Sturge-Weber Syndrome: Soft-Tissue and Skeletal Overgrowth : Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (original) (raw)
Original Articles
Soft-Tissue and Skeletal Overgrowth
Greene, Arin K. MD, MMSc; Taber, Sarah F. BA; Ball, Karen L. BA; Padwa, Bonnie L. DMD, MD; Mulliken, John B. MD
From the Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery and Vascular Anomalies Center, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Received July 3, 2008.
Accepted for publication Oct. 19, 2008.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Arin K. Greene, MD, MMSc, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115; E-mail: [email protected]
Statement of financial interest: No financial support or benefits were given to the authors from any source that is related to the scientific work reported in this article.
List of products used: No products, devices, or drugs were used in this article.
In Volume 20, Supplement 1 of the Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, which was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Synthes CMF, conflict of interest statements were inadvertently omitted. They are included below. These errors have been noted in the online version of the articles, which are available at www.jcraniofacialsurgery.com.
Financial Disclosures: There was no financial sponsorship of the work done by the authors in Volume 20, Supplement 1.
Abstract
Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is characterized by capillary malformation, glaucoma, leptomeningeal vascular anomalies, and variable facial overgrowth. The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence and morbidity of facial hypertrophy in 2 cohorts: group 1, surveyed patients registered in the SWS Foundation, and group 2, patients treated at our Vascular Anomalies Center. Predictive variables included age, sex, region of capillary stain, and ocular or cerebral involvement. Outcome variables were soft-tissue and bony overgrowth, as well as the type of operative correction. In group 1, the response rate to our questionnaire was 29.3% (108/368). Facial overgrowth was documented in 60.0% of patients. Soft-tissue hypertrophy was present in 55.0%; the lip (81.0%) was the most commonly affected site. Skeletal hypertrophy was reported in 22% of patients; the maxilla (83.0%) was the most frequently overgrown bone. Overall, 23.0% of patients (36.5% with overgrowth) had an operation: 34.0% of patients with soft tissue hypertrophy and 9.0% with skeletal enlargement. In group 2, 47 patients with SWS were treated at our center: 83% had facial overgrowth, either a localized cutaneous lesion (18.0%), soft-tissue enlargement (70.0%), or bony hypertrophy (45.0%). As in group 1, the lip (75.0%) and maxilla (94.0%) were the most commonly enlarged structures. Operations were necessary for localized cutaneous lesions (86.0%), soft-tissue hypertrophy (53.0%), or skeletal overgrowth (11.0%). In conclusion, facial hypertrophy is a major component of SWS; these patients should be counseled about the risk of overgrowth and about the types of possible operative correction.
© 2009 Mutaz B. Habal, MD