The theory of human development: A cross-cultural analysis | European Journal of Political Research | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

This article demonstrates that socioeconomic development, emancipative cultural change and democratization constitute a coherent syndrome of social progress – a syndrome whose common focus has not been properly specified by classical modernization theory. We specify this syndrome as ‘human development’, arguing that its three components have a common focus on broadening human choice. Socioeconomic development gives people the objective means of choice by increasing individual resources; rising emancipative values strengthen people's subjective orientation towards choice; and democratization provides legal guarantees of choice by institutionalizing freedom rights. Analysis of data from the World Values Surveys demonstrates that the linkage between individual resources, emancipative values and freedom rights is universal in its presence across nations, regions and cultural zones; that this human development syndrome is shaped by a causal effect of individual resources and emancipative values on freedom rights; and that this effect operates through its impact on elite integrity, as the factor which makes freedom rights effective.

References

Almond, G.A. & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anand, S. & Sen, A. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World Development 28(12): 2029–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Banfield, E.C. (1958). The moral basis of backwardness. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, S.H. et, Al. (1979). Political action. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Barro, R.J. (1997). Determinants of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bendix, R. (1974). Work and authority in industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Blalock, H.M. (1961). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of postindustrial society. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Birch, C. & Cobb, J.B. (1981). The liberation of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blau, P.M. (1994). Structural contexts of opportunity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Brint, S. (1984). ‘New class’ and cumulative trend explanations of the liberal political attitudes of professionals. American Journal of Sociology 90(1): 30–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollen, K.A. & Jackman, R.W. (1985). Political democracy and the size distribution of income. American Sociological Review 50(August): 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollen, K.A. & Paxton, P.M. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies 33(2): 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, I. (1996). The new challenge of direct democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bürklin, W., Klein, M. & Russe, A. (1996). Vom postmateriellen zum anthropozentrischen Wertewandel. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 37(4): 517–536.Google Scholar

Burkhart, R.E. & Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1994). Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis. American Political Science Review 88(December): 903–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casper, G. & Taylor, M.M. (1996). Negotiating democracy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chirot, D. (1986). Social change in the modern era. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Coleman, J.S. (1968). Modernization: Political aspects. in D.L. Sills(ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 10. Washington, DC: Free Press, pp. 395–402.Google Scholar

Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital and the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(Supplement): S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, P.E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes. in E.R. Tufte(ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 168–189.Google Scholar

Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. & Zonderman, A.B. (1987). Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being. British Journal of Psychology 78: 299–306. 3620790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cronin, T.E. (1999). Direct democracy, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cummins, R.A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research 52: 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutright, P.C. (1963). National political development. American Sociological Review 28(April): 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, R.A. (1973). Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, R.A. (1998). Development and democratic culture. Journal of Democracy (9): 34–39.Google Scholar

Dalton, R.J. (2001): Citizen Politics, 3rd edn. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Diamond, L. (1992). Economic development and democracy reconsidered. in G. Marks & L. Diamond(ed.), Reexamining democracy. London: Sage, pp. 93–139.Google Scholar

Diamond, L. (1993). The globalization of democracy. in R.O. Slater, B.M. Schutz & S.R. Dorr(ed.), Global transformation and the Third World. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diener, E., Diener, M. & Diener, C. (1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 851–864. 7473035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorenspleet, R. (2000). Reassessing the three waves of democratization. World Politics 52(April): 384–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkheim, É. (1988[1893]). Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Eckersley, R. (2000). The state and fate of nations: Implications of subjective measures of personal and social quality of life. Social Indicators Research 52: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckstein, H.S. (1988). A culturalist theory of political change. American Political Science Review 82(4): 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, S.N. (1986). The axial age breakthroughs. in S.N. Eisenstadt(ed.), The origins and diversity of axial age civilizations. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elkins, Z. (2000). Gradations of democracy? American Journal of Political Science 44(April): 287–294.Google Scholar

Ersson, S. & Lane, J.-E. (1996). Democracy and development. in A. Leftwich(ed.), Democracy and development. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 45–73.Google Scholar

Estes, R.J. (1998). Trends in world social development. Journal of Developing Societies 14(1): 11–39.Google Scholar

Flanagan, S. (1987). Value change in industrial society. American Political Science Review 81(4): 1303–1319.Google Scholar

Feng, Y. (1997). Democracy, political stability and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science 27(): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foweraker, J. & Landman, T. (1997). Citizenship rights and social movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freedom, House (ed.) (various years). Freedom in the world. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Frey, R.S. & Al-Roumi, A. (1999). Political democracy and the physical quality of life. Social Indicators Research 47: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Gasiorowski, M.J. & Power, T.J. (1998). The structural determinants of democratic consolidation. Comparative Political Studies 31(December): 740–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, J.L. & Duch, R.M. (1994). Postmaterialism and the emerging Soviet democracy. Political Science Quarterly 47: 5–39.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H. et, Al. (1998). A user's guide to Mlwin. London: Multilevel Models Project, University of London.Google Scholar

Gurr, T.R., Jaggers, K. & Moore, W.H. (1990). The transformation of the Western state. Studies in Comparative International Development 25(1): 73–108. 12283566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halman, L. (2001). The European values study. Tilburg: EVS, WORC, Tilburg University.Google Scholar

Helliwell, J.F. (1993). Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science 24(April): 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higley, J. & Gunther, R. (eds.) (1992). Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, B.B. (1999). International futures, 3rd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, S.P. (1991). The third wave. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, S.P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R. & Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review 65(February): 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2003). Democratic institutions and political culture. Comparative Politics 35: forthcoming.Google Scholar

Inkeles, A. (1983). Exploring individual modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inkeles, A. & Smith, D.H. (1974). Becoming modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, R.W. & Miller, R.A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T.R. (1995). Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32(4): 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopstein, J.S. & Reilly, D.A. (2000). Geographic diffusion and the transformation of the postcommunist world. World Politics 53(October): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurzman, C. (1998). Waves of democratization. Studies in Comparative International Development 33(Spring): 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landes, D.S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Leblang, D.A. (1997). Political democracy and economic growth. British Journal of Political Science 27(3): 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, D. (1968). Modernization: Social aspects. in D.L. Sills(ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social sciences, Vol. 10. New York: Free Press, pp. 386–395.Google Scholar

Lewis, W.A. (1955). The theory of economic growth. Homewood, NJ: Richard D. Irvin.Google Scholar

Linz, J.J. & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy. American Political Science Review 53(March): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipset, S.M., Kyoung-Ryung, S. & Torres, J.C. (1993). A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy. International Social Science Journal 45(May): 155–175.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C.B. (1977). The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. (1988). Motivation and personality, 3rd edn. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. & Tilly, C. (2001). Contentious dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Modelski, G. & Perry, G. III (1991). Democratization in long perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 39: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muller, E.N. (1997). Economic determinants of democracy. in M.I. Midlarski(ed.), Inequality, democracy and economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–155.Google Scholar

Muller, E.N. & Seligson, M.A. (1994). Civic culture and democracy. American Political Science Review 88(3): 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagle, J.D. & Mahr, A. (1999). Democracy and democratization. London: Sage.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, G. & Schmitter, P.C. (1986). Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. in G. O’Donnell, P.C. Schmitter & L. Whitehead(ed.), Transitions from authoritarian rule, Vol. 4.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar

Olson, M.J., Sarna, N. & Swamy, A.W. (2000). Governance and growth. Public Choice 102: 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, B. & Shapiro, R.Y. (1993). The rational public and democracy. in G.E. Marcus & R.L. Hanson (eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 35–64.Google Scholar

Perkin, H. (1996). The third revolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. (1992). The games of transition. in S. Mainwaring, G. O’Donnell & A. Valenzuela(ed.), Issues in democratic consolidation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 105–152.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics 49(January): 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pye, L.W. (1990). Political science and the crisis of authoritarianism. American Political Science Review 84(March): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, V. & Theobald, R. (1998). Political change and underdevelopment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rodrik, D. (1999). The new global economy and developing countries. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and the closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Rostow, W.W. (1961). The stages of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rowen, H.S. (1996). World wealth expanding. in R. Landau, T. Taylor & G. Wright (eds.), The mosaic of economic growth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 92–125.Google Scholar

Scarrow, S. (2001). Parties and the expansion of direct democracy. Party Politics (5): 341–362.Google Scholar

Schmuck, P., Kasser, T. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Social Indicators Research 50: 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. in M.P. Zanna (eds.), Advances in social psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar

Sides, J. (1999). It takes two: The reciprocal relationship between social capital and democracy. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Atlanta.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1984). Das Individuum und die Freiheit. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.Google Scholar

Sørensen, G. (1993). Democracy and democratization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. in J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby(ed.), The adapted mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United Nations Development Program(eds.) (2000). Human Development Report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects of democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Verba, S., Nie, N.H. & Kim, J.-O. (1978). Participation and political equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1958[1905]). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Welzel, C. (2002). Fluchtpunkt Humanentwicklung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Welzel, C. (2003). Effective democracy, mass culture, and the quality of elites. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43(3–5): 269–298.Google Scholar

Welzel, C. & Inglehart, R. (2001). Human development and the ‘explosion’ of democracy. Berlin: WZB Discussion Paper FS III 01–202, WZB.Google Scholar

Yule, G.U. & Kendall, M.G. (1950). An introduction to the theory of statistics. London: C. Griffin.Google Scholar

Zapf, W. & Habich, R. (1999). Die Wohlfahrtsentwicklung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1999. in M. Kaase & G. Schmid(ed.), Eine lernende Demokratie. Berlin: Sigma, pp. 285–314.Google Scholar