Post-transcriptional nucleotide modification and alternative folding of RNA (original) (raw)

Journal Article

Department of Chemistry, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Search for other works by this author on:

Received:

20 October 2005

Published:

01 January 2006

Accepted:

10 January 2006

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Alternative foldings are an inherent property of RNA and a ubiquitous problem in scientific investigations. To a living organism, alternative foldings can be a blessing or a problem, and so nature has found both, ways to harness this property and ways to avoid the drawbacks. A simple and effective method employed by nature to avoid unwanted folding is the modulation of conformation space through post-transcriptional base modification. Modified nucleotides occur in almost all classes of natural RNAs in great chemical diversity. There are about 100 different base modifications known, which may perform a plethora of functions. The presumably most ancient and simple nucleotide modifications, such as methylations and uridine isomerization, are able to perform structural tasks on the most basic level, namely by blocking or reinforcing single base-pairs or even single hydrogen bonds in RNA. In this paper, functional, genomic and structural evidence on cases of folding space alteration by post-transcriptional modifications in native RNA are reviewed.

INTRODUCTION

RNA consists of four major and a number of minor bases, the latter being generated post-transcriptionally by chemical modification of the four major ones, or in exceptional cases, by base replacement ( 1 ). The four major bases dispose of a matched set of hydrogen bond acceptors and donors, enabling the mutual complementary recognition in Watson–Crick pairs which are known as the basis of the genetic code. These interactions are quite strong and govern RNA folding in such a predominant and predictable way, that the pattern of Watson–Crick base pairs is perceived as a structural level in its own right and thus named secondary structure. RNA also undergoes interactions through hydrogen bonds on their so called Hoogsteen and sugar edges, giving rise to sophisticated 3D structures, referred to as tertiary structure ( 2 , 3 ). The combination of a low diversity of elemental units and the high strength of interaction makes it difficult for a given sequence to specify a unique secondary and tertiary structure. These circumstances are also known as ‘the RNA folding problem’, since they result in a multitude of alternative conformations of similar energy for almost any given RNA sequence. The ensemble of possible foldings of a given RNA is referred to as its folding space ( 4 ) or conformation space ( 5 , 6 ), even though the exact meaning of these terms in the literature differs depending on the authors. For the purpose of this review, the terms folding and folding space will be applied to issues of secondary, tertiary or global three-dimensional structure, thus not comprising local changes in the 3D structure without changes in base pairing.

In comparison with proteins, RNA displays a paucity of primary sequence information which may be partially remedied by post-transcriptional introduction of nucleotide modifications. Modified nucleotides perform a large number of functions ( 7 , 8 ), some of which are yet to be discovered. One particular function of modified nucleotides, namely the stabilization of functional RNA structures, is the object of this review. In the majority of the investigated cases, unmodified RNA would fold into a secondary and tertiary structure closely resembling that of the fully modified RNA. In those cases, the stabilizing effect of nucleotide modification mostly results in augmented thermal stability and reduced dynamics. Under certain circumstances, however, the presence of one or several modified nucleotides can induce an alternative folding, often comprising significant alterations in the secondary structure.

Since all function is mediated by structure on some level, a clean differentiation between functional and structural modifications is not possible, especially considering the numerous interactions with other molecules encountered, e.g. by tRNA. However, for the purpose of this review, modifications that have been shown to affect molecular interaction by direct contact with other molecules will be addressed as functional, while those for which structural changes extending beyond the local conformation have been described will be addressed as structural ( vide infra ). Note that this differentiation is necessarily incomplete and does not preclude a placement of a modification in both categories.

Alternative foldings

The laws of thermodynamics dictate that at ambient or body temperature several alternative structures of a given RNA sequence must coexist in significant proportions, provided the difference in their Gibbs free energies is small enough and a thermodynamic equilibrium is achieved. The proportions of two given foldings are determined according to their difference in free Gibbs energy: ΔΔ G = R•T•ln ( K ), where ΔΔ G is the difference in free Gibbs energies of both conformations, R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin, and K is the ratio of both conformations. If no equilibrium is achieved on a biologically significant timescale, at least one of the RNA conformations can be regarded as kinetically trapped and may therefore be called metastable ( 9 , 10 ). The trapping of metastable structures in kinetically stabilized minima might conceivably be prevented by RNA chaperones. By analogy to protein chaperones, RNA chaperones would be expected to interact with the RNA co-transcriptionally, to prevent misfolding in the first place. However, RNA polymerase produces RNA chains faster than the ribosome produces protein chains ( 11 , 12 ) and models for RNA chaperone activities are discussed to act on fully synthesized misfolded RNAs, rather than on nascent polymer chains ( 9 , 13 ). Excitingly though, in the rapidly evolving field of RNA switches, there are indications that small molecules might interact co-transcriptionally with RNA, thereby directing its folding pathway in a chaperon-like manner ( 14 ). RNA switches are structural RNAs with two alternative structures, one of which can be induced to prevail upon binding of a small molecule. Most reported RNA switches are regulatory elements in mRNAs which interact with metabolites related to the enzymatic activity of the proteins encoded in the respective mRNA ( 15 , 16 ). The concentration of metabolic ligands in a biological environment may thus have a drastic effect on the prevailing structure and corresponding function of an RNA. While it is unambiguous that small molecules do interact strongly with RNA switches to influence their conformation for regulatory purposes, recent evidence points to this influence being exerted through kinetic rather than thermodynamic control of the resulting conformation ( 14 , 17 ). Interestingly enough, different metabolites involved in nucleotide modification appear to be regulated by riboswitches ( 17 , 18 ). It is also noteworthy that a regulatory function of a post-transcriptional modification in a eukaryotic RNA has been reported ( 19 ).

The coexistence of several alternative structures of an RNA might conceivably present drawbacks to an organism, if only one of the structures has the desired biological activity. If, however, that activity has to be regulated, stabilization of either structure is a possible, and, importantly, simple regulation mechanism.

A number of recent papers suggest or directly report stabilization of a functionally relevant conformation by post-transcriptional nucleotide modification ( 20 ). Several such cases concern tRNAs ( 20 – 23 ), but a case of conformational fixation by base modification has also been suggested in ribosomal RNA ( 24 ). In at least one case, it could be shown that regulation of the steady state level of RNA can be achieved through modulation of modification activity ( 20 ). In what follows, these cases will be reviewed, bearing in mind a general scenario for regulation of RNA expression through nucleotide modification.

Impact of nucleotide modifications on local structure

From a biosynthetic point of view, the roughly 100 known different RNA nucleotide modifications can be easily divided according to their complexity ( 1 , 25 ). There are simple chemical transformations, such as addition of a methyl group or bond isomerization of uridine to yield pseudouridine, and there are more complex multistep transformations involving the action of several enzymes in a defined order. The synthesis of dihydrouridine in a redox reaction from uridine may hold something like a middle ground. The chemically simple modifications are, not surprisingly, also those which are wider spread. Not only are they found in many if not all classes and types of RNAs, but also in all kingdoms and probably in all species. Arguably, they may be the most ancient of nucleotide modifications and their modes of action relatively simple.

Since a detailed discussion of the electronic and steric effects of nucleoside modifications on base stacking, base pairing and sugar pucker is given by Davis ( 26 ), only a few effects are mentioned here. The stabilizing effect of isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine (Ψ) has been suggested to arise from improved stacking ( 27 , 28 ) or from the additional hydrogen bond donor that pseudouridine has to offer compared to uridine ( 29 ). Although inspection of tRNA crystal structures revealed no direct involvement of the N1 -H of Ψ in hydrogen bonds with other nucleotides, electron density suggesting a Ψ-coordinated water molecule, as well as molecular dynamics simulations indicate an improved definition of the hydration sphere around this site. Thus, the N1 -H of Ψ may form a bridge with adjacent phosphate residues, mediated by a stably coordinated water molecule ( 29 – 32 ). Methyl groups, such as in m 5 C, m 1 Ψ and T, increase base-stacking due to their hydrophobicity and because they augment the polarizability ( 27 , 33 ). Methyl groups may also induce structural changes by increasing steric encumbrance ( 34 ), or by blocking hydrogen bonds, e.g. at Watson–Crick positions ( 21 , 35 , 36 ). The ability of modified bases to affect hybridization has successfully been used in microarray hybridization screens for the detection of modified nucleotides ( 37 ). Methylations at the 2′-OH favour a 3′endo-conformation of the ribose ( 26 ), block sugar edge interactions and change the hydration sphere around the oxygen ( 31 , 32 ). They also increase stability against hydrolysis by bases and nucleases. Modifications may also change the acceptor/donor pattern of the base, e.g. in m 3 C. The formation of m 1 A simultaneously blocks a Watson–Crick position in the adenosine and introduces a positive charge to the nucleoside ( 35 , 38 ). Such positive charge, which has also been observed in m 7 G ( 38 ), modulates the electron density in the aromatic purine system and thus influences the strength of hydrogen bonds. It may conceivably promote ionic interactions with the negatively charged phosphates in the backbone. Reduction of uridine to dihydrouridine has been found to change the sugar pucker ( 33 ). Structural changes induced by modifications may be compounded through the creation of additional binding pockets, e.g. for magnesium ions, which in turn may enhance stability of the new structure ( 33 , 39 ).

Transfer RNA is a treasure chest of information

Most knowledge on modified nucleotides comes from studies of tRNA. Historically, tRNAs were the first ‘small’ RNAs discovered, and their function as translator molecules sustains a high level of continued scientific interest. The effect of nucleotide modification on RNA structure was studied with a variety of biophysical and biochemical methods including NMR, UV-melting curves, structural probing and X-ray crystallography. In tRNAs, which are among the most strongly modified RNAs, most nucleotide modification sites are clustered in two sites, one in the structural core of the L-shaped 3D structure and one in the anticodon domain ( 40 ).

Truncated anticodon-stem–loops (ASLs or ACSLs), which usually comprise the 5 bp of the anticodon stem and 7 nt of theanticodon loop, are readily accessible through solid phase synthesis and their small size facilitates assignment of NMR signals. Studies on ASLs have demonstrated important alterations of the anticodon loop structure induced by nucleotide modification, which in turn entail diverse functional effects. As there appears to be no direct evidence of structural cross-talk that would translate modification-induced structural changes from the tRNA core to the anticodon or vice versa , the structure of ASLs is generally assumed to be very similar to that of the corresponding region of the respective full length tRNAs. This has been validated by comparison of NMR structures of ASLs with the X-ray structures of full size tRNAs ( 6 , 41 – 43 ). Further validation for the use of ASLs as model systems comes from their activity in ribosome binding assays ( 44 ).

Studies of Ψ39 in ASLs have significantly contributed to the understanding of the role of Ψ in RNA structure ( 27 , 28 ). NMR studies of several modification isoforms of the yeast tRNA Phe ASL included incorporation of Ψ39 in one case ( 27 ), and of Cm32, Gm34 m 5 C40, and m 1 G37, the natural precursor of the hypermodified wybutosine base found at position 37 of the fully matured native tRNA ( 6 ) ( Figure 1A ). NMR studies on an ASL of Escherichia coli tRNA Phe revealed a hairpin structure including 7 bp and a three base loop. The expected ASL structure including a 7 base loop with a typical U-turn was only discovered after enzymatic introduction of i 6 A37 ( 45 , 46 ) ( Figure 1B ). Thus, modification of A37 to i 6 A37 is responsible for a change in secondary structure, while leaving the hydrogen bond capacity pattern of A37 unchanged. The thermodynamic effects of the i 6 A and similar modifications have also been studied after chemical modification of a non-natural precursor, which had been incorporated into the RNA by solid phase synthesis ( 34 , 47 ). The ASL of the tRNA Lys(NUU) isoacceptor ( Figure 1C ) has been the object of several studies ( 28 , 42 , 44 , 48 – 50 ), employing different combinations of Ψ39, s 2 U34, mnm 5 s 2 U34 (in E.coli ) mcm 5 U34 or mcm 5 s 2 U34 (in human), t 6 A37 or ms 2 t 6 A37. The hypermodifications at positions 34 and 37 are of special interest since they were reported to play major roles in aminoacylation identity [references in ( 51 )], codon recognition, frameshifting ( 52 – 54 ) misreading ( 55 ), and the annealing process of the human

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{3}^{\hbox{ Lys }} $

to the HIV RNA genome as a primer for reverse transcription ( 56 , 57 ). It is noteworthy that these modifications, which, according to the above definition, fall into the functional category, appear to confer the classical U-turn structure to anticodon loop, whose structure otherwise suffers from weak stacking of the four subsequent uridines ( 41 , 49 ). Anticodon loop nucleotide modifications and hypermodifications and their functions have been expertly reviewed by several authors ( 52 , 58 ). The particular importance of modifications in positions 34 and 37 is underscored by the fact that the major fraction of the chemically diversified ‘zoo’ of about 100 nt modifications is found there ( 7 , 25 , 58 ).

In stark contrast, the vast majority of modifications found in the core are of the biosynthetically simple type (methylated nucleotides, pseudouridines and dihydrouridines). A large body of data suggests primarily structural roles for these simple modifications. Structural investigations were applied mostly to full-length molecules as opposed to truncated molecules, such as ASLs. While avoiding possible artifacts arising from truncation, this advantage is partially offset by experimental problems of synthetic and analytical nature. Assignment of NMR signals and the subsequent model building is more complicated for 76mer-tRNAs than for 17mer-ASLs. Also, the solid-phase synthesis of a full-length tRNA has only recently been reported ( 59 ), and limitations in yield make the synthesis of sufficient amounts of modified and partially modified tRNAs a challenge.

Early work, conducted by comparison of tRNA from wild-type and mutant strains lacking certain modification activities ( 60 ), was severely limited by the availability of the respective mutant strains. Therefore, the introduction by Uhlenbeck of in vitro transcription with T7-RNA polymerase as the standard method to produce tRNA transcripts was a milestone ( 61 ). This technique produced a large number of studies in which unmodified transcripts were compared to native tRNAs isolated from living cells. These studies showed some common features of the ensemble of base modification. First exemplified with tRNA Phe from yeast ( Figure 2A ), lower conformational flexibility, improved thermal stability and improved aminoacylation parameters were illustrated as the paramount advantages that come with being modified. Interestingly, these effects seemed to be mediated by increased magnesium binding affinity in the modified tRNA, and the lack of modification in in vitro transcripts could be compensated by an increased concentration of magnesium ions ( 61 – 63 ). Similar observations were made for other classical tRNAs such as tRNA Val ( 64 – 68 ), tRNA Phe ( 69 ) and tRNA Gln ( 30 ) from E.coli , and for yeast tRNA Asp ( 70 ). In general, at high concentrations of magnesium ions transcripts behaved very similar to native tRNA, but differences were clearly observed at low concentrations. As one important consequence, the majority of functional studies, especially in vitro aminoacylation, are still performed at magnesium ion concentrations an order of magnitude above physiological value [references in ( 51 )]. In some cases, at low magnesium ion concentrations misfolding was observed as a consequence of a lack of modification.

Promotion of correct tRNA folding by nucleotide modification may occur either through direct reinforcement of structural features or through facilitation of magnesium ion binding. While the latter mechanism is in agreement with a number of reports [detailed discussion is given by Agris ( 33 )], exceptions are reported ( 69 ). Similarly, while restrictions of conformational dynamics due to modified nucleotides are a recurrent observation made in several systems [recent examples in ( 6 , 49 )] exceptions showing opposite effects are noted [e.g. ( 45 , 46 )].

Early genetic approaches were aimed at analyzing the fitness of mutant bacteria containing genes for non-functional modification enzymes. Thus, in bacteria devoid of one single modification activity at a time, a number of activities for nucleotide modification were found to be non-essential, with many of these showing weak or cryptic phenotypes ( 52 , 71 ). The more obvious phenotypes were mostly attributed to failures in codon recognition and frame shifting due to lack of functional modifications at positions 34 and 37 in the anticodon loop [reviewed in ( 54 , 72 )].

The low apparent impact is in sharp contrast with the fact that about 1% of the E.coli genome is involved in post-transcriptional base modification ( 72 ), with estimates in yeast being similar ( 73 ). Only lately have more severe phenotypes of core modifications been described ( 74 – 76 ). One might conclude that the ubiquitous tRNAs are so heavily used, that stabilization against degradation by modification outweighs the effort of upregulated de novo synthesis. This consideration applies regardless of the mechanism by which modifications produce metabolic stability and would be consistent with tRNA being the most heavily modified of all RNAs, even if ‘functional’ anticodon modifications are omitted from the above discussion.

tRNA tertiary structure and reinforcement

The structure of yeast tRNA Phe contains an acceptor domain composed of the acceptor stem, D-arm and D-loop, and an anticodon domain, composed of T-stem, T-loop, anticodon stem and anticodon loop. The 3D L-shaped structure, as known from X-ray crystallography, is stabilized by tertiary interactions, which are indicated by dotted lines in Figure 2A and B . These features, which are common to almost all cytosolic and some mitochondrial tRNAs, are mediated by a set of conserved and semi-conserved residues shown in Figure 2B . Various studies report that the tertiary interactions between the D-loop and the T-loop are the first to unravel upon heating, and that the first domain to unfold is the D-domain [e.g. ( 77 , 78 )]. Modified nucleotides in the core of the tRNA, which would be addressed as ‘structural’, stabilize the entire tRNA structure, and do so at least in part by reinforcing these tertiary interactions. Thus, tRNA Met from E.coli lacking T54 displayed decreased thermal stability in NMR experiments ( 60 ). A reinforcement of interactions of D- and T-domains was lately demonstrated by Nobles et al . ( 79 ) to be effected by modified bases m 5 C49, T54 and Ψ55 in the 3′half of yeast tRNA Phe . These modifications, which are frequently found in many other tRNAs, are effected by enzymes which recognize tRNA substructures, e.g. the T-stem and loop, even when the rest of the substrate is disordered ( 40 , 80 – 82 ). As opposed to these enzymes, which correspond to class I modification enzymes in the categorization proposed by Grosjean et al . ( 40 ), enzymes requiring an intact tRNA architecture for substrate recognition belong to class II. Using microinjection of yeast tRNA Tyr precursors into Xenopus oocytes, it was demonstrated that the typical class I type modifications m 1 A58, T54, Ψ55 and m 5 C49 occur on substrates containing intron and 5′leader sequences before any modification in the D-loop or stem take place ( 83 , 84 ). Only after intron removal were modifications at positions 34 and 37 produced.

There may be a general order of modification events in classical tRNA transcripts, where the D-domain is initially not well structured and the first modifications only occur in the adequately structured T-domain. These modifications may then aid in the structuring of the D-domain and enable its subsequent modification ( Figure 2C ). The fact that many enzymes effecting modification in the D-domain, for example m 2 G10 or

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G }26 $

, act on otherwise unmodified transcripts in vitro ( 85 , 86 ) might be perceived as a certain contradiction. However, in vitro conditions frequently include high concentrations of magnesium ions, which, by being elevated by as much as an order of magnitude, may emulate the effect of base modification and thus stabilize the D-domain, as has been discussed above. Also, the exact degree of structuring of the D-domain in vivo is not known and is certain to vary among tRNA species. Slight deviations from the hypothesis presented in Figure 2C have been shown, e.g. in Pyrococcus abyssi. Constantinesco et al . ( 87 ) have found some class I characteristics of the

$ \hbox{ tRNA }:{\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G }26 $

methyltransferase in the formation of m 2 G10. However, the same methyltransferase behaves like a class II enzyme in the second methylation step of the same nucleotide, leading to the formation of

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G }26 $

. Recently Urbonavicius et al . ( 88 ) have shown very similar properties for the

$ \hbox{ tRNA }:{\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G }10 $

methyltransferase from the same organism. Significantly, only the second methylation step requires the presence of magnesium ions, presumably to induce correct 3D substrate tRNA conformation.

In summary, it has gradually become clear that only very few single modifications have an outstanding impact on the structure of cytosolic elongator tRNAs. Rather, every single modification appears to contribute a certain measure of structural stabilization, thereby improving functionality and likely the lifetime of classical tRNA.

A cytosolic tRNA with deviations from the classical pattern

Recently, Anderson et al . ( 74 , 75 ) have discovered by a genetic approach an accelerated degradation of yeast initiator

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $

which was unmodified at position A58. Methylation at N1- A58 does allow normal expression of the initiator tRNA, while lack of methylation leads to a temperature-sensitive, non viable phenotype, which may be rescued through overexpression of the initiator tRNA. Importantly, lack of m 1 A58 in elongator tRNAs does not restrict either their expression or their stability. Presumably due to its particular function, yeast initiator tRNA has a particular sequence, deviating from the classic pattern in a number of nucleotides which ensure proper classic folding. The ensuing 3D structure, as determined by X-ray crystallography ( 89 ), sets it apart from all elongator tRNAs in yeast. As illustrated in Figure 3A , patterns of tertiary interactions in the T-loop and between T- and D-loop are altered. In particular, m 1 A58 is engaged in an interaction with A54, which strongly resembles the corresponding interaction with T54 in elongator tRNAs. A likely scenario implies a weakened or nonexistent A58–A54 interaction in the unmodified T-loop of the initiator tRNA as compared to m 1 A58-A54. Disruption of N1 -A58 methylation activity of the Trm6/Trm61 protein complex abolishes the only class I modification in the T-loop of this tRNA ( 75 ). It is thus tempting to speculate that the reinforcement mechanism of T-loop–D-loop interactions, as outlined above, might break down as a consequence. This might give rise to a non-functional tRNA structure, leading to tRNA degradation, while methylation at N1 -A58 would induce correct functional structure, and thus promote escape from premature degradation. The rather outstanding importance of m 1 A58 would thus be explained by the lack of other class I modifications, namely T54 and pseudouridine 55 in the T-loop of yeast initiator

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $

This scenario implies the existence of a kind of structural proofreading mechanism for tRNAs, which has indeed been experimentally supported by the discovery of genetic interaction between the TRM6/TRM61 genes coding for the N1 -A58-methyltransferase and genes coding for proteins of the nuclear exosome and a poly(A)-polymerase. These findings by the Anderson group ( 20 ) suggest a polyadenylation-dependent pathway of degradation of tRNAs by the exosome. Indeed, such a pathway has recently been characterized as structure-dependent in yeast ( 90 ). A somewhat similar pathway might exist in E.coli ( 91 ) although no proof of correlation to tRNA nucleotide modification has emerged yet.

A mitochondrial tRNA with classical aspects

Sequence and structure of animal mitochondrial (mt) tRNAs are known for their deviations from the classical prototype tRNAs. Several lines of evidence suggest that with the loss of classical structure and the introduction of a bias in nucleotide composition ( 92 ), the role of modified nucleotides for the maintenance of the L-shaped 3D tRNA structure increases in mitochondrial tRNA as compared with the cytosolic counterparts. These structural effects can reach such importance that certain mitochondrial tRNAs are entirely non-functional when devoid of modified nucleotides. An impressive demonstration of the differential susceptibility of cytosolic and mitochondrial tRNAs to lack of nucleotide modification has recently been published. A missense mutation in the human gene for pseudouridin synthase 1 (PUS1) ablates formation of pseudouridines at positions 27 and 28 (and probably others) in cytosolic as well as in mitochondrial tRNAs ( 93 , 94 ). While cytosolic protein synthesis is largely intact, the lack of modification in mitochondrial tRNAs causes the mitochondrial protein synthesis to stall and results in a human mitochondrial myopathy.

Human mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) is one of the most investigated mitochondrial tRNAs, because of its involvement in the pathogenesis of a number of mitochondrial diseases ( 95 ). This tRNA is actually the one with the most classic attributes in animal mitochondrial genomes ( Figure 3B ). A sequence alignment of 30 mammalian mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) shows the conservation of all major tertiary interactions known from tRNA Phe and other classical tRNAs ( 92 ). Also, mt tRNA Leu(UUR) contains one of the highest numbers of modified nucleotides found in any animal mitochondrial tRNA so far ( 96 ), among them eight structural modifications (m 1 G9, m 2 G10, D20, Ψ27, m 5 C48, T54, Ψ55 and m 1 A58) assumed to reinforce tertiary interactions. Because of its involvement in mitochondrial myopathies, the structural and functional properties of tRNA Leu(UUR) have been studied by several groups ( 97 – 101 ). Owing to the unavailability of native material, especially such carrying pathogenic points mutations, all studies have been carried out using RNAs which were synthesized by transcription in vitro and thus devoid of modified nucleotides. Transcripts were found to be aminoacylatable with preparations of pure recombinant mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase, but the structure was found to be ill defined ( 98 ). While the acceptor domain behaved as the expected in structural probing experiments, the anticodon domain was found to be highly accessible to several modifying agents and nucleases ( 98 ) ( Figure 3B ). The fact that the anticodon-domain is generally less stable than the acceptor domain has already been mentioned and applies to mt tRNA Leu(UUR) to a degree that is higher than usual. The apparent looseness of this anticodon domain is in keeping with the low structural stability of animal mt tRNA transcripts in general. In accordance with the reinforcement mechanism hypothesis displayed in Figure 2C , in vitro modification assays of tRNA Leu(UUR) transcripts with mitochondrial protein extracts show preferential modification by class I enzymes in the acceptor domain. As opposed to the transcript, the modified native tRNA forms a well-defined structure in the anticodon domain as well [( 102 ); M. Helm, unpublished data].

The Kelley laboratory has studied the tendency of unmodified transcripts of human mt tRNA Leu(UUR) to dimerize in vitro ( 103 , 104 ). Dimerization is observed upon introduction of a mutation at position 3243 of the human mitochondrial genome, one of the most frequent pathogenic mutations and commonly known as the MELAS mutation. This mutation causes an A→G transition in the middle of a stretch of nucleotides identified by the authors as a self-complementary dimerization interface. The experimentally determined _K_d of 150 ± 30 nM is in a range that might well allow such dimerization to occur in vivo . Interestingly, the dimerization interface is located in the D-domain, in proximity to two methylated guanosines, m 1 G9 and m 2 G10 and a dihydrouridine at position 20, of which m 2 G10, was indeed reported to be affected by the very MELAS mutation investigated ( 23 ). These modifications can be expected to have a stabilizing influence on the tertiary structure of monomeric tRNA and might thus affect dimerization. Inversely, dimerized transcripts might escape modification and thus account for lowered steady-state levels or processing artifacts attributed to the MELAS mutation at 3243 ( 95 ).

Alternative secondary structures in tRNAs

A number of tRNA sequences are known ( 96 ) which cannot be unambiguously fitted into the standard cloverleaf pattern shown in Figure 2B , raising the question how their structures can be recognized by the many components in the protein biosynthesis machinery. Based on computer simulations ( 105 ) different structural organization patterns have been identified that allow maintenance of the overall L-shape despite the apparent incompatibility. In these alternative foldings, helices which are shortened or extended by one or two base pairs are compensated for by corresponding changes in the second helix of the respective domain. The number of base pairs in each domain thus remains constant, and the different spatial orientation of closing base pairs in the helices is compensated for by changes in the length of the connector regions formed by nucleotides 8–9, 26 and the variable loop in classical tRNA (compare Figure 2B ). Screening tRNA sequences, Steinberg and Cedergren ( 21 ) have found a correlation between the presence of “

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G } $

and alternative tRNA foldings. They proposed that

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G } $

might prevent misfolding of tRNA by prohibiting the formation of

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G-C } $

base pairs, as shown in Figure 4 . Interestingly,

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{2}\hbox{ G-U } $

base pairs would still be allowed. Although these calculations lack experimental verification, they may be regarded as the first prototype of a rearrangement of secondary structure induced by a single modified nucleotide.

Transfer RNAs from animal mitochondria are known for their strong deviations from the standard secondary structure pattern, which sometimes include the substitution of an entire D-or T-domain with short replacement loops. A survey in mammalian mitochondria has evidenced the loss of the classical T-loop structure in the majority of tRNA species ( 92 ). Concomitant with the loss of the structural signature of the T-arm, which presented an important recognition signal for several class I modification enzymes, the corresponding modifications in the acceptor domain are also considerably less abundant ( 96 ). It is thus clear that folding and structure formation must rely on different pathways and principles than in classical tRNAs. The animal mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) with all its attributes of a classical tRNA is thus rather an exception among mitochondrial tRNAs.

Human mt tRNA Lys is an example of a tRNA having lost all recognizable D-loop/T-loop interactions. Its sequence is altogether poorly conserved ( 92 ). An in vitro transcript of the corresponding tRNA gene adopts an extended hairpin structure rather than a cloverleaf, as has been determined by structural probing ( Figure 5 ). The native tRNA Lys isolated from human mitochondria contains five types of base modifications in six positions and does fold into the expected cloverleaf, illustrating that the secondary structure and the ensuing 3D shape depend strongly on the presence of modified nucleotides ( 22 ). A closer inspection of the unusual structure of the transcript revealed an extension of the normally 7 bp long acceptor stem by three additional base pairs, which are incompatible with the presence of an m 1 A at position 9 in the native tRNA. Nitrogen 1 in adenosines is involved in standard Watson–Crick pairing, but blocked by a methyl group in m 1 A. A chimeric tRNA Lys with m 1 A9 as sole modified nucleotide did indeed adopt the expected cloverleaf folding ( 35 ). While the cloverleaf shape was readily aminoacylated, the extended hairpin structure was inactive in aminoacylation experiments in vitro ( 106 ). Analysis of post-transcriptional modification events in vitro indicated that further introduction of m 2 G at position 10 and pseudouridines at positions 27 and 28 depended strongly on the cloverleaf structure and thus on previous synthesis of m 1 A at position 9 ( 102 ). Thus, a post-transcriptional modification by a single methyl group controls biological function by means of controlling a structural rearrangement. While an analysis of mechanistic aspects of the modification process ( 13 , 107 ) would go beyond the scope of this review, it is clear that the insights coming from such studies might consolidate kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of alternative RNA structures and thus be of high interest. The above example impressively illustrates how a single methyl group can bring about a conformational rearrangement by breaking one single Watson–Crick base pair. Such a base pair contributes roughly 12 kJ/mol to the free Gibbs energy, and its neutralization may thus bring about a large change in the equilibrium constant K . It is tempting to speculate that such a mechanism may be used for regulation of activity and stability of the respective tRNA. The recent evidence of involvement of tRNA modification in a structure-specific degradation pathway ( 20 , 90 ) might indeed be indicative of a more general and widespread mechanism for tRNA maintenance, which has thus far gone unnoticed. As is typical for animal mitochondrial tRNAs, mt tRNA Lys carries relatively few modified nucleotides, compared to its cytosolic counterpart ( 96 ). As already suggested by the differential impact of defective PUS1 ( 93 , 94 ) on mitochondrial and cytosolic tRNAs, the relative importance of a single modification may be much bigger in mitochondrial tRNAs. Similar importance of nucleotide modification in mitochondrial tRNAs is indeed suggested by the fact that unmodified transcripts are mostly poor substrates for their cognate synthetases ( 97 , 108 – 110 ). That a strong impact of a single modification on secondary structure has been observed in a mitochondrial tRNA rather than in a cytosolic one is, therefore, probably not a coincidence, even though the clarity of it might have been a stroke of luck.

Other RNAs

Pseudouridine is a ubiquitous and abundant modified nucleotide which was found to improve RNA stability in a number of cases including rRNA from the small ribosomal subunit ( 111 , 112 ). In eukaryotic U2 snRNA, the extra hydrogen bond of a conserved pseudouridine significantly alters the branch-site architecture, with important consequences for splicing activity. A dynamic equilibrium of a nonfunctional conformation, in which the adenosine 24 is stacked within a helix, and a functional extrahelical conformation of the same adenosine is thought to occur in the unmodified snRNA. The pseudouridine lowers the free Gibbs energy enough to shift the equilibrium towards the functional extrahelical conformation ( 113 , 114 ). Ribosomal RNA, especially in eukaryotes, contains many modified bases, although its large size depresses the overall ratio to unmodified bases. The large majority of the nucleotide modifications consists of pseudouridines and 2′-OH ribose methylations. The process of modification and the modification enzymes themselves are involved in the complicated and highly coordinated process of rRNA processing and assembly in the nucleolus, including post-transcriptional modifications involved in regulatory processes ( 115 ). Since rRNA exists and functions as a ribonucleoprotein (RNP), the situation becomes both simpler and more complicated than in tRNA. It becomes simpler for the RNA to adopt its functional structure, because permanent association to a protein with potential for ‘structure induction’ and/or ‘structure capture’ ( 13 ) provides a multitude of pathways to overcome the RNA folding problem without the need for nucleotide modification. However, for the scientist it is challenging to investigate and define a native and functional RNA structure, because by definition the naked RNA of an RNP cannot adopt it. A number of modified nucleotides in rRNA stand out, because they are highly conserved and neither pseudouridines nor ribose methylations. A possible role of such particular nucleotide modifications has been hinted at by the Micura laboratory. A highly conserved stem–loop structure in helix 45 of the small ribosomal subunit, with an equally high conserved methylation pattern

$ {\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{6}\hbox{ A }-{\hbox{ m }}_{2}^{6}\hbox{ A } $

situated in a tetraloop was investigated ( 24 , 116 ). These four base methylations are effected by a single enzyme and are accompanied by other base methylations in some species [reviewed in ( 115 )]. Höbartner et al . ( 24 ) could show the potential of these methylations to shift a dynamic equilibrium of alternative structures towards the biologically active tetraloop structure, as illustrated in Figure 6 . Using several short oligoribonucleotides derived from the stem–loop structure, thermodynamic parameters were determined by NMR and UV-melting experiments These investigations were based on insights from a groundwork study on conformation space restriction by naturally occurring base methylations ( 24 , 36 , 117 ). Several groups have recently shown the potential of base modifications in problems of fundamental research. Using custom-made modifications they were able to release a previously restricted RNA conformation into an extended conformation space by chemical ( 118 ) or photochemical ( 119 ) removal of the modification in situ . Such applications are extremely useful for studying RNA rearrangements ( 116 ).

CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

Because of the extensive literature available on RNA nucleotide modification, this review has focused on such cases where significant structural changes of RNA conformation were observed as a consequence of nucleotide modification. It is important to understand the impact of nucleotide modification on RNA structure, since structure mediates all RNA function. This underscores once more the artificial character of the distinction between ‘functional’ and ‘structural’ modifications. These terms had initially been defined in this review in order to separate functional effects, mediated by direct contact of modified nucleotides with other molecules, from effects mediated by modification-induced conformational changes. As has become obvious, most evidence for a role of nucleotide modification in RNA folding has come from studies of tRNA, which maintain their structure without the help of proteins. Evidence is accumulating that thermodynamic and metabolic stabilization of classical tRNA is performed by the ensemble of ‘structural’ modifications, but that the effect of any single modification is not critical. This is in agreement with the fact that critical importance of single modifications have so far only been documented for tRNAs which deviate at least to some extent from the classical pattern shown in Figure 2B . One of these, initiator

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $

from yeast, has opened a new area of research, which is likely to show that expression and stability of tRNA may be more strictly controlled by modification events than hitherto assumed. Transfer RNAs, as the most heavily modified RNAs, thus still have a lot of secrets left to be discovered, while the structural impact of nucleotide modification in other RNAs is only starting to unveil.

The example of rRNA ( 116 ) illustrates well the problems one has to face when trying to investigate a modification-induced structural rearrangement in a large RNA, which actually has little physiological relevance when devoid of proteins. The X-ray structures of the ribosomal subunits have indeed revealed that the role of ribosomal proteins is mainly one of structural support for the RNA ( 67 , 120 ). One might thus speculate that nucleotide modification as an ancient remedy for RNA misfolding has been replaced to a certain degree by proteins, especially in those RNAs which today function as RNP.

At a time were small RNAs with new functions are discovered on a daily basis, the recent discovery of the involvement of pseudouridine formation in gene regulation might represent the tip of an iceberg ( 19 ), and post-transcriptional modification may turn out to be a factor of more general importance in gene expression than hitherto assumed. And why should modification-induced structural rearrangement not be involved? Advances in chemical synthesis of modified nucleotides and the rapidly progressing identification of enzymes involved in RNA modification will certainly lead to more detailed insights in the near future.

Figure 1

Anticodon stem loops (ASLs) of well studied classical tRNAs. ( A ) Yeast tRNA Phe including m 1 G37, the natural precursor of the hypermodified wybutosine base found at position 37 of the fully matured native tRNA (compare Figure 2 ). ( B ) E.coli tRNA Phe ASL modification isoforms. The unmodified ASL displays (left) a hairpin structure with a small loop of three nucleotides and two extra base pairs U32-A38 and U33-A37. Introduction of i 6 A as sole nucleotide modification leads two the formation of the classical ASL-stem loop structure including a U-turn (middle). An ASL corresponding to that of the native tRNA Phe would include Ψ32, Ψ39 and ms 2 i 6 A modification (right). ( C ) tRNA Lys(NUU) from E.coli contains mnms 2 U (x = m) and t6A, while the tRNA from human cytosol contains mcms 2 U (x = c) and ms2t6A.The human mitochondrial tRNA Lys has a similar stem and an identical loop sequence (compare Figure 5 ) and contains τm 5 U (x = τ).

Figure 2

( A ) Secondary structure of yeast tRNA Phe . Modified nucleotides are in bold. Tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. ( B ) General architecture of classical elongator tRNAs. On the cloverleaf structure on the left, conserved residues important for elements of tertiary structure are indicated. R stands for conserved purine residues and Y stands for conserved pyrimidine residues. Frequently modified positions [>25%; according to reference ( 121 )] in the anticodon are highlighted by circles. Frequently modified positions elsewhere in the tRNA are boxed. Tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. In the representation on the right, acceptor and anticodon domains are arranged in an L-shape according to the 3D structure. ( C ) Reinforcement hypothesis. On the left, the unmodified tRNA forms a stable acceptor domain and a loosely structured anticodon domain (weak interactions are symbolized by grey dotted lines). Class I modification enzymes act on the acceptor domain and introduce modifications like T54, Ψ55, m 1 A58, m 5 C48, m 5 C49 and/or others, as indicated by arrows. These modifications stabilize the T-loop structure and reinforce tertiary interactions with the D-loop. The formerly loose structure of the anticodon domain is thus better defined (symbolized by black lines) and now allows better substrate recognition by other modification enzymes.

$Slight deviations from the classical tRNA structure. ( A ) Secondary structure of initiator \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} $ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $ \end{document} from yeast. Modified nucleotides are in bold. Tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. Note the absence of T54 and Ψ55 and the additional tertiary interactions between the A20 and the T-loop as compared to tRNA Phe . R denotes a purine at position 59 of \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} $ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $ \end{document} for which sequence data in the literature are contradictory ( 96 , 89 ). ( B ) Human mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) . The secondary structure of the native tRNA including all modified bases is shown on the left. Modified nucleotides are in bold and tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. The loose structure of the anticodon domain of the unmodified transcript ( 98 ) is shown on the right. Modified nucleotides are abbreviated according to references ( 96 , 122 ).$

Figure 3

Slight deviations from the classical tRNA structure. ( A ) Secondary structure of initiator

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $

from yeast. Modified nucleotides are in bold. Tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. Note the absence of T54 and Ψ55 and the additional tertiary interactions between the A20 and the T-loop as compared to tRNA Phe . R denotes a purine at position 59 of

$ {\hbox{ tRNA }}_{\hbox{ I }}^{\hbox{ Met }} $

for which sequence data in the literature are contradictory ( 96 , 89 ). ( B ) Human mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) . The secondary structure of the native tRNA including all modified bases is shown on the left. Modified nucleotides are in bold and tertiary interactions are indicated by dotted lines. The loose structure of the anticodon domain of the unmodified transcript ( 98 ) is shown on the right. Modified nucleotides are abbreviated according to references ( 96 , 122 ).

Figure 4

Rearrangements on the secondary structure level induced by double methylation of human cytosolic tRNA Asn . The calculated structure of the unmodified transcript on the left side features an aberrant D-stem without G10, but including G26. Double methylation on N6 of G26 impedes its Watson–Crick pairing with cytidines and thus renders the base pair G26-C11, which is highlighted by a box, impossible. The fully modified tRNA Asn may thus adopt the classical cloverleaf structure as shown on the right. U? denotes an unknown modified uridine, likely a derivative of ribothymidine, at position 54.

Figure 5

Methylation-induced rearrangement of human mitochondrial tRNA Lys . ( A ) Cloverleaf secondary structure of the fully modified human mitochondrial tRNA Lys . ( B ) The extended hairpin secondary structure of the unmodified transcript of human mitochondrial tRNA Lys (left) is converted to the cloverleaf by methylation on N1 -A9, as evidenced in a chimeric tRNA containing m 1 A9 as single modified nucleotide (right). The methylation prevents an A9-U64 base pair (boxed) in the extended hairpin structure on the left. Modified nucleotides in bold are abbreviated according to references ( 96 , 122 ).

Figure 6

Possible influence of a conserved methylation pattern in rRNA. An unmodified oligoribonucleotide derived from helix 45 of a bacterial small subunit rRNA shows two alternative conformations in equilibrium, with K around 3, favouring the structure shown on the upper right. Introduction of several methyl groups restricts conformation space and results in the equilibrium being shifted almost completely to the structure shown on the lower left. Modified nucleotides are abbreviated according to reference ( 24 ).

The author acknowledges funding by the DFG grant HE 3397/3-1. The author would like to thank Henri Grosjean, Jaunius Urbonavicius, Roberto Fiammengo and the referees for extremely helpful comments on such a vast topic. The author apologizes to those colleagues whose work could not be cited here. The Open Access publication charges for this article were waived by Oxford University Press.

Conflict of interest statement . None declared.

REFERENCES

Garcia, G.A. and Goodenough-Lashua, D.M.

1998

Mechanisms of RNA-modifying and -editing enzymes In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

Washington DC ASM Press pp.

135

–168

Leontis, N.B. and Westhof, E.

2001

Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs

RNA

499

–512

Leontis, N.B., Stombaugh, J., Westhof, E.

2002

The non-Watson–Crick base pairs and their associated isostericity matrices

Nucleic Acids Res

3497

–3531

Sczyrba, A., Kruger, J., Mersch, H., Kurtz, S., Giegerich, R.

2003

RNA-related tools on the Bielefeld Bioinformatics server

Nucleic Acids Res

3767

–3770

Flamm, C., Fontana, W., Hofacker, I.L., Schuster, P.

2000

RNA folding at elementary step resolution

RNA

325

–338

Stuart, J.W., Koshlap, K.M., Guenther, R., Agris, P.F.

2003

Naturally-occurring modification restricts the anticodon domain conformational space of tRNA(Phe)

J. Mol. Biol

334

901

–918

In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

1998

Washington, DC ASM Press

In Grosjean, H. (Ed.).

Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing

2005

Berlin Heidelberg Springer

Herschlag, D.

1995

RNA chaperones and the RNA folding problem

J. Biol. Chem

270

20871

–20874

Woodson, S.A.

2000

Recent insights on RNA folding mechanisms from catalytic RNA

Cell Mol. Life Sci

796

–808

Makarova, O.V., Makarov, E.M., Sousa, R., Dreyfus, M.

1995

Transcribing of Escherichia coli genes with mutant T7 RNA polymerases: stability of lacZ mRNA inversely correlates with polymerase speed

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

12250

–12254

Pape, T., Wintermeyer, W., Rodnina, M.V.

1998

Complete kinetic mechanism of elongation factor Tu-dependent binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the E.coli ribosome

EMBO J

7490

–7497

Lorsch, J.R.

2002

RNA chaperones exist and DEAD box proteins get a life

Cell

109

797

–800

Wickiser, J.K., Winkler, W.C., Breaker, R.R., Crothers, D.M.

2005

The speed of RNA transcription and metabolite binding kinetics operate an FMN riboswitch

Mol. Cell

–60

Winkler, W.C. and Breaker, R.R.

2003

Genetic control by metabolite-binding riboswitches

Chembiochem

1024

–1032

Mandal, M. and Breaker, R.R.

2004

Gene regulation by riboswitches

Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol

451

–463

Sudarsan, N., Wickiser, J.K., Nakamura, S., Ebert, M.S., Breaker, R.R.

2003

An mRNA structure in bacteria that controls gene expression by binding lysine

Genes Dev

2688

–2697

Winkler, W.C., Nahvi, A., Sudarsan, N., Barrick, J.E., Breaker, R.R.

2003

An mRNA structure that controls gene expression by binding S-adenosylmethionine

Nature Struct. Biol

701

–707

Zhao, X., Patton, J.R., Davis, S.L., Florence, B., Ames, S.J., Spanjaard, R.A.

2004

Regulation of nuclear receptor activity by a pseudouridine synthase through posttranscriptional modification of steroid receptor RNA activator

Mol. Cell

549

–558

Kadaba, S., Krueger, A., Trice, T., Krecic, A.M., Hinnebusch, A.G., Anderson, J.

2004

Nuclear surveillance and degradation of hypomodified initiator tRNAMet in S. cerevisiae

Genes Dev

1227

–1240

Steinberg, S. and Cedergren, R.

1995

A correlation between N2-dimethylguanosine presence and alternate tRNA conformers

RNA

886

–891

Helm, M., Brule, H., Degoul, F., Cepanec, C., Leroux, J.P., Giege, R., Florentz, C.

1998

The presence of modified nucleotides is required for cloverleaf folding of a human mitochondrial tRNA

Nucleic Acids Res

1636

–1643

Helm, M., Florentz, C., Chomyn, A., Attardi, G.

1999

Search for differences in post-transcriptional modification patterns of mitochondrial DNA-encoded wild-type and mutant human tRNALys and tRNALeu(UUR)

Nucleic Acids Res

756

–763

Höbartner, C., Ebert, M.O., Jaun, B., Micura, R.

2002

Two-state conformation equilibria and the effect of nucleobase methylation

Angew. Chem. Int. Ed

605

–609

Rozenski, J., Crain, P.F., McCloskey, J.A.

1999

The RNA Modification Database: 1999 update

Nucleic Acids Res

196

–197

Davis, D.R.

1998

Biophysical and conformational properties of modified nucleosides in RNA (nuclear magnetic resonance studies) In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

. Washington DC pp.

–102

Yarian, C.S., Basti, M.M., Cain, R.J., Ansari, G., Guenther, R.H., Sochacka, E., Czerwinska, G., Malkiewicz, A., Agris, P.F.

1999

Structural and functional roles of the N1- and N3-protons of psi at tRNA's position 39

Nucleic Acids Res

3543

–3549

Durant, P.C. and Davis, D.R.

1999

Stabilization of the anticodon stem-loop of tRNALys,3 by an A+-C base-pair and by pseudouridine

J. Mol. Biol

285

115

–131

Charette, M. and Gray, M.W.

2000

Pseudouridine in RNA: what, where, how, and why

IUBMB Life

341

–351

Arnez, J.G. and Steitz, T.A.

1994

Crystal structure of unmodified tRNA(Gln) complexed with glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and ATP suggests a possible role for pseudo-uridines in stabilization of RNA structure

Biochemistry

7560

–7567

Auffinger, P. and Westhof, E.

1997

Rules governing the orientation of the 2′-hydroxyl group in RNA

J. Mol. Biol

274

–63

Auffinger, P. and Westhof, E.

1998

Effects of Pseudouridylation on tRNA Hydration and Dynamics In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

Washington ASM Press pp.

103

–112

Agris, P.F.

1996

The importance of being modified: roles of modified nucleosides and Mg2+ in RNA structure and function

Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol

–129

Kierzek, E. and Kierzek, R.

2003

The thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes and hairpins containing N6-alkyladenosines and 2-methylthio-N6-alkyladenosines

Nucleic Acids Res

4472

–4480

Helm, M., Giege, R., Florentz, C.

1999

A Watson–Crick base-pair-disrupting methyl group (m1A9) is sufficient for cloverleaf folding of human mitochondrial tRNALys

Biochemistry

13338

–13346

Micura, R., Pils, W., Hobartner, C., Grubmayr, K., Ebert, M.O., Jaun, B.

2001

Methylation of the nucleobases in RNA oligonucleotides mediates duplex-hairpin conversion

Nucleic Acids Res

3997

–4005

Hiley, S.L., Jackman, J., Babak, T., Trochesset, M., Morris, Q.D., Phizicky, E., Hughes, T.R.

2005

Detection and discovery of RNA modifications using microarrays

Nucleic Acids Res

Agris, P.F., Sierzputowska-Gracz, H., Smith, C.

1986

Transfer RNA contains sites of localized positive charge: carbon NMR studies of [13C]methyl-enriched Escherichia coli and yeast tRNAPhe

Biochemistry

5126

–5131

Chen, Y., Sierzputowska-Gracz, H., Guenther, R., Everett, K., Agris, P.F.

1993

5-Methylcytidine is required for cooperative binding of Mg2+ and a conformational transition at the anticodon stem-loop of yeast phenylalanine tRNA

Biochemistry

10249

–10253

Grosjean, H., Edqvist, J., Straby, K.B., Giegé, R.

1996

Enzymatic formation of modified nucleosides in tRNA: dependence on tRNA architecture

J. Mol. Biol

255

–85

Benas, P., Bec, G., Keith, G., Marquet, R., Ehresmann, C., Ehresmann, B., Dumas, P.

2000

The crystal structure of HIV reverse-transcription primer tRNA(Lys,3) shows a canonical anticodon loop

RNA

1347

–1355

Stuart, J.W., Gdaniec, Z., Guenther, R., Marszalek, M., Sochacka, E., Malkiewicz, A., Agris, P.F.

2000

Functional anticodon architecture of human tRNALys3 includes disruption of intraloop hydrogen bonding by the naturally occurring amino acid modification, t6A

Biochemistry

13396

–13404

Kim, S.H., Suddath, F.L., Quigley, G.J., McPherson, A., Sussman, J.L., Wang, A.H., Seeman, N.C., Rich, A.

1974

Three-dimensional tertiary structure of yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA

Science

185

435

–440

Yarian, C., Marszalek, M., Sochacka, E., Malkiewicz, A., Guenther, R., Miskiewicz, A., Agris, P.F.

2000

Modified nucleoside dependent Watson–Crick and wobble codon binding by tRNALysUUU species

Biochemistry

13390

–13395

Cabello-Villegas, J., Tworowska, I., Nikonowicz, E.P.

2004

Metal ion stabilization of the U-turn of the A37 N6-dimethylallyl-modified anticodon stem–loop of Escherichia coli tRNAPhe

Biochemistry

–66

Cabello-Villegas, J., Winkler, M.E., Nikonowicz, E.P.

2002

Solution conformations of unmodified and A(37)N(6)-dimethylallyl modified anticodon stem-loops of Escherichia coli tRNA(Phe)

J. Mol. Biol

319

1015

–1034

Kierzek, E. and Kierzek, R.

2003

The synthesis of oligoribonucleotides containing N6-alkyladenosines and 2-methylthio-N6-alkyladenosines via post-synthetic modification of precursor oligomers

Nucleic Acids Res

4461

–4471

Agris, P.F., Guenther, R., Ingram, P.C., Basti, M.M., Stuart, J.W., Sochacka, E., Malkiewicz, A.

1997

Unconventional structure of tRNA(Lys)SUU anticodon explains tRNA's role in bacterial and mammalian ribosomal frameshifting and primer selection by HIV-1

RNA

420

–428

Durant, P.C., Bajji, A.C., Sundaram, M., Kumar, R.K., Davis, D.R.

2005

Structural effects of hypermodified nucleosides in the Escherichia coli and human tRNALys anticodon loop: the effect of nucleosides s2U, mcm(5)u, mcm5S2U, mnm5S2U, t6A, and ms2t6A

Biochemistry

8078

–8089

Sundaram, M., Durant, P.C., Davis, D.R.

2000

Hypermodified nucleosides in the anticodon of tRNA(Lys) stabilize a canonical U-turn structure

Biochemistry

15652

Giege, R., Sissler, M., Florentz, C.

1998

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity

Nucleic Acids Res

5017

–5035

Bjork, G.R., Durand, J.M., Hagervall, T.G., Leipuviene, R., Lundgren, H.K., Nilsson, K., Chen, P., Qian, Q., Urbonavicius, J.

1999

Transfer RNA modification: influence on translational frameshifting and metabolism

FEBS Lett

452

–51

Urbonavicius, J., Qian, Q., Durand, J.M., Hagervall, T.G., Bjork, G.R.

2001

Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications

EMBO J

4863

–4873

Namy, O., Lecointe, F., Grosjean, H., Rousset, J.-P.

2005

Translational Recoding and RNA Modification In Grosjean, H. (Ed.).

Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing

Berlin Heidelberg Springer pp.

309

–340

Hagervall, T.G., Pomerantz, S.C., McCloskey, J.A.

1998

Reduced misreading of asparagine codons by Escherichia coli tRNALys with hypomodified derivatives of 5-methylaminoamethyl-2-thiouridine in the wobble position

J. Mol. Biol

284

–42

Isel, C., Lanchy, J.M., Le Grice, S.F., Ehresmann, C., Ehresmann, B., Marquet, R.

1996

Specific initiation and switch to elongation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription require the post-transcriptional modifications of primer tRNA3Lys

EMBO J

917

–924

Tisne, C., Rigourd, M., Marquet, R., Ehresmann, C., Dardel, F.

2000

NMR and biochemical characterization of recombinant human tRNA(Lys)3 expressed in Escherichia coli: identification of posttranscriptional nucleotide modifications required for efficient initiation of HIV-1 reverse transcription

RNA

1403

–1412

Agris, P.F.

2004

Decoding the genome: a modified view

Nucleic Acids Res

223

–238

Persson, T., Kutzke, U., Busch, S., Held, R., Hartmann, R.K.

2001

Chemical synthesis and biological investigation of a 77-mer oligoribonucleotide with a sequence corresponding to E.coli tRNA(Asp)

Bioorg. Med. Chem

–56

Davanloo, P., Sprinzl, M., Watanabe, K., Albani, M., Kersten, H.

1979

Role of ribothymidine in the thermal stability of transfer RNA as monitored by proton magnetic resonance

Nucleic Acids Res

1571

–1581

Sampson, J.R. and Uhlenbeck, O.C.

1988

Biochemical and physical characterization of an unmodified yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA transcribed in vitro

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

1033

–1037

Hall, K.B., Sampson, J.R., Uhlenbeck, O.C., Redfield, A.G.

1989

Structure of an unmodified tRNA molecule

Biochemistry

5794

–5801

Maglott, E.J., Deo, S.S., Przykorska, A., Glick, G.D.

1998

Conformational transitions of an unmodified tRNA: implications for RNA folding

Biochemistry

16349

–16359

Chu, W.C. and Horowitz, J.

1989

19F NMR of 5-fluorouracil-substituted transfer RNA transcribed in vitro : resonance assignment of fluorouracil-guanine base pairs

Nucleic Acids Res

7241

–7252

Derrick, W.B. and Horowitz, J.

1993

Probing structural differences between native and in vitro transcribed Escherichia coli valine transfer RNA: evidence for stable base modification-dependent conformers

Nucleic Acids Res

4948

–4953

Yue, D., Kintanar, A., Horowitz, J.

1994

Nucleoside modifications stabilize Mg2+ binding in Escherichia coli tRNA(Val): an imino proton NMR investigation

Biochemistry

8905

–8911

Kintanar, A., Yue, D., Horowitz, J.

1994

Effect of nucleoside modifications on the structure and thermal stability of Escherichia coli valine tRNA

Biochimie

1192

–1204

Vermeulen, A., McCallum, S.A., Pardi, A.

2005

Comparison of the global structure and dynamics of native and unmodified tRNAval

Biochemistry

6024

–6033

Serebrov, V., Vassilenko, K., Kholod, N., Gross, H.J., Kisselev, L.

1998

Mg2+ binding and structural stability of mature and in vitro synthesized unmodified Escherichia coli tRNAPhe

Nucleic Acids Res

2723

–2728

Perret, V., Garcia, A., Puglisi, J., Grosjean, H., Ebel, J.P., Florentz, C., Giege, R.

1990

Conformation in solution of yeast tRNA(Asp) transcripts deprived of modified nucleotides

Biochimie

735

–743

Niederberger, C., Graub, R., Costa, A., Desgres, J., Schweingruber, M.E.

1999

The tRNA N2,N2-dimethylguanosine-26 methyltransferase encoded by gene trm1 increases efficiency of suppression of an ochre codon in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

FEBS Lett

464

–70

Björk, G.R.

1995

Genetic dissection of synthesis and function of modified nucleosides in bacterial transfer RNA

Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol

263

–338

Hopper, A.K. and Phizicky, E.M.

2003

tRNA transfers to the limelight

Genes Dev

162

–180

Anderson, J., Phan, L., Cuesta, R., Carlson, B.A., Pak, M., Asano, K., Bjork, G.R., Tamame, M., Hinnebusch, A.G.

1998

The essential Gcd10p-Gcd14p nuclear complex is required for 1-methyladenosine modification and maturation of initiator methionyl-tRNA

Genes Dev

3650

–3662

Anderson, J., Phan, L., Hinnebusch, A.G.

2000

The Gcd10p/Gcd14p complex is the essential two-subunit tRNA(1-methyladenosine) methyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA

5173

–5178

Alexandrov, A., Grayhack, E.J., Phizicky, E.M.

2005

tRNA m7G methyltransferase Trm8p/Trm82p: evidence linking activity to a growth phenotype and implicating Trm82p in maintaining levels of active Trm8p

RNA

821

–830

Coutts, S.M., Gangloff, J., Dirheimer, G.

1974

Conformational transitions in tRNA Asp (brewer's yeast). Thermodynamic, kinetic, and enzymatic measurements on oligonucleotide fragments and the intact molecule

Biochemistry

3938

–3948

Filimonov, V.V., Privalov, P.L., Glangloff, J., Dirheimer, G.

1978

A calorimetric investigation of melting of tRNAAsp from brewer's yeast

Biochim. Biophys. Acta

521

209

–216

Nobles, K.N., Yarian, C.S., Liu, G., Guenther, R.H., Agris, P.F.

2002

Highly conserved modified nucleosides influence Mg2+ -dependent tRNA folding

Nucleic Acids Res

4751

–4760

Gu, X. and Santi, D.V.

1991

The T-arm of tRNA is a substrate for tRNA (m5U54)-methyltransferase

Biochemistry

2999

–3002

Gu, X., Ivanetich, K.M., Santi, D.V.

1996

Recognition of the T-arm of tRNA by tRNA (m5 U54)-methyltransferase is not sequence specific

Biochemistry

11652

–11659

Becker, H.F., Motorin, Y., Sissler, M., Florentz, C., Grosjean, H.

1997

Major identity determinants for enzymatic formation of ribothymidine and pseudouridine in the T psi-loop of yeast tRNAs

J. Mol. Biol

274

505

–518

Nishikura, K. and De Robertis, E.M.

1981

RNA processing in microinjected Xenopus oocytes. Sequential addition of base modifications in the spliced transfer RNA

J. Mol. Biol

145

405

–420

Maden, B.E.H.

1998

Intracellular locations of RNA-modifying enzymes In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

Washington, DC ASM Press pp.

421

–440

Constantinesco, F., Motorin, Y., Grosjean, H.

1999

Transfer RNA modification enzymes from Pyrococcus furiosus : detection of the enzymatic activities in vitro

Nucleic Acids Res

1308

–1315

Armengaud, J., Urbonavicius, J., Fernandez, B., Chaussinand, G., Bujnicki, J.M., Grosjean, H.

2004

N2-methylation of guanosine at position 10 in tRNA is catalyzed by a THUMP domain-containing, S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase, conserved in Archaea and Eukaryota

J. Biol. Chem

279

37142

–37152

Constantinesco, F., Motorin, Y., Grosjean, H.

1999

Characterisation and enzymatic properties of tRNA(guanine 26, N (2), N (2))-dimethyltransferase (Trm1p) from Pyrococcus furiosus

J. Mol. Biol

291

375

–392

Urbonavicius, J., Armengaud, J., Grosjean, H.

2006

Identity elements required for enzymatic formation of N2, N2-dimethylguanosine from N2-monomethylated derivative and ist possible role in avoiding alternative conformations in archaeal tRNA

J. Mol. Biol

. in press

Basavappa, R. and Sigler, P.B.

1991

The 3 A crystal structure of yeast initiator tRNA: functional implications in initiator/elongator discrimination

EMBO J

3105

–3111

Vanacova, S., Wolf, J., Martin, G., Blank, D., Dettwiler, S., Friedlein, A., Langen, H., Keith, G., Keller, W.

2005

A new yeast poly(A) polymerase complex involved in RNA quality control

PLoS Biol

e189

Li, Z., Reimers, S., Pandit, S., Deutscher, M.P.

2002

RNA quality control: degradation of defective transfer RNA

EMBO J

1132

–1138

Helm, M., Brule, H., Friede, D., Giege, R., Pütz, J., Florentz, C.

2000

Search for characteristic structural features of mammalian mitochondrial tRNAs

RNA

1356

–1379

Bykhovskaya, Y., Casas, K., Mengesha, E., Inbal, A., Fischel-Ghodsian, N.

2004

Missense mutation in pseudouridine synthase 1 (PUS1) causes mitochondrial myopathy and sideroblastic anemia (MLASA)

Am. J. Hum. Genet

1303

–1308

Patton, J.R., Bykhovskaya, Y., Mengesha, E., Bertolotto, C., Fischel-Ghodsian, N.

2005

Mitochondrial myopathy and sideroblastic anemia (MLASA): missense mutation in the pseudouridine synthase 1 (PUS1) gene is associated with the loss of tRNA pseudouridylation

J. Biol. Chem

280

19823

–19828

Florentz, C., Sohm, B., Tryoen-Toth, P., Pütz, J., Sissler, M.

2003

Human mitochondrial tRNAs in health and disease

Cell Mol. Life Sci

1356

–1375

Sprinzl, M. and Vassilenko, K.S.

2005

Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes

Nucleic Acids Res

D139

–D140

Bullard, J.M., Cai, Y.C., Spremulli, L.L.

2000

Expression and characterization of the human mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase

Biochim. Biophys. Acta

1490

245

–258

Sohm, B., Frugier, M., Brule, H., Olszak, K., Przykorska, A., Florentz, C.

2003

Towards understanding human mitochondrial leucine aminoacylation identity

J. Mol. Biol

328

995

–1010

Wittenhagen, L.M., Roy, M.D., Kelley, S.O.

2003

The pathogenic U3271C human mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) mutation disrupts a fragile anticodon stem

Nucleic Acids Res

596

–601

100

Roy, M.D., Wittenhagen, L.M., Vozzella, B.E., Kelley, S.O.

2004

Interdomain communication between weak structural elements within a disease-related human tRNA

Biochemistry

384

–392

101

Zagryadskaya, E.I. and Kelley, S.O.

2005

Combinatorial analysis of loop nucleotides in human mitochondrial tRNALeu(UUR)

Biochemistry

233

–242

102

Helm, M. and Attardi, G.

2004

Nuclear control of cloverleaf structure of human mitochondrial tRNA(Lys)

J. Mol. Biol

337

545

–560

103

Wittenhagen, L.M. and Kelley, S.O.

2002

Dimerization of a pathogenic human mitochondrial tRNA

Nature Struct. Biol

586

–590

104

Roy, M.D., Wittenhagen, L.M., Kelley, S.O.

2005

Structural probing of a pathogenic tRNA dimer

RNA

254

–260

105

Steinberg, S., Gautheret, D., Cedergren, R.

1994

Fitting the structurally diverse animal mitochondrial tRNAsSer to common three-dimensional constraints

J. Mol. Biol

236

982

–989

106

Sissler, M., Helm, M., Frugier, M., Giege, R., Florentz, C.

2004

Aminoacylation properties of pathology-related human mitochondrial tRNA(Lys) variants

RNA

841

–853

107

Ishitani, R., Nureki, O., Nameki, N., Okada, N., Nishimura, S., Yokoyama, S.

2003

Alternative tertiary structure of tRNA for recognition by a posttranscriptional modification enzyme

Cell

113

383

–394

108

Bullard, J.M., Cai, Y.C., Demeler, B., Spremulli, L.L.

1999

Expression and characterization of a human mitochondrial phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase

J. Mol. Biol

288

567

–577

109

Tolkunova, E., Park, H., Xia, J., King, M.P., Davidson, E.

2000

The human lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene encodes both the cytoplasmic and mitochondrial enzymes by means of an unusual alternative splicing of the primary transcript

J. Biol. Chem

275

35063

–35069

110

Yokogawa, T., Shimada, N., Takeuchi, N., Benkowski, L., Suzuki, T., Omori, A., Ueda, T., Nishikawa, K., Spremulli, L.L., Watanabe, K.

2000

Characterization and tRNA recognition of mammalian mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase

J. Biol. Chem

275

19913

–19920

111

Meroueh, M., Grohar, P.J., Qiu, J., SantaLucia, J., Jr, Scaringe, S.A., Chow, C.S.

2000

Unique structural and stabilizing roles for the individual pseudouridine residues in the 1920 region of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA

Nucleic Acids Res

2075

–2083

112

Sumita, M., Desaulniers, J.P., Chang, Y.C., Chui, H.M., Clos, L., II, Chow, C.S.

2005

Effects of nucleotide substitution and modification on the stability and structure of helix 69 from 28S rRNA

RNA

1420

–1429

113

Newby, M.I. and Greenbaum, N.L.

2001

A conserved pseudouridine modification in eukaryotic U2 snRNA induces a change in branch-site architecture

RNA

833

–845

114

Greenbaum, N.L.

2005

Role of a conserved pseudouridine in U2 snRNA on the structural and electrostatic features of the splicosomal pre-mRNA branch site In Grosjean, H. (Ed.).

Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing

Berlin Heidelberg Springer pp.

205

–218

115

Lafontaine, D.L.J. and Tollervey, D.

1998

Regulatory aspects of rRNA modifications and pre-rRNA processing In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

Washington, DC ASM Press pp.

281

–288

116

Micura, R. and Hobartner, C.

2003

On secondary structure rearrangements and equilibria of small RNAs

Chem. Biochem

984

–990

117

Hobartner, C. and Micura, R.

2003

Bistable secondary structures of small RNAs and their structural probing by comparative imino proton NMR spectroscopy

J. Mol. Biol

325

421

–431

118

Hobartner, C., Mittendorfer, H., Breuker, K., Micura, R.

2004

Triggering of RNA secondary structures by a functionalized nucleobase

Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl

3922

–3925

119

Wenter, P., Furtig, B., Hainard, A., Schwalbe, H., Pitsch, S.

2005

Kinetics of photoinduced RNA refolding by real-time NMR spectroscopy

Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl

2600

–2603

120

Ramakrishnan, V.

2002

Ribosome structure and the mechanism of translation

Cell

108

557

–572

121

Auffinger, P. and Westhof, E.

1998

Appendix 5: Location and distribution of modified nucleotides in tRNA In Grosjean, H. and Benne, R. (Eds.).

Modification and Editing of RNA

Washington DC pp.

569

–577

122

Suzuki, T., Wada, T., Saigo, K., Watanabe, K.

2002

Taurine as a constituent of mitochondrial tRNAs: new insights into the functions of taurine and human mitochondrial diseases

EMBO J

6581

–6589

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions.

Submit a comment

Name

Affiliations

Comment title

Comment

You have entered an invalid code

Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. Your comment will be reviewed and published at the journal's discretion. Please check for further notifications by email.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 8,808

7,293 Pageviews

1,515 PDF Downloads

Since 11/1/2016

Month:	Total Views:
November 2016	4
December 2016	4
January 2017	13
February 2017	47
March 2017	54
April 2017	47
May 2017	30
June 2017	37
July 2017	25
August 2017	30
September 2017	24
October 2017	23
November 2017	48
December 2017	77
January 2018	96
February 2018	85
March 2018	269
April 2018	160
May 2018	121
June 2018	169
July 2018	134
August 2018	119
September 2018	103
October 2018	128
November 2018	95
December 2018	103
January 2019	92
February 2019	99
March 2019	110
April 2019	149
May 2019	204
June 2019	166
July 2019	182
August 2019	176
September 2019	112
October 2019	60
November 2019	74
December 2019	60
January 2020	48
February 2020	43
March 2020	86
April 2020	63
May 2020	95
June 2020	119
July 2020	95
August 2020	89
September 2020	76
October 2020	156
November 2020	162
December 2020	158
January 2021	136
February 2021	252
March 2021	118
April 2021	95
May 2021	99
June 2021	101
July 2021	127
August 2021	89
September 2021	58
October 2021	111
November 2021	64
December 2021	66
January 2022	76
February 2022	65
March 2022	112
April 2022	88
May 2022	55
June 2022	57
July 2022	74
August 2022	80
September 2022	56
October 2022	62
November 2022	126
December 2022	96
January 2023	68
February 2023	63
March 2023	112
April 2023	66
May 2023	64
June 2023	88
July 2023	48
August 2023	46
September 2023	75
October 2023	109
November 2023	106
December 2023	106
January 2024	91
February 2024	113
March 2024	91
April 2024	99
May 2024	96
June 2024	93
July 2024	62
August 2024	77
September 2024	63
October 2024	90

Citations

293 Web of Science

Post-transcriptional nucleotide modification and alternative folding of RNA (original) (raw)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Alternative foldings

Impact of nucleotide modifications on local structure

Transfer RNA is a treasure chest of information

tRNA tertiary structure and reinforcement

A cytosolic tRNA with deviations from the classical pattern

A mitochondrial tRNA with classical aspects

Alternative secondary structures in tRNAs

Other RNAs

CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

REFERENCES

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Email alerts

Citing articles via