Authoritarian Regimes and Their Permitted Oppositions: Election Day Outcomes in Cuba | Latin American Politics and Society | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Abstract

Electoral opposition to long-established authoritarian regimes may be loyal or rejectionist. Loyal oppositionists vote to send a selective signal to rulers; rejectionist oppositionists vote blank or void the ballot in full disapproval. In Cuba, the number of candidates equals the number of seats, yet voters may vote blank, void, or selectively (choosing some but not all candidates on the ballot), although the Communist Party has campaigned for all candidates. This article uses a unique dataset for Cuba's 2013 National Assembly elections to study aggregate opposition outcomes. It shows the emergence of a loyal opposition, which sometimes votes for and sometimes against Communist Party candidates. The rejectionist opposition, stable over time, never votes for Communist Party candidates; it is found where the Communist Party behaves monopolistically. This combined opposition has better national-level political information; it comes from more educated or larger urban areas or areas closer to Havana.

References

Ananta, Aries, Arifin, Evi Nurvidya, and Suryadinata, Leo. 2005. Emerging Democracy in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

August, Arnold. 2013. Cuba and Its Neighbours: Democracy in Motion. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

August, Arnold. 2014. Democracy Still in Motion: the 2013 Election Results in Cuba. International Journal of Cuban Studies 61 (Spring): 87–94.Google Scholar

Bahry, Donna, and Silver, Brian D.. 1990. Soviet Citizen Participation on the Eve of Democratization. American Political Science Review 84 3: 821–47.Google Scholar

Blaydes, Lisa. 2006. Who Votes in Authoritarian Elections and Why? Determinants of Voter Turnout in Contemporary Egypt. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August.Google Scholar

Brownlee, Jason. 2011. Executive Elections in the Arab World: When and How Do They Matter? Comparative Political Studies 44 7: 807–28.Google Scholar

Cuba Posible. 2015. Política y lealtad a Cuba: un debate. No. 17 (June).Google Scholar

Damore, David F., Waters, Mallory M., and Bowler, Shaun. 2012. Unhappy, Uninformed, or Uninterested? Understanding None of the above Voting. Political Research Quarterly 65 4: 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domínguez, Jorge I. 1978. Cuba: Order and Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Driscoll, Amanda, and Nelson, Michael J 2014. Ignorance or Opposition? Blank and Spoiled Votes in Low-Information, Highly Politicized Environments. Political Research Quarterly 67 3: 547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 40 11: 1279–1301.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. Elections under Authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–22.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2 1: 115–44.Google Scholar

Gilison, Jerome M. 1968. Soviet Elections as a Measure of Dissent: the Missing One Percent. American Political Science Review 62: 814–26.Google Scholar

Granma (Havana). 2008a. Llama la Ctc al voto unido. January 14.Google Scholar

Guanche, Julio César. 2012. La participación ciudadana en el Estado cubano. Temas 70: 69–79.Google Scholar

Herron, Michael C., and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2005. Black Candidates and Black Voters: Assessing the Impact of Candidate Race on Uncounted Vote Rates. Journal of Politics 67 1: 154–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morjé, Howard, Marc, and Roessler, Philip G.. 2006. Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. American Journal of Political Science 50 2: 365–81.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2013. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review 107 2: 326–43.Google Scholar

Kuran, Timur. 1997. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Prfseference Falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

López, Raimundo. 1993. Un domingo distinto. In Elecciones en Cuba: ¿farsa o democracia? Melbourne: Ocean Press.Google Scholar

Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malesky, Edmund, and Schuler, Paul. 2009. Paint-by-Numbers Democracy: the Stakes, Structure, and Results of the 2007 Vietnamese National Assembly Election. Journal of Vietnamese Studies 4 1: 1–48.Google Scholar

Malesky, Edmund, and Schuler, Paul. 2011. The Single-Party Dictator's Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 4: 491–530.Google Scholar

McAllister, Ian, and Makkai, Toni. 1993. Institutions, Society or Protest? Explaining Invalid Votes in Australian Elections. Electoral Studies 12 1: 23–40.Google Scholar

Miller, Michael K. 2015. Elections, Information, and Policy Responsiveness in Autocratic Regimes. Comparative Political Studies 48 6: 691–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Villanueva, Pérez, Everleny, Omar. 2004. The Cuban Economy Today and Its Future Challenges. In The Cuban Economy at the Start of the Twenty-First Century, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Villanueva, Pérez, and Barberia, Lorena. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Villanueva, Pérez, Everleny, Omar. 2012. The Cuban Economy: An Evaluation and Proposals for Necessary Policy Changes. In Cuban Economic and Social Development: Policy Reforms and Challenges in the 21st. Century, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I., Villanueva, Pérez, Prieto, Margarita Espina, and Barberia, Lorena. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Villanueva, Pérez, Everleny, Omar. 2016. La economía cubana: evolución y perspectivas. Cuban Studies 44: 19–42.Google Scholar

Power, Timothy J., and Garand, James C.. 2007. Determinants of Invalid Voting in Latin America. Electoral Studies 26 2: 432–44.Google Scholar

Rafuls Pineda, Daniel. 2014. El sistema electoral cubano: de la representación formal a la participación real. Temas 78: 64–71.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Howard, and Sen, Subrata. 1973. Electoral Participation in the French Fifth Republic. American Political Science Review 67 1: 29–54.Google Scholar

Samii, William A. 2004. Dissent in Iranian Elections: Reasons and Implications. Middle East Journal 58 3: 403–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shi, Tianjian. 1999. Voting and Nonvoting in China: Voting Behavior in Plebiscitary and Limited-choice Elections. Journal of Politics 61 4: 1115–39.Google Scholar

Simpser, Alberto, 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stiefbold, Rodney P. 1965. The Significance of Void Ballots in West German Elections. American Political Science Review 59 2: 391–407.Google Scholar

Swearer, Howard R. 1961. The Functions of Soviet Local Elections. Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 2: 129–49.Google Scholar

Uggla, Fredrik. 2008. Incompetence, Alienation, or Calculation? Explaining Levels of Invalid Ballots and Extra-Parliamentary Votes. Comparative Political Studies 41 8: 1141–64.Google Scholar

Zulfikarpasic, Adélaïde. 2001. Le vote blanc: abstention civique ou expression politique? Revue Française de Science Politique 51, 247–68.Google Scholar