EMAP and EMAGE (original) (raw)

Abstract

The Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Project (EMAP) is a time-series of mouse-embryo volumetric models. The models provide a context-free spatial framework onto which structural interpretations and experimental data can be mapped. This enables collation, comparison, and query of complex spatial patterns with respect to each other and with respect to known or hypothesized structure. The atlas also includes a time-dependent anatomical ontology and mapping between the ontology and the spatial models in the form of delineated anatomical regions or tissues. The models provide a natural, graphical context for browsing and visualizing complex data.

The Edinburgh Mouse Atlas Gene-Expression Database (EMAGE) is one of the first applications of the EMAP framework and provides a spatially mapped gene-expression database with associated tools for data mapping, submission, and query. In this article, we describe the underlying principles of the Atlas and the gene-expression database, and provide a practical introduction to the use of the EMAP and EMAGE tools, including use of new techniques for whole body gene-expression data capture and mapping.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, UK
    Richard A. Baldock, Jonathan B. L. Bard, Albert Burger, Nicolas Burton, Jeff Christiansen, Guanjie Feng, Bill Hill, Derek Houghton, Matthew Kaufman, Jianguo Rao, James Sharpe, Allyson Ross, Peter Stevenson, Shanmugasundaram Venkataraman, Andrew Waterhouse, Yiya Yang & Duncan R. Davidson
  2. Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh, UK
    Jonathan B. L. Bard & Matthew Kaufman

Authors

  1. Richard A. Baldock
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Jonathan B. L. Bard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Albert Burger
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Nicolas Burton
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Jeff Christiansen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Guanjie Feng
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Bill Hill
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Derek Houghton
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Matthew Kaufman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Jianguo Rao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. James Sharpe
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Allyson Ross
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Peter Stevenson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Shanmugasundaram Venkataraman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Andrew Waterhouse
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. Yiya Yang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. Duncan R. Davidson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRichard A. Baldock.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldock, R.A., Bard, J.B.L., Burger, A. et al. EMAP and EMAGE.Neuroinform 1, 309–325 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:1:4:309

Download citation

Index Entries