Partial Melt Distributions from Inversion of Rare Earth Element Concentrations (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences

Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OEZ, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Bullard Laboratories, Department of Earth Sciences

Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OEZ, UK

Search for other works by this author on:

Published:

01 October 1991

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Inverse theory is used to calculate the melt distribution required to produce the rare earth element concentrations in a wide variety of terrestrial and extra-terrestrial magmas. The concentrations of the major and minor elements in the source regions are assumed to be the same as those for the bulk Earth, and the peridotite mineralogy calculated from the mineral compositions by least squares. Rare earth element partition coefficients are then used for inversion, assuming the melt generation is by fractional melting. The mean composition of the magmas is taken to be an estimate of the average composition of the melt. For n-typc and e-type MORB the results agree well with the adiabatic decompression calculations if the potential temperatures are 1300 and 1500°C respectively. The major and minor element compositions calculated from the melt distribution obtained from the inversion also agree well with those observed. The observations are consistent with a melt fraction that increases monotonically towards the surface, starting at ∼ 80 km and producing ∼ 9 km of melt in the case of n-type MORB, and at ∼ 120 km to produce 23 km in the case of e-type MORB.

The inversion calculations show that the melt fractions produced beneath an intact plate by a plume like that beneath Hawaii are smaller, and are also in agreement with the adiabatic calculations if the potential temperature of the plume is ∼ 1500°C. Much of the melt is produced in the depth and temperature range of the transition from garnet to spinel peridotite, in agreement with laboratory experiments and with the full convective models of the Hawaiian plume. The inversion calculations show that the source region for Hawaiian tholeiites changes with time from primitive to depleted mantle. This behaviour is likely to result from percolation, and the processes involved can be understood with the help of a simple analytic model. The last, post-erosional, magmas produced on Oahu come from a source that has been uniformly enriched in all rare earth elements by a factor of about two. Magmas associated with island arcs come from two sources. One resembles that of n-type MORB, and probably is produced by adiabatic upwelling. The other generates calc-alkaline basalt strongly enriched in light rare earth elements, but with a smaller constant enrichment between Gd and Lu. This composition is consistent with the extraction of a melt fraction of 1% from a source containing ∼9% of amphibole. Such a source region can also account for the low values of Ti and Nb, and perhaps also of Ta, observed in island arc magmas. Basaltic andesites and andesites from island arcs show the same amphibole signature, and can be produced from the calc-alkaline basalts by fractional crystallization if amphibole separates with olivine and orthopyroxene. The percolation of a small melt fraction through a mantle wedge that contains considerable amounts of amphibole can only transport very incompatible elements, such as He, U, Th, and Rb, towards the Earth's surface. Sr and Nd are likely to be too compatible to move against the matrix flow, but Pb may do so locally. These results have important implications for the isotopic systematics of the upper mantle.

The melt distributions obtained from ophiolites are like those for island arc tholeiites, though a potential temperature of 1400 °C fits the results better than does one of 1300°C. Archaean tholeiites and basaltic komatiites give melt distributions similar to that of e-type MORB from Iceland, and can be produced by adiabatic decompression if the mantle potential temperature is 1500cC, with tholeiites having lost more material by fractional crystallization. The melt distribution obtained from komatiites requires the melt fraction to reach ∼60% at the surface. Though the calculated compositions agree with those observed, decompression is unable to generate such large melt fractions.

Inversion shows that plateau basalts can be produced from the upper mantle beneath the plates by adiabatic upwelling beneath a mechanical boundary layer 60 km thick. Many of the varied alkali-rich continental magmas are generated by melting an enriched source in the stability field of garnet peridotite. The average enrichment required, by a factor of between two and five, can be produced by the addition of a small melt fraction. Carbonatites show no evidence of amphibole involvement at any stage, a result that is consistent with their formation by liquid immiscibility. Inversion of the rare earth element concentrations in shales gives a melt distribution similar to that from calc-alkaline basalts from island arcs, with a strong amphibole signature. Generation of the continental crust by separation of calc-alkaline magma from 40% of the mantle can account for the difference between primitive and depleted mantle.

Low-K highland basalts from the Moon can be produced directly from the average primitive lunar mantle if the melt fraction involved is °0-5%, and if they were generated in the stability field of plagioclase and spinel peridotite. Intermediate-K highland basalts come from a source that has been enriched by a factor of about two, and show no evidence of amphibole involvement. The rare earth concentrations in mare basalts require melt fractions of up to 7% in the spinel peridotite stability field, and can be generated by adiabatic upwelling of mantle whose potential temperature is 1300°C beneath a mechanical boundary layer that is 150 km thick. Because lunar gravity is only one-sixth of that of the Earth, the thickness of the melting zone and the volume of melt produced are six times greater for the Moon than for the Earth for the same value of Tp. Both low-Ti and high-Ti mare basalts may have lost as much as 70 and 85% respectively of their original material through crystal fractionation. It is, however, difficult to understand how such an origin can account for the high magnesium concentrations. Basaltic achondrites involve melt fractions of 10-15%, generated in the spinel or plagioclase stability field.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© Oxford University Press

You do not currently have access to this article.

Personal account

Get help with access

Institutional access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Sign in through your institution

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

  1. Click Sign in through your institution.
  2. Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
  3. When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  4. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Sign in with a library card

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

  1. Click Sign in through society site.
  2. When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
  3. Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

Personal account

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

Institutional account management

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Purchase

Short-term Access

To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.

Don't already have a personal account? Register

Partial Melt Distributions from Inversion of Rare Earth Element Concentrations - 24 Hours access

EUR €51.00

GBP £44.00

USD $55.00

Rental

Read this now at DeepDyve

This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 2,264

240 Pageviews

2,024 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 1
January 2017 25
February 2017 40
March 2017 18
April 2017 11
May 2017 30
June 2017 4
July 2017 8
August 2017 13
September 2017 43
October 2017 27
November 2017 38
December 2017 17
January 2018 28
February 2018 28
March 2018 18
April 2018 31
May 2018 14
June 2018 13
July 2018 9
August 2018 17
September 2018 12
October 2018 10
November 2018 14
December 2018 12
January 2019 14
February 2019 16
March 2019 15
April 2019 16
May 2019 20
June 2019 7
July 2019 10
August 2019 32
September 2019 68
October 2019 84
November 2019 66
December 2019 65
January 2020 52
February 2020 41
March 2020 63
April 2020 70
May 2020 56
June 2020 59
July 2020 69
August 2020 15
September 2020 11
October 2020 22
November 2020 24
December 2020 17
January 2021 14
February 2021 8
March 2021 26
April 2021 14
May 2021 17
June 2021 19
July 2021 20
August 2021 17
September 2021 18
October 2021 19
November 2021 24
December 2021 21
January 2022 19
February 2022 25
March 2022 32
April 2022 17
May 2022 16
June 2022 27
July 2022 16
August 2022 14
September 2022 22
October 2022 21
November 2022 20
December 2022 17
January 2023 13
February 2023 23
March 2023 30
April 2023 26
May 2023 19
June 2023 19
July 2023 18
August 2023 15
September 2023 6
October 2023 11
November 2023 16
December 2023 10
January 2024 10
February 2024 10
March 2024 19
April 2024 20
May 2024 22
June 2024 21
July 2024 26
August 2024 19
September 2024 23
October 2024 17
November 2024 15

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic