Reference study to characterize plasma and magnetic properties of ultracool atmospheres (original) (raw)

Abstract

Radio and X-ray emission from brown dwarfs (BDs) suggest that an ionized gas and a magnetic field with a sufficient flux density must be present. We perform a reference study for late M-dwarfs (MD), BDs and giant gas planet to identify which ultracool objects are most susceptible to plasma and magnetic processes. Only thermal ionization is considered. We utilize the drift-phoenix model grid where the local atmospheric structure is determined by the global parameters _T_eff, log (g) and [M/H]. Our results show that it is not unreasonable to expect Hα or radio emission to origin from BD atmospheres as in particular the rarefied upper parts of the atmospheres can be magnetically coupled despite having low degrees of thermal gas ionization. Such ultracool atmospheres could therefore drive auroral emission without the need for a companion's wind or an outgassing moon. The minimum threshold for the magnetic flux density required for electrons and ions to be magnetized is well above typical values of the global magnetic field of a BD and a giant gas planet. Na+, K+ and Ca+ are the dominating electron donors in low-density atmospheres (low log(g), solar metallicity) independent of _T_eff. Mg+ and Fe+ dominate the thermal ionization in the inner parts of MD atmospheres. Molecules remain unimportant for thermal ionization. Chemical processes (e.g. cloud formation) affecting the most abundant electron donors, Mg and Fe, will have a direct impact on the state of ionization in ultracool atmospheres.

INTRODUCTION

Ultracool objects like brown dwarfs (BDs) and giant gas planets have masses below the hydrogen-burning limit of ∼0.08 M⊙ (e.g. Burrows et al. 2001). BDs are born like stars by gravitational collapse, however, they have not sufficient mass to achieve the required core temperature to provide a steady rate of nuclear hydrogen fusion. As a consequence, gravitational collapse provides the only energy source for most of the BD's lifetime. Cooling and contracting during their entire life, BDs cannot compensate the radiative losses by thermonuclear processes. BDs evolve from a young object with an effective temperature _T_eff ≈ 3000 K that is comparable to late M-dwarfs (MDs) and surface gravities like giant gas planets to high-gravity objects of log (g) = 5.0 with an effective temperature lower than _T_eff ≈ 500 K. BDs are fully convective objects, and they can be fast rotators. BDs and giant gas planets form clouds in their atmospheres which have strong feedback on to the atmospheric structure due to element depletion and due to a high opacity (Helling & Casewell 2014 and references there in). Observations by Biller et al. (2013), Buenzli et al. (2014) and Crossfield et al. (2014), for example, suggest that BD atmospheres show a patchy cloud coverage. Transit spectroscopy from extrasolar planets suggests that giant gas planets are covered in hazes and clouds too (Pont et al. 2008; Gibson et al. 2012; Sing et al. 2015). Model simulations suggest that cloud formation prevails for a large range of effective temperatures up to 2800 K, and for metallicities as low as [M/H] = −5.0 (Witte, Helling & Hauschildt 2009). A significant volume of these clouds is susceptible to local discharge events (Helling et al. 2013): large-scale discharges in the upper cloud regions and corona-like small-scale discharges in the inner, denser part of the cloud. These local discharge events may generate atmospheric electrical storms. At the same time, storms may ionize the local gas. Luque et al. (2014) modelled the ionosphere of Saturn and Jupiter finding that the atmospheric electrical storms may produce up to 103 cm−3 of free electrons below the ionosphere.

Radio and X-ray emission from ultracool dwarfs are now well established (e.g. 2MASSJ10475385+2124234 by Route & Wolszczan 2012; 2MASS J13153094−2649513AB by Burgasser et al. 2013). Berger (2002) observed 12 sources in radio, X-ray and Hα emission between the spectral types M8 and L3.5. Sorahana, Suzuki & Yamamura (2014) present mid-IR AKARI observations which suggest the presence of chromospheric activity in BDs. Schmidt et al. (2015) derive a rise in magnetic activity in form of Hα emission from SDSS spectra from 2% for early M-dwarfs (M0) to 88 per cent for early L-dwarfs (L0). 39% of the L dwarfs in their sample observed multiple times are suggested to be variable. Such observations indicate that an appropriately ionized gas is present in the atmospheres of such cool objects that allows chromospheric heating. The prevailing question is how much of such a cool, cloud-forming atmosphere needs to be ionized that a chromosphere could form.

It is suggested that the magnetic field strength of BDs is as high as 103G (e.g. Shulyak et al. 2011). Lynch, Mutel & Güdel (2015) suggest field strengths of ∼2.5–2.5 kG for the surface field on TVLM 0513−46 and 2M 0746+20. A correlation between radio activity and rotation has not been settled for BDs given the wide parameter range occupied by these objects (McLean, Berger & Reiners 2012; Antonova et al. 2013). Williams et al. (2014) demonstrate that ultracool objects do not follow the classical Güdel–Benz relation where the X-ray and the radio luminosity from F – M stars correlate (Güdel & Benz 1993). This relation was shown to persist for solar flares and active rotating binaries (Benz & Güdel 1994). The deviation of ultracool stars from the Güdel–Benz relation beyond than approximately M5 may suggest a change in the dynamo mechanism that produces the magnetic field in such ultracool objects (Cook, Williams & Berger 2014). If the atmospheric gas can couple to the strong magnetic field in BDs, the kinetic energy carried by large-scale convective motions may be transported to the top of the atmosphere and released in form of flares, quiescent or quasi-quiescent emissions. The flares are a sudden release of magnetic energy from the deeper convective layers. The quiescent emission is a continuous emission but at lower energy levels than flares. The most likely mechanism to produce this emission is electron cyclotron maser emission from highly relativistic electrons or plasma emission alternatively, incoherent synchrotron or gyrosynchrotron emission from relativistic electrons (Hallinan et al. 2006). Flares and quiescent emission were reported for example by Burgasser & Putman (2005) for two late-type MDs, with a magnetic field strength of 1 kG. Tanaka, Suzuki & Inutsuka (2014) study the mass-loss of hot Jupiters through MHD waves. They suggest the formation of a chromosphere by Alfvén wave heating. Tanaka et al. (2014), however, observe, that the gas does not need to be fully ionized, i.e. degree of ionization _f_e < 1, for the mechanism to work. Mohanty et al. (2002) analysed magnetic Reynolds number, _R_m ∝ _f_e, for a set of model atmospheres to show why the chromospheric Hα activity should be low in rapid rotating BDs with _T_eff ≥ 1500 K and solar metallicity. The works by Schmidt et al. (2015) and Sorahana et al. (2014) suggest that L-dwarfs should have a chromosphere (but with a reduced filling factor) despite having low magnetic Reynolds numbers.

Our paper presents a theoretical framework using a set of fundamental parameters to analyse the ionization and magnetic coupling state of objects with ultracool atmospheres. This paper focuses on late MDs, BDs and giant gas planets spanning _T_eff = 1000–3000 K. The approach is also applicable to, for example, protoplanetary discs. Only thermal ionization is considered for this reference study against which the effect of additional processes (e.g. dust–dust collisions, cosmic ray ionization, Alfvén ionization, lighting, photoionization) can be tested in future works. Our investigations utilize results from drift-phoenix 1D model atmosphere simulations (Helling et al. 2008; Witte et al. 2009, 2011). This allows us to perform an extensive reference study across the late MD, BD and planetary regime on the basis of a consistently calculated model atmosphere grid for a large set of global parameters (_T_eff, log (g), [M/H]). The aim of this study is to identify ultracool objects that are most susceptible to plasma processes by itself or that lead to instabilities that trigger the emergence of a strong plasma. This study does not include any multidimensional atmospheric flows and resulting multi-D radiative transfer effects.

Section 2 describes our approach and the use of the drift-phoenix model atmosphere results. Sections 3 and 5 introduce our theoretical frame work in form of basic plasma and magnetic parameters, respectively. Our study shows that ultracool atmospheres are composed of an ionized and magnetized gas. The local degree of ionization varies largely amongst the objects and throughout the atmospheres. While a late MD has a considerable degree of ionization throughout the whole atmosphere, the degree of thermal ionization for an L-dwarf is rather low but may well be enough to seed other ionization processes like for example due to Alfvén ionization (Stark et al. 2013). In Section 3.3.2 we demonstrate that electromagnetic interactions can dominate over electron–neutral interactions also in regions of a very low degree of ionization. In Section 3.3.3 we investigate the relevant length-scales effected by electrostatic interactions in the gas phase. Section 4 (with additional material in Appendix A) contains our assessment of the local equilibrium chemistry abundances with respect to electron donors species across the late MDs, BDs and giant gas planets regime.

In Section 5 we demonstrate that 30–50 per cent of the atmospheric volume can be magnetically coupled in L-dwarfs for a magnetic field strength of 103 G. The atmospheric volume with a degree of thermal ionization above a plasma threshold value of >10−7 is, however, considerably lower. Our results show that it is not unreasonable to expect ultracool atmospheres to emit Hα or even in radio wavelength as in particular the rarefied upper parts of the atmospheres are affected by electromagnetic interactions over many pressure scaleheights despite having low degrees of ionization. Section 6 contains the discussion of our results in view of previous publications. Section 7 presents our conclusions.

APPROACH

We aim to assemble a theoretical framework that allows us to assess the plasma and magnetic character in atmospheres of objects across the stellar-planetary boundary, namely for late MDs, BDs and planets. Our approach is not limited to these objects as the plasma parameters used are fundamental properties of a gas rather than of a particular object. We utilize the grid of drift-phoenix model atmosphere structures in order to quantify the plasma and magnetic characteristics. drift-phoenix is a combination of two complementary codes, drift and phoenix (Helling et al. 2008; Witte et al. 2009, 2011). The drift code (Woitke & Helling 2004; Helling et al. 2008) solves a system of equations that describes the stationary dust formation process of mineral clouds (seed formation, growth, evaporation, sedimentation, element depletion) and interaction between the dust grains and gas (Woitke & Helling 2003, 2004; Helling & Woitke 2006; Helling, Woitke & Thi 2008). phoenix is a hydrostatic radiative transfer model atmosphere code (Hauschildt & Baron 1999) that determines the resultant thermodynamic structure of the atmosphere (local gas temperature _T_gas [K], local gas pressure pgas [bar] and local electronic pressure pe [bar]) from fundamental stellar parameters (effective temperature _T_eff [K], surface gravity log (g) [cm s−2] and metallicity [M/H]). When combined with drift it provides a self-consistent atmospheric model that takes into account cloud formation and its impact on the thermodynamic structure and the resulting spectral energy distribution.

The drift-phoenix atmosphere simulations model the kinetic formation of mixed mineral cloud particle made of TiO2[s], Al2O3[s], Fe[s], SiO2[s], MgO[s], MgSiO3[s], Mg2SiO4[s] which effects 6 elements (O, Mg, Si, Fe, Al, Ti). Mg, Si, and Fe are the most abundant elements after O and C in a gas with solar element abundances. Using drift-phoenix atmospheric models with a range of effective temperatures (_T_eff = 1000 K – 3000 K), surface gravity (log (g) = 3.0, 4.0, 5.0) and metallicity ([M/H] = −0.6, −0.3, 0.0 +0.3), we evaluate the degree of thermal gas ionization, the plasma parameter (Section 3) and magnetic parameters (Section 5). Applying a separate chemical equilibrium code, we evaluate the gas-phase composition of various atmosphere models to assess if the dominating electron donating species changes or remains the same (Section 4.1).

We apply a chemical equilibrium routine to calculate the chemical composition in more detailed than available from the standard drift-phoenix output. Our main interest is to evaluate the results regarding the ions in the gas phase. A combination of 155 gas-phase molecules (including 33 complex hydrocarbon molecules), 16 atoms, and various ionic species were used under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). The Grevesse, Asplund & Sauval (2007) solar composition is used for calculating the gas-phase chemistry outside the metal depleted cloud layers. No solid particles were included in the chemical equilibrium calculations but their presence influences the gas phase by the reduced element abundances due to cloud formation and the cloud opacity impact on the radiation field, both accounted for in the drift-phoenix model simulations.

We utilize drift-phoenix model atmosphere (_T_gas, pgas, pe) structures and the dust element depleted abundances as input for our calculations. We group the drift-phoenix atmosphere structures into three groups for an easier presentation of our results (Table 1). These groups, defined by a range of global parameters, cover young and old giant gas planets, young and old BDs and late MDs. Fig. 1 shows the thermodynamic profiles (_T_gas, pgas) for each of these groups. As the effective temperature increases, the thermodynamic gas temperature of the atmosphere increases as well for a given log (g) and [M/H]. The effect of dust on the local gas temperature in the atmosphere appears as a step-like temperature change (backwarming) in the atmosphere models.

(Tgas–pgas) structure from the drift-phoenix model atmosphere grid. The hottest models represent late MD atmospheres or atmospheres of young BDs. The coolest models represent atmospheres in the planetary regime. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 1.

(_T_gas–pgas) structure from the drift-phoenix model atmosphere grid. The hottest models represent late MD atmospheres or atmospheres of young BDs. The coolest models represent atmospheres in the planetary regime. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Table 1.

drift-phoenix atmosphere structures used: Group 1: giant gas planets and young BDs. Group 2: dependence on log(g). Group 3: dependence on metallicity.

_T_eff [K] log (g) [M/H]
Group 1 1000–3000 3.0 0.0
1000
Group 2 2000 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 0.0
2800
1000
Group 3 2000 3.0 −0.6, −0.3, 0.0, +0.3
2800
_T_eff [K] log (g) [M/H]
Group 1 1000–3000 3.0 0.0
1000
Group 2 2000 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 0.0
2800
1000
Group 3 2000 3.0 −0.6, −0.3, 0.0, +0.3
2800

Table 1.

drift-phoenix atmosphere structures used: Group 1: giant gas planets and young BDs. Group 2: dependence on log(g). Group 3: dependence on metallicity.

_T_eff [K] log (g) [M/H]
Group 1 1000–3000 3.0 0.0
1000
Group 2 2000 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 0.0
2800
1000
Group 3 2000 3.0 −0.6, −0.3, 0.0, +0.3
2800
_T_eff [K] log (g) [M/H]
Group 1 1000–3000 3.0 0.0
1000
Group 2 2000 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 0.0
2800
1000
Group 3 2000 3.0 −0.6, −0.3, 0.0, +0.3
2800

BASIC PLASMA PARAMETERS

In the following section, we lay out the theoretical framework that we use to characterize the plasma of an atmospheric environment with respect to its electrostatic and magnetostatic behaviour. This is inspired by the wealth of radio observations of substellar objects (Berger 2002; Berger et al. 2010; Route & Wolszczan 2012; Burgasser et al. 2013; Williams et al. 2014). To understand these observations, radio wavelength (quiescent emission) and X-ray emission (flares), the atmospheric gas must couple with the background magnetic field. As a consequence, free charged particles produced in the atmosphere would be accelerated along magnetic field lines and released into the upper parts of the atmosphere. A magnetic coupling of the local gas would also be required for Alfvén waves to develop and potentially contributing to an acoustic heating of a chromosphere also on such ultracool objects (e.g. Testa, Saar & Drake 2015). We note that ideal and non-ideal MHD simulations require a certain degree of ionization to allow Alfvén wave heating to develop as possible mechanisms for chromospheric heating.

For a plasma to exist, the gas needs to be ionized. The degree of ionization, _f_e measures the extent to which a gas is ionized, and it is defined as

\begin{equation} f_{\rm e} = \frac{p_{\rm e}}{p_{\rm e}+p_{\rm gas}} \,\,, \end{equation}

(1)

where _p_gas and _p_e are the gas and electron pressure, respectively, both in [bar]. Once we have determined the degree of ionization of the atmospheric gas depending on the global parameters (_T_eff, log (g), [M/H]) we evaluate the plasma frequency to investigate where in the atmosphere electromagnetic interactions dominate over kinetic collisions between electrons and neutrals,

\begin{equation} \omega _{\rm pe}\gg \nu _{\rm ne}. \end{equation}

(2)

ωpe [rad s− 1] is the plasma frequency (i.e. the frequency at which the plasma reacts to an imposed or perturbed electric fields), νne [s− 1] is the electron–neutral collision frequency. Only if equation (2) is fulfilled, we can expect the ionized gas to undergo electromagnetic interactions that could lead, for example, to discharge processes. A more refined insight about electrostatic interactions influencing the atmospheric gas can be gained by determining the length-scales beyond which the Coulomb force of a charge does not any more effects its surrounding. On length-scale larger than the Debye length, a gas will be quasi-neutral and no electrostatic forces will affect the gas behaviour. Hence,

\begin{equation} \lambda _{\rm D}\ll L \end{equation}

(3)

with λD the Debye length and L the typical length-scale of the considered plasma, both in [m]. Ideally, this would be associated with the atmospheric volume where the ionized gas can couple to an external magnetic field.

In the following subsections we define each of the plasma criteria and evaluate them for our model atmosphere grid. All equations and natural constants are given in S i units. All results, however, have been converted into cgs unit for an easier representation in the astrophysical context.

Plasma Frequency: ωpe ≫ νne

In a plasma, if electrons are displaced from their equilibrium position (assuming a uniform, stationary ionic background), a charge imbalance is imposed on the plasma, creating a local, restoring electric field. Consequently, the electrons try to re-establish charge neutrality resulting in them oscillating around their equilibrium position with a particular frequency called plasma frequency. The plasma frequency is defined as

\begin{equation} \omega _{\rm pe} = \left(\frac{n_{\rm e}e^{2}}{\epsilon _{0}m_{\rm e}}\right)^{1/2}, \end{equation}

(4)

with _n_e the electron number density [m− 3], e the electron charge [C], _m_e the electron mass [kg]. If the plasma frequency, ωpe, is greater than the frequency of collisions between the electrons and neutral particles, νne [s− 1] then, long-range electromagnetic collective effects dominant over short-range binary interactions (see Fig. 3). The collision frequency for neutral particles with electrons is given by νne = σgas_n_gas_v_th,e, where _v_th,e is the thermal velocity of electrons given by _v_th,e = (_k_B_T_s/_m_s)1/2 [m s−1], _n_gas the ambient gas density and σgas the collision, or scattering, cross-section of particles. The latter is assumed to be |$\sigma _{\rm gas} = \pi \times r_{\rm gas}^2$| with |$r_{\rm gas} = r_{\rm H_2}$| as the atmospheric gas in late MDs, BDs and most likely in giant gas planets is composed mostly of molecular hydrogen, H2. Therefore, the collision cross-section is approximated by |$\sigma _{\rm gas}\approx \sigma _{\rm H_{2}}\approx \pi \times {r_{\rm H_{2}}}^{2} = 5.81\times 10^{-20}$| m2 (r|$_{\rm H_{2}} = 1.36\times 10^{-10}$| m). If the charged particles collide frequently with the ambient neutral gas (ωpe/νne < 1), their motion will be determined by nearest neighbour interactions and not by collective, long-range electromagnetic interactions.

Debye length: λD ≪ L

The Debye length, λD, is the spatial length-scale beyond which a plasma can be considered quasi-neutral (_n_e ≈ _n_i ≈ _n_gas). For length-scales less than the Debye length, a test charge will experience the influence of the charge imbalance inside the Debye sphere. The Debye length, λD [m], resulting from the solution of the Poisson equation for a non-zero charge density near test charge, is defined as

\begin{equation} \lambda _{\rm D} = \left(\frac{\epsilon _{0}k_{B}T_{\rm e}}{n_{\rm e}e^{2}}\right)^{1/2}, \end{equation}

(5)

with _k_B = 1.38 × 10−23 [J K−1] and ϵ0 = 8.85 × 10−12 [F m−1]. A plasma is quasi-neutral if

\begin{equation} \lambda _{\rm D}\ll L. \end{equation}

(6)

For an ionized gas region to exhibit plasma behaviour, it is required that over the length-scale of the region, the electron number density is high enough that L is greater than the Debye length. The typical length-scale of the plasma, L [m], considered in the literature (e.g. Mohanty et al. 2002; Tanaka et al. 2014) is the pressure scaleheight which depends on the local gas properties and varies with 1/g. Typical values for the pressure scaleheight are 105–106 cm for a BD with log (g) = 5. Tanaka et al. (2014) base their length-scale on the definition of the Alfvén speed that is of the order of the velocity of sound (their equation 12). Also their approach results in a typical length-scale of the order of the pressure scaleheight. Associate with the Debye length is the number of charges inside a Debye sphere, _N_D (plasma parameter, App. B). If _N_D ≫ 1, the ionized gas exhibits plasma behaviour.

Plasma parameters across the star–planet regime

In the following, we evaluate the plasma criteria for late MDs, BDs and giant gas planet atmospheres. All results have been calculated considering thermal ionization only and compose our reference study against which the need for additional ionization processes can be derived. First we examine for which global parameters and _p_gas values, the gas is ionized above the threshold value of _f_e > 10−7 (Section 3.3.1). In Section 3.3.2 we demonstrate that long-range electromagnetic collective interactions of many charged particles can dominate over short-range binary interactions also in regions of a very low degree of ionization. Recent BD atmospheric investigations have focused on the degree of ionization to characterize plasma behaviour, in this paper we consider multiple parameters to gain a more detailed characterization (e.g. Osten et al. 2015). In Section 3.3.3 we demonstrate for which length-scale ultracool atmospheres will be effected by electrostatic processes and that it is not unreasonable to expect ultracool atmospheres to emit Hα or even in radio wavelength as in particular the rarefied upper parts of the atmospheres fulfill plasma criteria easily despite having low degrees of ionization.

Degree of ionization by thermal processes, fe

Fig. 2 shows the degree of thermal ionization evaluated for the same models represented in Fig. 1 (Table 1). Guided by these results we consider _f_e > 10−7 to be a threshold above which the gas is partially ionized and it may exhibit plasma behaviour. The above choice of a threshold value is supported by results from laboratory experiments and laboratory plasma devices (e.g. Tokamak; Diver 2001; Fridman 2008). For a fluorescent tube, the degree of ionization is _f_e ≈ 10−5 according to Inan & Golkowski (2010). Christophorou & Olthoff (2004) showed that at low temperature (_T_gas ≈ 300–600 K) and low density (1013–1016 cm−3) the gas is weakly ionized with _f_e ≈ 10−6–10−1. If the density of the charged particles increases towards _f_e → 1 the gas will be fully ionized. For example, a fully ionized gas is assumed in ideal MHD calculations. This threshold, _f_e > 10−7, allows us to derive the atmospheric volume that can be considered as an ionized gas (Section 3.4, Fig. 9). Deriving such atmospheric volume fractions will enable us to compare the results from different plasma criteria (Equations 2, 3) and to demonstrate that a gas does not need to be fully ionized in order to exhibit collective plasma effects.

The degree of thermal ionization, fe = pe/(pe + pgas) as a measure of free charged particles for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres. The MD atmosphere is easily ionized by thermal processes. Atmosphere of BDs can only be thermally ionized in deeper layers. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 2.

The degree of thermal ionization, _f_e = _p_e/(_p_e + _p_gas) as a measure of free charged particles for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres. The MD atmosphere is easily ionized by thermal processes. Atmosphere of BDs can only be thermally ionized in deeper layers. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

All models of non-irradiated atmospheres show a degree of ionization which increases from a minimum (_p_gas ∼ 10−8 − 10−6 bar) with increasing local gas pressure values towards the deeper layers of the atmosphere. Atmosphere models with _T_eff ≤2800 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0 can reach _f_e > 10−7 only for high _p_gas (inner parts of the atmosphere). Only one model atmosphere achieves _f_e > 10−7 throughout nearly the entire atmosphere (_T_eff = 3000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0). For atmospheres of late MDs, BDs and giant gas planets for _T_eff = 1000–3000 K for varying log(g) and metallicity, we observe that:

Section 4 investigates which atoms or molecules are the most important electron donors in these cold atmospheres, and hence, responsible for the values of the degree of thermal ionization, _f_e. We note that the degree of thermal ionization will be influenced by the formation of clouds if the dominating electron donors are amongst the most abundant condensing species. Ca does not fall into this category.

Dominating electromagnetic interaction

The criterion ωpe ≫ νne is used to derive where in an ultracool atmosphere the long-range, electromagnetic, collective interactions of many charged particles dominates over short-range binary interactions in an ionized gas of a certain degree of ionization. Fig. 3 shows the results of this criterion for the three groups of model atmosphere structures (Fig. 1).

Ratio of plasma frequency of the electrons and the frequency of collisions between neutral particles and electrons. Electromagnetic interactions dominate over electron–neutral interactions if ωpe/νne ≫ 1. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 3.

Ratio of plasma frequency of the electrons and the frequency of collisions between neutral particles and electrons. Electromagnetic interactions dominate over electron–neutral interactions if ωpe/νne ≫ 1. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Fig. 3 demonstrates that the collective, long-range electromagnetic interactions dominate over short-range binary interactions in atmospheres of low degrees of ionizations, i.e. for 2800 ≥ _T_eff ≥ 2000 K. As _T_eff and the metallicity increase, ωpe ≫ νne is easier fulfilled at high _p_gas, however, as _T_eff increases and the metallicity decreases, ωpe ≫ νne is easier fulfilled at low _p_gas for _T_eff = 2800 K, 1000 K. This effect is counteracted by an increase in log(g). The lowest value of log (g) causes a decrease of ωpe/νne in the uppermost parts of the atmosphere and an increase in the innermost parts. Consequently, long-range, electromagnetic, collective interactions of many charged particles do not require a complete ionization of the atmospheric gas, and a moderate gas ionization is sufficient.

Electrostatically effected atmospheric length-scales

The Debye length, λD, is compared to a typical atmospheric length-scale of the order of the pressure scaleheight, L = 103 m (Helling et al. 2011b). Fig. 4 shows how the Debye length changes depending on the local atmospheric gas pressure, and where λD ≪ L is fulfilled.

Debye length versus the local gas pressure assuming Te = Tgas. For length-scales less than the Debye length, a test charge will experience the influence of the charge imbalance inside the Debye sphere. The horizontal line indicates the typical length-scale of the plasma L = 103m consider in this study (Helling et al. 2011b). Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 4.

Debye length versus the local gas pressure assuming _T_e = _T_gas. For length-scales less than the Debye length, a test charge will experience the influence of the charge imbalance inside the Debye sphere. The horizontal line indicates the typical length-scale of the plasma L = 103m consider in this study (Helling et al. 2011b). Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Fig. 4 demonstrates that the Debye length is generally very large in the upper atmospheric regions throughout the whole regime of ultracool objects, i.e. late MDs, BDs and giant gas planets. In the upper atmosphere the electron density is low causing an increasing Debye length; whereas deeper in the atmosphere the electron number density is high and so the Debye length is relatively lower. According to Cravens (1997), at the top of the Earth's ionosphere λD ≈ 1 cm for _T_e ≈ 1000 K and _n_e ≈ 1011 cm−3, compared to a vertical extant of ≈300 km of the ionosphere. For the solar wind at ≈1 au, λD ≈ 700 cm (_T_e ≈ 105 K, _n_e ≈ 107 cm−3). A comparison of different values of the Debye sphere for different astrophysical environments is presented in Table 2 and in Fig. 5. Duru et al. (2008) investigate the electron density in the upper ionosphere of Mars, Trotignon et al. (2001) the interaction of the Martian's atmosphere with the solar wind. Both consider the presence of the dust in the plasma environment. Yaroshenko et al. (2011) model a plasma composed of electrons, water group ions and protons with the presence of photoemission due to the UV radiation. Kremer et al. (2006) work with a pure electron plasma.

Comparison Debye length of different astrophysical environments Group1 (Table 1) is plotted here. The red lines represent Teff = 3000-2200 K covering MD and young L-dwarfs. Blue lines represent Teff = 2000 −1000 K covering late L-dwarfs and giant gas planets regime. The Debye lengths for Martian's atmosphere are plotted as red diamond (Duru et al. 2008) and black circle (Trotignon et al. 2001), for plasma composed of electrons, water group ions and protons as violet triangle (Yaroshenko et al. 2011) and a pure electron plasma as light blue square symbols (Kremer et al. 2006). The black line represents the typical atmospheric length-scale, L = 103 m (Helling et al. 2011b).

Figure 5.

Comparison Debye length of different astrophysical environments Group1 (Table 1) is plotted here. The red lines represent _T_eff = 3000-2200 K covering MD and young L-dwarfs. Blue lines represent _T_eff = 2000 −1000 K covering late L-dwarfs and giant gas planets regime. The Debye lengths for Martian's atmosphere are plotted as red diamond (Duru et al. 2008) and black circle (Trotignon et al. 2001), for plasma composed of electrons, water group ions and protons as violet triangle (Yaroshenko et al. 2011) and a pure electron plasma as light blue square symbols (Kremer et al. 2006). The black line represents the typical atmospheric length-scale, L = 103 m (Helling et al. 2011b).

Table 2.

Debye lengths for different astrophysical environments. Fig. 5 provides a comparison to results of these papers.

Object _T_e [K] _n_e [cm−3] λ_D_[_cm_] References
Martian's Duru et al. (2008)
ionosphere 5000 10−3 1.5 × 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
347 9.78 1.3
Martian's 3131 4.12 × 10−1 19 Trotignon et al. (2001)
ionosphere 12 222 5.82 × 10−2 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
86 665 3.47 × 10−3 1.1 × 103
1.16 × 104 50 102
Saturn 3 × 104 30 2 × 102 Yaroshenko et al. (2011)
Orbit 7 × 104 10 5.6 × 102 (electron, water group ions
Insertion 1.7 × 105 2 1.9 × 103 and protons plasma)
4 × 105 0.1 5 × 103
Laboratory Kremer et al. (2006)
Experiments 46 418 7.5 × 106 1.7 (pure electrons plasma)
Object _T_e [K] _n_e [cm−3] λ_D_[_cm_] References
Martian's Duru et al. (2008)
ionosphere 5000 10−3 1.5 × 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
347 9.78 1.3
Martian's 3131 4.12 × 10−1 19 Trotignon et al. (2001)
ionosphere 12 222 5.82 × 10−2 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
86 665 3.47 × 10−3 1.1 × 103
1.16 × 104 50 102
Saturn 3 × 104 30 2 × 102 Yaroshenko et al. (2011)
Orbit 7 × 104 10 5.6 × 102 (electron, water group ions
Insertion 1.7 × 105 2 1.9 × 103 and protons plasma)
4 × 105 0.1 5 × 103
Laboratory Kremer et al. (2006)
Experiments 46 418 7.5 × 106 1.7 (pure electrons plasma)

Table 2.

Debye lengths for different astrophysical environments. Fig. 5 provides a comparison to results of these papers.

Object _T_e [K] _n_e [cm−3] λ_D_[_cm_] References
Martian's Duru et al. (2008)
ionosphere 5000 10−3 1.5 × 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
347 9.78 1.3
Martian's 3131 4.12 × 10−1 19 Trotignon et al. (2001)
ionosphere 12 222 5.82 × 10−2 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
86 665 3.47 × 10−3 1.1 × 103
1.16 × 104 50 102
Saturn 3 × 104 30 2 × 102 Yaroshenko et al. (2011)
Orbit 7 × 104 10 5.6 × 102 (electron, water group ions
Insertion 1.7 × 105 2 1.9 × 103 and protons plasma)
4 × 105 0.1 5 × 103
Laboratory Kremer et al. (2006)
Experiments 46 418 7.5 × 106 1.7 (pure electrons plasma)
Object _T_e [K] _n_e [cm−3] λ_D_[_cm_] References
Martian's Duru et al. (2008)
ionosphere 5000 10−3 1.5 × 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
347 9.78 1.3
Martian's 3131 4.12 × 10−1 19 Trotignon et al. (2001)
ionosphere 12 222 5.82 × 10−2 102 (Mar's atmosphere)
86 665 3.47 × 10−3 1.1 × 103
1.16 × 104 50 102
Saturn 3 × 104 30 2 × 102 Yaroshenko et al. (2011)
Orbit 7 × 104 10 5.6 × 102 (electron, water group ions
Insertion 1.7 × 105 2 1.9 × 103 and protons plasma)
4 × 105 0.1 5 × 103
Laboratory Kremer et al. (2006)
Experiments 46 418 7.5 × 106 1.7 (pure electrons plasma)

Appendix B provides supplementary material about _N_D, the average number of charges in the Debye sphere. The values for _N_D are ≫105 in the rarefied upper part of the atmospheres (_p_gas < 10−4 bar) for all MD, BD and giant gas planet model atmospheres investigated here. Values for the above quoted Debye length for the Earth ionosphere and solar wind are N|$_{\rm D}^{\rm ionosphere} = 10^5$| and N|$_{\rm D}^{\rm sol wind} = 10^{10}$|⁠. The parameter _N_D indicates that the gas is dominated by many long-range interactions of charged particles, rather than the short-range binary interactions. If any charged particle is close enough to others then, it interacts in a collective behaviour, not only with the closest one. This collective behaviour distinguishes a plasma from a kinetic gas. Collective behaviour occurs if _N_D ≫ 1. Fig. B1 shows that _N_D ≫ 1 is satisfied throughout the whole atmosphere for model atmosphere structures presented in Table 1. A substantially higher _N_D is required for cooler atmospheres than in atmospheres for higher _T_eff if thermal ionization is considered only (i.e. _T_e = _T_gas,LTE).

Comparing different plasma criteria

Radio and X-ray observations from low-mass objects suggest that their atmospheres contain enough free charges to constitute a magnetized plasma (Hallinan et al. 2008). From our evaluation of the thermal degree of ionization (Section 3.3.1), we chose a threshold for the degree of ionization of _f_e > 10−7 above which an atmospheric gas can be sufficiently ionized that it may exhibit plasma behaviour. In a plasma, electron–electron interactions dominate over collisions between electrons and neutral particles, ωpe ≫ νne (Section 3.3.2). Additionally, for a plasma to be considered magnetized, the magnetic field must be sufficiently strong that it significantly influences the electron and ion dynamics, which we address in Section 5.

We now cast the results in terms of atmospheric volumes to allow a comparison between the results for different parameters. Fig. 9 and 10 summarize our findings in terms of the volume fraction, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, with |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}$| the thermally ionized volume of the atmosphere and _V_atm the total atmospheric volume. |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}$| is derived by calculating the fraction of the atmospheric volume for which _f_e > 10−7 (Fig. 9). Fig. 10 visualizes the atmospheric volume fraction where ωpe ≫ νne is fulfilled. The atmosphere volume that reached _f_e > 10−7 and satisfied ωpe ≫ νne is affected by the global parameters as follows.

The late MDs have the largest atmosphere volume fraction, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, that reached _f_e > 10−7 that is for model atmosphere structures with _T_eff = 2600–3000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0 and _T_eff = 2800 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = +0.3. For late MD and BDs, the atmospheric gas satisfies _f_e > 10−7 only for half of their atmosphere. For planetary objects the fraction of the volume that reaches _f_e > 10−7 becomes increasingly small except for those that have the highest value of metallicity and the lowest value of surface gravity.

Models with 2200 K ≤ _T_eff ≤ 3000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0 have the largest atmosphere volume fraction that reached ωpe ≫ νne for a given log (g) and [M/H]. Models with _T_eff = 2800 K, log (g) = 4.0, [M/H] = 0.0; _T_eff = 2800 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = −0.6, −0.3, 0.0, +0.3 and _T_eff = 2000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = +0.3 have the largest atmosphere volume fraction that reached ωpe ≫ νne as well. In young BDs, the atmospheric gas volume that reaches ωpe ≫ νne is more than 50 per cent. The atmospheric gas volume that reaches ωpe ≫ νne for planetary objects is smaller than for the rest of the objects, i.e. for _T_eff = 1000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = +0.3. Our results show that |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$| (ωpe ≫ νne) is larger than |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|(_f_e > 10−7) for 1000 K ≤ _T_eff ≤ 3000 K. A general observation is that despite a relatively low degree of ionization, large-scale electromagnetic interactions can dominate a considerably larger atmospheric volume than an _f_e evaluation would suggest for all ultracool objects in our sample.

MOST ABUNDANT THERMAL IONS IN LATE MD, BD AND GIANT GAS PLANET ATMOSPHERES

We investigate the atmospheric gas-phase composition regarding the most abundant local gas ions to demonstrate which are the dominating electron donors across the star–planet regime based on our non-irradiated drift-phoenix model atmosphere grid. This investigation allows us to understand which gas-phase species are responsible for increasing the number of free electrons in ultracool atmospheres and consequently, responsible of satisfying the plasma parameters given in equations (1)–(3). It also allows us to understand how the chemical composition of the gas is linked with the dominating electron donors in the gas-phase. In the case of cloud-forming atmospheres, the abundance of the element depleted by cloud formation has an effect on electron donors at the location of the cloud. This section serve also as reference for future investigations on ionization processes and their effect on the gas composition like in (Rimmer & Helling 2013).

Dominating ions across the late MD, BD and planetary regime

Fig. 6 demonstrates for a subset of effective temperatures _T_eff = 1000–3000 K (log(g) = 3, 0 solar element abundances) that K+, Na+, Ca+, Mg+ and Fe+ are the dominating thermal electron donors. These ionic species are the most significant contributors to the electron number density from thermal ionization. Species that have sufficiently low first ionization potentials and sufficiently high atmospheric number densities will contribute most effectively to the thermal degree of ionization. Therefore, K+, Na+ and Ca+ provide the majority of thermal electrons. Fig. 6 demonstrates that K+ is the dominating thermal electron donor where pgas < 10−2 bar for all atmospheres except in an MD atmosphere of _T_eff = 3000 K. The second dominating electron donor is Na+ from _T_eff = 2000 K. Na+ dominates for _T_eff = 3000 K. For increasing gas pressure, _p_gas > 10−2 bar, Na+ and K+ are the dominating thermal electron donor for _T_eff = 2000 K, 1400 K, 1000 K. For example, Mg+ provides most of the electrons in the _T_eff = 3000 K model for _p_gas > 10−2 bar. The detailed results for all model groups are summarize in Tables A1 and A2 in the Appendix A.

The dominating thermal electron donors for a subset of effective temperatures for log(g) = 3, 0 and solar element abundances; Na+, K+ and Ca+ in the low-density atmosphere for all Teff; Mg+ and Fe+ in the inner parts for Teff ≥ 2800 K. An off-set of 3 orders of magnitudes is applied between the models for all Teff > 1000 K to allow a better comparison.

Figure 6.

The dominating thermal electron donors for a subset of effective temperatures for log(g) = 3, 0 and solar element abundances; Na+, K+ and Ca+ in the low-density atmosphere for all _T_eff; Mg+ and Fe+ in the inner parts for _T_eff ≥ 2800 K. An off-set of 3 orders of magnitudes is applied between the models for all _T_eff > 1000 K to allow a better comparison.

Table A1.

First, second and third ions represent the most abundant positive ion in the high, middle and lower pressure regions, respectively. First ion corresponds to the higher pressure (and therefore higher abundances) and vice versa.

Teff (K) log(g) 3.0 4.0 5.0
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
Mg+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Mg+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+
Teff (K) log(g) 3.0 4.0 5.0
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
Mg+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Mg+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+

Table A1.

First, second and third ions represent the most abundant positive ion in the high, middle and lower pressure regions, respectively. First ion corresponds to the higher pressure (and therefore higher abundances) and vice versa.

Teff (K) log(g) 3.0 4.0 5.0
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
Mg+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Mg+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+
Teff (K) log(g) 3.0 4.0 5.0
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
Mg+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Mg+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+

Table A2.

First, second and third ions represent the most abundant positive ion in the high, middle and lower pressure regions respectively. First ion corresponds to the higher pressure (and therefore higher abundances) and vice versa.

M/H Teff (K) −0.6 −0.3 0.0 +0.3
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1500 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Na+ K+ Na+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+ Na+ K+ Ca+ Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+ Na+
K+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+
M/H Teff (K) −0.6 −0.3 0.0 +0.3
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1500 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Na+ K+ Na+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+ Na+ K+ Ca+ Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+ Na+
K+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+

Table A2.

First, second and third ions represent the most abundant positive ion in the high, middle and lower pressure regions respectively. First ion corresponds to the higher pressure (and therefore higher abundances) and vice versa.

M/H Teff (K) −0.6 −0.3 0.0 +0.3
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1500 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Na+ K+ Na+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+ Na+ K+ Ca+ Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+ Na+
K+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+
M/H Teff (K) −0.6 −0.3 0.0 +0.3
1000 K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+ K+
Na+ Na+ Na+ Na+
1200 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1400 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1500 K+ K+ K+
Na+
1600 Na+ K+ K+
1800 Na+ K+ K+
2000 Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
2200 Na+ K+ K+
2400 Na+ K+ K+
2600 Mg+ K+ K+
Na+
2800 Na+ K+ Na+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+ Na+ K+ K+
Ca+ Na+ K+ Ca+ Na+ Mg+ Na+ Mg+ Na+
K+
3000 Na+ K+ Na+
Mg+ Na+ K+
H+

Figs 7 and 8 show the distribution of the most important electron donating elements over atoms, molecules and ions. For example, Na+ is the dominating Na-species at high temperature, but the atomic Na followed by NaH and NaOH contain most of the element Na at lower temperatures. Ca, Mg and Fe are involved in the formation of many molecules. In the case of Ca, CaCl2, CaOH and Ca(OH)2 reach the abundances not much lower or even higher than the atomic Ca. Our investigations show that it is not sufficient to determine the local degree of ionization based on one prescribed electron donor species. Such an approach has been chosen in various complex simulations like MHD simulations for protoplanetary discs (e.g. Sano et al. 2000) or atmospheric circulation models (e.g. Perna, Menou & Rauscher 2010).

Distribution of electron donor's abundance over atoms, molecules and ions for a warm model of Teff = 2000 K, log(g) = 3.0 and solar element composition. The upper left corner contains the element considered.

Figure 7.

Distribution of electron donor's abundance over atoms, molecules and ions for a warm model of _T_eff = 2000 K, log(g) = 3.0 and solar element composition. The upper left corner contains the element considered.

Same like Fig. 7. Both, Mg and Fe are influenced by dust formation which strongly decreases both elements, resulting into the localize large kink. The upper left corner contains the element considered. H-binding species are shown for comparison.

Figure 8.

Same like Fig. 7. Both, Mg and Fe are influenced by dust formation which strongly decreases both elements, resulting into the localize large kink. The upper left corner contains the element considered. _H_-binding species are shown for comparison.

The exact amount with which K, Na, Ca, Mg and Fe contribute to the local degree of thermal ionization will also depend on the amount of each element that is chemically locked in cloud particles. Element depletion by cloud formation is fully taken into account for Mg and Fe (see Section 2) in the drift-phoenix atmosphere simulations. The more extended work by Helling et al. (2008) (Fig. 6) suggests that the effect of cloud formation on the Ca+ abundance is negligible. Morley et al. (2012) (Fig. 3) show that Na2S[s] is thermally stable for _T_gas < 1100 K and KCl[s] for _T_gas < 900 K, hence Na+ and K+ would be effected by cloud formation in a similar temperature window. The solar element abundances for Na (6.17), K (5.08) and Cl (5.5) are lower than for Ca (6.31) and it may therefore be reasonable to expect a similarly negligible effect of cloud formation on the abundances of Na+ and K+.

Summary on electrostatic parameters

Our reference study suggests that

K+, Na+, Ca+, Mg+ and Fe+ are the dominating thermal electron donors, however, K+, Na+ and Ca+ provide the majority of electrons for _T_eff = 1000–3000 K for log(g) = 3,0 and solar element abundances. In particular, the degree of ionization is low in the upper atmospheres where the abundances of those ions are low. As their abundances increase, _f_e increases as well. Long-range electromagnetic interactions dominating over collisions (equation 2) and a zero electrostatic forces inside the plasma (equation 3) require a sufficient number of free charged particles. Any process (cloud formation, CR impact) that impacts the element abundance of the dominating electron donors will affect to the electric state of the atmosphere, and the potential coupling to a large-scale magnetic field.

MAGNETIZED PLASMA PARAMETERS ACROSS THE STAR-PLANET REGIME

In the previous sections we discussed that for a plasma to exists, the gas needs to be ionized to a certain degree (_f_e > 10−7). The plasma frequency was used to investigate where in the atmosphere, electromagnetic interactions dominate over kinetic collisions between electrons and neutrals.

The Debye length provides insight about the length-scales on which electrostatic interactions influencing the atmospheric gas. We demonstrated that the atmospheric volume fraction, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, suspected to show plasma behaviour, varies largely through the MD to planetary regime.

A plasma is considered magnetized when the motion and dynamics of the charged particles are influenced by an ambient magnetic field. This requires that the magnetic field is of sufficient magnitude that the charged particles can on average participate in at least one Larmor orbit before colliding with a neutral atom or dust particle. Otherwise, frequent collisions with the ambient neutrals will dominate the dynamical evolution of the plasma particles and the influence of the magnetic field will be negligible. In some instances, because of the differing mass between electrons and ions, the electrons can be magnetized while the ions are not. For magneto-fluid descriptions of plasmas (such as magnetohydrodynamics) both the electrons and ions need to be magnetized. Radio flares (Route & Wolszczan 2012), X-ray flares (Berger et al. 2010) and quiescent radio emission (Williams, Berger & Zauderer 2013) have been observed in BDs, Schmidt et al. (2015) conclude that 45 per cent of their active L-dwarfs are also variable. This fraction of L-dwarfs, which is lower compared to the 60 per cent of active MDs that were found to be variable in their sample, lead Schmidt et al. (2015) to speculate about a BD chromosphere as origin for the observed Hα emission and variability. These observations suggest that there should be a strong magnetic field and considerable coupling between the magnetic field and the atmospheric gas, either to directly accelerate free electrons or to allow plasma waves to travel into the low-density upper atmosphere and deposit their energy causing a chromosphere to develop. It is interesting to note here that old BDs (log(g) = 5.0) have enough time available to build up a chromosphere even if the acoustic heating rates should be low due to an insufficient magnetic coupling of the atmosphere. For young BDs, rapid rotation may favour chromospheric heating by a better coupling to a stronger magnetic field.

Cyclotron frequency versus collisional frequency |$\boldsymbol \omega _{c}\gg \nu _{\rm coll}$|

The cyclotron frequency is the angular velocity with which charged particles gyrate around the magnetic field line (Boyd & Sanderson 2003), ωc, s = _v_⊥, s/rL, s = qsB/ms in [rad s− 1], where _m_s [kg], _q_s [C], B [T] and _v_⊥, s [m s− 1] are the mass of species s, with charge _q_s and speed perpendicular to the magnetic field _v_⊥, s, respectively; and |$|\boldsymbol B| = B$| is the magnitude of the external magnetic flux density present in the medium. For a charged particle's motion to be dictated by a magnetic field, the particle needs to complete on average one gyration before a collision with a neutral atom. Formally, a magnetized plasma requires

\begin{equation} \omega _{\rm c,s}\gg \nu _{\rm ns}, \end{equation}

(7)

where νns [s− 1] is the collision frequency for neutral particles with charged species s. From equation (7) we obtain the minimum value for the external magnetic field flux, |$|\vec{\boldsymbol B}| = B$|⁠, that is needed to satisfy this criteria. Applying the definitions for ωc,s and νns, we derive the critical magnetic flux density that is required for the dynamics of the charged particle to be influenced by the background magnetic field

\begin{eqnarray} \frac{eB}{m_{\rm s }}&\gg & \sigma _{\rm gas,e }n_{\rm gas}v_{\rm s }, \end{eqnarray}

(8)

\begin{eqnarray} \Rightarrow B_{\rm s}&\gg &\frac{m_{\rm s}}{e} \sigma _{\rm gas,e }n_{\rm gas }{ \left( \frac{k_{\rm B}T_{\rm s}}{m_{\rm s }} \right) }^{ 1/2 }, \end{eqnarray}

(9)

where the collision, or scattering, cross-section is |$\sigma _{\rm gas} = \pi \times r_{\rm gas}^2$|⁠. The atmospheric gas in late MDs, BDs and most likely also in giant gas planets is composed mostly of molecular hydrogen, H2. The collision cross-section is approximated as |$\sigma _{\rm gas}\approx \sigma _{\rm H_{2}}\approx \pi \times {r_{\rm H_{2}}}^{2} = 5.81\times 10^{-20}$| m2 (r|$_{\rm H_{2}} = 1.36\times 10^{-10}$| m).

Taking the electrons and ions as the particles that are influenced by an external magnetic flux density, equation (9) becomes

\begin{eqnarray} B_{\rm e}&\gg &\frac{m_{\rm e}}{e} \sigma _{\rm gas }n_{\rm gas }{ \left( \frac{k_{\rm B}T_{\rm e}}{m_{\rm e }} \right) }^{ 1/2 }, \end{eqnarray}

(10)

\begin{eqnarray} B_{\rm i}&\gg &\frac{m_{\rm i}}{e} \sigma _{\rm gas }n_{\rm gas }{ \left( \frac{k_{\rm B}T_{\rm i}}{m_{\rm i }} \right) }^{ 1/2 }. \end{eqnarray}

(11)

Grouping the constants, we rewrite equations 10 and 11 as _B_e ∝ _n_gas(_m_e_T_e)1/2, with _B_e as the minimum threshold for the magnetic flux density to ensure that the electrons are magnetized and _B_i ∝ _n_gas(_m_i_T_i)1/2, with _B_i as the minimum threshold for magnetic flux density required to ensure that an ion, i, is magnetized in Fig. 12. The ion masses, _m_i, are taken to be for K+, Na+ Ca+, Fe+, and Mg+ according to Section 4 assuming local thermal equilibrium, _T_gas ≈ _T_i ≈ _T_e.

Fig. 11 shows that for a _p_gas < 100 bar and B = 103 G and for a _p_gas < 10−2 bar and B = 10 G, ωce ≫ νne (horizontal black line) is reached for all model atmosphere structures. There is almost no dependence on _T_eff, log (g) and the metallicity. Largest values of ωce/νne are reached for B = 103 G representative for MDs or BDs. Fig. 12 shows for which atmospheric gas pressures, _p_gas, electrons and ions can be magnetized in the atmospheres of MDs, BDs and giant gas planets. For MDs and BDs a background magnetic field flux density of B = 103 G is large enough to magnetise the charged particles: for electrons at _p_gas < 1 bar and for ions at _p_gas < 10−3 bar. For giant gas planets, the magnetized part of the atmosphere decreases because of a smaller background field (B ≤ 10 G) compared to MDs and BDs. For electrons this occurs at _p_gas < 10−2 bar and for ions at _p_gas < 10−5 bar. Fig. 15 summarizes the results on magnetic coupling in term of the affected atmospheric gas volume, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, that reach ωc, e ≫ νne.

For a fixed value of magnetic flux density, MDs and BD atmospheres have the largest magnetically coupled volume. Unsurprisingly, a smaller fraction of a giant gas planets atmosphere is magnetically coupled when thermal ionization is considered as the only source of gas ionization. However, this fraction can reach 80 per cent also in a planetary atmosphere. The fraction of the atmospheric gas volume, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, that reaches _f_e > 10−7 (Fig. 9) and ωpe ≫ νne (Fig. 10) increases for the same set of global parameters _T_eff, log (g), [M/H] like the atmospheric gas volume that reaches ωce ≫ νne. Fig. 15 demonstrates also that a larger atmospheric gas volume can be expected to be magnetically coupling than the thermal degree of ionization had initially suggested in Fig. 9. This finding is particularly relevant with respect to the effect that the magnetic field geometry might have on the detection of the Hα activity signatures and on the radio emission: Donati et al. (2008) show that partially-convective MDs host non-axisymmetric large-scale magnetic fields with a strong toroidal component, while fully convective MDs have stronger large-scale field dominated by a mainly axisymmetric poloidal component. A partial ionization of the magnetically coupled gas does influence the magnetic flux density.

The fraction of the thermally ionized atmospheres volume, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msubsup><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></mrow></msubsup><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1.2322em;vertical-align:-0.3831em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8491em;"><span style="top:-2.453em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">gas</span></span></span></span></span><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">th</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3831em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2806em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">atm</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, for fe > 10−7 and for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres.

Figure 9.

The fraction of the thermally ionized atmospheres volume, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, for _f_e > 10−7 and for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres.

The fraction of the thermally ionized atmospheres volume, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msubsup><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></mrow></msubsup><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1.2322em;vertical-align:-0.3831em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8491em;"><span style="top:-2.453em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">gas</span></span></span></span></span><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">th</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3831em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2806em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">atm</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> for ωpe ≫ νne for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres.

Figure 10.

The fraction of the thermally ionized atmospheres volume, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$| for ωpe ≫ νne for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres.

Magnetic Reynolds Number, _R_m

The previous sections outlined the framework quantifying when an ionized gas in a substellar atmosphere behaves like a magnetized plasma. The magnetic Reynolds number is an easy-to-utilize measure of a potentially magnetically coupled ionized gas. Within the context of MHD, the magnetic Reynolds number (_R_m) is the ratio of the convective and diffusive terms from the magnetic field induction equation. It quantifies whether the MHD plasma is in the ideal or resistive regimes. When the magnetic Reynolds number is very large (i.e. in the limit of large length-scales), the MHD plasma is in the ideal MHD regime and the convective term has the dominant influence. In this regime the motion of the plasma fluid is determined by the magnetic field and vice versa. In the resistive MHD regime, the diffusive term is important and dissipative processes as Ohmic dissipation (Perna et al. 2010; Huang & Cumming 2012) become significant. The magnetic Reynolds number is defined through the induction equation

\begin{equation} \frac{\mathrm{\partial} {\boldsymbol B}}{\mathrm{\partial} t} = \nabla \times ({\boldsymbol u}\times {\boldsymbol B})+\eta \nabla ^{2}B, \end{equation}

(12)

where |$|{\boldsymbol B}| = B$| [_T_] is the magnetic flux density, u is the flow velocity (formed by electrons and ions), and σ [S m−1] is the electric conductivity. The magnetic diffusivity, η, is linked to the conductivity by η = 1/σ in [m2 s− 1] and represents the diffusion of the magnetic field, a measure of the effect of collisions between the electrons and the neutral particles on the magnetic field. The collisions between the neutral particles and the charged particles (electrons or ions) have an influence on the diffusivity of the magnetic field. If the effect of the collisions is sufficient to displace them away from the magnetic lines, the coupling between the magnetic field and the fluid may not be effective. Therefore, the diffusion of the magnetic field depends on the frequency of the collisions between neutral particles and charged particles.

The magnetic Reynolds number, _R_m can be defined as the ratio between the relative strength between the diffusive term and the advective term of the induction equation. It can be used as a measure of the magnetic coupling calling the plasma coupled to the magnetic field if _R_m ≥ 1, with

\begin{equation} R_{\text{m}} = \frac{\mid \nabla \times (\vec{u}\times \vec{B})\mid }{\eta \mid \nabla ^{2}B\mid }. \end{equation}

(13)

Applying a dimensional analyses, equation (13) reduces to

\begin{equation} R_{\text{m}}\approx \frac{vB/L}{\eta B/L^{2}} = \frac{vL}{\eta }\,, \end{equation}

(14)

where L [cm] is a typical length-scale of the plasma over which |$|{\boldsymbol B}| = B$| varies through a hydrodynamic motion of a velocity |$|\boldsymbol { v }|$|⁠, can be approximated by L = 103 [m] (Helling et al. 2011b). The diffusion coefficient, η, can be approximated by η ≈ ηd (Fig. 13).1 Therefore, the expression for the magnetic Reynolds number is rewritten as

\begin{equation} R_{\rm m}\approx 10^{-4}\times v_{\rm flow}\left(\frac{n_{\rm e}}{n_{\rm gas}T_{\rm e}^{1/2}}\right). \end{equation}

(15)

The values for the flow velocity chosen are _v_flow = 104 cm s−1 and _v_flow = 106 cm s−1 guided by values of circulation models (Cooper & Showman 2005; Menou & Rauscher 2009; Rauscher & Menou 2013; Rauscher & Kempton 2014: Heng & Showman 2015). Fig. 14 represents the magnetic Reynolds number for the drift-phoenix model atmosphere structures which are comparable to the earlier results by Mohanty et al. (2002) that were based on Dusty- and Cond-phoenix.

Reynolds number increases as _T_eff increases because of the increasing of _n_e/_n_gas in globally and locally hotter atmospheres (see Section 3.3.1). The highest _R_m is reached for _T_eff = 3000 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0, _v_flow = 106 cm s−1.

Our results suggest that ideal MHD, where a fully ionized gas is assumed, is best suited for models atmospheres with _T_eff ≥ 3000 K which includes MDs and young BDs. For cooler BDs and planetary regime objects only a small fraction of their atmosphere can be considered in ideal MHD.

DISCUSSION

Chromospheres on ultracool objects

Observations in radio, soft X-ray and Hα wavelengths from low-mass objects infer that their atmospheres are populated with magnetized plasmas. Radio and X-ray emission from ultracool dwarfs have been well established by different authors (e.g. Berger 2002, Route & Wolszczan 2012, Burgasser et al. 2013). Sorahana et al. (2014) and Schmidt et al. (2015) suggest the presence of chromospheres in BDs. Sorahana et al. (2014) suggest that weakened H2O (2.7 μm), CH4 (3.3 μm) and CO (4.6 μm) absorption in combination with moderate Hα emission could be linked to chromospheric activity. They represent a potential chromospheric heating by an increased, constant temperature (with _p_gas = nkT) in the upper atmosphere of their UCM 1D model atmosphere which allows a considerably better data fit of their observation. Schmidt et al. (2015) use a comparable approach by replacing the outer atmospheric temperature of BT-settle model atmospheres with a chromospheric temperature structure where the start of the chromosphere, a chromospheric break and the start of the transition region are used as parameters. Metchev et al. (2015) discuss the likely correlation of magnetic spots and high-amplitude photometric variability in BDs with low surface gravity values. Williams et al. (2014) demonstrate that ultracool objects do not follow the classical Güdel–Benz relationship where the radio luminosity increases proportional to the X-ray luminosity in F–M stars (Güdel & Benz 1993). The deviation of ultracool stars in the Güdel–Benz relationship beyond than approximately M5 may suggest a change in the dynamo mechanism that produces the magnetic field in such ultracool objects (Cook et al. 2014). Another interpretation of radio emission is the concurrence of an auroral region (Nichols et al. 2012). Speirs et al. (2014) describe a theoretical approach for cyclotron radio emission from Earth's auroral region providing a physical description for the widely used loss cone parametrization (e.g. Osten et al. 2015). Speirs et al. (2014) show that the radiation results from a backward-wave cyclotron-maser emission process. The radio emission is generated by electrons following a horseshoe velocity distribution, instead of a cone, that travel the magnetic field lines downward. The backward travelling waves cause the upward refraction of the radiation which will be further enhanced by density inhomogeneities.

If the atmospheric gas is well coupled with the background magnetic field in BDs and planets, the kinetic energy carried by large-scale convective motions may be transported to the top of the atmosphere and released. Tanaka et al. (2014) suggest that energy from the convective part of the atmosphere might be transported through the upper atmosphere by magneto-convection processes and suggest the formation of a chromosphere by Alfvén wave heating. Mohanty et al. (2002) carried out a study of magnetic field diffusivity to explain why the chromospheric Hα activity in BDs is low in spite of being rapid rotators. Mohanty et al. (2002) based their work on a grid of model atmospheres (mid-M and L dwarfs) in a parameter range _T_eff = 3000 –1500 K, log (g) = 5.0 and [M/H] = 0.0. They explained why in these range of _T_eff the observation of chromospheric levels activity are lower than early MDs, considering mid-M and L dwarfs as rapid rotators.

In our work, we extend our model atmosphere grid until _T_eff = 1000 K and we include atmosphere structures with different values of log (g) and [M/H] (Table 1). A linear field diffusion equation, MHD regime and LTE are used in both works.

Results obtained for _R_m as a measure of the ideal or resistive MHD atmosphere (see Fig. 14) could be incomplete and therefore misleading. According to equation (14), _R_m ∝ 1/η. Our results demonstrate that the regions where _R_m > 1 satisfy also _f_e > 10−7. Atmospheres of ultracool objects could be ionized and treated as an ideal MHD gas only at deep layers. Furthermore, ωce/νne ≫ 1 measures the coupled between the magnetic field and the atmospheric gas and it depends, mostly, on the strength of the magnetic field (see Fig. 15). Therefore, it is possible to find large volumes of the atmospheric gas that are magnetized, but smaller magnetized volumes that are strongly ionized.

Our results further suggest not only that higher effective temperatures (in agreement with Mohanty et al. (2002)) and higher metallicity atmospheres are the best candidates for forming a magnetized atmospheric plasma in support of radio, X-ray and Hα observations in ultracool objects. Also low surface gravity atmospheres fall in this category which supports the interpretation by Metchev et al. (2015) that high-amplitude photometric variability in L3–L5.5 dwarfs can also be related to magnetic spot appearance. While MDs have been shown to be fully magnetized, L-dwarfs and later BDs have smaller atmospheric volume that can be magnetized in an external magnetic field. This findings relate to the activity-versus-SpecT results in Schmidt et al. (2015) (e.g. their fig. 6). The threshold of T_eff = 2300 K given in their fig. 6 is the Mohanty et al. (2002) threshold that points out the limit from which models R_m > 1 using v = 104 cms−1 and 10−2 ≤ τ_J ≤102 (convection zone) being τ_J the optical length in the J band. Our paper suggests that this threshold move towards _T_eff = 1400 K for the same value of flow velocity and same region. This result suggests that atmospheres cooler than _T_eff = 2300 K may be susceptible to be magnetized. Another criterion to consider a gas magnetized is ωce ≫ νne (see Fig. 11). For all models considered in this study (Table 1) the atmospheric gas fulfill ωce ≫ νne for _p_gas < 1 bar. Combining both criteria ωce ≫ νne and _R_m > 1, a large fraction of possible active objects are found for _T_eff = 3000 K–1400 K, log (g) = 3.0, [M/H] = 0.0 (Group1).

Ratio of cyclotron frequency of the electrons and the frequency of collisions between neutral particles and electrons. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 11.

Ratio of cyclotron frequency of the electrons and the frequency of collisions between neutral particles and electrons. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Magnetic flux density required for electrons, Be (lower set of lines), and ions, Bi (upper set of lines), to be magnetically coupled to a background magnetic field in the object (B = 10 G – giant gas planets (GP), B = 103 G – MD, BD; black horizontal/vertical lines). If B > Bi (or B > Be), ωc,s ≫ νns is fulfilled and the gas is magnetized by the external magnetic field B.

Figure 12.

Magnetic flux density required for electrons, Be (lower set of lines), and ions, Bi (upper set of lines), to be magnetically coupled to a background magnetic field in the object (B = 10 G – giant gas planets (GP), B = 103 G – MD, BD; black horizontal/vertical lines). If B > _B_i (or B > _B_e), ωc,s ≫ νns is fulfilled and the gas is magnetized by the external magnetic field B.

Decoupled diffusion coefficient, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>ν</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">p</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\rm d} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm en}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.625em;vertical-align:-0.1944em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3361em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">d</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">=</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1.1972em;vertical-align:-0.3831em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal">c</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8141em;"><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">2</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.06366em;">ν</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.1514em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0637em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">en</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">ω</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8141em;"><span style="top:-2.453em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">pe</span></span></span></span></span><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">2</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3831em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> and the Ohmic diffusion coefficient, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><msup><mi>c</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><msub><mi>ν</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi></mrow></msub></mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><msubsup><mi>ω</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">p</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\rm ohm} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm ei}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.625em;vertical-align:-0.1944em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3361em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">ohm</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span><span class="mrel">=</span><span class="mspace" style="margin-right:0.2778em;"></span></span><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1.1972em;vertical-align:-0.3831em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal">c</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8141em;"><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">2</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.06366em;">ν</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3175em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0637em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">ei</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">ω</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8141em;"><span style="top:-2.453em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">pe</span></span></span></span></span><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight">2</span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3831em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span> for the dominating thermal electron donors for Teff = 1000, 2800 K, for log(g) = 3, 0 and solar element abundances; K+, Na+, Ca+, Fe+ and Mg+ (Fig. 6). The Ohmic diffusion coefficient is smaller than the decoupled diffusion coefficient. This result suggests that the binary interactions between the ions and electrons (ηOhm) are not significantly compared to the binary interactions between electrons and neutral particles (ηd) in the case of thermal ionization. The lines in both temperature sets appear from top to bottom in the order ηd, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mo separator="true">,</mo><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">K</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\rm Ohm,K^+}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.7167em;vertical-align:-0.2861em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3419em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">Ohm</span><span class="mpunct mtight">,</span><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">K</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.7027em;"><span style="top:-2.786em;margin-right:0.0714em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.5em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size3 size1 mtight"><span class="mbin mtight">+</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2861em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mtext>Ohm</mtext><mo separator="true">,</mo><mtext>N</mtext><msup><mi>a</mi><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{N}a^+}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.7167em;vertical-align:-0.2861em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3419em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Ohm</span></span><span class="mpunct mtight">,</span><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">N</span></span><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathnormal mtight">a</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.7027em;"><span style="top:-2.786em;margin-right:0.0714em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.5em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size3 size1 mtight"><span class="mbin mtight">+</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2861em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mtext>Ohm</mtext><mo separator="true">,</mo><msup><mtext>Ca</mtext><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Ca}^+}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.7449em;vertical-align:-0.3143em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3448em;"><span style="top:-2.5218em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Ohm</span></span><span class="mpunct mtight">,</span><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Ca</span></span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.7471em;"><span style="top:-2.8305em;margin-right:0.0714em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.5em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size3 size1 mtight"><span class="mbin mtight">+</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3143em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mtext>Ohm</mtext><mo separator="true">,</mo><msup><mtext>Mg</mtext><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Mg}^+}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.7449em;vertical-align:-0.3143em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3448em;"><span style="top:-2.5218em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Ohm</span></span><span class="mpunct mtight">,</span><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Mg</span></span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.7471em;"><span style="top:-2.8305em;margin-right:0.0714em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.5em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size3 size1 mtight"><span class="mbin mtight">+</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3143em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>η</mi><mrow><mtext>Ohm</mtext><mo separator="true">,</mo><msup><mtext>Fe</mtext><mo>+</mo></msup></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Fe}^+}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:0.7449em;vertical-align:-0.3143em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.03588em;">η</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3448em;"><span style="top:-2.5218em;margin-left:-0.0359em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Ohm</span></span><span class="mpunct mtight">,</span><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord text mtight"><span class="mord mtight">Fe</span></span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.7471em;"><span style="top:-2.8305em;margin-right:0.0714em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.5em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size3 size1 mtight"><span class="mbin mtight">+</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3143em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>.

Figure 13.

Decoupled diffusion coefficient, |$\eta _{\rm d} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm en}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}$| and the Ohmic diffusion coefficient, |$\eta _{\rm ohm} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm ei}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}$| for the dominating thermal electron donors for _T_eff = 1000, 2800 K, for log(g) = 3, 0 and solar element abundances; K+, Na+, Ca+, Fe+ and Mg+ (Fig. 6). The Ohmic diffusion coefficient is smaller than the decoupled diffusion coefficient. This result suggests that the binary interactions between the ions and electrons (ηOhm) are not significantly compared to the binary interactions between electrons and neutral particles (ηd) in the case of thermal ionization. The lines in both temperature sets appear from top to bottom in the order ηd, |$\eta _{\rm Ohm,K^+}$|⁠, |$\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{N}a^+}$|⁠, |$\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Ca}^+}$|⁠, |$\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Mg}^+}$|⁠, |$\eta _{\text{Ohm},\text{Fe}^+}$|⁠.

Magnetic Reynolds number Rm for the three different model atmosphere structure groups described in Section 2. Rm is calculated for a flow speed of vflow = 106 cm s−1. If the flow speed increases, then Rm increases. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure 14.

Magnetic Reynolds number _R_m for the three different model atmosphere structure groups described in Section 2. _R_m is calculated for a flow speed of _v_flow = 106 cm s−1. If the flow speed increases, then _R_m increases. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

The fraction of the atmospheric volume, <span class="katex"><span class="katex-mathml"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><semantics><mrow><msubsup><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi></mrow></msubsup><mi mathvariant="normal">/</mi><msub><mi>V</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">a</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow></msub></mrow><annotation encoding="application/x-tex">V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}</annotation></semantics></math></span><span class="katex-html" aria-hidden="true"><span class="base"><span class="strut" style="height:1.2322em;vertical-align:-0.3831em;"></span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.8491em;"><span style="top:-2.453em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">gas</span></span></span></span></span><span style="top:-3.063em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">th</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.3831em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="mord">/</span><span class="mord"><span class="mord mathnormal" style="margin-right:0.22222em;">V</span><span class="msupsub"><span class="vlist-t vlist-t2"><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.2806em;"><span style="top:-2.55em;margin-left:-0.2222em;margin-right:0.05em;"><span class="pstrut" style="height:2.7em;"></span><span class="sizing reset-size6 size3 mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mtight"><span class="mord mathrm mtight">atm</span></span></span></span></span></span><span class="vlist-s">​</span></span><span class="vlist-r"><span class="vlist" style="height:0.15em;"><span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>, where ωce ≫ νne for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres. MDs and BDs are represented by B = 103 G and giant gas planets for B = 10 G.

Figure 15.

The fraction of the atmospheric volume, |$V^{\rm th}_{\rm gas}/V_{\rm atm}$|⁠, where ωce ≫ νne for MD, BD and giant gas planet atmospheres. MDs and BDs are represented by B = 103 G and giant gas planets for B = 10 G.

Ionisation through non-thermal processes

Our work focuses on determining global parameters to provide the suitable local atmospheric conditions for a magnetized plasma to be present. The results suggest that ultracool atmospheres are susceptible to plasma and magnetic processes even if only thermal ionization processes are considered and the influence of dust beyond element depletion is neglected. An atmospheric plasma regime and magnetized gas were found MD atmosphere, cooler BDs and planetary objects require high _p_gas, hence, their magnetized volume is smaller than in MD atmospheres.

Additional potentially non-thermal ionization processes will enhance the degree of ionization and increase the local volume affected by a magnetic field. Local enhancement can result from dust-dust collisions in large cloud areas (Helling, Jardine & Mokler 2011a) and Alfvén ionization if the local, hydrodynamic wind speed is high enough (Stark et al. 2013). Electric storms that develop inside an atmosphere effects the extent of an ionosphere causing a link between the local ionization processes and the global effects (Luque et al. 2014). Irradiation from a host star for close-in exoplanets or in white dwarfs–BD binaries (Casewell et al. 2013) will increase the local thermal ionization globally. Galactic cosmic rays increase the number of free charge particles in single BDs. Cosmic rays are effective at ionizing the upper atmospheric parts, however, the exact amount is hard to quantify without extensive chemistry simulations (Rimmer & Helling 2013).

CONCLUSIONS

We present a reference study for late MDs, BDs and giant gas planet to identify which ultracool objects are most susceptible to atmospheric gas-phase plasma processes. Only thermal ionization is considered for this reference study and the influence of dust beyond element depletion is neglected. The effect of additional processes like cosmic ray ionization, irradiation, Alfvén ionization, lighting can be evaluated against the reference results in this paper.

Ultracool atmospheres with high _T_eff, high [M/H] and low log (g) have large fraction of atmospheric volume where plasma processes occur, and are therefore the best candidates for radio, X-ray and Hα emissions. MDs have a considerable degree of ionization throughout the whole atmosphere, the degree of thermal ionization for a L-dwarf is low but high enough to seed other local ionization processes like Alfvén ionization or lightning discharges. Electromagnetic interaction dominates over electron–neutral interactions also in regions of a very low degree of ionization in most model atmospheres in our sample. The relevant length-scales effected by electromagnetic interactions in the gas phase are larger in low-density regions of any atmosphere. The minimum threshold for the magnetic flux density required for electrons and ions to be magnetized is smaller than typical values of the global magnetic field strengths of a BD and a giant gas planet. A considerably lower magnetic flux density is required for magnetic coupling of the atmosphere in the rarefied upper atmosphere than in the dense inner atmosphere. Na+, K+and Ca+ are the dominating electron donors in low-density atmospheres (low log(g), solar metallicity) independent of Teff. Mg+ and Fe+dominate the thermal ionization in the inner parts of MD atmospheres. Molecules remain unimportant for thermal ionization. Chemical processes (e.g. cloud formation, cosmic ray ionization) that affect the abundances of Na, K, Mg, Ca and Fe will have a direct impact on the state of ionization in ultracool atmospheres.

Our results suggest that it is not unreasonable to expect ultracool atmospheres (MDs and BDs) to emit Hα or even in radio wavelength as in particular the rarefied upper parts of the atmospheres fulfill plasma criteria easily despite having low degrees of ionization. Our results therefore suggest that an ionosphere may emerge also in BD and giant gas planet atmospheres, and that the built-up of a chromosphere is likely. Both effects will contribute to atmospheric weather features and to space weather occurrences in extrasolar, planet-like objects. Ultracool atmospheres could also drive auroral emission without the need for a companion's wind or an outgassing moon.

This file has been amended to highlight the proper use of |${\rm \LaTeX }\, 2\varepsilon $| code with the class file. These changes are for illustrative purposes and do not reflect the original paper by M. I. Rodríguez-Barrera. We thank the referee for a helpful report. We highlight financial support of the European Community under the FP7 by the ERC starting grant 257431. We thank G. Lee, G. Hodósan, I. Vorgul, P. Rimmer and I. Leonhardt for valuable discussions of the manuscript. Most literature search was performed using the ADS. We acknowledge our local computer support highly.

1

The diffusion coefficient used in equation (14) is given by η = ηd + ηohm being |$\eta _{\rm d} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm ne}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}$| as the decoupled diffusion coefficient and |$\eta _{\rm ohm} = {c^{2}\nu _{\rm ei}}/{\omega _{\rm pe}^{2}}$| as the Ohmic diffusion coefficient and ηd ≫ ηohm. Both measure the degree of the dominance of the collisions between electrons–neutral particles and electrons-ions, respectively, over long-range electromagnetic collective interactions. It is easy to relate ηd with ωpe/νne (see Fig. 3). If the latter increase, the diffusion coefficient decrease and the magnetic field may be generated and transported by fluid motions allowing the magnetic energy to be released into upper layers of the atmosphere as radio, X-ray and Hα emissions.

REFERENCES

The Physics of Plasmas

2003

Cambridge

Cambridge Univ. Press

Rev. Mod. Phys.

2001

73

719

Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital.

2013

84

1022

Fundamental Electron Interactions with Plasma Processing Gases

2004

Berlin

Springer

Physics of Solar System Plasma

1997

Cambridge

Cambridge Univ. Press

et al.

Nature

2014

505

654

A plasma formulary for physics, technology, and astrophysics

2001

New York

Wiley-VCH

et al.

MNRAS

2008

390

545

J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.)

2008

113

7302

Plasma Chemistry

2008

Cambridge

Cambridge Univ. Press

et al.

MNRAS

2012

422

753

Space Sci. Rev.

2007

130

105

J. Comput. Appl. Math.

1999

109

41

Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.

2015

43

509

Principles of Plasma Physics for Engineers and Scientists

2010

Cambridge

Cambridge Univ. Press

Phys. Rev. Lett.

2006

97

095003

J. Geophys. Res., (Space Phys.)

2014

119

8705

et al.

MNRAS

2015

446

2428

Phys. Rev. Lett.

2014

113

155002

R. Soc. Phil. Trans. A

2015

373

40259

Planet. Space Sci.

2001

49

155

J. Geophys. Res., (Space Phys.)

2011

116

12218

APPENDIX A: MOST ABUNDANT THERMAL IONS IN MD, BD AND GIANT GAS PLANET ATMOSPHERES

Varying _T_eff and log (g): Table A1 includes model atmospheres where [M/H] is kept at a constant value of 0.0 and _T_eff is varied alongside log (g) (see Section 4). The ions shown in the table are the most abundant; it does not include ions that are very prominent but not the most abundant. Note: When there are two ions listed (for example, Al+/Na+), the second ion occurs at the higher pressure.

Higher values of log(g) correspond to higher overall values of pressure, due to the increased surface gravity.

It is worth noting that there are other ions which are highly prominent within these models, however the following tables only show which ones are the most prominent.

Varying _T_eff and [M/H] Table A2 shows model atmospheres where log (g) has been kept at a constant value of 3.0 and _T_eff is varied alongside [M/H].

APPENDIX B: Plasma parameter: Number of particles in a Debye sphere: ND ≫ 1

A plasma has the capacity to screen a single charged particle placed at any point. That means that any single charged particle attracts oppositely charged particles producing a screening and repels those who have the same charge. A net space is produced in the neighbourhood of any single charged particle, reducing the electric field generated by it. The effective range of the net force between particles is restricted to the order of the Debye length (see Section 3). As a consequence, a test particle in the Debye sphere interacts only with particles that lie within this sphere. _N_D measured the efficiency of this screening and allows us to calculate how many gas particles are required to participate. Hence, only particle inside this screening areas (λD) can be considered as electrostatically active.

All particles have a thermal velocity due to the temperature of the plasma. The deflected angle due to the electrostatic interactions is bigger if the number of particles around of the screened particle in the Debye sphere is small. The movement of the screened particle will not be smooth, unlike in the situation when the number of particles in the Debye sphere is sufficiently large to reduce it. That is why the Debye length increases as the number of particles in the screened sphere decreases. This is demonstrated in Fig. 4 where all Debye length increase with height in the atmosphere, i.e. with the outwards decreasing local gas pressure.

The change in velocity due to the interactions with the particles produces a non-negligible net electrostatic force inside the Debye sphere. Therefore, large numbers of particles that are uniformly distributed inside the Debye sphere are required to avoid a large-angle deflection on a test particle. Hence the Debye length will be small in comparison to the length-scale of the plasma. In this case, the plasma is dominated by many long-range interactions, rather than the short-range binary collisions of a neutral gas. A measure of the efficiency of the screening is the plasma parameter _N_D.

The plasma parameter is defined as

\begin{equation} N_{\rm D} = (4/3)\pi n_{\rm e}\lambda _{\rm D}^{3}, \end{equation}

(B1)

the number of particles in a Debye sphere with radius λD and centred on a single charge particle that produced the charge imbalance. When there are many plasma particles in a Debye sphere (_N_D ≫ 1) and long-range collective interactions are dominant over short-range collisions, the plasma frequency is much larger than the electron-ion collision frequency. Fig. B1 shows _N_D ≫ 1 for all model atmosphere structures. This indicates that thermal electrons interact over large distances in atmosphere of ultracool atmospheres.

Number of particles inside of Debye sphere measure the efficiency of the screening given by the Debye sphere in the plasma. ND ≫ 1 results in the collective interactions dominate over short-range collisions in the gas. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

Figure B1.

Number of particles inside of Debye sphere measure the efficiency of the screening given by the Debye sphere in the plasma. _N_D ≫ 1 results in the collective interactions dominate over short-range collisions in the gas. Top: Group 1. Middle: Group 2. Bottom: Group 3.

© 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society