Radial pulsation as a function of hydrogen abundance (original) (raw)

Abstract

Using linear non-adiabatic pulsation analysis, we explore the radial-mode (p-mode) stability of stars across a wide range of mass (⁠|$0.2 \le M \le 50{\,\rm M_{{\odot }}}$|⁠), composition (0 ≤ X ≤ 0.7, Z = 0.001, 0.02), effective temperature (3000 ≤ _T_eff ≤ 40 000 K), and luminosity (0.01 ≤ L/M ≤ 100 000 solar units). We identify the instability boundaries associated with low- to high-order radial oscillations (0 ≤ n ≤ 16). The instability boundaries are a strong function of both composition and radial order (n). With decreasing hydrogen abundance we find that (i) the classical blue edge of the Cepheid instability strip shifts to higher effective temperature and luminosity, and (ii) high-order modes are more easily excited and small islands of high radial-order instability develop, some of which correspond with real stars. Driving in all cases is by the classical κ-mechanism and/or strange modes. We identify regions of parameter space where new classes of pulsating variable may, in future, be discovered. The majority of these are associated with reduced hydrogen abundance in the envelope; one has not been identified previously.

INTRODUCTION

Since the discovery of periodic light variations in the luminous giant δ Cephei, the study of stellar pulsations has transformed our understanding of how stars work, as well as establishing a distance scale whereby the cosmos can be measured. The fact that the light variations in δ Cep represented a major discovery testifies to the fact that not all stars are variable. However, as telescopes and detectors have become more sensitive, pulsations have been identified in diverse groups of stars of all masses and across the Hertzsprung–Russell (H–R) diagram. Such discoveries continue to the present day, with pulsations in low-mass white dwarfs and pre-white dwarfs being the latest additions to the pulsating star zoo (Fig. 1; Hermes et al. 2013; Maxted et al. 2013).

Luminosity-effective temperature (or H–R) diagram showing the approximate locations of major pulsating variables coloured roughly by spectral type, the zero-age main sequence and horizontal branch, the Cepheid instability strip, and evolution tracks for model stars of various masses, indicated by small numbers (M⊙). Shadings represent opacity-driven p modes (\\\), g modes (///) and strange modes (|||) and acoustically driven modes (≡). Approximate spectral types are indicated on the top axis. Based on figures by Christensen-Dalsgaard and subsequently by Jeffery (2008a).

Figure 1.

Luminosity-effective temperature (or H–R) diagram showing the approximate locations of major pulsating variables coloured roughly by spectral type, the zero-age main sequence and horizontal branch, the Cepheid instability strip, and evolution tracks for model stars of various masses, indicated by small numbers (M⊙). Shadings represent opacity-driven p modes (\\\), g modes (///) and strange modes (|||) and acoustically driven modes (≡). Approximate spectral types are indicated on the top axis. Based on figures by Christensen-Dalsgaard and subsequently by Jeffery (2008a).

Jeffery & Saio (2013) demonstrated that pulsation instability in the low-mass pre-white dwarf J0247-25B would arise in a high-order overtone if the envelope was depleted in hydrogen. The principal reason for this, demonstrated previously by Saio & Jeffery (1988) and Jeffery & Saio (2007), is that hydrogen acts as a poison, suppressing the positive opacity gradient around an opacity peak which would otherwise drive pulsations if located at an appropriate depth beneath the stellar surface.1

The question therefore arose whether it would be possible to predict the properties of other hitherto undiscovered pulsating variables, especially those in which hydrogen has been depleted as a consequence of prior evolution. Consequently, we have carried out a parametric survey in order to identify locations where new classes of variable star await discovery.

RADIAL PULSATION MODELS

The investigation commenced by computing a grid of 258 000 models of stellar envelopes covering a range of chemical mixtures and for masses on the range |$0.2 \le M/{\,\rm M_{\odot }}\le 50$|⁠, effective temperatures log _T_eff/K = 3.50(0.02)4.60, and luminosity-to-mass ratios |$\log (L/{\,\rm L_{\odot }})/(M/{\,\rm M_{\odot }}) = -2.0 (0.2) 5.0$|⁠. The linear non-adiabatic analysis of stability against pulsation was carried out following methods described by Saio, Winget & Robinson (1983) and Jeffery & Saio (2006a,b).

The OPAL95 (Iglesias & Rogers 1996) opacities were adopted, except at low temperatures, where Alexander & Ferguson (1994) opacities were used. As a test of sensitivity to opacity, additional calculations were made with OP opacities (Badnell et al. 2005). Convection is treated assuming a standard mixing-length theory with the ratio mixing-length to pressure scaleheight l/Hp = 1.5. Any convection/pulsation interaction is neglected by setting the divergence of the convective flux perturbation to zero. Therefore, results for _T_eff < 4000 K should be treated with caution.

The outer boundary for the envelope model is set at the Rosseland mean optical depth τ = 10−3, The integration is carried out with pressure log10_P_ as the independent variable, with initial stepsize δlog10_P_ = 0.02, which is adjusted to maintain increments in radius δ_r_/r < 0.01, density δρ/ρ < 0.1 and electron pressure δ_P_e/_P_e < 0.08 at each step. The integration is halted at a fractional mass m = _M_⋆/10 or fractional radius r = _R_⋆/100, whichever occurs first.

For each model envelope, the first 17 eigenfrequencies were located and stored, including the real and imaginary components ωr and ωi, the period and the number of nodes in the eigensolution. Modes with ωi < 0 were deemed to be unstable, i.e. pulsations could be excited.

We considered a range of abundances with hydrogen-mass fraction X = 0.002, 0.1, 0.30 and 0.70 and metal mass fraction Z = 0.001 and 0.02. We have assumed that the iron and nickel abundances are scaled to solar values (metal mixture GN93; Grevesse & Noels 1993) for all values of Z. We have not considered any additional enhancements to iron-group or other elements.

The results are presented primarily as contour plots representing the number of unstable modes as a function of (_T_eff, L/M) for each composition (Figs 2 and A1–A8). This provides an overall instability boundary since it includes pulsations in both low- and high-order modes. In some cases, envelope models with very high L/M ratios and/or very low _T_eff were difficult to integrate due to very low densities in the equation of state; these appear as voids on the contour plots.

Unstable pulsation modes in stars with homogeneous envelopes for selected compositions and masses, as labeled. Full grids are shown in Appendix A. The number of unstable radial modes is represented by grey-scale contours, with the lightest shade marking the instability boundary (one unstable mode), and the darkest shade representing 10 or more unstable modes. Broken (maroon online) diagonal lines represent contours of constant surface gravity at log g = 8, 7, 6, …, 1. Pale green areas denote regions where envelope models encountered convergence difficulties. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected panels represent the observed positions of pulsating low-mass hydrogen-deficient stars, including extreme helium stars and R Coronae Borealis variables (Jeffery 2008b), shown on panels with X ≤ 0.1 and <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1.0</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M=1.0 {\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.6833em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">=</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">1.0</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, and α Cyg variables (Crowther, Lennon & Walborn 2006; Searle et al. 2008; Firnstein & Przybilla 2012), shown on panels with X = 0.7, Z = 0.02 and <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>10</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M \ge 10 {\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8193em;vertical-align:-0.136em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">≥</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">10</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>. Figs 2 and 3 are best viewed online and expanded; one grid is enlarged in Fig. 4.

Figure 2.

Unstable pulsation modes in stars with homogeneous envelopes for selected compositions and masses, as labeled. Full grids are shown in Appendix A. The number of unstable radial modes is represented by grey-scale contours, with the lightest shade marking the instability boundary (one unstable mode), and the darkest shade representing 10 or more unstable modes. Broken (maroon online) diagonal lines represent contours of constant surface gravity at log g = 8, 7, 6, …, 1. Pale green areas denote regions where envelope models encountered convergence difficulties. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected panels represent the observed positions of pulsating low-mass hydrogen-deficient stars, including extreme helium stars and R Coronae Borealis variables (Jeffery 2008b), shown on panels with X ≤ 0.1 and |$M=1.0 {\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠, and α Cyg variables (Crowther, Lennon & Walborn 2006; Searle et al. 2008; Firnstein & Przybilla 2012), shown on panels with X = 0.7, Z = 0.02 and |$M \ge 10 {\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠. Figs 2 and 3 are best viewed online and expanded; one grid is enlarged in Fig. 4.

Secondly, the instability boundaries for modes with n = 0, 1, or more nodes, i.e. the instability boundaries for the fundamental radial, and for the first and higher overtone pulsations are shown, also as a function of (_T_eff, L/M) (Figs 3 and A9–A16).

As Fig. 2, but showing the boundaries for individual radial modes as coloured contours, with the darkest red representing the boundary of the fundamental (n = 0) mode, with increasing higher orders (n = 1–10) represented progressively by colours of increasing frequency (orange, yellow, green, blue …). Solid blue lines represent contours of equal fundamental radial-mode period in seconds spaced at decadal intervals.

Figure 3.

As Fig. 2, but showing the boundaries for individual radial modes as coloured contours, with the darkest red representing the boundary of the fundamental (n = 0) mode, with increasing higher orders (n = 1–10) represented progressively by colours of increasing frequency (orange, yellow, green, blue …). Solid blue lines represent contours of equal fundamental radial-mode period in seconds spaced at decadal intervals.

It is noted that many models may not represent any known stars (e.g. high M models with very low L/M.) Nevertheless, exploring such models provides a systematic insight into the pulsation properties of stars in general.

RADIAL-MODE INSTABILITY

The use of L/M to parametrize the model grid exploits the fact that the radial pulsation properties of stellar envelopes are only slowly dependent on the mass of the star over a range from 0.2 to 50 M⊙(cf. Fig. 2: top row). Nevertheless there are significant features to note; details may be verified from figures in Appendix.

At X = 0.70, Z = 0.02 (Figs A1 and A9):

At X = 0.30, Z = 0.02 (Figs A2 and A10), a modest reduction in hydrogen abundance has the effect of increasing the driving effect of helium in the classical instability strip and iron in the ‘Z-bump’ instability finger. The chief consequences are:

At X = 0.10, Z = 0.02 (Figs A3 and A11), the consequences of reducing the hydrogen abundance seen at X = 0.3 continue. In addition:

At X = 0.002, Z = 0.02 (Figs A4 and A12), the consequences of reducing the hydrogen abundance seen at X = 0.1 continue. In addition:

As Figs 2 and 3, for composition X = 0.002, Z = 0.02, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.50</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M=0.50{\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.6833em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">=</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">0.50</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, enlarged for clarity.

Figure 4.

As Figs 2 and 3, for composition X = 0.002, Z = 0.02, |$M=0.50{\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠, enlarged for clarity.

As Fig. 4 with OP opacities rather than OPAL95 opacities.

Figure 5.

As Fig. 4 with OP opacities rather than OPAL95 opacities.

Work integrals W as a function of temperature for the 9th overtone in the neighbourhood of the instability island at X = 0.002, Z = 0.02, with <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.5</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M=0.5{\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.6833em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">=</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">0.5</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, log L/M = 2.7, and log Teff as shown. Positive values of W at the surface indicate instability. At log Teff ≤ 3.9, driving is due to He0 ionization – essentially the classical Cepheid mechanism. For log Teff = 3.95, 4.0 and 4.2, the mode is stable. For log Teff = 4.1, the mode is unstable due to driving by both He0 and He+ ionization.

Figure 6.

Work integrals W as a function of temperature for the 9th overtone in the neighbourhood of the instability island at X = 0.002, Z = 0.02, with |$M=0.5{\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠, log L/M = 2.7, and log _T_eff as shown. Positive values of W at the surface indicate instability. At log _T_eff ≤ 3.9, driving is due to He0 ionization – essentially the classical Cepheid mechanism. For log _T_eff = 3.95, 4.0 and 4.2, the mode is stable. For log _T_eff = 4.1, the mode is unstable due to driving by both He0 and He+ ionization.

At X = 0.70, Z = 0.001 (Figs A5 and A13), the principal consequence of reducing the metallicity is that the Z-bump finger disappears. In addition, the classical instability strip, and the high-overtone strip to the red are both narrowed.

At X = 0.002, Z = 0.001 (Figs A8 and A16), the high-overtone instability island identified at X = 0.002, Z = 0.02 persists but, as there were substantial difficulties computing envelope models with |$M<2{\,\rm M_{\odot }}$| at this composition for other ranges of L/M and _T_eff, these models are not shown.

At X = 0.70, Z = 0.02 and log L/M ≤ 0 (Fig. A1), unstable radial modes initially form a single narrow strip, extending the classical Cepheid instability strip to very low L/M. With X = 0.30 (Fig. A2), a second strip develops substantially to the blue of the first. Again, this is the low L/M extension of the He+-driven strip already seen. We note that the excited modes are dominated by high-order modes (Fig. A10). At X = 0.10 both strips broaden to form a single region with a complicated mode structure (Figs A3, A11). Finally, at X = 0.002, the redward strip stabilizes, to leave only a broad blue instability strip (Fig. A12). Similar behaviour is replicated at Z = 0.001. Predictions of radial instability in both DA and DB white dwarfs are well established (Saio et al. 1983; Kawaler 1993). However there has so far been no successful detection of p-mode pulsations in any white dwarfs (Silvotti et al. 2011; Kilkenny et al. 2014).

CONCLUSION

We have made an extensive survey of the stability against radial pulsations for the envelopes of stars having masses in the range |$0.2\hbox{--}50 {\,\rm M_{\odot }}$| and hydrogen abundances (by mass fraction) from X = 0.70 to 0.002, considering both metal-rich (Z = 0.02) and metal-poor (Z = 0.001) mixtures. The grid of models ranges in effective temperature from _T_eff = 3000–40 000 K, and in luminosity-to-mass ratio from L/M = 0.01–100 000 (in solar units), covering most of parameter space occupied by stars, excepting only the hottest and coolest supergiants, the hottest subdwarfs, the most massive white dwarfs and the coolest supergiants and dwarfs. By considering overtones up to n = 16, we identify nearly all stars likely to be unstable to p-mode oscillations driven by the κ-mechanism.

We demonstrate that the H–R diagram for pulsation instability expressed as a plot of L/M versus _T_eff is only slowly variant with mass M, but is much more sensitive to composition, especially the hydrogen abundance since the latter normally acts to damp pulsations.

Within a single computational framework, we recover all hitherto known regions of radial and non-radial p-mode instability due to the κ-mechanism and/or strange modes. The detailed boundaries are likely to vary for specific cases owing to other properties such as internal composition gradients and long-term evolution effects.

We identify one new region of pulsation instability for low-mass hydrogen-deficient stars with log L/M ≈ 2–3 and log _T_eff ≈ 4.0–4.2; κ-mechanism driving is by He0 and He+ ionization. No stars are currently known to exhibit these pulsations.

In addition, we conclude that solar-like oscillations in red giants may be at least partially driven by the κ-mechanism, supporting Xiong & Deng (2007). To investigate this and other questions, a more detailed study of the relative rôles of convection and the κ-mechanism in exciting pulsations across the H–R diagram will follow.

The Armagh Observatory is funded by direct grant from the Northern Ireland Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure.

1

The condition for driving an oscillation by the κ-mechanism in such a region is generally understood to be that the spatial derivative d(κ_T_ + κρ/(Γ3 − 1))/d_r_ > 0, where κ_T_ and κρ are the temperature and density derivatives of the opacity κ, and Γ3 is the usual adiabatic exponent (Unno et al. 1989, p. 243).

2

Strange modes in high L/M stars are essentially as defined by Gautschy & Glatzel (1990) and Saio et al. (1998), and first identified by Wood (1976). Other modes of somewhat different character have also been described as strange, e.g. by Buchler, Yecko & Kollath (1997), Buchler & Kolláth (2001) and Smolec (2016). The current analysis makes no distinction between strange and normal modes; it only identifies which modes are stable or unstable.

REFERENCES

Origin and Evolution of the Elements

1993

Cambridge Univ. Press

Cambridge

15

Commun. Asteroseismology

2008a

157

240

Inf. Bull. Var. Stars

2008b

5817

1

et al.

Nature

2013

498

463

Nonradial Oscillations of Stars

1989

Tokyo

University of Tokyo Press

APPENDIX: Radial Pulsation Model Grids

Figs A1–A16 contain the complete grids showing the numbers of unstable radial modes and the instability boundaries for each unstable mode.

Unstable pulsation modes in stars with homogeneous envelopes with hydrogen content X = 0.70, Z = 0.02 and OPAL opacities, and mass <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mn>0.20</mn><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em"><</mo><mi>M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><mtext> </mtext><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em"><</mo><mn>50</mn></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0.20 {<} M/\,\rm M_{\odot }{<} 50</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1em;vertical-align:-0.25em;"></span><span class="mord">0.20</span><span class="mord"><span class="mrel"><</span></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord"><span class="mrel"><</span></span><span class="mord mathrm">50</span></span></span></span></span>, as labeled. The number of unstable radial modes is represented by grey-scale contours, with the lightest shade marking the instability boundary (one unstable mode), and the darkest shade representing 10 or more unstable modes. Broken (maroon online) diagonal lines represent contours of constant surface gravity at log g = 8, 7, 6, …, 1. Models with X = 0.7 and log Teff < 3.6 were excluded. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected high-mass panels represent the observed parameters of pulsating α Cygni variables (Crowther et al. 2006; Searle et al. 2008; Firnstein & Przybilla 2012).

Figure A1.

Unstable pulsation modes in stars with homogeneous envelopes with hydrogen content X = 0.70, Z = 0.02 and OPAL opacities, and mass |$0.20 {<} M/\,\rm M_{\odot }{<} 50$|⁠, as labeled. The number of unstable radial modes is represented by grey-scale contours, with the lightest shade marking the instability boundary (one unstable mode), and the darkest shade representing 10 or more unstable modes. Broken (maroon online) diagonal lines represent contours of constant surface gravity at log g = 8, 7, 6, …, 1. Models with X = 0.7 and log _T_eff < 3.6 were excluded. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected high-mass panels represent the observed parameters of pulsating α Cygni variables (Crowther et al. 2006; Searle et al. 2008; Firnstein & Przybilla 2012).

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.02.

Figure A2.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.02.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.02. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected low-mass panels represent the observed parameters of pulsating low-mass hydrogen-deficient stars, including extreme helium stars and R Coronae Borealis variables (Jeffery 2008b).

Figure A3.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.02. Red symbols with error bars shown on selected low-mass panels represent the observed parameters of pulsating low-mass hydrogen-deficient stars, including extreme helium stars and R Coronae Borealis variables (Jeffery 2008b).

As Fig. A3 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.02.

Figure A4.

As Fig. A3 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.02.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.70, Z = 0.001.

Figure A5.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.70, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.001.

Figure A6.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.001.

Figure A7.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.001, for models with <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>4</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M \ge 4{\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8193em;vertical-align:-0.136em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">≥</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">4</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>. Lower mass models encountered numerical problems at high L/M ratios.

Figure A8.

As Fig. A1 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.001, for models with |$M \ge 4{\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠. Lower mass models encountered numerical problems at high L/M ratios.

Unstable pulsation mode boundaries in stars with homogeneous envelopes with hydrogen content X = 0.70, Z = 0.02, and OPAL opacities, and mass <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mn>0.20</mn><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em"><</mo><mi>M</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em"><</mo><mn>50</mn></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">0.20 {<} M/{\,\rm M_{\odot }}{<} 50</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1em;vertical-align:-0.25em;"></span><span class="mord">0.20</span><span class="mord"><span class="mrel"><</span></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord"><span class="mrel"><</span></span><span class="mord">50</span></span></span></span>, as labeled. The boundaries of unstable radial modes are represented by coloured contours, with the darkest red representing the boundary of the fundamental (n = 0) mode, with increasing higher orders represented progressively by colours of increasing frequency (orange, yellow, green, blue …). Models with X = 0.7 and log Teff < 3.6 were excluded. Solid blue lines represent contours of equal fundamental radial-mode period in seconds spaced at decadal intervals.

Figure A9.

Unstable pulsation mode boundaries in stars with homogeneous envelopes with hydrogen content X = 0.70, Z = 0.02, and OPAL opacities, and mass |$0.20 {<} M/{\,\rm M_{\odot }}{<} 50$|⁠, as labeled. The boundaries of unstable radial modes are represented by coloured contours, with the darkest red representing the boundary of the fundamental (n = 0) mode, with increasing higher orders represented progressively by colours of increasing frequency (orange, yellow, green, blue …). Models with X = 0.7 and log _T_eff < 3.6 were excluded. Solid blue lines represent contours of equal fundamental radial-mode period in seconds spaced at decadal intervals.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.02.

Figure A10.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.02.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.02.

Figure A11.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.02.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.02.

Figure A12.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.02.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.70, Z = 0.001.

Figure A13.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.70, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.001.

Figure A14.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.30, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.001.

Figure A15.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.10, Z = 0.001.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.001, for models with <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><mi>M</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>4</mn><mrow><mtext> </mtext><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi><mo lspace="0em" rspace="0em">⊙</mo></msub></mrow></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">M \ge 4{\,\rm M_{\odot }}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8193em;vertical-align:-0.136em;"></span><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.10903em;">M</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">≥</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.8917em;vertical-align:-0.2083em;"></span><span class="mord">4</span><span class="mord"><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.1667em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathrm">M</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2583em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:0em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">⊙</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2083em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>. Lower mass models encountered numerical problems at high L/M ratios.

Figure A16.

As Fig. A9 with X = 0.002, Z = 0.001, for models with |$M \ge 4{\,\rm M_{\odot }}$|⁠. Lower mass models encountered numerical problems at high L/M ratios.

© 2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society