail (excluding the portion that turned anterior). The nucleus accumbens was excluded as well.

The Putamen

The delineation of the putamen started in the first slice where it became visible laterally to the caudate. The superior boundary was defined by the corona radiata, the internal capsule was the medial border, and the lateral border was the external capsule. The posterior limit was the point at which the putamen was no longer visible in the corona radiata. The lower limit was just above the amygdala, excluding nucleus accumbens, when the operator could see the most inferior aspect of the third ventricle, and the chiasmatic cistern was no longer visible.

The Thalamus

The 2 thalami were disconnected between the 2 smallest cross-sections through the massa intermedia in the sagittal plane. The thalamus volumes included the centromedian, ventral anterior, ventral lateral, ventral posterior, lateral posterior, lateral dorsal, and medial dorsal nuclei, the pulvinar and the anterior nuclear group, the midline nuclei, the intralaminar, centrolateral, and the reticular nucleus. The borders of the thalamus were determined by anatomical landmarks as described by Kretschmann and Weinrich (1995) and using the Duvernoy atlas. The anterior border was defined at the level of the anterior end of the third ventricle and the interthalamic adhesion. The inferior margin was defined as the superior border of the midbrain structures, and the medial margin was the wall of the third ventricle and the interthalamic adhesion. The lateral margin of the thalamus was defined as the medial border of the posterior limb of the internal capsule, and the superior margin as the body of the lateral ventricle. The posterior border was demarcated as the section showing the fornices in their entire width in the coronal plane. The medial and lateral geniculate bodies were excluded.

The cerebral hemispheres were delineated on every second coronal slice of the individual MR images. The same coronal section was displayed in parallel windows to avoid overlapping demarcation. Cerebral hemispheres were divided at the midline in the coronal plane by a hand-drawn line connecting the measured midpoint of the corpus callosum with the midpoint of the hypothalamus, third ventricle, and cerebral aqueduct (Savic and Lindstrom 2008). The respective VOI included ventricles and ended in the caudal direction at the level of the superior colliculum, as described previously. Thus, the subcortical regions, brainstem, and cerebellum were separated from the remaining brain and not included.

The hippocampus was delineated on coronal images, the other structures on horizontal sections. All the volumes were then viewed and corrected on coronal, horizontal as well as sagital images.

Venous blood samples were collected in the morning to assess plasma levels of sex hormones (Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics at the Karolinska University Hospital).

Statistical Analysis

Age and education difference, as well as difference in the total intracranial volume (TIV), calculated as (GM + WM + CSF), and the total tissue volume (GM + WM) was tested with one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), using group as the factor of variance (P < 0.05). One way ANOVA was also employed for group comparisons in total GM and WM volumes but using the intracranial volume as covariate.

VBM

Group differences in regional GM and WM volume were tested with flexible factorial design in SPM5 (voxel threshold P < 0.001, minimum cluster size 0.4 cm3) using age and the total GM volume or total WM volume, as a covariate of no interest (the latter to adjust for individual age differences and potential sex dimorphism in the whole GM and WM volume, respectively). The coordinates are reported in MNI space.

Structural Volumes

Group differences in brain tissue volume (sum of total GM and WM) and total brain volumes (sum of GM, WM, and CSF) were tested with separate one-way ANOVAs using group as the factor of variance and Fischer’s post hoc test (P < 0.05). The mean relative values of the 2 homologous VOIs for each type of structure were employed as input function for evaluations of possible group differences in relative structural volumes (VOI/brain ratios) (separate one way ANOVAs with group as the between factor and age as covariate; P < 0.0125, after Bonferroni correction for the 4 separate regions).

Asymmetry in hemispheric volumes and in the homologous volumes of the hippocampus, caudate, putamen, and thalamus was first tested in each group with paired t tests (P < 0.01 because of the Bonferroni correction for the 5 investigated regions). Possible group differences in asymmetry indices (right/left hemisphere, right/left structural volume) were then evaluated using one-way ANOVA (P < 0.01 with Bonferroni correction for the 5 comparisons), and Fisher’s post hoc test (P < 0.05). The interrater variability was calculated using simple regression (Pearson’s coefficient)

Results

The groups did not differ in age or education, and no significant difference was detected between HeM and MtF-TR in sex hormone levels (Table 1). No gross anatomical abnormalities were found as judged by an experienced neuroradiologist. One subject (MtF-TR) was excluded because of movement artifacts during the scan. After the segmentation and normalization, no outlier was found when checking for homogeneity, and no further subjects had to be excluded from the analysis.

Group difference was found in the total brain tissue volume (degrees of freedom [df] = 2, F = 17.8, P < 0.0001, one way ANOVA), which was smaller in HeW compared than in HeM and MtF-TR (P < 0.0001, Fischer’s post hoc test); no difference was found between HeM and MtF-TR (P = 0.726, Table 2). HeW had also smaller TIV compared with the 2 male groups (df = 2, F = 3.7, P = 0.029, Table 2), whereas no group difference was found in the total GM or total WM volume, when using TIV as covariate (df = 2, F = 1.5, P = 0.24, and df = 2, F = 1.5, P = 0.23, respectively, Table 2).

Voxel-Based Morphometry

Differences between HeM and HeW were found in several regions (Table 3, Fig. 1). The GM volume in the lingual gyrus, the cerebellum, right putamen, and left amygdala and perirhinal cortex was larger in HeM. HeW, on the other hand, showed larger GM and WM volumes in the precentral gyrus.

Table 3

Group differences in GM and WM volumes

GM volume WM volume
Region Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates
Male controls—female controls
L amygdala + enthorhinal cortex 4.7 1.4 −17, −2, −21
R putamen 4.0 3.2 29, −2, −2
R lingual gyrus 4.0 2.4 11, −63, −9
Cerebellum 5.1 4.8 27, −90, −22
R superior temporal gyrus 3.8 0.8 47, −42, 16
Female controls—male controls
Precentral gyrus 4.2 0.8 6, −8, 48 5.1, 4.7 8.8, 6.3 −30, 0, 29; 29, −8, 45
Subcallosum (BA 24, 32) 3.9 3.6 −16, 22, −18
R middle frontal gyrus 4.1 2.2 46, 38, 17
MTF transsexuals—male controls
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.4 3.1 49, −40, 18
R insular cortex + parts of inferior frontal gyrus 5.8 3.4 39, 15, −16
Male controls—MTF transsexuals
Thalamusb 4.3 1.9 13, −28, 5
R frontal WM 4.2 4.5 13, 45, 32
MTF transsexuals—females
R insular cortex + inferior frontal gyrus 5.5 2.5 41, 16, −12
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.2 3.0 52, −33, 16
Lingual gyrus 5.1 2.5 10, −89, −22
Cerebellum 4.6 1.4 −30, −90, −24
Females—MTF transsexuals
Thalamus 5.6 2.7 −1, −13, 5
Pre and postcentral gyrus 3.9 1.4 −39, −20, 44
Precentral gyrus 4.1 1.4 −4, −11, 49
Frontal WM (precentral gyrus) 4.3 3.3 29, −2, 30
GM volume WM volume
Region Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates
Male controls—female controls
L amygdala + enthorhinal cortex 4.7 1.4 −17, −2, −21
R putamen 4.0 3.2 29, −2, −2
R lingual gyrus 4.0 2.4 11, −63, −9
Cerebellum 5.1 4.8 27, −90, −22
R superior temporal gyrus 3.8 0.8 47, −42, 16
Female controls—male controls
Precentral gyrus 4.2 0.8 6, −8, 48 5.1, 4.7 8.8, 6.3 −30, 0, 29; 29, −8, 45
Subcallosum (BA 24, 32) 3.9 3.6 −16, 22, −18
R middle frontal gyrus 4.1 2.2 46, 38, 17
MTF transsexuals—male controls
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.4 3.1 49, −40, 18
R insular cortex + parts of inferior frontal gyrus 5.8 3.4 39, 15, −16
Male controls—MTF transsexuals
Thalamusb 4.3 1.9 13, −28, 5
R frontal WM 4.2 4.5 13, 45, 32
MTF transsexuals—females
R insular cortex + inferior frontal gyrus 5.5 2.5 41, 16, −12
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.2 3.0 52, −33, 16
Lingual gyrus 5.1 2.5 10, −89, −22
Cerebellum 4.6 1.4 −30, −90, −24
Females—MTF transsexuals
Thalamus 5.6 2.7 −1, −13, 5
Pre and postcentral gyrus 3.9 1.4 −39, −20, 44
Precentral gyrus 4.1 1.4 −4, −11, 49
Frontal WM (precentral gyrus) 4.3 3.3 29, −2, 30

Note: Values calculated using height threshold at P = 0.001, minimum cluster size 100 voxels (0.4 cc), corrected P < 0.05. Values in italics are calculated at P = 0.001, corrected P < 0.1, and illustrate trend values. MNI coordinates indicate the peak value and the indicated regions coverage of the respective cluster. R, right; L, left.

a

Covers posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus, the angular gyrus, and a portion of the inferior parietal cortex.

b

Covers parts of the L caudate.

Table 3

Group differences in GM and WM volumes

GM volume WM volume
Region Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates
Male controls—female controls
L amygdala + enthorhinal cortex 4.7 1.4 −17, −2, −21
R putamen 4.0 3.2 29, −2, −2
R lingual gyrus 4.0 2.4 11, −63, −9
Cerebellum 5.1 4.8 27, −90, −22
R superior temporal gyrus 3.8 0.8 47, −42, 16
Female controls—male controls
Precentral gyrus 4.2 0.8 6, −8, 48 5.1, 4.7 8.8, 6.3 −30, 0, 29; 29, −8, 45
Subcallosum (BA 24, 32) 3.9 3.6 −16, 22, −18
R middle frontal gyrus 4.1 2.2 46, 38, 17
MTF transsexuals—male controls
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.4 3.1 49, −40, 18
R insular cortex + parts of inferior frontal gyrus 5.8 3.4 39, 15, −16
Male controls—MTF transsexuals
Thalamusb 4.3 1.9 13, −28, 5
R frontal WM 4.2 4.5 13, 45, 32
MTF transsexuals—females
R insular cortex + inferior frontal gyrus 5.5 2.5 41, 16, −12
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.2 3.0 52, −33, 16
Lingual gyrus 5.1 2.5 10, −89, −22
Cerebellum 4.6 1.4 −30, −90, −24
Females—MTF transsexuals
Thalamus 5.6 2.7 −1, −13, 5
Pre and postcentral gyrus 3.9 1.4 −39, −20, 44
Precentral gyrus 4.1 1.4 −4, −11, 49
Frontal WM (precentral gyrus) 4.3 3.3 29, −2, 30
GM volume WM volume
Region Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates Z level Size, cm3 Coordinates
Male controls—female controls
L amygdala + enthorhinal cortex 4.7 1.4 −17, −2, −21
R putamen 4.0 3.2 29, −2, −2
R lingual gyrus 4.0 2.4 11, −63, −9
Cerebellum 5.1 4.8 27, −90, −22
R superior temporal gyrus 3.8 0.8 47, −42, 16
Female controls—male controls
Precentral gyrus 4.2 0.8 6, −8, 48 5.1, 4.7 8.8, 6.3 −30, 0, 29; 29, −8, 45
Subcallosum (BA 24, 32) 3.9 3.6 −16, 22, −18
R middle frontal gyrus 4.1 2.2 46, 38, 17
MTF transsexuals—male controls
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.4 3.1 49, −40, 18
R insular cortex + parts of inferior frontal gyrus 5.8 3.4 39, 15, −16
Male controls—MTF transsexuals
Thalamusb 4.3 1.9 13, −28, 5
R frontal WM 4.2 4.5 13, 45, 32
MTF transsexuals—females
R insular cortex + inferior frontal gyrus 5.5 2.5 41, 16, −12
R superior temporal gyrus + angular gyrusa 5.2 3.0 52, −33, 16
Lingual gyrus 5.1 2.5 10, −89, −22
Cerebellum 4.6 1.4 −30, −90, −24
Females—MTF transsexuals
Thalamus 5.6 2.7 −1, −13, 5
Pre and postcentral gyrus 3.9 1.4 −39, −20, 44
Precentral gyrus 4.1 1.4 −4, −11, 49
Frontal WM (precentral gyrus) 4.3 3.3 29, −2, 30

Note: Values calculated using height threshold at P = 0.001, minimum cluster size 100 voxels (0.4 cc), corrected P < 0.05. Values in italics are calculated at P = 0.001, corrected P < 0.1, and illustrate trend values. MNI coordinates indicate the peak value and the indicated regions coverage of the respective cluster. R, right; L, left.

a

Covers posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus, the angular gyrus, and a portion of the inferior parietal cortex.

b

Covers parts of the L caudate.

Group differences in regional GM volume. Colored clusters were calculated from the following group comparisons: (A) HeW-HeM (left), HeM-HeW (right). (B) MtF-TR-HeW (left), HeW-MtF-TR (right). (C) MtF-TR—HeM (left), HeM-MtF-TR (right). Contrast calculated at T corresponding to P = 0.001 at pixel level, P < 0.05 corrected, minimum cluster size 0.4 cm3. Clusters are superimposed on the standard brain, SPM5. The scale is arbitrary showing T-values between 0 and 6.5. The lines indicate the 3 regions in which the gray matter fraction differed between transsexuals and controls. Notably, these regions were similar independently of whether the controls were men or women.

Figure 1.

Group differences in regional GM volume. Colored clusters were calculated from the following group comparisons: (A) HeW-HeM (left), HeM-HeW (right). (B) MtF-TR-HeW (left), HeW-MtF-TR (right). (C) MtF-TR—HeM (left), HeM-MtF-TR (right). Contrast calculated at T corresponding to P = 0.001 at pixel level, P < 0.05 corrected, minimum cluster size 0.4 cm3. Clusters are superimposed on the standard brain, SPM5. The scale is arbitrary showing _T_-values between 0 and 6.5. The lines indicate the 3 regions in which the gray matter fraction differed between transsexuals and controls. Notably, these regions were similar independently of whether the controls were men or women.

None of these differences were reproduced when comparing HeM with MtF-TR. Differences between MtF-TR and controls were found, instead, in several other regions (Table 3, Fig. 1) and in relation to both HeM and HeW. They were constituted by increases in GM volume in MtF-TR in the right temporo-parietal junction (around the angular gyrus and in the posterior portion of the superior temporal gurus), the right inferior frontal and insular cortex, and decreases in GM volumes in the thalamus. Post hoc recalculation with false discovery rate (P < 0.05) did not change the results.

Structural Volumetry

Differences in regional structural volumes were detected in the:

No group difference was detected in the caudate volume (df = 2, F = 1.97, P = 0.14). Table 2 shows values from both sides to illustrate possible effect of side on the overall comparisons.

Interrater reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.96 (0.76 for the hippocampus, 0.89 the thalamus, 0.95 the cerebral hemispheres, and 0.96 the caudate and putamen).

Structural Asymmetries

A significant rightward asymmetry was detected in the hemispheric volume in both HeM (P = 0.002) and MtF-TR (P = 0.006), whereas the 2 hemispheres were symmetrical in HeW (P = 0.701) (Table 2). This difference was significant ([df = 2, F = 4.8, P = 0.0016, one way ANOVA], P = 0.006 for the comparison between HeM and HeW, and P = 0.008 for the comparison between MtF-TR and HeW, Fischer’s post hoc test). Rightward asymmetries were detected in HeM and MtF-TR but not in HeW also in the thalamus (P = 0.008 for HeM and P = 0.010 for MtF-TR; P = 0.160 for HeW) and in HeM in the hippocampus (P = 0.010; the corresponding P value for MtF-TR was 0.065 and for HeW 0.470). Whereas the asymmetry index (right/left side) for the hippocampus differed significantly between the groups (df = 2, F = 6.6, P = 0.002; P = 0.001 for HeW vs. HeM and P = 0.009 for HeW vs. MtF TR, Fischer’s post hoc test), no significant group difference was detected in the thalamus index (df = 2, F = 1.04, P = 0.35) (Table 2). None of the groups showed asymmetry in the caudate or putamen.

Discussion

Tentative sex dimorphic features were investigated in a group of healthy MtF-TR in relation to age and education matched right-handed heterosexual male and female controls. Contrary to the primary hypothesis, no sex-atypical features with signs of “feminization” were detected in the transsexual group. Instead, we found significant volume reductions of the thalamus and putamen in MtF-TR and significant increases in GM volumes in an area covering the right angular gyrus and posterior portion of the superior temporal gyrus and in the right insular and inferior frontal cortex.

The volumetry measures primarily included structures previously reported to be sexually dimorphic (Filipek et al. 1994; Raz et al. 1995, 2001, 2004, 2005; Giedd et al. 1997; Neufang et al. 2009). In addition, we investigated the thalamus volume post hoc to the VBM analysis and the putamen volumetry due to the recent finding of GM volume increase in MtF-TR in this region (Luders, Sanchez, et al. 2009). Although sex differences have been described also in the amygdala and cingulate gyrus, these structures were not included in the analysis because the identification of anatomical landmarks in these regions is less reliable, especially when using a 1.5-T scanner.

The presently observed sex differences in controls are congruent with those described in several previous publications. The VBM findings adhere with Good et al. (2001) and Luders et al. (2005), who detected greater relative amounts of GM (volume and concentration, respectively) in the prefrontal gyri and in the inferior frontal cortex in female brains (the latter increase was in the present study detected only at P < 0.1 corrected). They are also compatible with Good et al. (2001) and Chen et al. (2007), who reported that men have a larger GM volume in the inferior and mesial temporal cortex, the cerebellum, and the right occipital and lingual gyri. Congruent with previous reports is also the present finding of a significantly elevated hippocampus volume in HeW (Filipek et al. 1994; Murphy et al. 1996; Giedd et al. 1997, 2006). Finally, in accordance with our earlier observations (Savic and Lindstrom 2008), the hemispheric volumes were symmetrical in HeW but not HeM (Table 2). This agreement with several earlier observations of sex dimorphism in male and female controls adds validity to the present findings in MtF-TR even when considering that the sample size was relatively low. These findings argue against a sex atypical dimorphism in MtF-TR, at least in those who are not androphillic.

VBM data from MtF-TR has previously been published only by Luders, Sanchez, et al. (2009), who did not find any clear signs of cerebral feminization either. They detected, however, an elevated GM volume in the right putamen in MtF-TR in relation to both female and male controls. Our study converges on their findings only when carrying out small volume correction (z = 2.7, size 0.3 cc, MNI coordinate −25, 0, −1, P = 0.037 for MtF-TR vs. HeM; z = 3.3, size 0.5 cc, MNI coordinate −20, −1, 0, P = 0.037 for MtF-TR vs. HeW). However, we also investigated putamen’s structural volume and found that it was significantly reduced in MtF-TR in relation to both HeM and HeW, which supports the hypothesis that gender dysphoria may be associated with changes in this structure.

MR volumetry outside the hypothalamus has, to the best of our knowledge, hitherto not been reported in transsexuals, and the presently observed reductions of the thalamus and putamen volumes in MtF-TR have no precedents. Neither have increases of GM volumes in the temporoparietal junction, and the insular and inferior frontal cortex been described earlier. These findings need further validation with larger samples, and their origin is currently unknown. Any interpretation must, therefore, proceed cautiously and can at this point only be highly speculative.

The principal feature of gender dysphoria is a strong and persistent identification with the opposite sex and a strong discomfort with one’s birth sex, often with a feeling of being trapped in the wrong body (Becker and Mester 1996). There is no evidence that this feeling is caused by a general sensory deficit in transsexual persons. Own body and self-perception is, according to current literature, related to both sensory and cognitive processes (Northoff et al. 2006). Sensory processes include perception of physical stimuli from one’s own body, which depends on sensory and motor feedback mechanisms by means of which the consequences of the movements/actions are related to the own person (Gallagher and Frith 2003). The cognitive component of own body perception encompasses propositional knowledge about one’s self and incorporates episodic and autobiographical memories (Rekkas and Constable 2005). Several studies propose that own body perception involves networks in the temporo-parietal, inferior parietal cortex, the inferior frontal, and insular cortex (Blanke et al. 2002, 2004; Adamovich et al. 2009; Hodzic et al. 2009), and their connections with the putamen and thalamus (Leichnetz 2001). Thus, theoretically, the experience of dissociation of the self from the body may be a result of failure to integrate complex somatosensory and memory processes executed by these networks. Such disintegration accords with the present findings and could, perhaps, explain recent observation of poorer parietal cortex activation during a spatial orientation task in MtF-TR compared with male controls (Carillo et al. 2010). However, it is difficult to explain how such disintergration can be linked to a dysphoria restricted to the own body’s sex characteristics. Moreover, even if a link exists, it is uncertain whether the here observed morphometric features in transsexual patients underpin their gender identity or are a consequence of being transsexual. One highly speculative thought is that the enlargement of the GM volume in the insular and inferior frontal cortex and the superior temporal-angular gyrus could derive from a constant rumination about the own body. Brain tissue enlargement has been detected in response to training, and GM enlargement of the insular cortex has been reported in response to meditation, which involves mental focusing on the own body (Holzel et al. 2008; Luders, Toga, et al. 2009; Vestergaard-Poulsen et al. 2009). Alternatively, entirely other variables may be independently affecting both the expression of a transsexual identity and the neuroanatomy in transsexuals leading to the observed association between both. Of note is also that regional GM and WM is a composite measure of different microunits, such as neuronal bodies, dendrites, synapses, axons, myelin, glia cells, and others, and an enlargement or reduction of GM volume cannot be directly translated to function. It should be emphasized that the present data, being focused on extra hypothalamic structures, do not disapprove previous reports about sex-atypical hypothalamic dimorphism in transsexuals (Swaab et al. 1992; Zhou et al. 1995). Furthermore, they were generated exclusively from investigations of nonhomosexual, gynephillic MtF-TR. The issue of possible cerebral difference between gynephillic and androphillic (homosexual) MtF-TR and also between androphillic MtF-TR and homosexual healthy men is of special interest and needs to be addressed separately in future studies. Additional studies of the relationship between brain structure and function in transsexual persons and also extending the material to female to male transsexuals are necessary to more precisely interpret the present observations.

Methodological Strengths and Limitations

A few methodological aspects deserve a comment. First of all, one may argue that our limited sample size could hamper reliable detection of group differences. However, as already mentioned, differences were found between HeM and HeW in regions previously reported to be sexually dimorphic, and similar differences were also detected between MtF-TR and HeW but not between MtF-TR and HeM. Consequently, it is difficult to disregard the present findings simply on the basis of group size. Another potential methodological concern is difference in brain size. Because of their larger brains, the outer brain limits in men are farther away from the center of the coil in the MR scanner and, therefore, could be located in less homogenous parts of the field. As a consequence, sex differences in GM volumes in the most peripheral parts from the center of the brain (frontal pole, pre- and postcentral gyrus, occipital pole) could be a potential confound. This in turn could result in lower signal intensity in these locations leading to regionally decreased GM in male subjects. While our findings of lower GM volume in the precentral gyrus in men could be in agreement with this assumption they are incompatible with the enlarged GM volume in the lingual gyrus in men and the fact that other structures located far from the center of the coil, such as the frontal pole, did not show a lower GM volume in HeM or MtF-TR. Furthermore, when comparing GM between females and males of matched brain size larger regional GM volumes were still demonstrated in females (Luders, Gaser, et al. 2009). Also of note is that the whole brain volume did not differ between MtF-TR and HeM in the present study.

The differences observed in our age-matched samples of adults might not be reproduced in older subjects.

MR volumetry was applied as a complement to VBM because of its higher sensitivity to detect regional changes. VBM, on the other hand, allowed explorative analyses, and by using the 2 methods in tandem, it was possible to extend previous information about brain and gender dysphoria by adding data from several cortical and subcortical regions outside the hypothalamus. That the present set of VOIs was reliably delineated is suggested by the high interrater reliability, and the congruence between the present and previously reported volume measures.

While changes in the thalamus were detected with both VBM and structural volumetry, they were found in the putamen only with the latter approach. A similar disparity has been described earlier (Ciumas and Savic 2006) and is not surprising, as the 2 methods may show different results in regions with well-defined structural landmarks but a poor gray-WM contrast. In such regions, volumetric measures are usually more reliable.

Finally, we would like to emphasize that at variance to previous reports, the investigated study groups were homogenous with respect to sexual orientation. This is essential considering that structural differences have been detected between homo and heterosexual persons (Savic and Lindstrom 2008). Also, the testosterone and estrogen levels were tested at the time of the scan in each patient and showed that levels in MtF-TR were significantly lower than those in women but not different from male controls (Table 1), making it improbable that the transsexual subjects were using estrogen substitution (although this could not be explicitly excluded separately for each individual due to the inherently high variability of plasma estrogen).

Conclusions

The present study does not support the dogma that MtF-TR have atypical sex dimorphism in the brain but confirms the previously reported sex differences in structural volumes, gray, and WM fractions. The observed differences between MtF-TR and controls raise the question as to whether gender dysphoria may be associated with changes in multiple structures and involve a network (rather than a single nodal area).

VINNOVA, Swedish Research Council, and Center for Gender Medicine at Karolinska Institute are acknowledged for financial support. We are indepted to Dr Carolina Ciumas, Alexander Berglund, and Claudija Espino for drawing of regions and Elodie André for some technical assistance. Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

A virtual reality-based system integrated with fmri to study neural mechanisms of action observation-execution: a proof of concept study

,

Restor Neurol Neurosci

,

2009

, vol.

27

(pg.

209

-

223

)

A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm

,

Neuroimage

,

2007

, vol.

38

(pg.

95

-

113

)

Further insights into transsexualism

,

Psychopathology

,

1996

, vol.

29

(pg.

1

-

6

)

A common polymorphism of the SRD5A2 gene and transsexualism

,

Reprod Sci

,

2007

, vol.

14

(pg.

705

-

709

)

Male-to-female transsexuals show sex-atypical hypothalamus activation when smelling odorous steroids

,

Cereb Cortex

,

2008

, vol.

18

(pg.

1900

-

1908

)

Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women

,

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

,

2006

, vol.

103

(pg.

8269

-

8274

)

The classification and labeling of nonhomosexual gender dysphorias

,

Arch Sex Behav

,

1989

, vol.

18

(pg.

315

-

334

)

Varieties of autogynephilia and their relationship to gender dysphoria

,

Arch Sex Behav

,

1993

, vol.

22

(pg.

241

-

251

)

Heterosexual and homosexual gender dysphoria

,

Arch Sex Behav

,

1987

, vol.

16

(pg.

139

-

152

)

Comparison of height and weight in homosexual versus nonhomosexual male gender dysphorics

,

Arch Sex Behav

,

1995

, vol.

24

(pg.

543

-

554

)

Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin

,

Brain

,

2004

, vol.

127

(pg.

243

-

258

)

Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions

,

Nature

,

2002

, vol.

419

(pg.

269

-

270

)

Cortical activation during mental rotation in male-to-female and female-to-male transsexuals under hormonal treatment

,

Psychoneuroendocrinology

,

2010

, vol.

35

8

(pg.

1213

-

1222

)

Cerebral cortex: an MRI-based study of volume and variance with age and sex

,

J Clin Neurosci

,

2006

, vol.

13

(pg.

60

-

72

)

Sex differences in regional gray matter in healthy individuals aged 44–48 years: a voxel-based morphometric study

,

Neuroimage

,

2007

, vol.

36

(pg.

691

-

699

)

Assessment of sexual orientation in lesbian/gay/bisexual studies

,

J Homosex

,

1996

, vol.

30

(pg.

49

-

62

)

Structural changes in patients with primary generalized tonic and clonic seizures

,

Neurology

,

2006

, vol.

67

(pg.

683

-

686

)

Transsexualism: a review of etiology, diagnosis and treatment

,

J Psychosom Res

,

1999

, vol.

46

(pg.

315

-

333

)

The young adult human brain: an MRI-based morphometric analysis

,

Cereb Cortex

,

1994

, vol.

4

(pg.

344

-

360

)

Functional imaging of “theory of mind”

,

Trends Cogn Sci

,

2003

, vol.

7

(pg.

77

-

83

)

A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: relationship to gender identity

,

Brain

,

2008

, vol.

131

(pg.

3132

-

3146

)

Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain

,

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

,

1997

, vol.

21

(pg.

1185

-

1201

)

et al.

Puberty-related influences on brain development

,

Mol Cell Endocrinol

,

2006

, vol.

254–255

(pg.

154

-

162

)

Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging

,

Cereb Cortex

,

2001

, vol.

11

(pg.

490

-

497

)

Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains

,

Neuroimage

,

2001

, vol.

14

(pg.

685

-

700

)

The disparate maternal aunt-uncle ratio in male transsexuals: an explanation invoking genomic imprinting

,

J Theor Biol

,

2000

, vol.

202

(pg.

55

-

63

)

Increased thalamus levels of glutamate and glutamine (Glx) in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy

,

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

,

2006

, vol.

77

(pg.

489

-

494

)

Distinct cortical networks for the detection and identification of human body

,

Neuroimage

,

2009

, vol.

45

(pg.

1264

-

1271

)

Investigation of mindfulness meditation practitioners with voxel-based morphometry

,

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci

,

2008

, vol.

3

(pg.

55

-

61

)

Sexual behavior in the human male

,

Am J Public Health

,

2003

, vol.

93

(pg.

894

-

898

)

Gender and age effects in structural brain asymmetry as measured by MRI texture analysis

,

Neuroimage

,

2003

, vol.

19

(pg.

895

-

905

)

Comprehensive and specialty practice-related education in preclinical teaching exemplified by neuroanatomy

,

Med Klin (Munich)

,

1995

, vol.

90

(pg.

166

-

169

)

Male-to-female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus

,

J Clin Endocrinol Metab

,

2000

, vol.

85

(pg.

2034

-

2041

)

Sexuality before and after male-to-female sex reassignment surgery

,

Arch Sex Behav

,

2005

, vol.

34

(pg.

147

-

166

)

Connections of the medial posterior parietal cortex (area 7m) in the monkey

,

Anat Rec

,

2001

, vol.

263

(pg.

215

-

236

)

Why sex matters: brain size independent differences in gray matter distributions between men and women

,

J Neurosci

,

2009

, vol.

29

(pg.

14265

-

14270

)

Mapping cortical gray matter in the young adult brain: effects of gender

,

Neuroimage

,

2005

, vol.

26

(pg.

493

-

501

)

Regional gray matter variation in male-to-female transsexualism

,

Neuroimage

,

2009

, vol.

46

(pg.

904

-

907

)

The underlying anatomical correlates of long-term meditation: larger hippocampal and frontal volumes of gray matter

,

Neuroimage

,

2009

, vol.

45

(pg.

672

-

678

)

et al.

Sex differences in human brain morphometry and metabolism: an in vivo quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography study on the effect of aging

,

Arch Gen Psychiatry

,

1996

, vol.

53

(pg.

585

-

594

)

Sex differences and the impact of steroid hormones on the developing human brain

,

Cereb Cortex

,

2009

, vol.

19

(pg.

464

-

473

)

Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging

,

Psychiatry Res

,

2000

, vol.

98

(pg.

1

-

13

)

Self-referential processing in our brain—a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self

,

Neuroimage

,

2006

, vol.

31

(pg.

440

-

457

)

The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory

,

Neuropsychologia

,

1971

, vol.

9

(pg.

97

-

113

)

Human cingulate and paracingulate sulci: pattern, variability, asymmetry, and probabilistic map

,

Cereb Cortex

,

1996

, vol.

6

(pg.

207

-

214

)

Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume

,

Neurobiol Aging

,

2004

, vol.

25

(pg.

377

-

396

)

Age and sex differences in the cerebellum and the ventral pons: a prospective MR study of healthy adults

,

ANJR Am J Neuroradiol

,

2001

, vol.

22

(pg.

1161

-

1167

)

Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers

,

Cereb Cortex

,

2005

, vol.

15

(pg.

1676

-

1689

)

Age, gender, and hemispheric differences in human striatum: a quantitative review and new data from in vivo MRI morphometry

,

Neurobiol Learn Mem

,

1995

, vol.

63

(pg.

133

-

142

)

Evidence that autobiographic memory retrieval does not become independent of the hippocampus: an fMRI study contrasting very recent with remote events

,

J Cogn Neurosci

,

2005

, vol.

17

(pg.

1950

-

1961

)

Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men

,

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

,

2005

, vol.

102

(pg.

7356

-

7361

)

PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects

,

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

,

2008

, vol.

105

(pg.

9403

-

9408

)

Structural differences in the cerebral cortex of healthy female and male subjects: a magnetic resonance imaging study

,

Psychiatry Res

,

1995

, vol.

61

(pg.

129

-

135

)

Transsexual subtypes: clinical and theoretical significance

,

Psychiatry Res

,

2005

, vol.

137

(pg.

151

-

160

)

Sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior

,

Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab

,

2007

, vol.

21

(pg.

431

-

444

)

Gender and sexual orientation in relation to hypothalamic structures

,

Horm Res

,

1992

, vol.

2

Suppl 38

(pg.

51

-

61

)

Mapping brain asymmetry

,

Nat Rev Neurosci

,

2003

, vol.

4

(pg.

37

-

48

)

Organizing and activating effects of sex hormones in homosexual transsexuals

,

Behav Neurosci

,

2002

, vol.

116

(pg.

982

-

988

)

Long-term meditation is associated with increased gray matter density in the brain stem

,

Neuroreport

,

2009

, vol.

20

(pg.

170

-

174

)

Anatomic basis of amygdaloid and hippocampal volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging

,

Neurology

,

1992

, vol.

42

(pg.

1743

-

1750

)

Hemispheric and gender-related differences in the gross morphology of the anterior cingulate/paracingulate cortex in normal volunteers: an MRI morphometric study

,

Cereb Cortex

,

2001

, vol.

11

(pg.

17

-

25

)

A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality

,

Nature

,

1995

, vol.

378

(pg.

68

-

70

)

© The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Topic:

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 31,990

29,754 Pageviews

2,236 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 11
December 2016 21
January 2017 7
February 2017 70
March 2017 77
April 2017 62
May 2017 74
June 2017 21
July 2017 40
August 2017 46
September 2017 63
October 2017 75
November 2017 82
December 2017 358
January 2018 411
February 2018 675
March 2018 748
April 2018 708
May 2018 809
June 2018 795
July 2018 622
August 2018 681
September 2018 677
October 2018 705
November 2018 849
December 2018 558
January 2019 586
February 2019 755
March 2019 719
April 2019 864
May 2019 752
June 2019 682
July 2019 634
August 2019 706
September 2019 530
October 2019 526
November 2019 269
December 2019 238
January 2020 285
February 2020 207
March 2020 231
April 2020 218
May 2020 144
June 2020 216
July 2020 253
August 2020 231
September 2020 238
October 2020 259
November 2020 244
December 2020 228
January 2021 165
February 2021 247
March 2021 304
April 2021 245
May 2021 240
June 2021 248
July 2021 211
August 2021 215
September 2021 186
October 2021 343
November 2021 196
December 2021 252
January 2022 325
February 2022 313
March 2022 248
April 2022 261
May 2022 334
June 2022 150
July 2022 372
August 2022 224
September 2022 161
October 2022 161
November 2022 386
December 2022 235
January 2023 307
February 2023 232
March 2023 276
April 2023 372
May 2023 397
June 2023 261
July 2023 351
August 2023 305
September 2023 391
October 2023 476
November 2023 459
December 2023 225
January 2024 647
February 2024 281
March 2024 204
April 2024 174
May 2024 207
June 2024 185
July 2024 215
August 2024 247
September 2024 168
October 2024 223
November 2024 105

Citations

107 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic