Assessment of Cosmesis After Breast Reconstruction Surgery: a Systematic Review (original) (raw)

• Matala CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1455–72.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Sbalchiero JC, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Beahm EK, Markey MK. Assessment of breast aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):186e–94e.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature [see comment]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(1):469–80.
  Article Google Scholar
• Christie D, O’Brien M, Christie J, Kron T, Ferguson S, Hamilton C, et al. A comparison of methods of cosmetic assessment in breast conservation treatment. The Breast. 1996;5:358–67.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ. Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40(2):115–26.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cohen M, Evanoff B, George LT, Brandt KE. A subjective rating scale for evaluating the appearance outcome of autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(2):440–9.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sacchini V, Luini A, Tana S, Lozza L, Galimberti V, Merson M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(11):1395–400.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Cosmetic assessment of breast conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. The Breast. 1999;8:162–8.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Pusic A, Chen C, Cano S, Klassen A, McCarthy CM, Collins E, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review of patient reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(4):823–37.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• www.stata.com [computer program]. 2009.
• Mosahebi A, Ramakrishnan V, Gittos M, Collier J. Aesthetic outcome of different techniques of reconstruction following nipple-areola-preserving envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(3):796–803.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nicholson RM, Leinster S, Sassoon EM. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast. 2007;16(4):396–410.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F. The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. [Review] [12 refs]. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):84–95.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Petit JY, Rietjens M, Ferreira MA, Montrucoli D, Lifrange E, Martinelli P. Abdominal sequelae after pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(3):723–9.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rogers NE, Allen RJ. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1925;109(6):1919–24.
  Google Scholar
• Tzafetta K, Ahmed O, Bahia H, Jerwood D, Ramakrishnan V. Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(7):1694–701.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Behranwala KA, Dua RS, Ross GM, Ward A, A’hern R, Gui GPH. The influence of radiotherapy on capsule formation and aesthetic outcome after immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical expander implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2006;59(10):1043–51.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Foo IT, Coleman DJ, Holmes JD, Palmer JH, Sharpe DT. Delay between expansion and expander/implant exchange in breast reconstruction—a prospective study. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(4):279–83.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90(4):433–9.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gui GP, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, Choy C, A’hern R, Ward A. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139;111(1):125–38.
• Lossing C, Holmstrom H, Malm M, Blomqvist L. Clinical follow up of the lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction: comparative evaluation from two plastic surgical centres. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;34(4):331–8.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mori H, Umeda T, Osanai T, Hata Y. Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2005;12(4):299–303.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stark B. Delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: Five years follow-up of 338 cases. Eur J Plast Surg. 1993;16(4–5):193–7.
  Google Scholar
• Tarantino I, Banic A, Fischer T. Evaluation of late results in breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi flap and prosthesis implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(5):1387–94.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Thomson HJ, Potter S, Greenwood RJ, Bahl A, Barker J, Cawthorn SJ, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(4):1081–91.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lossing C, Elander A, Gewalli F, Holmstrom H. The lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction: a long-term follow up study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;35(2):183–92.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, Palmer B. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25(5):470–6.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(5):1142–53.
  Google Scholar
• Spear S, Baker J. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(5):1119–23.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):455–62.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Harris J, Levine M, Svennson G. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiotherapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5:257–61.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Garbay J, Rietjens M, Petit JY. Resultats esthetiques de la reconstruction mammaire apres amputation pour cancer. A propos de 323 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1992;21:405–12.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Lowery JC, Wilkins EG, Kuzon WM, Davis JA. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(6):601–6.
  Google Scholar
• Pusic A, Klassen A, Scott A, Klok J, Ordeiro PG, Cano S. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–53.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• The Breast-Q. http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/shared/Breast-Q/index.html. Accessed on October 11, 2010.
• Constant C, Van Wersch AMEA, Wiggers T, Wai RTJ, van Geel AN. Motivations, satisafction and information of immediate braest reconstruction following mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;40:201–8.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fee-Fulkerson K, Conaway MR, Winer EP, Fulkerson CC, Rimer BK, Georgiade G. Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction using silicone gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(7):1420–6.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(1):46–54.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jabor M, Shayani P, Collins D, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areolar reconstruction: Satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):457–63.
  Article Google Scholar
• DiBernardo B, Adams R, Krause J, Fiorillo M, Gherardini G. Photographic standards in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(2):559–68.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ellenbogen R, Jankauskas S, Collini F. Achieving standardised photographs in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(5):955–61.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cardoso MJ, Santos A, Cardoso JS, Barros AC, De Oliveira M. Chosing observers for evaluation of aesthetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. International J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61(3):879–81.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Santos A, Barros AC, Cardoso de Oliveira M. Interobserver agreement and consnsus over the esthetic evaluation of conservative treatment for breast cancer. The Breast. 2006;15:52–7.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, Janni W, Jaenicke F, Friese K. Aesthetic result among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;275(6):445–50.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gui GP, Kadayaprath G, Tan SM, Faliakou EC, Choy C, A’hern R, et al. Evaluation of outcome after immediate breast reconstruction: prospective comparison of four methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(7):1916–26.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Losken A, Fishman I, Denson DD, Moyer HR, Carlson GW. An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(6):571–5.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Amaral N, Azevedo I, Barreau L, Bernardo M, et al. Turning the subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. The Breast. 2007;16:456–61.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes J, Carlson GW. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plastic Surg. 2005;54(5):471–6.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P. Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(1):58–70.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nahabedian MY, Galdino G. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1582–90.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Reece GP, Beahm EK, Miller MJ, Neely AE, Markey MK. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcomes of breast cancer treatment: measuring ptosis from clinical photographs. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(1):49–59.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, Choi M, Karp N. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery.[see comment]. Am J Surg. 2006;192(4):548–51.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, et al. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques. Breast. 2007;16(2):137–45.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Catanuto G, Spano A, Pennati A, Riggio E, Farinella GM, Impoco G, et al. Experimental methodology for digital breast shape analysis and objective surgical outcome evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg. 2008;61(3):314–8.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Raposio E, Santi P. Computer planning for breast reconstruction by tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(7):1931–3.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Raposio E, Cicchetti S, Adami M, Ciliberti RG, Santi PL. Computer planning for breast reconstruction by tissue expansion: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):2095–7.
  Google Scholar
• Carlson GW, Page AL, Peters K, Ashinoff R, Schaefer T, Losken A. Effects of radiation therapy on pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(5):568–72.
  Article CAS Google Scholar