Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. (original) (raw)

Journal Article

,

Search for other works by this author on:

Search for other works by this author on:

Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search

Abstract

Episodes of population growth and decline leave characteristic signatures in the distribution of nucleotide (or restriction) site differences between pairs of individuals. These signatures appear in histograms showing the relative frequencies of pairs of individuals who differ by i sites, where i = 0, 1, .... In this distribution an episode of growth generates a wave that travels to the right, traversing 1 unit of the horizontal axis in each 1/2u generations, where u is the mutation rate. The smaller the initial population, the steeper will be the leading face of the wave. The larger the increase in population size, the smaller will be the distribution's vertical intercept. The implications of continued exponential growth are indistinguishable from those of a sudden burst of population growth Bottlenecks in population size also generate waves similar to those produced by a sudden expansion, but with elevated uppertail probabilities. Reductions in population size initially generate L-shaped distributions with high probability of identity, but these converge rapidly to a new equilibrium. In equilibrium populations the theoretical curves are free of waves. However, computer simulations of such populations generate empirical distributions with many peaks and little resemblance to the theory. On the other hand, agreement is better in the transient (nonequilibrium) case, where simulated empirical distributions typically exhibit waves very similar to those predicted by theory. Thus, waves in empirical distributions may be rich in information about the history of population dynamics.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Metrics

Total Views 3,476

810 Pageviews

2,666 PDF Downloads

Since 12/1/2016

Month: Total Views:
December 2016 5
January 2017 8
February 2017 71
March 2017 128
April 2017 75
May 2017 75
June 2017 42
July 2017 40
August 2017 48
September 2017 67
October 2017 59
November 2017 51
December 2017 49
January 2018 78
February 2018 76
March 2018 76
April 2018 84
May 2018 19
June 2018 16
July 2018 16
August 2018 13
September 2018 18
October 2018 19
November 2018 24
December 2018 19
January 2019 19
February 2019 16
March 2019 41
April 2019 33
May 2019 15
June 2019 24
July 2019 18
August 2019 19
September 2019 21
October 2019 11
November 2019 12
December 2019 13
January 2020 14
February 2020 13
March 2020 19
April 2020 16
May 2020 6
June 2020 15
July 2020 23
August 2020 26
September 2020 46
October 2020 28
November 2020 55
December 2020 27
January 2021 30
February 2021 20
March 2021 24
April 2021 43
May 2021 41
June 2021 29
July 2021 27
August 2021 34
September 2021 60
October 2021 55
November 2021 52
December 2021 44
January 2022 65
February 2022 36
March 2022 45
April 2022 64
May 2022 36
June 2022 37
July 2022 33
August 2022 30
September 2022 49
October 2022 63
November 2022 32
December 2022 25
January 2023 37
February 2023 34
March 2023 43
April 2023 38
May 2023 26
June 2023 40
July 2023 25
August 2023 27
September 2023 33
October 2023 31
November 2023 39
December 2023 20
January 2024 54
February 2024 53
March 2024 61
April 2024 48
May 2024 45
June 2024 34
July 2024 35
August 2024 27
September 2024 30
October 2024 16

×

Email alerts

Email alerts

Citing articles via

More from Oxford Academic