The cleavage specificity of RNase III (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Albany

Albany, NY 12222, USA

Search for other works by this author on:

Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Albany

Albany, NY 12222, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Search for other works by this author on:

+Present address: Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Author Notes

Revision received:

23 July 1990

Published:

25 August 1990

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

We determined sites in λ cll mRNA that are cleaved by RNase III in the presence of λ OOP antisense RNA, using a series of OOP RNAs with different internal deletions. In OOP RNA-cll mRNA structures containing a potential region of continuous double-stranded RNA bounded by a non-complementary unpaired region, RNase III cleaved the ell mRNA at one or more preferred sites located 10 to 14 bases from the 3′-end of the region of continuous complementarity. Cleavage patterns were almost identical when the presumptive structure was the same continuously double-stranded region followed by a single-stranded bulge and a second short region of base pairing. The sequences of the new cleavage sites show generally good agreement with a consensus sequence derived from thirty-five previously determined cleavage sequences. In contrast, four ‘non-sites’ at which cleavage is never observed show poor agreement with this consensus sequence. We conclude that RNase III specificity is determined both by the distance from the end of continuous pairing and by nucleotide sequence features within the region of pairing.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

+Present address: Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

© Oxford University Press

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 141

13 Pageviews

128 PDF Downloads

Since 1/1/2017

Month: Total Views:
January 2017 1
February 2017 2
March 2017 2
April 2017 2
May 2017 3
June 2017 1
August 2017 1
September 2017 3
October 2017 4
November 2017 1
December 2017 9
January 2018 9
February 2018 7
March 2018 6
April 2018 8
May 2018 1
June 2018 3
July 2018 6
August 2018 3
September 2018 4
October 2018 5
November 2018 4
December 2018 2
February 2019 2
April 2019 1
May 2019 1
June 2019 1
August 2019 1
October 2019 2
November 2019 2
December 2019 2
July 2020 1
October 2020 2
January 2021 3
July 2021 2
September 2021 1
October 2021 1
November 2021 1
March 2022 1
April 2022 1
June 2022 1
August 2022 2
September 2022 3
November 2022 5
January 2023 2
February 2023 1
April 2023 3
November 2023 1
December 2023 1
February 2024 3
April 2024 1
May 2024 1
June 2024 1
August 2024 1
September 2024 2
October 2024 1

Citations

59 Web of Science

×

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic