Effect of Potential Renal Acid Load of Foods on Calcium Metabolism of Renal Calcium Stone Formers (original) (raw)

Skip Nav Destination

Article navigation

[ Issue Cover ](/eur/issue/39/Suppl. 2)

Research Articles| February 16 2001

Alberto Trinchieri;

Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy

Search for other works by this author on:

Giampaolo Zanetti;

Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy

Search for other works by this author on:

Anna Currò;

Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy

Search for other works by this author on:

Renata Lizzano

Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Italy

Search for other works by this author on:

European Urology (2001) 39 (Suppl. 2): 33–37.

Content Tools

Abstract

Objectives: Diet has been proposed as a causative factor of hypercalciuria in patients with calcium stones. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of diet on calcium metabolism of renal stone formers. Methods: Thirty-five renal calcium stone formers were entered in this study. A 2-day recall of dietary intake was obtained from each subject. The food records were coded and computer analyzed for total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, oxalate, vitamin C and fiber. Daily potential renal acid load (PRAL) of the diet was calculated considering the mineral and protein composition of foods, the mean intestinal absorption rate for each nutrient and the metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acids. A fasting blood sample was drawn and a 24-hour urine collection were obtained for analyses of calcium, phosphate and creatinine. Serum osteocalcin was also analyzed. A fasting 2-hour urine sample was collected in the morning for hydroxyproline, pyridinium cross-links and creatinine. Results: The mean daily dietary PRAL of renal stone formers was 22.4 ± 15.7 (range 4.2–65.8) mEq/day. Regression analysis demonstrated that urinary calcium excretion is dependent on daily protein intake and dietary PRAL, whereas the urinary pyridinium cross-links/creatinine ratio is inversely dependent on daily calcium intake. The urinary pyridinium cross-links/creatinine ratio was significantly lower in patients on a low calcium diet (<600 mg/day) than in other patients (19.5 ± 7.8 vs. 27.3 ± 7.5 n_M_/m_M_, p = 0.008). No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for daily urinary calcium (254 ± 109 vs. 258 ± 140 mg/day), serum osteocalcin (8.2 ± 3.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.4 ng/ml) and urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine (14.1 ± 7.4 vs. 10.3 ± 4 mg/g). Conclusions: The urinary calcium excretion of renal stone formers seems to be dependent on dietary acid load rather than dietary calcium intake. In patients consuming an acidifying diet a restriction of calcium intake could increase bone resorption leading to a progressive bone loss.

References

Robertson WG: Diet and calcium stones. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1987;13:228–234.

Trinchieri A, Mandressi A, Luongo P, Longo G, Pisani E: The influence of diet on urinary risk factors for stones in healthy subjects and idiopathic renal calcium stone formers. Br J Urol 1991;67:230–236.

Bleich HL, Moore MJ, Lemann J, Adams ND, Gray RW: Urinary calcium excretion in human beings. N Engl J Med 1979;301:535–541.

Remer T, Manz F: Potential renal acid load of foods and its influence on urine pH. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:791–797.

Trinchieri A, Nespoli R, Ostini F, Rovera F, Zanetti G, Pisani E: A study of dietary calcium and other nutrients in idiopathic renal calcium stone formers with low bone mineral content. J Urol 1998;159:654–657.

© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

2001

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.

Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

You do not currently have access to this content.

Sign in

Digital Version

Pay-Per-View Access

$39.00

1 Karger Article Bundle Token

$150

Rental

This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve.