Resonance, Tacoma Narrows bridge failure, and undergraduate physics textbooks (original) (raw)
Papers| February 01 1991
Program in Structures and Mechanics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
Search for other works by this author on:
Department of Civil Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Search for other works by this author on:
Am. J. Phys. 59, 118–124 (1991)
The dramatic Tacoma Narrows bridge disaster of 1940 is still very much in the public eye today. Notably, in many undergraduate physics texts the disaster is presented as an example of elementary f o r c e d r e s o n a n c e of a mechanical oscillator, with the wind providing an external periodic frequency that matched the natural structural frequency. This oversimplified explanation has existed in numerous texts for a long time and continues to this day, with even more detailed presentation in some new and updated texts. Engineers, on the other hand, have studied the phenomenon over the past half‐century, and their current understanding differs fundamentally from the viewpoint expressed in most physics texts. In the present article the engineers’ viewpoint is presented to the physics community to make it clear where substantial disagreement exists. First it is pointed out that one misleading identification of forced resonance arises from the notion that the periodic natural vortex shedding of the wind over the structure was the source of the damaging external excitation. It is then demonstrated that the ultimate failure of the bridge was in fact related to an aerodynamically induced condition of s e l f_‐_e x c i t a t i o n or ‘‘negative damping’’ in a torsional degree of freedom. The aeroelastic phenomenon involved was an i n t e r a c t i v e one in which developed wind forces were strongly linked to structural motion. This paper emphasizes the fact that, physically as well as mathematically, f o r c e d r e s o n a n c e and s e l f_‐_e x c i t a t i o n are fundamentally different phenomena. The paper closes with a quantitative assessment of the Tacoma Narrows phenomenon that is in full agreement with the documented action of both the bridge itself in its final moments and a full, dynamically scaled model of it studied in the 1950s.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1991 American Association of Physics Teachers.
1991
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
Sign in
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Username ?
Password
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00