The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

1

Department of Genetics, Trinity College

Dublin 2, Ireland

2

Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas

PO Box 20334, Houston, TX 77225, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Search for other works by this author on:

2

Center for Demographic and Population Genetics, University of Texas

PO Box 20334, Houston, TX 77225, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Revision received:

18 December 1986

Accepted:

18 December 1986

Published:

11 February 1987

Cite

Paul M. Sharp, Wen-Hsiung Li, The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 15, Issue 3, 11 February 1987, Pages 1281–1295, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/15.3.1281
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

A simple, effective measure of synonymous codon usage bias, the Codon Adaptation Index, is detailed. The index uses a reference set of highly expressed genes from a species to assess the relative merits of each codon, and a score for a gene is calculated from the frequency of use of all codons in that gene. The index assesses the extent to which selection has been effective in moulding the pattern of codon usage. In that respect it is useful for predicting the level of expression of a gene, for assessing the adaptation of viral genes to their hosts, and for making comparisons of codon usage in different organisms. The index may also give an approximate indication of the likely success of heterologous gene expression.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© IRL Press Limited

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 3,820

802 Pageviews

3,018 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
November 2016 5
December 2016 1
January 2017 24
February 2017 61
March 2017 67
April 2017 57
May 2017 43
June 2017 38
July 2017 54
August 2017 54
September 2017 55
October 2017 49
November 2017 53
December 2017 126
January 2018 122
February 2018 127
March 2018 152
April 2018 141
May 2018 13
June 2018 13
July 2018 9
August 2018 9
September 2018 16
October 2018 5
November 2018 10
December 2018 2
January 2019 13
February 2019 17
March 2019 11
April 2019 13
May 2019 15
June 2019 12
July 2019 10
August 2019 17
September 2019 22
October 2019 24
November 2019 14
December 2019 18
January 2020 13
February 2020 12
March 2020 16
April 2020 14
May 2020 8
June 2020 11
July 2020 14
August 2020 10
September 2020 15
October 2020 12
November 2020 27
December 2020 15
January 2021 31
February 2021 17
March 2021 20
April 2021 17
May 2021 24
June 2021 22
July 2021 19
August 2021 22
September 2021 28
October 2021 22
November 2021 21
December 2021 27
January 2022 19
February 2022 16
March 2022 16
April 2022 28
May 2022 31
June 2022 50
July 2022 25
August 2022 131
September 2022 86
October 2022 87
November 2022 87
December 2022 84
January 2023 50
February 2023 24
March 2023 36
April 2023 36
May 2023 27
June 2023 22
July 2023 29
August 2023 35
September 2023 32
October 2023 28
November 2023 31
December 2023 18
January 2024 43
February 2024 37
March 2024 32
April 2024 114
May 2024 160
June 2024 128
July 2024 131
August 2024 135
September 2024 83

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic