Manipulation of host behaviour by parasites: ecosystem engineering in the intertidal zone? (original) (raw)

Skip Nav Destination

Research article| 22 Jun 1998

F. Thomas;

1

Department of Zoology, University of Otago

,

POBox 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Search for other works by this author on:

F. Renaud;

2

Laboratoire de Parasitologie Comparée, (UMR 5555, CNRS) UniversitéMontpellier II

,

CC105 Place Eugène Bataillon, 34 095 Montpellier cedex 05, France

Search for other works by this author on:

T. de Meeûs;

2

Laboratoire de Parasitologie Comparée, (UMR 5555, CNRS) UniversitéMontpellier II

,

CC105 Place Eugène Bataillon, 34 095 Montpellier cedex 05, France

Search for other works by this author on:

R. Poulin

1

Department of Zoology, University of Otago

,

POBox 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Search for other works by this author on:

Publisher: The Royal Society

Online ISSN: 1471-2954

Print ISSN: 0962-8452

Proc Biol Sci (1998) 265 (1401): 1091–1096 .

• Views Icon Views Open Menu
  • Article contents
  • Figures & tables
  • Video
  • Audio
  • Supplementary Material
  • Peer Review
• Tools Icon Tools Open Menu
• Search Site
• Cite Open Menu
  • View this citation
  • Add to citation manager for

Abstract

Understanding the influence of parasites on the community ecology of free–living organisms is an emerging theme in ecology. The cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi is an abundant mollusc inhabiting the sheltered shores of New Zealand. This species, which lives just few centimetres under the surface, plays a key role for many benthic invertebrate species, because in these habitats the cockle shell is the only available hard surface where invertebrates can establish. However, the behaviour of this cockle can be altered locally by a parasite, the trematode Curtuteria australis. Indeed, heavily infected cockles are unable to bury perfectly and typically lie entirely exposed at the surface of the mud. In this study, we investigated the ecological consequences of this behavioural alteration for two invertebrates species commonly associated with cockles, the anemone Anthopleura aureoradiata and the limpet Notoacmea helmsi. A field study first demonstrated that in both infected and non–infected populations of cockles, there was a negative relationship between the number of anemones and limpets found on cockles. In the laboratory, we showed that predation of limpets by anemones is possible when they share the same cockle shell. In a heavily infected population of cockles, limpets were significantly more frequent and more abundant on cockles manipulated by C. australis than on cockles with a normal behaviour. A colonization test conducted in natural conditions demonstrated that the predominance of limpets on manipulated cockles results from a direct habitat preference. Conversely, anemones were significantly less frequent and less abundant on manipulated cockles than on cockles manipulated by C. australis. A desiccation test revealed that, relative to limpets, they had a lower resistance to this physical stress. We discuss our results in relation to current ideas on ecosystem engineering by organisms.

This content is only available via PDF.

You do not currently have access to this content.

Sign in

Client account

You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.

Email address / username ?

Password

Could not validate captcha. Please try again.

Pay-per-view access

$24.00

Metrics

Total Views 728

1 Pageviews

727 PDF Downloads

Since 2/1/2009

728 Views

119 Web of Science

Cited by

Email alerts

Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad