Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Search for other works by this author on:

Search for other works by this author on:

Published:

01 November 1994

• PDF
• Split View
• • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Video
  • Audio
  • Supplementary Data

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

We examine mitochondrial DNA variation at the cytochrome b locus within and between three species of Drosophila to determine whether patterns of variation conform to the predictions of neutral molecular evolution. The entire 1137-bp cytochrome b locus was sequenced in 16 lines of Drosophila melanogaster, 18 lines of Drosophila simulans and 13 lines of Drosophila yakuba. Patterns of variation depart from neutrality by several test criteria. Analysis of the evolutionary clock hypothesis shows unequal rates of change along D. simulans lineages. A comparison within and between species of the ratio of amino acid replacement change to synonymous change reveals a relative excess of amino acid replacement polymorphism compared to the neutral prediction, suggestive of slightly deleterious or diversifying selection. There is evidence for excess homozygosity in our world wide sample of D. melanogaster and D. simulans alleles, as well as a reduction in the number of segregating sites in D. simulans, indicative of selective sweeps. Furthermore, a test of neutrality for codon usage shows the direction of mutations at third positions differs among different topological regions of the gene tree. The analyses indicate that molecular variation and evolution of mtDNA are governed by many of the same selective forces that have been shown to govern nuclear genome evolution and suggest caution be taken in the use of mtDNA as a "neutral" molecular marker.

This content is only available as a PDF.

© Genetics 1994

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 133

0 Pageviews

133 PDF Downloads

Since 1/1/2021

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

• Latest

• Most Read

• Most Cited

More from Oxford Academic