Why a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealth | European Journal of Political Research | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Policy makers can use four different modes of governance: ‘hierarchy’, ‘markets’, ‘networks’ and ‘persuasion’. In this article, it is argued that ‘nudging’ represents a distinct (fifth) mode of governance. The effectiveness of nudging as a means of bringing about lasting behaviour change is questioned and it is argued that evidence for its success ignores the facts that many successful nudges are not in fact nudges; that there are instances when nudges backfire; and that there may be ethical concerns associated with nudges. Instead, and in contrast to nudging, behaviour change is more likely to be enduring where it involves social identity change and norm internalisation. The article concludes by urging public policy scholars to engage with the social identity literature on ‘social influence’, and the idea that those promoting lasting behaviour change need to engage with people not as individual cognitive misers, but as members of groups whose norms they internalise and enact.

References

Allport, G.W. (1924). The study of the undivided personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 19(2): 132–141.10.1037/h0064744CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J.L. (1997). Governmental suasion: Refocusing the Lowi policy typology. Policy Studies Journal 25(2): 266–282.10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00020.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgements. In Guetzkow, H. (ed.), Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.Google Scholar

Australian Medical Association (AMA) (2009). Alcohol Use and Harms in Australia. Information Paper. Barton: Australian Medical Association.Google Scholar

Bell, S. et al. (2010). Persuasion as governance: A state‐centric relational perspective. Public Administration 88(3): 851–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkowitz, A.D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research and annotated bibliography. Washington, DC: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse and Violence Prevention, US Department of Education.Google Scholar

Beverage Digest (2008). Fact book 2008: Statistical yearbook of non‐alcoholic beverages. Bedford Hills, NY: Beverage Digest.Google Scholar

Borsari, B. & Carey, K.B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta‐analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 64(3): 331–341.10.15288/jsa.2003.64.331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, L. & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research 63(2): 140–146.10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronchetti, E.T. et al. (2011). When a Nudge is Not Enough: Defaults and Saving among Low‐income Tax Filers. NBER Working Paper 16887. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economics Research.Google Scholar

Bullock, A. (2004). The secret sales pitch: An overview of subliminal advertising. San Jose, CA: Norwich.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5): 752–766.10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, R.B. et al. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, J. et al. (2003). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Influencing public behaviour for environmental goals. London: Demos.Google Scholar

Costa, D.L. & Kahn, M.E. (2013). Energy conservation ‘nudges’ and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(3): 680–702.10.1111/jeea.12011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterill, S. et al. (2012). Can nudging create the Big Society? Experiments in civic behaviour and implications for the voluntary and public sector. Voluntary Sector Review 3(2): 265–274.10.1332/204080512X649405CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillard, J. & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communications. Communication Monographs 72(2): 144–168.10.1080/03637750500111815CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festinger, L. (1953). An analysis of compliant behavior. In Sherif, M. & Wilson, M.O. (eds), Group relations at the crossroads. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Fiske, S.T. & Taylor, S.E. (1984) Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Goodwin, T. (2012). Why we should reject ‘nudge’. Policy and Politics 41(2): 159–182.Google Scholar

Grandpre, J. et al. (2003). Adolescent reactance and anti‐smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication 15(3): 349–366.10.1207/S15327027HC1503_6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grasmick, H.G. et al. (1991). Shame and embarrassment as deterrents to non‐compliance with the law: The case of an anti‐littering campaign. Environment and Behaviour 23(2): 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haines, M.P. (1996). A social norms approach to preventing binge drinking at colleges and universities. Newton, MA: Higher Education Centre for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.Google Scholar

Haslam, S.A. (2004). Psychology in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Haslam, S.A. (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology 53(1): 1–20.10.1111/bjso.12061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D. & Platow, M.J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, D.M. & Welch, B. (2010). To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 123–136.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henriksen, L. et al. (2006). Industry‐sponsored anti‐smoking ads and adolescent reactance: Test of a boomerang effect. Tobacco Control 15(1): 13–18.10.1136/tc.2003.006361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Héritier, A. & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 1–17.10.1017/S0143814X08000755CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoggan, J., Littlemore, R.D. & Ball, T. (2009). Climate cover‐up: The crusade to deny global warming. Vancouver: Greystone Books.Google Scholar

Hyland, M. & Birrell, J. (1979). Government health warnings and the ‘boomerang’ effect. Psychological Reports 44(2): 643–647.10.2466/pr0.1979.44.2.643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, G. et al. (2010). Examining prejudice reduction theories in anti‐racism initiatives. International Journal of Non‐Profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 15(2): 181–198.10.1002/nvsm.383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jetten, J. et al. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self‐categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(6): 1222–1233.10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jetten, J. et al. (2002). ‘We're all individuals’: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology 32(2): 189–207.10.1002/ejsp.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, P. et al. (2009). Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. Political Quarterly 80(3): 361–370.10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, P. et al. (2011). Nudge nudge, think think: Experimenting with ways to change civic behaviour. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781849662284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. et al. (2013). Psychological governance and behaviour change. Policy and Politics 41(2): 159–182.10.1332/030557312X655422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology of behavioural economics. American Economic Review 93(5): 1449–1475.10.1257/000282803322655392CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, W.B. (1974). Subliminal seduction. New York: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar

Knight, C. & Haslam, S.A. (2010). The relative merits of lean, enriched and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well‐being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 16(2): 158–172.Google ScholarPubMed

Kotler, P. & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing 36: 3–12.10.1177/002224297103500302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggett, W. (2014). The politics of behaviour change: Nudge, neoliberalism and the state. Policy and Politics 42(1): 3–19.10.1332/030557312X655576CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsey, B.J. (1997). Peer education: A viewpoint and critique. Journal of American College Health 45(4): 187–189.10.1080/07448481.1997.9936882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Linkenbach, J. & Perkins, H.W. (2003). Most of Us Wear Seatbelts: The Processes and Outcomes of a 3‐year State‐wide Adult Seatbelt Campaign in Montana. Paper presented at the National Conference on the Social Norms Model, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Lowndes, V. & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi‐organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration 76(2): 313–333.10.1111/1467-9299.00103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maio, G.B. et al. (2007). Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review 1(1): 99–137.10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00005.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marteau, T.M. et al. (2011). Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? British Medical Journal 342: 263–265.10.1136/bmj.d228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McGarty, C. et al. (1994). The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion. Small Group Research 25(2): 267–293.10.1177/1046496494252007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKenzie‐Mohr, D. (2013). Fostering sustainable behaviour: An introduction to community‐based social marketing. London: New Society.Google Scholar

McLeroy, K.R. et al. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly 15(4): 351–377.10.1177/109019818801500401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Milburn, K. (1995). A critical review of peer education with young people, with special reference to sexual health. Health Education Research 10(4): 407–420.10.1093/her/10.4.407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, C.M. et al. (2006). Identifying principal risk factors for the initiation of adolescent smoking behaviour: The significance of psychological reactance. Health Communication 19(3): 241–252.10.1207/s15327027hc1903_6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, D.T. & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In Suls, J. and Wills, T. (eds), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Montague, M. et al. (2001). Slip! Slop! Slap! and Sunsmart, 1980–2000: Skin cancer control and 20 years of population‐based campaigning. Health Education and Behaviour 28(3): 290–305.10.1177/109019810102800304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moseley, A. & Stoker, G. (2013). Nudging citizens: Prospects and pitfalls confronting a new heuristic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 79: 4–10.10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newland, J. & Treloar, C. (2013). Peer education for people who inject drugs in New South Wales: Advantages, unanticipated benefits and challenges. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 20(4): 304–311.Google Scholar

Oyserman, D. et al. (2007). Identity‐based motivation and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93(6): 1011–1027.10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar

Perkins, H.W. & Berkowitz, A.D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions 21(9–10): 961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prentice, D.A. & Miller, D.T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 28(1996): 161–209.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60238-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pykett, J. et al. (2011). Interventions in the political geography of ‘liberal paternalism’. Political Geography 30(6): 301–310.10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qizilbash, M. (2011). Sudgen's critique of Sen's capability approach and the dangers of liberal paternalism. International Review of Economics 58(1): 21–42.10.1007/s12232-011-0112-2CrossRef. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4): 629–645.10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Witte, K. & Allen, M. (2000). A meta‐analysis of fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Health Education and Behaviour 27(5): 608–632.Google Scholar