The Effect of Gene Conversion on Intralocus Associations (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
Committee on Genetics
, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Corresponding author: Peter Andolfatto, Department of Ecology and Evolution, 1101 E. 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: pandolfa@midway.uchicago.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Committee on Genetics
, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Department of Genetics
, Lund University, Sölvegatan 29, 223 62 Lund, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Accepted:
24 November 1997
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
SEVERAL predictions of the genomic pattern of nucleotide polymorphism include the local recombination rate, r, as a parameter. In typical population genetic models, the parameter r, for two specified loci (or sites), is properly defined as the probability that a randomly selected gamete produced by a double heterozygote is a recombinant. In a given region, r can be measured directly through genetic crosses. This is typically done by observing markers spaced several centimorgans apart, in which case recombinants are produced almost exclusively by classical crossing-over. Over small intervals it may be assumed that crossing-over events are equally likely to occur at any point between two markers, and the probability of observing more than one can be neglected. Thus r, to a reasonable approximation, increases linearly over short physical distances. The problem we wish to draw attention to is that this model is often extrapolated to distances far too small to ignore the added effect of gene conversion events on the overall probability of producing a recombinant.
In fungi and Drosophila, a common feature of models of homologous recombination is that Holliday junctions are resolved either as gene conversion alone or as gene conversion with the accompanying exchange of flanking markers (Carpenter 1984). Thus some fraction of genetic exchanges will involve the transfer of short tracts of information from one gamete to another (i.e., gene conversion) without concurrent crossing-over. For clarity, we will refer to gene conversion without crossing-over as “gene conversion,” and gene conversion accompanied by crossing-over as “crossing-over.” Here we show that, at intragenic distances, gene conversion, rather than crossing-over, is likely to be the dominant force that breaks up associations among sites. We discuss implications for population genetic predictions for the behaviour of neutral sites closely linked to a site under balancing or directional selection.
A crude model: It is intuitive that gene conversion should increase the rate of exchange for closely linked sites, but should have negligible effects for more distant sites. Assume that over very short intervals, the probability of crossing-over increases linearly with d, the physical distance in base pairs between two sites. Thus the probability of producing a recombinant by crossing-over equals ρd, where ρ is the probability of a crossing-over event between two given sites per base pair per generation. We suggest that the following crude model describes the added effect of gene conversion events on the rate of exchange between two sites. Define γ as the probability per generation that a given site is included in a gene conversion tract of length L base pairs, where L is taken to be fixed. The probability per generation that a gene conversion tract will produce a recombinant for two markers d base pairs apart will then be roughly 2γd/L, when d < L. Thus, incorporating both crossing-over and gene conversion, r depends on d as follows:
r=ρd+2γdLifd<L,r=ρd+2γifd≥L.
(1)
Reasonable values for ρ and γ in Drosophila are ~10−8 and ~10−5 per generation, respectively (Ashburner 1989; Hilliker and Chovnick 1981), and L is estimated to be about 350 base pairs on average (Hilliker et al. 1994). It is clear from Equation 1 that gene conversion contributes significantly to r only when d is of the same order as L or smaller.
Some implications: Several attempts have recently been made to interpret estimated levels of linkage disequilibrium between polymorphic sites at the intragenic level in the context of competing population genetic models (e.g., Schaeffer and Miller 1993; Miyashita et al. 1993; Begun and Aquadro 1995). Ohta and Kimura (1971) showed that in a neutral finite population at equilibrium,
[X′XX′ZX′ZQZ′XZ′Z+A−1λZ′ZQQ′Z′XQ′Z′ZQ′Z′ZQ+G−1α][b^u^q^]=[X′YZ′YQ′Z′Y]
Figure 1.
The expected pairwise coalescence time, E(T2), as a function of physical distance for neutral sites linked to a balanced polymorphism (Equation 3) under various models of recombination: r = ρd for crossing-over only, r = 2γd/L for gene conversion only and see Equation 1 for crossing-over + gene conversion. The parameters used are N = 106, ρ = 10−8, γ = 10−5 and L = 350.
where σ2 is the squared correlation between linked sites and N is the effective population size. We see that Equation 2 predicts stronger associations, on average, in regions of the genome with “low recombination,” such as the tip of the X chromosome in Drosophila. However, “low recombination” refers only to empirically measured rates of crossing-over in the region. When rates of crossing-over are low, rates of gene conversion need not be similarly affected; the two mechanisms are to some extent separable (Carpenter 1984; Engebrecht et al. 1990). Under Equation 1, we expect less linkage disequilibrium among closely linked sites than expected under a model that only considers rates of crossing-over. It is easy to see that if Nγ is sufficiently large, a low local rate of crossing-over will have little effect on the expected level of intragenic disequilibrium. In support of this view, Begun and Aquadro (1995) observed extensive haplotype shuffling in the y-ac-su(f) region, despite its position in a region of low rates of crossing-over. This observation is also consistent with other available data for patterns of linkage disequilibria at the tip of the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster (C. H. Langley, personal communication). It should also be noted that because gene conversion will tend to decrease the expected level of linkage disequilibrium, tests for selective sweeps based on haplotypic structure that ignore gene conversion (e.g., Hudson et al. 1994) may be conservative.
Another implication concerns our ability to detect balancing selection. If some form of balancing selection acts on a given polymorphism for a sufficiently long time, a build-up of differences between allelic classes, centered on the selected site, is expected. Consider the expected pairwise coalescence time for a neutral site linked to a two-allele polymorphism with both alleles maintained at equal frequencies, given by
where r is the rate of recombination between the neutral site and the site under selection (Strobeck 1983; Hudson and Kaplan 1988; Hey 1991; Nordborg 1997). Since the expected number of pairwise differences (π) between alleles is proportional to E(T2), Equation 3 implies that a “peak of polymorphism” surrounding the selected site is expected. Figure 1 illustrates this effect and also demonstrates that gene conversion, even in the absence of crossing-over, will narrow the peak considerably.
Strong signals of balancing selection have been observed at MHC loci in humans (Hughes and Nei 1988) and at plant self-incompatibility loci (see Charlesworth and Guttman 1997 for a review). In D. melanogaster, a few loci with polymorphisms thought to be maintained by selection have been investigated, but so far, only the Adh locus shows significant evidence for balancing selection (Begun and Aquadro 1994; Eanes et al. 1996; Hudson et al. 1987; Hudson and Kaplan 1988; Kreitman and Hudson 1991). This has led to speculation that either balancing selection is not a prevalent force maintaining variation or that it only rarely acts long enough for the equilibrium pattern predicted by Equation 3 to develop (Kreitman and Akashi 1995; Hudson 1996). In light of Figure 1, we suggest an alternative explanation: Perhaps the rate of gene conversion in Drosophila is simply too high, given the population size, for this phenomenon to be readily observed. The striking signal seen at Adh remains an enigma as it is larger than expected even under a model that does not include gene conversion (Hudson and Kaplan 1988). Possible explanations include past geographic subdivision or the association of Adh alleles with the common polymorphic rearrangement, In(2L)t .
In conclusion, methods for detecting balancing selection and positive directional selection that rely on Nr being sufficiently small may not have much power in organisms such as Drosophila. An exception may be genomic regions where gene conversion is likely to be suppressed, such as near an inversion breakpoint (see, for instance, Hasson and Eanes 1996). As Hudson and Kaplan (1988) point out, picking an organism with smaller N may not help, because such organisms are expected to harbor less polymorphism, which reduces our power to detect selection. A better solution may be to study organisms with lower r, such as partially selfing organisms, where the effective rate of exchange is reduced because most individuals are homozygous (Nordborg et al. 1996).
Acknowledgement
We thank Joy Bergelson, Marty Kreitman, Molly Przeworski, and Jeff Wall for helpful discussions. Comments from Brian Charlesworth, Richard Hudson, Steven Orzack, Baharé Rashidi, and an anonymous reviewer significantly improved this manuscript. P.A. holds a Postgraduate Scholarship from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Footnotes
Communicating editor: R. R. Hudson
LITERATURE CITED
Ashburner
M
,
1989
Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook
.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
,
New York
.
Begun
D J
,
Aquadro
C F
,
1994
Evolutionary inferences from DNA variation at the 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase locus in natural populations of Drosophila: Selection and geographic differentiation
.
Genetics
136
:
155
–
171
.
Begun
D J
,
Aquadro
C F
,
1995
Evolution at the tip and base of the X chromosome in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
12
:
382
–
390
.
Carpenter
A T C
,
1984
Meiotic roles of crossing-over and of gene conversion
.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
49
:
23
–
26
.
Charlesworth
D
,
Guttman
D S
,
1997
Seeing selection in S allele sequences
.
Curr. Biol.
7
:
R34
–
R37
.
Eanes
W F
,
Kirchner
M
,
Yoon
J
,
Biermann
C H
,
Wang
I N
et al. ,
1996
Historical selection, amino acid polymorphism and lineage-specific divergence at the G6pd locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans
.
Genetics
144
:
1027
–
1041
.
Engebrecht
J
,
Hirsch
J
,
Roeder
G S
,
1990
Meiotic gene conversion and crossing-over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation
.
Cell
62
:
927
–
937
.
Hasson
E
,
Eanes
W F
,
1996
Contrasting histories of three gene regions associated with In(3L)Payne of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genetics
144
:
1559
–
1564
.
Hey
J
,
1991
A multi-dimensional coalescent process applied to multi-allelic selection models and migration models
.
Theor. Pop. Biol.
39
:
30
–
48
.
Hilliker
A J
,
Chovnick
A
,
1981
Further observations of intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genet. Res.
38
:
281
–
296
.
Hilliker
A J
,
Harauz
G
,
Reaume
A G
,
Gray
M
,
Clark
S H
et al. ,
1994
Meiotic gene conversion tract length distribution within the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genetics
137
:
1019
–
1026
.
Hudson
R R
,
Kreitman
M
,
Aguadé
M
,
1987
A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data
.
Genetics
116
:
153
–
160
.
Hudson
R R
,
Kaplan
N L
,
1988
The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination
.
Genetics
120
:
831
–
840
.
Hudson
R R
,
Bailey
K
,
Skarecky
D
,
Kwiatowski
J
,
Ayala
F J
,
1994
Evidence for positive selection in the Superoxide Dismutase (Sod) region of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genetics
136
:
1329
–
1340
.
Hudson
R R
,
1996
Molecular population genetics of adaptation
, pp.
291
-
309
in
Adaptation
, edited by
Rose
M R
,
Lauder
G V
.
Academic Press
,
San Diego
.
Hughes
A L
,
Nei
M
,
1988
Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection
.
Nature
335
:
167
–
170
.
Kreitman
M
,
Hudson
R R
,
1991
Inferring the evolutionary histories of the Adh and Adh-dup loci in Drosophila melanogaster from patterns of polymorphism and divergence
.
Genetics
127
:
565
–
582
.
Kreitman
M
,
Akashi
H
,
1995
Molecular evidence for natural selection
.
Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
26
:
403
–
422
.
Miyashita
NT
,
Aguadé
M
,
Langley
C H
,
1993
Linkage disequilibrium in the white locus region of Drosophila melanogaster
.
Genet. Res.
62
:
101
–
109
.
Nordborg
M
,
Charlesworth
B
,
Charlesworth
D
,
1996
Increased levels of polymorphism surrounding selectively maintained sites in highly selfing species
.
Proc. R. Soc. Lon. Ser. B.
263
:
1033
–
1039
.
Nordborg
M
,
1997
Structured coalescent processes on different time scales
.
Genetics
146
:
1501
–
1514
.
Ohta
T
,
Kimura
M
,
1971
Linkage disequilibrium between two segregating nucleotide sites under the steady flux of mutations in a finite population
.
Genetics
68
:
571
–
580
.
Schaeffer
S W
,
Miller
E L
,
1993
Estimates of linkage disequilibrium and the recombination parameter determined from segregating nucleotide sites in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura
.
Genetics
135
:
541
–
552
.
Strobeck
C
,
1983
Expected linkage disequilibrium for a neutral locus linked to a chromosomal rearrangement
.
Genetics
103
:
545
–
555
.
© Genetics 1998
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 281
223 Pageviews
58 PDF Downloads
Since 2/1/2021
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
February 2021 | 7 |
March 2021 | 1 |
April 2021 | 6 |
May 2021 | 3 |
June 2021 | 5 |
August 2021 | 3 |
September 2021 | 1 |
October 2021 | 4 |
November 2021 | 11 |
December 2021 | 3 |
January 2022 | 11 |
February 2022 | 13 |
March 2022 | 10 |
April 2022 | 12 |
June 2022 | 2 |
July 2022 | 6 |
August 2022 | 6 |
September 2022 | 18 |
October 2022 | 3 |
November 2022 | 3 |
December 2022 | 4 |
January 2023 | 8 |
February 2023 | 5 |
March 2023 | 6 |
April 2023 | 4 |
May 2023 | 13 |
June 2023 | 3 |
July 2023 | 10 |
August 2023 | 9 |
September 2023 | 5 |
October 2023 | 5 |
November 2023 | 6 |
December 2023 | 6 |
January 2024 | 5 |
February 2024 | 8 |
March 2024 | 5 |
April 2024 | 6 |
May 2024 | 7 |
June 2024 | 12 |
July 2024 | 10 |
August 2024 | 6 |
September 2024 | 3 |
October 2024 | 5 |
November 2024 | 2 |
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic