Seizure detection in adult ICU patients based on changes in EEG synchronization likelihood (original) (raw)

Abstract

Introduction

Seizures are common in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, and may increase neuronal injury.

Purpose

To explore the possible value of synchronization likelihood (SL) for the automatic detection of seizures in adult ICU patients.

Methods

We included EEGs from ICU patients with a variety of diagnoses. The gold standard for further analyses was the consensus judgment of three clinical neurophysiologists who classified 150 scalp EEG epochs as “definitely epileptiform,” “definitely nonepileptiform,” or “uncertain.” SL estimates the statistical interdependencies between two time series, such as two EEG channels. We computed the average synchronization by calculating the SL between one channel and every other channel, and taking the mean of these values.

Results

The mean SL in the 38 “definitely epileptiform” epochs ranged from 0.095 to 0.386 (mean 0.189; SD 0.066). In the 34 “definitely nonepileptiform” epochs the mean SL ranged from 0.087 to 0.158 (mean 0.115; SD 0.016; p<0.0005). The area under the ROC curve was 0.812 (95% Confidence Interval 0.725 to 0.898).

Conclusion

The mean SL may distinguish between seizure and nonseizure epochs, and may prove helpful to monitor epileptic activity in ICU patients.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000;54:340–345.
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  2. Jordan KG. Neurophysiologic monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit. Neurol Clin 1995;13:579–626.
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  3. Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, Emerson RG, Hirsch LJ. Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Neurology 2004;62: 1743–1748.
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  4. Young GB, Jordan KG. Do nonconvulsive seizures damage the brain?—Yes. Arch Neurol 1998;55:117–119.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  5. Scheuer ML, Wilson SB. Data analysis for continuous EEG monitoring in the ICU: seeing the forest and the trees. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004;21:353–378.
    PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Gabor AJ. Seizure detection using a self-organizing neural network: validation and comparison with other detection strategies. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;107:27–32.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  7. Saab ME, Gotman J. A system to detect the onset of epileptic seizures in scalp EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116: 427–442.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  8. Pauri F, Pierelli F, Chatrian GE, Erdly WW. Long-term EEG-video-audio monitoring: computer detection of focal EEG seizure patterns. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;82: 1–9.
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  9. Salinsky MC. A practical analysis of computer based seizure detection during continuous video-EEG monitoring. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;103:445–449.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  10. Van Putten MJ van, King T, Visser F, Lagerburg V. Detecting temporal lobe seizures from scalp recordings: a comparison of various features. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:2480–2489.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Faul S, Boylan G, Connolly S, Marnane L, Lightbody G. An evaluation of automated neonatal seizure detection methods. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:1533–1541.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Altenburg J, Vermeulen RJ, Strijers RL, Fetter WP, Stam CJ. Seizure detection in the neonatal EEG with synchronization likelihood. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:50–55.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Smit LS, Vermeulen RJ, Fetter WPF, Stijers RLM, Stam CJ. Neonatal seizure monitoring using non-linear EEG analysis. Neuropediatrics 2004;35:329–335.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  14. Stam CJ. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:2266–2301.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  15. Pijn JP, Velis DN, van der Heyden MJ, DeGoede J, van Veelen CW, Lopes da Silva FH. Nonlinear dynamics of epileptic seizures on basis of intracranial EEG recordings. Brain Topogr 1997;9: 249–270.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  16. Stam CJ, van Dijk BW. Synchronization likelihood; an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets. Physica D 2002;163:236–251.
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Lehnertz K, Elger CE. Can epileptic seizures be predicted? Evidence from nonlinear time series analysis of brain electrical activity. Phys Rev Lett 1998;80:5019–5022.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Martinerie J, Adam C, Le Van Quyen M, et al. Eplleptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysis. Nat Med 1998; 4:1173–1176.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  19. Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Navarro V, et al. Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings. Lancet 2001;357: 183–188.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. De Clercq W, Lemmerling P, Van Huffel S, Van Paesschen W. Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings. Lancet 2003;361:970.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R, Maiwald T, Winterhalder M, Voss HU, Timmer J, Schulze-Bonhage A. How well can epileptic seizures be predicted? An evaluation of a nonlinear method. Brain 2003;126:2616–2626.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  22. Lehnertz K, Litt B. The first collaborative workshop on seizure prediction: summary and data description. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:493–505.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Van Putten MJ. Nearest neighbor phase synchronization as a measure to detect seizure activity from scalp EEG recordings. J Clin Neurophysiol 2003;20:320–325.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Rulkov NF, Sushchik MM, Ysimring LS, Abarbanel HDI. Generalized synchronization of chaos in directionally coupled chaotic systems. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 1995;51: 980–994.
    Google Scholar
  25. Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lecture notes in mathematics 1981, 898:366–381.
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Theiler J. Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Phys Rev A 1986;34:2427–2432.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
    A. J. C. Slooter
  2. Department of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    J. J. Spijkstra & A. R. J. Girbes
  3. Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
    F. S. S. Leijten & A. C. van Huffelen
  4. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    E. M. Vriens & C. J. Stam

Authors

  1. A. J. C. Slooter
  2. E. M. Vriens
  3. F. S. S. Leijten
  4. J. J. Spijkstra
  5. A. R. J. Girbes
  6. A. C. van Huffelen
  7. C. J. Stam

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Stam.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slooter, A.J.C., Vriens, E.M., Leijten, F.S.S. et al. Seizure detection in adult ICU patients based on changes in EEG synchronization likelihood.Neurocrit Care 5, 186–192 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1385/NCC:5:3:186

Download citation

Key Words