Does Prophylactic Octreotide Decrease the Rates of... : Annals of Surgery (original) (raw)

Scientific Papers

Does Prophylactic Octreotide Decrease the Rates of Pancreatic Fistula and Other Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Results of a Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Yeo, Charles J. MD; Cameron, John L. MD; Lillemoe, Keith D. MD; Sauter, Patricia K. RN; Coleman, JoAnn RN; Sohn, Taylor A. MD; Campbell, Kurtis A. MD; Choti, Michael A. MD

From the Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland

Correspondence: Charles J. Yeo, MD, Dept. of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 606, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-4606.

Presented at the 120th Annual Meeting of the American Surgical Association, April 6–8, 2000, The Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Supported in part by NIH grants RO1-CA56130 and P50-CA62924.

E-mail: [email protected]

Accepted for publication April 2000.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the endpoints of complications (specifically pancreatic fistula and total complications) and death in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Summary Background Data

Four randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials from Europe have evaluated prophylactic octreotide (the long-acting synthetic analog of native somatostatin) in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Each trial reported significant decreases in overall complication rates, and two of the four reported significantly lowered rates of pancreatic fistula in patients receiving prophylactic octreotide. However, none of these four trials studied only pancreaticoduodenal resections, and all trials had high pancreatic fistula rates (>19%) in the placebo group. A fifth randomized trial from the United States evaluated the use of prophylactic octreotide in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and found no benefit to the use of octreotide. Prophylactic use of octreotide adds more than 75tothedailyhospitalchargeintheUnitedStates.Incalendaryear1996,288patientsreceivedoctreotideonthesurgicalserviceattheauthors’institution,fortotalbilledchargesof75 to the daily hospital charge in the United States. In calendar year 1996, 288 patients received octreotide on the surgical service at the authors’ institution, for total billed charges of 75tothedailyhospitalchargeintheUnitedStates.Incalendaryear1996,288patientsreceivedoctreotideonthesurgicalserviceattheauthors’institution,fortotalbilledchargesof74,652.

Methods

Between February 1998 and February 2000, 383 patients were recruited into this study on the basis of preoperative anticipation of pancreaticoduodenal resection. Patients who gave consent were randomized to saline control versus octreotide 250 μg subcutaneously every 8 hours for 7 days, to start 1 to 2 hours before surgery. The primary postoperative endpoints were pancreatic fistula, total complications, death, and length of hospital stay.

Results

Two hundred eleven patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreatic-enteric anastomosis, received appropriate saline/octreotide doses, and were available for endpoint analysis. The two groups were comparable with respect to demographics (54% male, median age 66 years), type of pancreaticoduodenal resection (60% pylorus-preserving), type of pancreatic-enteric anastomosis (87% end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy), and pathologic diagnosis. The pancreatic fistula rates were 9% in the control group and 11% in the octreotide group. The overall complication rates were 34% in the control group and 40% in the octreotide group; the in-hospital death rates were 0% versus 1%, respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 9 days in both groups.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that the prophylactic use of perioperative octreotide does not reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula or total complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Prophylactic octreotide use in this setting should be eliminated, at a considerable cost savings.