Buspirone and Meperidine Synergistically Reduce the... : Anesthesia & Analgesia (original) (raw)
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and is the most important cause of major adult-onset disability. The annual US cost of strokes has been estimated at US$45 billion. Stroke victims are also substantial users of intensive care resources. Any reduction in stroke-related morbidity would thus benefit an enormous number of people and markedly reduce overall health care costs. Considerable animal data suggest that as little as a 2°C–3°C reduction in temperature provides increased protection against tissue hypoxia and ischemia compared with available drugs, including large-dose isoflurane or barbiturate coma (1).
Only limited human data are currently available, but therapeutic hypothermia clearly reduces intracranial pressure (2) and seems to be relatively safe (3). Hypothermia was reported to be an effective treatment for traumatic brain injury (4), although a subsequent study failed to confirm any benefit (5). Hypothermia also seems to improve recovery from catastrophic strokes resulting from middle cerebral artery occlusion (6). Mild hypothermia thus remains a promising intensive treatment for ischemic brain injury.
Autonomic cold defenses are well maintained in most stroke victims (7). The induction of therapeutic hypothermia in these patients is thus complicated by the need to overcome arterio-venous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering and to do so without provoking extreme thermal discomfort (8) or sympathetic nervous system activation (9), neither of which would be appropriate in these fragile patients. Numerous drugs reduce cold-defense thresholds by 2°C–3°C. However, they are all anesthetics or major sedatives that significantly compromise airway defense and ventilatory competence when given in sufficient doses (10). None would thus be suitable without critical care levels of monitoring and facilities for mechanical ventilation.
Numerous drugs have proved effective for the treatment of shivering, including clonidine, magnesium sulfate, and physostigmine. However, meperidine (11), unlike other opioids, possesses a special antishivering action. Specifically, the drug inhibits shivering twice as much as vasoconstriction (12) without altering the gain of the response (a proportional increase in shivering intensity) (13). The mechanism mediating meperidine’s special antishivering action remains unclear but seems unlikely to be serotonergic. Even with meperidine, though, large plasma concentrations are required to reduce the shivering threshold to 33.5°C (12). At these concentrations, humans no longer reliably breathe spontaneously; meperidine alone will thus be insufficient for the induction of thermoregulatory tolerance except in intensively monitored patients.
Buspirone is a serotonin (5-HT) 1A partial agonist (14). It is a very mild sedative that produces hypothermia in rats (15) but has little effect in humans (16). Application of 5-HT in the hypothalamus activates heat-loss mechanisms in most experiments, whereas application of norepinephrine increases heat conservation and production (17). Because buspirone and meperidine apparently inhibit thermoregulatory control via different mechanisms, these drugs may facilitate the induction of therapeutic hypothermia synergistically rather than additively. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the combination of buspirone and meperi- dine synergistically reduces the shivering threshold in humans.
Methods
With approval of the Committee on Human Research at the University of California–San Francisco and informed consent, we studied eight healthy male volunteers. None was obese, taking medication, or had a history of thyroid disease, dysautonomia, or Raynaud’s syndrome.
The volunteers had a light breakfast and refrained from caffeine for at least 8 h before the study. During the studies, the volunteers rested supine on a standard operating room table; they were minimally clothed, and ambient temperature was maintained near 19°C–20°C. The volunteers were studied on four randomly assigned days, separated by at least 48 h: 1) control (no drug), 2) meperidine at a target plasma concentration of 0.8 μg/mL; 3) meperidine at a target concentration of 0.4 μg/mL and buspirone 30 mg; and 4) buspirone 60 mg.
Meperidine was given by target-controlled infusion starting approximately 15 min before active cooling (below). The infusion profile was based on a modification of the method of Kruger-Thiemer (18) and published data (19). The time to peak plasma concentrations after the oral administration of buspirone is 60 min; the mean elimination half-life is 150 min (20). Buspirone was thus given in three equally spaced oral doses, with the first being 90 min before active cooling and the last at the time cooling started. This dosing scheme was intended to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations, minimize side effects during the initial phase, and maintain a therapeutic level throughout the study.
A 20-cm-long IV catheter was inserted into the left upper arm for fluid and drug administration; a catheter was also inserted into a vein in the right arm for blood sampling. Throughout the study period, mean skin temperature was maintained at 32°C by adjusting the temperature of circulating water (Cincinnati Sub-Zero, Cincinnati, OH) and forced-air warmers (Augustine Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN). Furthermore, the back, upper body, and lower body were individually maintained at the designated skin temperature.
Lactated Ringer’s solution cooled to ≈4°C was infused at rates sufficient to decrease the tympanic membrane temperature ≈2.5°C/h. Fluid was given until the shivering threshold was identified (below) or a total of 70 mL/kg of fluid was given. We have used this model in numerous previous studies; it markedly reduces core temperature and is well tolerated by young, healthy volunteers. Heart rate was measured continuously with an electrocardiogram; blood pressure was determined oscillometrically at 5-min intervals at the left ankle.
Core temperature was recorded from the tympanic membrane by using Mon-a-Therm thermocouples (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, Inc., St. Louis, MO). The aural probe was inserted by volunteers until they felt the thermocouple touch the tympanic membrane; appropriate placement was confirmed when volunteers easily detected gentle rubbing of the attached wire. The aural canal then was occluded with cotton, the probe securely taped in place, and a gauze bandage positioned over the external ear. The mean skin surface temperature was determined from 15 area-weighted sites (21).
Arterio-venous shunt vasomotor tone was evaluated with forearm-minus-fingertip and calf-minus-toe skin temperature gradients. There is an excellent correlation between skin temperature gradients and volume plethysmography (22). Vasoconstriction was defined by a forearm skin temperature gradient exceeding 0°C.
All temperatures were recorded by using Mon-a-Therm thermocouples. Temperatures were recorded from thermocouples connected to calibrated Iso-Thermex 16-channel electronic thermometers having an accuracy of 0.1°C and a precision of 0.01°C (Columbus Instruments International Corp., Columbus, OH). Individual and mean skin temperatures were computed by a data acquisition system, displayed at 1-s intervals, and recorded at 1-min intervals.
Oxygen consumption, as measured by a DeltaTrac (SensorMedics Corp., Yorba Linda, CA) metabolic monitor, quantified shivering; the system was used in canopy mode (23). Measurements were averaged over 1-min intervals and recorded every minute. End-tidal Pco2 was measured from nasal prongs with an Ultima monitor (Datex, Helsinki, Finland); exhaust gas from this monitor was returned to a oxygen consumption monitor.
Blood for meperidine and buspirone concentrations was obtained at the time cooling started and at the shivering threshold (or after 70 mL/kg of fluid had been given). Blood samples were centrifuged at 4°C and then frozen at −170°F (−112°C) until assayed. For meperidine, plasma (1 mL), 0.050 mL bupivacaine 30 mg/L (internal standard), 0.1 mL 2.4 M NaOH, and 6 mL ethyl acetate were combined in a polypropylene tube, capped, and vortexed for 10 s. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min, and the ethyl acetate phase was transferred to a second polypropylene tube containing 0.125 mL 30 mM of _o_-phosphoric acid. This was vortexed and centrifuged, and the ethyl acetate phase was discarded. The injection volume was 0.080 mL of the _o_-phosphoric acid phase into the high-performance liquid chromatograph running a mobile phase of 400💯40 of 20 mM K2HPO4 at pH 7.0:acetonitrile:methanol at 1 mL/min through a 15 cm × 3.9 mm Novapak CN column (Waters Inc., Milford, CT). Detection was by ultraviolet absorbance at 205 nm. This method is linear to at least 10 μg/mL, with a limit of quantitation of 20 ng/mL. The within-day coefficient of variation was 4.6% at 500 ng/mL (n = 8) (12).
For buspirone, plasma (1 mL), 1 mL buspirone standard or water (for samples), 0.050 mL sufentanil 10 mg/L (internal standard), 1.5 mL 0.5 M Na3PO4, and 6 mL 5% methanol in chlorobutane were combined in a borosilicate glass tube, capped, and vortexed for 10 s. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min. The chlorobutane phase was transferred to a second glass tube and evaporated to dryness at 40°C. The residue was reconstituted in 0.025 mL methanol and the whole sample injected into the gas chromatograph. The chromatograph used a programmable temperature vaporizer, a 30 m × 0.25 mm BPX-50 column (SGE Inc., Melbourne, Australia), and nitrogen-phosphorus detection. This method is linear to at least 1000 ng/mL, with a limit of quantitation of 0.1 ng/mL. The within-day coefficient of variation was 5.4% at 5 ng/mL (n = 8).
Sedation was evaluated with the Bispectral index of the electroencephalogram (BIS). The level of sedation was also evaluated with the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Score (OAA/S). The OAA/S test consists of four components (Table 1); as described by Chernik et al. (24), we summed the component scores. The OAA/S score sum is at least as reliable and valid as the visual analog scale and the digit-symbol substitution test (24). A score was obtained at 0.5°C intervals throughout cooling.
Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale
A sustained increase in oxygen consumption of 25% identified the shivering threshold. The baseline for this analysis was considered to be the steady-state value with the drug but before core cooling. Hemodynamic responses, OAA/S, BIS, ambient temperature, and relative humidity on each study day were first averaged within each volunteer. The resulting values were then averaged among volunteers. Results on the four study days were compared by using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Scheffé test. Drug concentrations are presented as the average of the two values on each study day.
All IV anesthetics and sedatives that have been specifically evaluated in humans have a linear dose dependent effect on thermoregulatory thresholds (25). The dose dependence of opioids, including meperidine, is also linear (12). We therefore assumed that the thermoregulatory effects of buspirone were also likely to be linear. The interaction between buspirone and meperidine was evaluated by comparing the shivering threshold with a full dose of each drug with the combination of a half-dose of each. Specifically, we used linear regression to estimate the shivering threshold that would be expected were the effects of each drug additive. In practice, this consisted of a linear regression between the two full-dose points. The resulting value in each volunteer was then compared with the observed value with a half-dose of each drug by using a two-tailed, paired Student’s _t_-test. Results are expressed as mean ± sd; differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0.01.
Results
Morphometric characteristics of volunteers were the following: age, 34 ± 5 yr; height, 172 ± 5 cm; and weight, 73 ± 14 kg. Ambient temperature and relative humidity were comparable on all study days. The mean skin temperature was maintained near 32°C. All the volunteers were vasoconstricted before infusion of cold fluid started.
Drug concentrations before cooling and at the shivering threshold did not differ significantly. Individual drug concentrations were stable over time, although there was considerable interindividual variability. Except on the large-dose meperidine day, volunteers were minimally sedated, as determined by individual average OAA/S scores uniformly equal to 20 and BIS values from 97 to 98. BIS scores remained similar during large-dose meperidine, but OAA/S was from 18 to 20, indicating moderate sedation. Two volunteers experienced respiratory difficulty and needed verbal reminders to breathe during the study, both during large-dose meperidine. End-tidal Pco2 was 5–12 mm Hg more on the large-dose meperidine day than during the other study conditions. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were comparable on each study day (Table 2).
Buspirone reduced the shivering threshold nearly 1°C, from 35.7°C ± 0.2°C to 35.0°C ± 0.8°C. In contrast, large-dose meperidine reduced the shivering threshold more than 2°C, to 33.4°C ± 0.3°C. However, the combination of small-dose buspirone and small-dose meperidine similarly reduced the shivering threshold to 33.4°C ± 0.7°C (Table 2, Fig. 1). The actual threshold during the small-dose combination was significantly less than predicted for an additive response (P = 0.006). The combination of buspirone and meperidine thus synergistically reduced the shivering threshold.
Potential Confounding Factors and Major Results
The shivering threshold (triggering core temperature) without drugs (Control), with 60 mg of buspirone (Buspirone), with meperidine at a target plasma concentration of 0.8 μg/mL (Meperidine), and a combination of buspirone 30 mg and meperidine at a target plasma concentration of 0.4 μg/mL (Combination). Data are shown as mean ± sd. The shivering threshold with a combination of small-dose meperidine and small-dose buspirone was similar to that with a full dose of meperidine. Furthermore, the combination threshold was significantly less than expected from the regression between the thresholds observed with the large doses of each drug alone (i.e., if the effects of each drug were additive) (P = 0.006). This figure thus indicates that the combination synergistically reduces the shivering threshold. See Table 2 for additional statistical analysis.
Discussion
Numerous animal data suggest that mild hypothermia is protective against cerebral ischemia, especially stroke (1,26). However, thermoregulatory defenses are usually well maintained, even in stroke victims (7). Consequently, it is difficult to induce hypothermia in these patients. Furthermore, shivering induces potentially harmful tachycardia and hypertension (27). The routine clinical use of therapeutic hypothermia thus depends on the development of drugs that inhibit cold defenses. Many such drugs are already known, but they are all anesthetics (28) or sedatives (29) and produce substantial respiratory toxicity in therapeutic doses.
Large-dose buspirone produced slight thermoregulatory inhibition. But as expected from previous studies (12), large-dose meperidine reduced the shivering threshold to ≈33.5°C—more than 2°C below normal. This is a clinically relevant reduction, because numerous studies indicate that comparable hypothermia provides marked protection against ischemic tissue injury. However, large-dose meperidine was associated with substantial sedation and respiratory depression. Our key result is thus that the combination of small-dose meperidine and small-dose buspirone produced comparable thermoregulatory tolerance without concomitant sedation or respiratory toxicity.
Why the combination of buspirone and meperidine should be synergistic rather than additive remains unknown. Buspirone produces hypothermia in rats (30) because it is a 5-HT1A partial agonist (14). 5-HT produces hyperthermia in cats (31) but produces hypothermia in numerous other species (32). 5-HT3 receptors may also reduce the shivering threshold in humans (33). The mechanism behind meperidine’s special antishivering action remains unknown, although activation of κ-opioid receptors, anticholinergic action, and _N_-methyl-d-aspartate antagonism have all been proposed. However, there is no expectation that the special antishivering action of meperidine is mediated by 5-HT receptors. The two drugs thus apparently inhibit thermoregulatory control via different mechanisms. We can only speculate that these pathways interact to amplify their respective antishivering actions.
Numerous and consistent data indicate that mild hypothermia markedly reduces infarct size in a variety of stroke models in numerous animal species. However, it remains to be established whether hypothermia is comparably helpful in humans. A major reason is that therapeutic hypothermia has generally been restricted to surgical patients and those in critical care settings because drugs that sufficiently inhibit thermoregulation produce substantial respiratory toxicity. Our combination of small-dose buspirone and meperidine removes this restriction by inducing thermoregulatory tolerance without toxicity. We thus expect this drug combination to facilitate studies evaluating the putative benefits of therapeutic hypothermia.
The internal cooling method we used, infusion of cold fluid, is unlikely to be safe in stroke victims. However, it is an excellent model for a new generation of internal heat-exchanging catheters that induce core hypothermia without any net exchange of fluid. Stroke victims are typically elderly. Although the risks of hypothermia may be increased in the elderly, it is easy to induce hypothermia in this population because advanced age per se impairs thermoregulatory responses (34). It should thus be possible to induce comparable hypothermia in the elderly with even smaller drug doses or to induce greater hypothermia with similar drug doses.
In preliminary studies, we maintained the mean skin temperature near 34°C. However, we were then unable to reduce the core temperature to the shivering threshold in many volunteers without giving excessive fluid. One reason is that considerable surface heating was required to maintain 34°C. The other reason is that skin temperature contributes 20% to thermoregulatory control (35); high skin temperatures thus reduce the shivering threshold. We therefore decreased the skin temperature to 32°C in these volunteers. A consequence of this reduction is that they were already vasoconstricted before core cooling started; it was thus impossible to evaluate the vasoconstriction threshold.
Although we were unable to evaluate the vasoconstriction threshold in these volunteers, we have simultaneously determined the shivering and vasoconstriction thresholds in numerous previous studies (36). With the sole exception of meperidine (12), the shivering threshold has always been 1°C less than the vasoconstriction threshold. We therefore assume that the vasoconstriction threshold in our volunteers would have been at least 1°C more than the shivering threshold.
The vasoconstriction threshold is of considerable interest because vasoconstriction is an effective thermoregulatory response. Vasoconstriction is the primary autonomic defense against cool environments, and—once triggered—prevents further hypothermia even in surgical patients (37). It might thus be difficult to reduce core temperature below the vasoconstriction threshold with surface cooling. Internal cooling, such as we used, has no such limitation because heat is removed directly from the core thermal compartment. A further advantage of internal cooling is that patient comfort, which largely depends on skin temperature (38), can be improved by simultaneous cutaneous heating.
In summary, large-dose buspirone produced minimal thermoregulatory inhibition, whereas large-dose meperidine reduced the shivering threshold more than 2°C, to ≈33.5°C. Large-dose meperidine was associated with significant respiratory toxicity and hypercarbia. However, the combination of small-dose meperidine and small-dose buspirone produced comparable thermoregulatory tolerance without sedation or respiratory toxicity. We expect this synergistic combination to facilitate studies evaluating the putative benefits of therapeutic hypothermia.
References
1. Kader A, Frazzini VI, Baker CJ, et al. Effect of mild hypothermia on nitric oxide synthesis during focal cerebral ischemia. Neurosurgery 1994; 35: 272–7.
2. Shiozaki T, Sugimoto H, Taneda M, et al. Effect of mild hypothermia on uncontrollable intracranial hypertension after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1993; 79: 363–8.
3. Hindman BJ, Todd MM, Gelb AW, et al. Mild hypothermia as a protective therapy during intracranial aneurysm surgery: a randomized prospective pilot trial. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 23–32.
4. Marion DW, Penrod LE, Kelsey SF, et al. Treatment of traumatic brain injury with moderate hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 540–6.
5. Clifton GL, Miller ER, Choi SC, et al. Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 556–63.
6. Schwab S, Schwarz S, Spranger M, et al. Moderate hypothermia in the treatment of patients with severe middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke 1998; 29: 2461–6.
7. Zweifler RM, Sessler DI, Zivin JA. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction and shivering impede therapeutic hypothermia in acute ischemic stroke victims. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1997; 6: 100–4.
8. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Narzt E, et al. Postoperative hemodynamic and thermoregulatory consequences of intraoperative core hypothermia. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 359–66.
9. Frank SM, El-Gamal N, Raja SN, et al. Alpha-adrenoceptor mechanisms of thermoregulation during cold challenge in humans. Clin Sci 1996; 91: 627–31.
10. Xiong J, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al. Isoflurane produces marked and non-linear decreases in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 240–5.
11. Horn E-P, Standl T, Sessler DI, et al. Physostigmine prevents postanesthetic shivering as does meperidine or clonidine. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 108–13.
12. Kurz A, Ikeda T, Sessler DI, et al. Meperidine decreases the shivering threshold twice as much as the vasoconstriction threshold. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1046–54.
13. Ikeda T, Sessler DI, Tayefeh F, et al. Meperidine and alfentanil do not reduce the gain or maximum intensity of shivering. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 858–65.
14. Lee HS, Meltzer H. Buspirone does not produce a 5-HT1A-mediated decrease in temperature in man. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 1991; 86: 71–6.
15. Lesch KP, Poten B, Söhnle K, et al. Pharmacology of the hypothermic response to 5-HT1A receptor activation in humans. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 39: 17–9.
16. Young AH, McShane R, Park SB, et al. Buspirone-induced hypothermia in normal male volunteers. Biol Psychiatry 1993; 34: 665–6.
17. Zeisberger E, Roth J. Central regulation of adaptive responses to heat and cold. In: Fregly MJ, Blatteis CM, eds. Handbook of physiology: section 4—environmental physiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996: 579–95.
18. Crankshaw DP, Edward NE, Blackman GL, et al. Evaluation of infusion regimens for thiopentone as a primary anaesthetic agent. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1985; 28: 543–52.
19. Scott JC, Ponganis KV, Stanski DR. EEG quantification of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 1985; 62: 234–41.
20. Lamberg TS, Kivisto KT, Neuvonen PJ. Effects of verapamil and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 63: 640–5.
21. Sessler DI, McGuire J, Moayeri A, et al. Isoflurane-induced vasodilation minimally increases cutaneous heat loss. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 226–32.
22. Rubinstein EH, Sessler DI. Skin-surface temperature gradients correlate with fingertip blood flow in humans. Anesthesiology 1990; 73: 541–5.
23. Tissot S, Delafosse B, Bertrand O, et al. Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21: 149–53.
24. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10: 244–51.
25. Sessler D. Perioperative hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1730–7.
26. Illievich UM, Zornow MH, Choi KT, et al. Effects of hypothermia or anesthetics on hippocampal glutamate and glycine concentrations after repeated transient global cerebral ischemia. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 177–86.
27. Frank SM, Higgins MS, Breslow MJ, et al. The catecholamine, cortisol, and hemodynamic responses to mild perioperative hypothermia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 83–93.
28. Annadata RS, Sessler DI, Tayefeh F, et al. Desflurane slightly increases the sweating threshold, but produces marked, non-linear decreases in the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1205–11.
29. Kurz A, Go JC, Sessler DI, et al. Alfentanil slightly increases the sweating threshold and markedly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 293–9.
30. Ginefri-Gayet M, Gayet J. Hypothermia induced by infusion of methionine sulfoximine into the dorsal raphe nucleus of the rat: involvement of 5-HT1A and GABAB receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 1993; 235: 189–96.
31. Feldberg W, Myers RD. Effects on temperature of amines injected into the cerebral ventricles: a new concept of temperature regulation. J Physiol 1964; 173: 226–37.
32. Gordon CJ. Temperature regulation in laboratory rodents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
33. Powell RM, Buggy DJ. Ondansetron given before induction of anesthesia reduces shivering after general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1423–7.
34. Vassilieff N, Rosencher N, Sessler DI, et al. The shivering threshold during spinal anesthesia is reduced in the elderly. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1162–6.
35. Cheng C, Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, et al. Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering in humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1160–8.
36. Talke P, Tayefeh F, Sessler DI, et al. Dexmedetomidine does not alter the sweating threshold, but comparably and linearly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 835–41.
37. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Christensen R, et al. Heat balance and distribution during the core-temperature plateau in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 491–9.
38. Frank S, Raja SN, Bulcao C, et al. Relative contribution of core and cutaneous temperatures to thermal comfort, autonomic, and metabolic responses in humans. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86: 1588–93.
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society