A paradigm for local conformational control of fucntion in the ribosome: binding of ribosomal protein S19 to Escherichia coli 16S rRNA in the presence of S7 is required for methylation of m 2 G966 and blocks methylation of m 5 C967 by their respective methyltransferases (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Roche Institute of MOlecular Biology, Roche Research Center
Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Roche Institute of MOlecular Biology, Roche Research Center
Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
Roche Institute of MOlecular Biology, Roche Research Center
Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Roche Institute of MOlecular Biology, Roche Research Center
Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
25 December 1991
Cite
Carl Weitzmann, Santa J. Tumminia, Miloslav Boublik, James Ofengand, A paradigm for local conformational control of fucntion in the ribosome: binding of ribosomal protein S19 to Escherichia coli 16S rRNA in the presence of S7 is required for methylation of m 2 G966 and blocks methylation of m 5 C967 by their respective methyltransferases , Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 19, Issue 25, 25 December 1991, Pages 7089–7095, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.25.7089
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
We have partially purified two 16S rRNA-specific methyltransferases, one of which forms m 2 gse ( m 2 GMT), while the other one makes m 5 C967 (m 5 C RAT). The m 2 G RAT uses unmethylated 30S subunits as a substrate, but not free unmethylated 16S rRNA, while the m 5 C RflT functions reciprocally, using free rRNA but not 30S subunits (Negre, D., Weitzmann, C. and Ofengand, J. (1990) UCLA Symposium: Nucleic Acid itfethylation (Alan Liss, New York), pp. 1–17). We have now determined the basis for this unusual inverse specificity at adjacent nucleotides. Binding of ribosomal proteins S7, S9, and S19 to unmodified 16S rRNA individually and in all possible combinations showed that S7 plus S19 were sufficient to block methylation by the m 5 C RAT, while simultaneously inducing methylation by the m 2 G RAT. A purified complex containing stoichiometric amounts of proteins S7, S9, and S19 bound to 16S rRNA was isolated and shown to possess the same methylation properties as 30S subunits, that is, the ability to be methylated by the m 2 G RAT but not by the m 5 C RAT. Since binding of S19 requires prior binding of S7, which had no effect on methylation when bound alone, we attribute the switch in methylase specificity solely to the presence of RNA-bound S19. Single-omission reconstitute of 30S subunits deficient in S19 resulted in particles that could not be efficiently methylated by either enzyme. Thus while binding of S19 is both necessary and sufficient to convert 16S rRNA into a substrate of the m 2 G RAT, binding of either S19 alone or some other protein or combination of proteins to the 16S rRNA can abolish activity of the m 5 C MT. Binding of S19 to 16S rRNA is known to cause local conformational changes in the 960–975 stem-loop structure surrounding the two methylated nucleotides (Powers, T., Changchien, L.-RA., Craven, G. and Noller, H.F. (1988) J. Mol. Biol . 200, 309–319). Our results show that the two ribosomal RNA RflTs studied In this work are exquisitely sensitive to this small but nevertheless functionally Important structural change.
This content is only available as a PDF.
© 1991 Oxford University Press
I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.
Submit a comment
Name
Affiliations
Comment title
Comment
You have entered an invalid code
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 78
16 Pageviews
62 PDF Downloads
Since 1/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
January 2017 | 2 |
February 2017 | 2 |
August 2017 | 1 |
October 2017 | 1 |
December 2017 | 12 |
January 2018 | 10 |
February 2018 | 3 |
March 2018 | 7 |
April 2018 | 6 |
September 2018 | 1 |
October 2019 | 1 |
November 2019 | 1 |
December 2019 | 2 |
March 2020 | 1 |
June 2020 | 1 |
January 2021 | 2 |
May 2021 | 1 |
August 2021 | 1 |
August 2022 | 1 |
September 2022 | 2 |
November 2022 | 2 |
December 2022 | 4 |
March 2023 | 1 |
April 2023 | 1 |
September 2023 | 2 |
December 2023 | 1 |
February 2024 | 1 |
March 2024 | 1 |
April 2024 | 2 |
July 2024 | 2 |
August 2024 | 2 |
October 2024 | 1 |
Citations
31 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic