Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a neuroprotectant in the mouse hippocampus (original) (raw)
Relationship between tPA activity and hippocampal neuronal death. To study the distribution of tPA activity in the normal hippocampus, we performed an in situ zymography assay in hippocampal sections of nonischemic WT mice (n = 4). We found that tPA activity was circumscribed to the CA2 and CA3 fields as well as to the DG. In contrast, we did not detect tPA activity in the CA1 layer (Figure 1B). To investigate the effect of hippocampal ischemia on tPA activity, we performed an in situ zymography assay in WT mice following 20 minutes of bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO; n = 4). We detected tPA’s caseinolytic activity in the hippocampal CA2, CA3, and DG fields but failed to observe tPA activity in the CA1 layer (Figure 1F). To correlate our findings with hippocampal neuronal death, we performed cresyl violet staining in a subgroup of WT mice 72 hours after 20 minutes of BCCAO (n = 6). We observed that the ischemic insult induced extensive neuronal death in the CA1 layer, with neuronal preservation in the CA2 and CA3 fields (Figure 1, E, G, and H). Then we performed similar experiments in tPA–/– mice (n = 6). We found that in contrast to WT mice, in which cell death was limited to the hippocampal CA1 layer, in tPA–/– mice there was widespread neuronal death involving not only the CA1 layer, but also the CA2 and CA3 fields (Figure 1, I, K, and L). Because delayed neuronal death may occur as late as 5 days after BCCAO (15), and to better understand the mechanisms of cell death involved in this process, we performed DAPI, Fluoro-Jade, and TUNEL staining in the hippocampus of WT and tPA–/– mice 5 days after 20 minutes of BCCAO (n = 6). Our DAPI staining indicated the presence of widespread necrotic changes in both WT and tPA–/– mice that corresponded to areas of neurodegeneration (Figure 1, Q, R, U, and V). We also detected extensive zones of apoptotic cell death in both strains of mice (Figure 1, T and X).
Relationship between tPA activity and hippocampal cell death. (A–L) Representative pictures of cresyl violet staining and in situ zymography assays of the dorsal hippocampus of WT mice under normoxic conditions (A–D) or of WT and tPA-deficient (tPA–/–) mice 72 hours after 20 minutes of BCCAO (E–L). Note the presence of cell death in areas devoid of tPA activity in WT (CA1 layer, G) and tPA–/– mice (CA1-CA2 and CA3 layers; I, K, and L). Original magnification, ×4 (A, B, E, F, I, and J) and ×20 (C, D, G, H, K, and L). (M–X) Representative pictures of DAPI, Fluoro-Jade, and TUNEL staining in the CA1 layer of WT mice under normoxic conditions (M–P) or of WT and tPA–/– mice 5 days after 20 minutes of BCCAO (Q–X). Note the presence of widespread necrotic changes, neurodegeneration, and apoptotic cell death in both WT (Q–T) and tPA–/– mice (U–X). Blue is DAPI, and green is Fluoro-Jade (N, R, and V) or TUNEL (P, T, and X). Original magnification, ×40 (M–X).
Effect of hypoxia on neuronal cell death. The effect of hypoxia on neuronal death varies not only with the severity but also with the duration of the hypoxic insult. Indeed, there is a sublethal period of time during which exposure to hypoxia/ischemia does not induce cell death but instead may activate neuroprotective mechanisms (17). To characterize this effect, hippocampal and cortical neurons were exposed to 0–60 minutes of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) conditions, followed by determination of cell death/survival by 3 different methods: a fluorescence assay that differentially detects dead and live cells; the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, which detects cell survival; and Trypan blue staining, which differentiates viable from nonviable cells. Our results indicate that exposure to 0–30 minutes of OGD does not cause significant cell death or changes in neuronal survival. In contrast, exposure to 60 minutes of OGD increased cell death in hippocampal neurons to 75% ± 8% (by the fluorescence assay) and 65% ± 11% (by the Trypan blue method), with a reduction in neuronal survival to 57% ± 7.9% (by MTT assay). Likewise, cortical neuronal death increased at 60 minutes to 70% ± 9% and 65% ± 8% (fluorescence assay and Trypan blue methods, respectively), with a reduction in neuronal survival to 49.3% ± 1.5% (MTT assay; Figure 2).
Time-dependent effect of hypoxia on neuronal death. Hippocampal (A–C) and cortical neurons (D–F) were exposed to OGD conditions during 0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes, followed by quantification of cell death at each time point by fluorometry (LIVE/DEAD Viability assay; A and D) or Trypan blue staining (C and F) and determination of cell survival with the MTT assay (B and E). Values in A, C, D, and F are given as percentage of dead cells relative to the total number of cells per field. Values in B and E are given as percentage compared with cell survival in neurons maintained under normoxic conditions. Error bars denote SD. *P < 0.05 compared with cells maintained under OGD for 0–30 minutes. n = 6–12 observations for each experiment.
Effect of hypoxia on the release of neuronal tPA. To investigate the effect of OGD conditions on the release of neuronal tPA, hippocampal and cortical neurons were exposed to OGD conditions for 0–60 minutes, followed by quantification of the release of tPA into the media with an ELISA. We found that OGD conditions induced a rapid release of tPA from both hippocampal and cortical neurons the first minute after the onset of the hypoxic insult (Figure 3, A and D).
Effect of tPA on neuronal survival. (A and D) Mean increase in enzymatically active tPA in the media of hippocampal (A) and cortical (D) neurons exposed to OGD conditions for 0–60 minutes. Error bars denote SD. n = 12. *P < 0.05 compared with controls maintained under normoxia. The insets are magnifications of the first 5 minutes of each curve. (B and E) Mean reduction in cell survival in hippocampal (B) and cortical neurons (E) 24 hours after incubation with 0–1 μM tPA under normoxic conditions. Error bars denote SD. n = 10. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells (white bar). (C and F) Mean decrease in cell survival in WT (white bars) and tPA deficient (tPA–/–; black bars) hippocampal (C) and cortical (F) neurons exposed to 55 minutes of OGD conditions or kept under normoxic conditions (no OGD). A subgroup of neurons was incubated with 1 μM tPA (+ tPA). Error bars denote SD. n = 10 for each observation. In C: *P < 0.05 compared with cells kept under normoxic conditions; **P < 0.05 compared with neurons maintained under OGD conditions without tPA. In F: *P < 0.05 compared with WT cells maintained under OGD conditions without tPA or with WT and tPA–/– neurons maintained under OGD conditions and treated with tPA; **P < 0.05 compared with WT and tPA–/– neurons maintained under OGD conditions without tPA.
Effect of tPA on neuronal survival. To study the effect of tPA on neuronal survival, hippocampal and cortical neurons were incubated under normoxic conditions with progressive concentrations of tPA (0–1 μM), followed by determination of cell survival 24 hours later with the MTT assay. We found that incubation with tPA did not induce cell death in hippocampal neurons (Figure 3B). In contrast, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 1 μM tPA decreased cortical neuronal survival to 91% ± 0.1%, 92% ± 0.13%, and 96% ± 0.1%, respectively (Figure 3E). To investigate whether endogenous tPA, released from neurons in response to OGD exposure, has an effect on cell survival, WT and tPA–/– hippocampal and cortical neurons were exposed to OGD conditions for 55 minutes, followed 24 hours later by determination of cell survival (n = 10). A subset of cells was incubated with recombinant tPA simultaneously with the hypoxic insult (Figure 3, C and F). Our results indicate that 55 minutes of OGD decreased neuronal survival in WT and tPA–/– hippocampal neurons to 55.7% ± 2.9% and 53.3% ± 5.8%, respectively. Surprisingly, we found that incubation with tPA increased cell survival in WT and tPA–/– hippocampal neurons to 81.4% ± 1.2% and 78.65% ± 3%, respectively (Figure 3C). We also found that OGD decreased cell survival in WT cortical neurons to 48.44% ± 2.8%. However, in contrast to hippocampal neurons, this effect was attenuated in tPA–/– cortical neurons (65% ± 2.8%). Also in contrast to our observations in hippocampal neurons, incubation with tPA decreased neuronal cortical survival in both WT and tPA–/– cultures to 41.59% ± 1.88% and 40.9% ± 2.7%, respectively (Figure 3F).
Neuroprotective effect of tPA on early preconditioning. There are two types of IPC: early and delayed (15). In early preconditioning, treatment with the protective agent simultaneously or very close to the exposure to the lethal insult promotes cell survival. In contrast, in delayed preconditioning, the development of tolerance is induced by treatment with the protective agent 24 hours before exposure to the lethal injury. Our results indicate that although endogenous tPA does not have an effect on early preconditioning, treatment with recombinant tPA during OGD increases hippocampal neuronal survival (Figure 3C). To study the effect of recombinant tPA on early preconditioning, we determined cell survival in WT hippocampal neurons incubated with 0–1 μM tPA followed by exposure to OGD conditions for 55 minutes. We found that whereas 60 nM and 100 nM tPA did not have an effect on cell survival, incubation with 500 nM and 1 μM tPA increased neuronal survival from 55.71% ± 1.9% (in cells not incubated with tPA) to 73.6% ± 6.4% and 81.4% ± 0.9%, respectively (Figure 4A). To study whether the proteolytic action of tPA is needed for this protective effect, we performed similar experiments with proteolytically inactive tPA (itPA). We found that incubation with itPA also increased hippocampal neuronal survival, to 86.02% ± 1.55% (Figure 4A). To further study this effect, a subgroup of neurons was incubated with a combination of tPA and α2-antiplasmin (140 nM) or with plasmin alone (100 nM). We found not only that α2-antiplasmin did not abrogate the protective effect of tPA, but also that incubation with plasmin alone failed to induce neuronal survival (Figure 4B). Because a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that in the brain some effects of tPA are not mediated by plasminogen/plasmin but instead by the LDL receptor–related protein–1 (LRP1; refs. 3, 4, 23, 24), we performed similar experiments in hippocampal neurons incubated with either tPA alone or with a combination of tPA and the receptor-associated protein (RAP, 100 nM), a universal inhibitor of members of the LDL receptor family. Our results indicate that cotreatment with RAP abrogates the protective effect of tPA on early preconditioning (Figure 4B).
tPA-induced early preconditioning. (A) Mean cell survival in hippocampal neurons treated with either tPA (in nM) or with itPA followed by exposure to OGD conditions during 55 minutes. n = 20 for each observation. Error bars denote SD. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells; **P < 0.05 compared with untreated neurons and with cells treated with 500 nM tPA. (B and C) Mean hippocampal neuronal survival following exposure to OGD conditions (55 minutes) and incubation with 1 μM tPA alone or in combination with either α2-antiplasmin (AP, 140 nM) or RAP (100 nM) or with either one of the NMDAR antagonists MK-801 (10 μM) or DL-AP5 (50 μM) or with plasmin alone (Pl; 100 nM) or with RAP alone. n = 20 in B and n = 15 in C. Error bars denote SD. In B: *P < 0.05 compared with cells left untreated; **P < 0.05 compared with cells kept under OGD conditions; ***P < 0.05 compared with neurons maintained under OGD conditions and with tPA alone. In C: *P < 0.05 compared with cells maintained under OGD conditions and either left untreated or incubated with MK-801 or DL-AP5 alone. (D) Mean neuronal survival following incubation with 250 μM KA either alone or in combination with 1 μM tPA. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells. n = 10. Error bars denote SD in all panels. “PREC.” (preconditioning) indicates the moment when cells were incubated with each compound.
Effect of NMDAR antagonism on tPA-induced early preconditioning. It has been demonstrated that NMDAR activation mediates the protective effect of delayed preconditioning (17). Likewise, a growing body of evidence indicates the existence of an interaction between tPA and the NMDAR (20, 22, 25). Then we investigated whether the NMDAR mediates the early neuroprotective effect of tPA. As shown in Figure 4C, cotreatment with 2 different NMDAR antagonists (10 μM MK-801 or 50 μM DL-AP5) did not inhibit the protective effect of tPA (Figure 4C). These findings indicate that the protective effect of tPA in early preconditioning is not associated with attenuation of the excitotoxic injury induced by the hypoxic insult. To further test this hypothesis, we studied neuronal survival in WT hippocampal neurons incubated with kainic acid (KA, 250 μM) either alone or in combination with 1 μM tPA. Our results indicate that incubation with KA alone decreases neuronal survival to 64.1% ± 1.1% and that this effect is not attenuated by cotreatment with tPA (66.04% ± 4.4%; Figure 4D), indicating that the protective effect of tPA in early preconditioning is not mediated by attenuation of the excitotoxic injury.
Effect of tPA on delayed preconditioning. We then investigated whether tPA was also protective in a model of delayed preconditioning. WT hippocampal neurons were incubated with 0–1 μM tPA followed 24 hours later by exposure to 55 minutes of OGD conditions and determination of neuronal survival. We found that incubation with 60 nM tPA increased neuronal survival from 62% ± 2.88% to 88.28% ± 2.72% and that this effect required tPA’s proteolytic activity (Figure 5A). Then we decided to investigate whether this delayed protective effect of tPA is mediated by the plasminogen/plasmin system. WT hippocampal neurons were incubated with 60 nM tPA alone; with a combination of tPA and 140 nM α2-antiplasmin, 1.4 μM aprotinin, 20 mM ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA), or 100 nM RAP; with plasmin alone (100 nM); or with plasminogen alone (200 nM), 24 hours before exposure to lethal OGD conditions. As shown in Figure 5B, the protective effect of tPA was inhibited by coincubation with α2-antiplasmin, aprotinin, or EACA, and consistent with this finding, incubation with plasmin alone increased neuronal survival to 86.44% ± 1.64%, an effect comparable to that observed following incubation with tPA alone (87.94% ± 1.39%; Figure 5B). Importantly, treatment with plasminogen alone did not have a protective effect (60.03% ± 1.58%). To study whether the LDL receptor plays a role on tPA-induced delayed preconditioning, we performed similar experiments following incubation with either tPA alone or in combination with RAP. In contrast to tPA-induced early preconditioning, we found that whereas treatment with tPA alone increased neuronal survival from 57.3% ± 1.7% to 82.93% ± 1.3%, cotreatment with a combination of tPA and RAP further increased this protective effect to 93.8% ± 2.6% (Figure 5B). Treatment with α2-antiplasmin alone, aprotinin alone, EACA alone (data not shown), or RAP alone did not have an effect on delayed preconditioning.
tPA-induced delayed preconditioning. (A–C) Mean survival in hippocampal neurons exposed to OGD conditions (55 minutes) 24 hours after treatment with 60 nM tPA or 1 μM itPA (A); or with a combination of 60 nM tPA and 140 nM α2-antiplasmin, 1.4 μM aprotinin (Apro), 20 mM EACA, 100 nM RAP, 10 μM MK-801, or 50 μM DL-AP5; or with 200 nM plasminogen (Plg) alone or 100 nM plasmin alone or RAP alone (B and C). In A: *P < 0.05 compared with cells under normoxic conditions; **P < 0.05 compared with untreated neurons under OGD conditions and with cells treated with itPA. In B and C: *P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells under OGD conditions; **P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells; ***P < 0.05 compared with cells treated with tPA or plasmin alone. n = 20 for each observation in A and B and n = 15 in C. Error bars denote SD. (D) Western blot analysis detecting the expression of the NR2A subunit of the NMDAR in hippocampal neurons incubated with 60 nM tPA or 100 nM plasmin. (E) Mean neuronal survival following incubation with 250 μM KA alone or 24 hours after treatment with 60 nM tPA. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated cells; **P < 0.05 compared with KA-treated cells. n = 10. Error bars denote SD in all panels.
Effect of NMDAR antagonism on tPA-induced delayed preconditioning. Then we investigated whether the NMDAR mediates the neuroprotective effect of tPA in the same model of delayed preconditioning. As shown in Figure 5C, in contrast to our observation in the model of early preconditioning, cotreatment with either MK-801 or DL-AP5 completely blocked the protective effect of tPA (58.49% ± 1.59% and 59.12% ± 1.99% cell survival, respectively; Figure 5C). Importantly, incubation with neither of these NMDAR antagonists alone induced delayed preconditioning. It has been reported that the NR2A subunit of the NMDAR mediates the protective effect of IPC in the hippocampus (26, 27). Likewise, in earlier studies we found that plasmin cleaves the NR2A subunit of the NMDAR in hippocampal neurons, relieving the inhibition of this receptor by zinc (28). Thus, we decided to study the effect of tPA on the cleavage of the NR2A subunit in hippocampal neurons left untreated or incubated with either 60 nM tPA or 100 nM plasmin. Our results indicate that incubation with either tPA or plasmin decreases the expression of the NR2A subunit in cell lysates, with the detection of approximately 80 kDa cleavage product in the culture medium (Figure 5D). Together, our observations indicate that the delayed protective effect of tPA is mediated by attenuation of the excitotoxic injury. To test this hypothesis, we studied neuronal survival in WT hippocampal neurons treated with 60 nM tPA followed 24 hours later by incubation with 250 μM KA. In contrast to our observations in early preconditioning, we found that incubation with tPA 24 hours before the excitotoxic injury with KA increased neuronal survival from 64.1% ± 1.3% to 87.6% ± 2.5% (Figure 5E).
Akt phosphorylation mediates tPA-induced delayed IPC. Because a large body of evidence indicates that during cerebral ischemia Akt phosphorylation induces neuronal survival (18), we decided to investigate whether Akt mediates the protective effect of tPA. First, we performed a Western blot analysis for Akt phosphorylated at serine 473 (pAkt) in cell lysates of hippocampal neurons untreated or incubated under normoxic conditions for 60 minutes with 60 nM active tPA, 60 nM itPA, or a combination of active tPA and 10 μM MK-801. As shown in Figure 6A, incubation with proteolytically active tPA induced a rapid increase in pAkt expression. In contrast, this effect was abrogated by cotreatment with the NMDAR antagonist MK-801 and was not observed following treatment with itPA. Then we studied whether this rapid phosphorylation of Akt mediates the effect of tPA on early IPC. WT hippocampal neurons were incubated with tPA alone, tPA in combination with 20 nM wortmannin, or wortmannin alone and exposed to lethal OGD conditions (55 minutes). Our results indicate that wortmannin did not abrogate the immediate protective effect of incubation with tPA (Figure 6B), indicating that Akt phosphorylation does not mediate the effect of tPA on early preconditioning. Then we decided to study whether phosphorylation of Akt mediates the protective effect of tPA on a model of delayed preconditioning. WT hippocampal neurons were incubated with tPA alone, plasmin alone, or wortmannin alone or with a combination of tPA and wortmannin or plasmin and wortmannin, followed 24 hours later by exposure to OGD conditions for 55 minutes. We found that in contrast to immediate preconditioning, cotreatment with wortmannin significantly attenuated the delayed protective effect of tPA on cell survival, from 86.1% ± 6.5% in neurons incubated with tPA alone to 60.5% ± 5.5% in cells treated with a combination of tPA and wortmannin. Additionally, incubation with plasmin alone increased cell survival to 86% ± 8% and this effect was abrogated by cotreatment with wortmannin (Figure 6C). Importantly, incubation with wortmannin alone did not have an effect on delayed preconditioning.
Akt phosphorylation mediates tPA-induced delayed tolerance. (A) Representative image of Western blot analysis for Akt phosphorylated at serine 473 (pAkt), total Akt (tAkt), and β-actin in lysates from WT hippocampal neurons incubated during 60 minutes with 60 nM tPA, 60 nM itPA, or a combination of tPA and 10 μM MK-801. (B) Mean MTT reduction in hippocampal neurons incubated with tPA either alone or in combination with wortmannin 20 nM while exposed to OGD conditions for 55 minutes. n = 10. Error bars denote SD. *P < 0.05 compared with other experimental groups. (C) Mean MTT reduction in hippocampal neurons incubated with 60 nM tPA, 100 nM plasmin, or 20 nM wortmannin or with a combination of tPA and wortmannin or wortmannin and plasmin, followed 24 hours later by exposure to OGD conditions for 55 minutes. n = 12. Lines denote SD. *P < 0.05 compared with neurons treated with a combination of wortmannin and tPA; **P < 0.05 compared with neurons treated with a combination of wortmannin and plasmin. “PREC.” denotes the moment of incubation with each compound. MTT, quantification of cell survival by MTT assay.
Effect of endogenous tPA on delayed hypoxic preconditioning. Because our results indicate that low concentrations of recombinant tPA (60 nM) induce delayed tolerance, we hypothesized that endogenous tPA, released in response to the hypoxic insult, also may induce delayed IPC. To test this hypothesis, we used a previously validated model of hypoxic preconditioning where exposure to sublethal hypoxia (30 minutes OGD) confers protection against the deleterious effects of lethal hypoxia (55 minutes OGD) 24 hours later (17). WT and tPA–/– neurons were exposed to sublethal OGD conditions (preconditioning event), followed 24 hours later by exposure to lethal OGD conditions (55 minutes) and determination of cell survival. A subgroup of cells was incubated under OGD conditions for 55 minutes without previous preconditioning. As shown in Figure 7A, survival of WT hippocampal neurons after 55 minutes of OGD increased from 58.10% ± 2.3% in non-preconditioned cells to 80% ± 0.9% in preconditioned neurons. In contrast, survival of tPA–/– neurons after 55 minutes of incubation under OGD conditions remained unchanged despite hypoxic preconditioning (60.3% ± 1.2% and 60.77% ± 2.3%, respectively). To see whether this protective effect of endogenous tPA was mediated by plasminogen/plasmin, WT neurons were preconditioned with 30 minutes of OGD either alone or in the presence of 140 nM α2-antiplasmin, 1.4 μM aprotinin, or 20 mM EACA, followed 24 hours later by exposure to lethal OGD conditions. Our results indicate that incubation with either one of these plasminogen/plasmin inhibitors completely abolished the effect of IPC (Figure 7B). Then we performed similar observations in WT neurons incubated with MK-801 or wortmannin during the preconditioning phase. We found that antagonism of the NMDAR or inhibition of Akt phosphorylation completely abrogated the protective effect of the preconditioning event (Figure 7B). Importantly, we observed that incubation with 100 nM RAP during the preconditioning phase increased the protective effect of IPC from 56.19% ± 3.03% in non-preconditioned cells, to 82.85% ± 2.045% in WT cells preconditioned with sublethal ischemia without RAP and to 92.77% ± 1.41% in cells preconditioned with a sublethal hypoxic injury in the presence of RAP. To further characterize our observations, we performed similar experiments with tPA–/– hippocampal neurons. A subgroup of neurons was incubated during the preconditioning phase with tPA 60 nM, or with a combination of tPA and MK-801, tPA and wortmannin, or tPA and RAP. We found that IPC failed to induce tolerance in tPA–/– neurons (57.27% ± 2.92% and 56.01% ± 2.85% neuronal survival without and with preconditioning, respectively) indicating that endogenous tPA is needed for the induction of ischemic tolerance (Figure 7C). In contrast, we found that incubation of tPA–/– neurons with tPA during the preconditioning phase increased neuronal survival to 84.3% ± 2.99%, confirming that the lack of preconditioning observed in tPA–/– neurons was indeed due to tPA deficiency. However, this rescue effect of tPA was abrogated by coincubation with either MK-801 (56.81% ± 2.08% neuronal survival) or wortmannin (57.62% ± 1.97%; Figure 7C). Importantly, coincubation with RAP potentiated the rescue effect of tPA (92.52% ± 1.3%).
Endogenous tPA induces delayed hypoxic preconditioning. (A) Mean neuronal survival in WT and tPA–/– neurons preconditioned with sublethal OGD conditions for 30 minutes, followed 24 hours later by exposure to lethal OGD (55 minutes). n = 12–15. *P < 0.05 compared with WT neurons maintained under normoxic conditions; **P < 0.05 compared with non-preconditioned neurons; ***P < 0.05 compared with tPA–/– cells maintained under normoxia. (B) Mean neuronal survival in WT neurons preconditioned with sublethal OGD in the presence of 140 nM α2-antiplasmin, 1.4 μM aprotinin, 20 mM EACA, 10 μM MK-801, 20 nM wortmannin (Wort), or 100 nM RAP. n = 6–10. *P < 0.05 compared with non-preconditioned cells; **P < 0.05 compared with all preconditioned cells. (C) Mean neuronal survival in tPA–/– neurons preconditioned with sublethal OGD in the presence of 60 nM tPA or with a combination of tPA and 10 μM MK-801, tPA and 20 nM wortmannin, or tPA and 100 nM RAP, followed 24 hours by a lethal hypoxic injury (55 minutes of OGD). Error bars denote SD. n = 8–10. *P < 0.05 compared with untreated preconditioned cells; **P < 0.05 compared with cells preconditioned in the presence of tPA.
Effect of endogenous tPA on IPC in vivo. Then we investigated in vivo the effect of endogenous tPA in an animal model of IPC. First, we performed an in situ zymography assay in brain sections from WT and tPA–/– mice (n = 4) immediately after 3 episodes of sublethal BCCAO, performed as described in Methods (Figure 8A). We found that this form of preconditioning not only induced an increase in tPA activity in the hippocampal CA1 layer (Figure 8B) but also failed to produce cell death in the same hippocampal field 72 hours later (Figure 8D). We did not observe an increase in caseinolytic activity in the CA1 layer of tPA–/– mice, indicating that the proteolytic activity observed in the CA 1 layer of WT mice was due to tPA (Figure 8C). Likewise, as in WT mice, this paradigm of preconditioning did not induce cell death in tPA–/– animals (Figure 8E). To study the effect of IPC on plasminogen expression in the CA1 layer, WT and Plg–/– mice underwent 3 episodes of sub-lethal BCCAO, followed by immunohistochemical detection of plasminogen. Our results demonstrate that IPC increased the expression of plasminogen in the CA1 hippocampal layer (Figure 8, F and G). Importantly, we did not detect immunoreactivity in Plg–/– mice (data not shown). Then we used this model to investigate whether the increase in tPA activity in the CA1 layer induced by IPC has a protective effect against a subsequent lethal ischemic injury in the same hippocampal field. WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice (n = 6) underwent IPC as described in Figure 8A, followed 30 minutes later by 20 minutes of BCCAO and analysis of hippocampal cell death 72 hours later. We found that early IPC failed to induce tolerance against 20 minutes of BCCAO (data not shown). Then we decided to perform similar experiments in a model of delayed IPC. WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice (n = 6) underwent IPC as described in Figure 8A, followed 24 hours later by 20 minutes of BCCAO. A subgroup of mice underwent 20 minutes of BCCAO without preconditioning. Seventy-two hours later, brains were harvested, and hippocampal cell death was studied in cresyl violet–stained sections as described in Methods. As shown in Figure 9, A, C, and E, 20 minutes of BCCAO induced extensive cell death in the hippocampal CA1 field of WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice, and as previously described by others (15), IPC induced tolerance to the lethal ischemic insult in the CA1 layer of WT mice (Figure 9B). In contrast, the protective effect of IPC was abrogated in tPA–/– and Plg–/– mice (Figure 9, D and F). Accordingly, IPC decreased the mean score of hippocampal damage in WT mice from 3.5 ± 0.75 to 1.55 ± 0.527 but did not have any effect in either tPA–/– (3.8 ± 0.34 without IPC and 3.7 ± 0.36 with IPC) or Plg–/– mice. (3.90 ± 0.30 without IPC and 3.72 ± 0.44 with IPC; Figure 9G) Because our in vitro experiments demonstrated that the protective effect of tPA was mediated by Akt phosphorylation, we then performed Western blot analysis for pAkt in hippocampal extracts from WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice 0, 1, 6, and 24 hours after IPC. Our results indicate that IPC induces an increase in pAkt expression in WT but not in tPA–/– or Plg–/– mice (Figure 9H). Together with our observations in neuronal cultures, these data suggest that the protective effect of tPA is mediated by an Akt-induced gene.
IPC increases tPA activity and plasminogen expression in the hippocampal CA1 layer. (A) Representative example of cerebral perfusion changes in the hippocampus during preconditioning with 3 episodes of BCCAO of 1-minute duration, each separated by 5-minute intervals of normal perfusion. (B and C) Representative in situ zymography assay in WT and tPA–/– mice immediately after 3 episodes of BCCAO performed as described in A. Note the presence of tPA activity in the hippocampal CA1 layer (white arrows in B). (D and E) Cresyl violet staining in the hippocampal CA1 layer of WT (D) and tPA–/– (E) mice 48 hours after 3 episodes of intermittent BCCAO. Note the absence of cell death despite a significant increase in tPA activity in the same hippocampal area as in WT mice. (F and G) Immunoreactivity for plasminogen in the CA1 layer of WT mice before (F) and after (G) IPC. Blue is DAPI, green is plasminogen. Original magnification, ×4 (B and C) and ×40 (D–G).
Effect of tPA deficiency in an in vivo model of delayed IPC. (A–F). Representative images of cresyl violet staining through the dorsal hippocampus of WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice 72 hours after 20 minutes of BCCAO without (– IPC) and with (+ IPC) IPC performed 24 hours earlier as described in Methods. Original magnification, ×20. (G) Mean score of hippocampal damage in WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice 72 hours after 20 minutes of BCCAO without (–) or with (+) IPC 24 hours earlier. n = 8–10 observations. *P < 0.05 compared with preconditioned WT mice. (H) Representative Western blot analysis for Akt phosphorylated at serine 473 (pAkt) in WT, tPA–/–, and Plg–/– mice 0, 1, 6, and 24 hours after IPC performed as described in Figure 8. Lanes were run on the same gel but were noncontiguous.