A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction (original) (raw)
Journal Article
,
1Clinical Psychology, SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program, 200 West Arbor Drive, CTF-B Room 102, San Diego, CA 92103-0804
Search for other works by this author on:
,
2Department of Psychology, Santa Clara University, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
3Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
4Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
5Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
,
3Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Gary E. R. Schwartz, Ph.D
3Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
01 February 2007
Cite
Shamini Jain, Shauna L. Shapiro, Summer Swanick, Scott C. Roesch, Paul J. Mills, Iris Bell, Gary E. R. Schwartz, A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 1, February 2007, Pages 11–21, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3301_2
Close
Navbar Search Filter Mobile Enter search term Search
Abstract
Background: Although mindfulness meditation interventions have recently shown benefits for reducing stress in various populations, little is known about their relative efficacy compared with relaxation interventions. Purpose: This randomized controlled trial examines the effects of a 1-month mindfulness meditation versus somatic relaxation training as compared to a control group in 83 students (M age = 25; 16 men and 67 women) reporting distress. Method: Psychological distress, positive states of mind, distractive and ruminative thoughts and behaviors, and spiritual experience were measured, while controlling for social desirability. Results: Hierarchical linear modeling reveals that both meditation and relaxation groups experienced significant decreases in distress as well as increases in positive mood states over time, compared with the control group (p < .05 in all cases). There were no significant differences between meditation and relaxation on distress and positive mood states over time. Effect sizes for distress were large for both meditation and relaxation (Cohen's d = 1.36 and .91, respectively), whereas the meditation group showed a larger effect size for positive states of mind than relaxation (Cohen's d = .71 and .25, respectively). The meditation group also demonstrated significant pre-post decreases in both distractive and ruminative thoughts/behaviors compared with the control group (p < .04 in all cases; Cohen's d = .57 for rumination and .25 for distraction for the meditation group), with mediation models suggesting that mindfulness meditation's effects on reducing distress were partially mediated by reducing rumination. No significant effects were found for spiritual experience. Conclusions: The data suggest that compared with a no-treatment control, brief training in mindfulness meditation or somatic relaxation reduces distress and improves positive mood states. However, mindfulness meditation may be specific in its ability to reduce distractive and ruminative thoughts and behaviors, and this ability may provide a unique mechanism by which mindfulness meditation reduces distress.
This content is only available as a PDF.
© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2003
You do not currently have access to this article.
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Get help with access
Institutional access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Sign in through your institution
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
- Click Sign in through your institution.
- Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
- When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Sign in with a library card
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
- Click Sign in through society site.
- When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
Personal account
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
- View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
- View the institutional accounts that are providing access.
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
Institutional account management
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Purchase
Short-term Access
To purchase short-term access, please sign in to your personal account above.
Don't already have a personal account? Register
A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training: Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction - 24 Hours access
EUR €39.00
GBP £34.00
USD $42.00
Rental
This article is also available for rental through DeepDyve.
Citations
Views
Altmetric
Metrics
Total Views 4,704
97 Pageviews
4,607 PDF Downloads
Since 12/1/2017
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
December 2017 | 15 |
January 2018 | 13 |
February 2018 | 28 |
March 2018 | 24 |
April 2018 | 49 |
May 2018 | 31 |
June 2018 | 14 |
July 2018 | 10 |
August 2018 | 10 |
September 2018 | 21 |
October 2018 | 9 |
November 2018 | 4 |
December 2018 | 12 |
January 2019 | 10 |
February 2019 | 12 |
March 2019 | 10 |
April 2019 | 30 |
May 2019 | 12 |
June 2019 | 10 |
July 2019 | 21 |
August 2019 | 24 |
September 2019 | 121 |
October 2019 | 59 |
November 2019 | 27 |
December 2019 | 36 |
January 2020 | 27 |
February 2020 | 33 |
March 2020 | 34 |
April 2020 | 30 |
May 2020 | 36 |
June 2020 | 26 |
July 2020 | 16 |
August 2020 | 21 |
September 2020 | 75 |
October 2020 | 30 |
November 2020 | 31 |
December 2020 | 29 |
January 2021 | 39 |
February 2021 | 48 |
March 2021 | 42 |
April 2021 | 90 |
May 2021 | 88 |
June 2021 | 59 |
July 2021 | 38 |
August 2021 | 62 |
September 2021 | 81 |
October 2021 | 112 |
November 2021 | 121 |
December 2021 | 116 |
January 2022 | 88 |
February 2022 | 83 |
March 2022 | 117 |
April 2022 | 76 |
May 2022 | 83 |
June 2022 | 65 |
July 2022 | 66 |
August 2022 | 48 |
September 2022 | 131 |
October 2022 | 74 |
November 2022 | 116 |
December 2022 | 87 |
January 2023 | 88 |
February 2023 | 76 |
March 2023 | 135 |
April 2023 | 109 |
May 2023 | 110 |
June 2023 | 83 |
July 2023 | 70 |
August 2023 | 108 |
September 2023 | 95 |
October 2023 | 68 |
November 2023 | 85 |
December 2023 | 56 |
January 2024 | 69 |
February 2024 | 58 |
March 2024 | 86 |
April 2024 | 88 |
May 2024 | 147 |
June 2024 | 92 |
July 2024 | 49 |
August 2024 | 52 |
September 2024 | 49 |
October 2024 | 1 |
Citations
757 Web of Science
×
Email alerts
Citing articles via
More from Oxford Academic