VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing (original) (raw)
- Qunyuan Zhang1,
- David E. Larson1,
- Dong Shen1,
- Michael D. McLellan1,
- Ling Lin1,
- Christopher A. Miller1,
- Elaine R. Mardis1,2,3,
- Li Ding1,2,4 and
- Richard K. Wilson1,2,3,4
- 1The Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA;
- 2Department of Genetics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
- 3Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
Abstract
Cancer is a disease driven by genetic variation and mutation. Exome sequencing can be utilized for discovering these variants and mutations across hundreds of tumors. Here we present an analysis tool, VarScan 2, for the detection of somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) in exome data from tumor–normal pairs. Unlike most current approaches, our algorithm reads data from both samples simultaneously; a heuristic and statistical algorithm detects sequence variants and classifies them by somatic status (germline, somatic, or LOH); while a comparison of normalized read depth delineates relative copy number changes. We apply these methods to the analysis of exome sequence data from 151 high-grade ovarian tumors characterized as part of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We validated some 7790 somatic coding mutations, achieving 93% sensitivity and 85% precision for single nucleotide variant (SNV) detection. Exome-based CNA analysis identified 29 large-scale alterations and 619 focal events per tumor on average. As in our previous analysis of these data, we observed frequent amplification of oncogenes (e.g., CCNE1, MYC) and deletion of tumor suppressors (NF1, PTEN, and CDKN2A). We searched for additional recurrent focal CNAs using the correlation matrix diagonal segmentation (CMDS) algorithm, which identified 424 significant events affecting 582 genes. Taken together, our results demonstrate the robust performance of VarScan 2 for somatic mutation and CNA detection and shed new light on the landscape of genetic alterations in ovarian cancer.
Footnotes
↵4 Corresponding authors.
E-mail lding{at}genome.wustl.edu.
E-mail rwilson{at}genome.wustl.edu.[Supplemental material is available for this article.]
Article published online before print. Article, supplemental material, and publication date are at http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.129684.111.
Received July 27, 2011.
Accepted January 11, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press