Absence of cytosine methylation at C-C-G-G and G-C-G-C sites in the rDNA coding regions and intervening sequences of Drosophila and the rDNA of other higher insects (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Department of Biology, Yale University

New Haven, CT 06520, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Department of Biology, Yale University

New Haven, CT 06520, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Cite

Peter M.M. Rae, Robert E. Steele, Absence of cytosine methylation at C-C-G-G and G-C-G-C sites in the rDNA coding regions and intervening sequences of Drosophila and the rDNA of other higher insects, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 6, Issue 9, 11 July 1979, Pages 2987–2995, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/6.9.2987
Close

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Cytosine residues in C-G dinucleotides are frequently methylated in eukaryote DNA. In DNA of the dinoflagellate C . cohnii , the sequence C-MeC-G-G apparently renders Hpa II (C-C-G-G) incapable of digesting whole cell DNA in general, and rDNA in particular. Msp I, which also recognizes C-C-G-G but cleaves irrespective of methylation, degrades C . cohnii DNA and produces rDNA segments of 10.2 to 1.4 kb. We have applied this Hpa II/Msp I test to unfractionated DNA, and to rDNA and the rDNA intervening sequence of Drosophilavirilis embryos and adults. There is no evidence of C-MeC-G-G sequences in either developmental stage of this species. Absence of G-MeC-G-C from coding and intervening sequences of rDNA was shown in comparisons of Hha I (G-C-G-C) cleavage patterns of unfractionated DNA and cloned (unmodified) segments of rDNA. Comparisons of Hpa II and Msp I cleavage products of DNA from the house fly, the flesh fly and a bumblebee also revealed no internal cytosine methylation in the sequence C-C-G-G. Because amounts of MeC in C-G dinucleotides vary greatly among species, from apparent nonexistence to substantial proportions, no inference may yet be drawn about the role of such base modifications in DNA.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© Information Retrieval Limited

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 189

21 Pageviews

168 PDF Downloads

Since 9/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
September 2017 4
November 2017 1
December 2017 86
January 2018 48
February 2018 4
March 2018 5
April 2018 4
June 2018 1
July 2018 1
August 2019 1
November 2019 1
January 2020 1
October 2020 2
December 2020 2
October 2021 1
December 2021 1
January 2022 1
April 2022 1
August 2022 1
September 2022 1
October 2022 2
December 2022 3
September 2023 1
December 2023 1
April 2024 4
May 2024 1
July 2024 3
August 2024 2
September 2024 3
October 2024 2

Citations

78 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic