Comparing Typological Structures Across Cultures By Multigroup Latent Class Analysis (original) (raw)

Abstract

The advantages of latent class analysis for cross-cultural research in psychology are discussed. The basic principles of multigroup latent class analysis are described and illustrated by an empirical study comparing satisfaction-with-life-domain profiles across two nations (China, United States). In particular, it is shown how various assumptions of measurement invariance across cultures can be tested statistically in the latent class framework.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Clogg, C.C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C.C. Clogg, & M.E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311-359). New York: Plenum.

Clogg, C.C., & Goodman, L.A. (1985). Simultaneous latent structure analysis in several groups. In N.B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1985 (pp. 81-110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for affect in different cultures: Inter-and intraindividual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869-885.

Hagenaars, J.A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data. Log-linear panel, trend, and cohort analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hagenaars, J.A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Langeheine, R., Pannekoek, J., & van de Pol, F. (1996). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 492-516.

Langeheine, R., & Rost, J. (1988). Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum.

Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Henry, N.W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Lin, T.H., & Dayton, C.M. (1997). Model selection information criteria for non-nested latent class models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 249-264.

Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.

McCutcheon, A.L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

McCutcheon, A.L. (1998). Correspondence analysis used complementary to latent class analysis in comparative social research. In J. Blasius & M. Greenacre (Eds.), Visualization of categorical data (pp. 477-488). New York: Academic Press.

McCutcheon, A.L., & Hagenaars, J.A. (1997). Comparative social research with multi-sample latent class models. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 266-277). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

McCutcheon, A.L., & Nawojczyk, M. (1995). Making the break: Popular sentiment toward legalized abortion among American and Polish catholic laities. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 232-252.

Molenaar, P.C.M., & von Eye, A. (1994). On the arbitrary nature of latent variables. In A. von Eye & C.C. Clogg (Ed.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 226-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pearce, C.L., & Osmond, C.P. (1999). From workplace attitudes and values to a global pattern of nations: An application of latent class modeling. Journal of Management, 25, 759-778.

Read, T.R.C., & Cressie, N.A.C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer.

Rost, J., & Langeheine, R. (Eds.). (1997). Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H.C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482-493.

van de Pol, F., Langeheine, R., & de Jong, W. (1996). PANMARK 3. User's manual. Panel analysis using Markov chains-A latent class analysis program. Voorburg, the Netherlands.

van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1996). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J.W. Berry, Y.H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 257-300). Chicago: Allyn & Bacon.

van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Vermunt, J. (1993). Lem: Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm (WORC Paper 93.09.015/7). Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University.

Von Davier, M. (1997). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse categorical data. Results of a Monte Carlo study. Methods of Psychological Research-Online 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.mpr-online.de