Cluster Analysis Applied to Symptom Ratings of Psychiatric Patients: An Evaluation of its Predictive Ability | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core (original) (raw)

Summary

Ratings on 39 symptoms were examined for patients admitted to the Neuropsychiatric Institute of the University of Michigan Medical Center. A detailed evaluation was made of the clusters derived by a hierarchical clustering algorithm, using complete linkage and a simple matching coefficient on the binary variables of presence or absence of symptoms. The four groups of patients suggested by the cluster analysis can be characterized as follows: (1) generalized multiplicity of symptoms; (2) capacity to cope except for orientation apart from generally held norms; (3) activity level and thought processes speeded up, intensified, and unselected; (4) inwardly punitive, slowed down and distressed. It is shown that these groups received significantly different treatment and that the effect of treatment was significantly different, while no such differences were noted for groups defined in terms of diagnoses. By means of linear discriminant functions, rules are suggested for assigning other psychiatric patients to one of these four groups.

References

American Psychiatric Association (1968) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Second Edition (DSM-II). Washington, DC. Google Scholar

Anderberg, M. R. (1973) Cluster Analysis for Applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baron, D. N. & Fraser, P. M. (1968) Medical applications of taxonomic methods. British Medical Bulletin, 24, 236–40.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Everitt, B. S. (1972) Cluster analysis: a brief discussion of some of the problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 120, 143–5.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Goodman, L. A. & Kruskal, W. H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–64.Google Scholar

Goodman, L. A. & Kruskal, W. H. (1959) Measures of association for cross classifications: II. Further discussion and references. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54, 123–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kshirsagar, A. M. (1972) Multivariate Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar

Overall, J. E. (1963) Configurai analysis of psychiatric diagnostic stereotypes. Behavioral Science, 8, 211–19.Google Scholar

Overall, J. E. Hollister, L. E. & Pichet, P. (1967) Major psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 146–51.Google Scholar PubMed

Paykel, E. S. (1971) Classification of depressed patients: a cluster analysis derived grouping. British Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 275–88.Google Scholar PubMed

Pilowsky, I., Levine, S. & Boulton, D. M. (1969) The classification of depression by numerical taxonomy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 937–45.Google Scholar PubMed

Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. (1973) Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar

Strauss, J. S., Bartko, J. J. & Carpenter, W. J. (1973) The use of clustering techniques for the classification of psychiatric patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 531–40.Google Scholar PubMed

Wilks, S. S. (1962) Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (1973) The International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Vol 1. Geneva.Google Scholar