Internal Classification of the Alor-Pantar Language Family Using Computational Methods Applied to the Lexicon (original) (raw)

Online Publication Date:

01 Jan 2012

• Abstract
• Metadata
• References
• Cited By
• Metrics

The non-Austronesian languages of Alor and Pantar in eastern Indonesia have been shown to be genetically related using the comparative method, but the identified phonological innovations are typologically common and do not delineate neat subgroups. We apply computational methods to recently collected lexical data and are able to identify subgroups based on the lexicon. Crucially, the lexical data are coded for cognacy based on identified phonological innovations. This methodology can succeed even where phonological innovations themselves fail to identify subgroups, showing that computational methods using lexical data can be a powerful tool supplementing the comparative method.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

Internal Classification of the Alor-Pantar Language Family Using Computational Methods Applied to the Lexicon

In: Language Dynamics and Change

Online Publication Date:

01 Jan 2012

Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

• Abstract
• Metadata

The non-Austronesian languages of Alor and Pantar in eastern Indonesia have been shown to be genetically related using the comparative method, but the identified phonological innovations are typologically common and do not delineate neat subgroups. We apply computational methods to recently collected lexical data and are able to identify subgroups based on the lexicon. Crucially, the lexical data are coded for cognacy based on identified phonological innovations. This methodology can succeed even where phonological innovations themselves fail to identify subgroups, showing that computational methods using lexical data can be a powerful tool supplementing the comparative method.

Content Metrics