Fetal thymus size in pregnant women with diabetic diseases (original) (raw)

Abstract

Aim:

The aim of our study was to assess fetal thymus size in diabetic pregnancies compared with normal pregnancies.

Methods:

Sonographic fetal thymus size was retrospectively assessed in 161 pregnancies with maternal diabetes and in 161 uncomplicated pregnancies matched by gestational age. The anteroposterior thymic and the intrathoracic mediastinal diameter were measured and the quotient was calculated [thymic-thoracic ratio (TT-ratio)]. In addition, we defined the quotient of the anteroposterior thymic diameter and the head circumference as thymus-head ratio (TH-ratio). The maternal diabetes cases were subdivided into three groups: (1) diet-controlled gestational diabetes, (2) insulin-dependent gestational diabetes and (3) preexisting maternal diabetes.

Results:

TT-ratio and TH-ratio were smaller in pregnancies with maternal diabetes (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). In all three maternal diabetes subgroups, the TT-ratio and the TH-ratio were lower compared with the control group (P<0.001 for each group).

Conclusions:

Reduced fetal thymus size seems to be associated with diabetic pregnancy. We introduce fetal thymus size as a new potential prognostic parameter for maternal diabetes.

Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Materials and methods: Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The research related to human subject use has complied with all the relevant national regulations, and institutional policies, and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors’ institutional review board or equivalent committee.

References

[1] Ashwal E, Hadar E, Hod M. Diabetes in low-resourced countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29:91–101.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.05.009 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Wood SL, Jick H, Sauve R. The risk of stillbirth in pregnancies before and after the onset of diabetes. Diabet Med. 2003;20:703–7.10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01015.x Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 137: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):406–16.10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Felker RE, Cartier MS, Emerson DS, Brown DL. Ultrasound of the fetal thymus. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8:669–73.10.7863/jum.1989.8.12.669 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Zalel Y, Gamzu R, Mashiach S, Achiron R. The development of the fetal thymus: an in utero sonographic evaluation. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:114–7.10.1002/pd.257 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] De Leon-Luis J, Gamez F, Pintado P, Antolin E, Perez R, Ortiz-Quintana L, et al. Sonographic measurements of the thymus in male and female fetuses. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:43–8.10.7863/jum.2009.28.1.43 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Gamez F, De Leon-Luis J, Pintado P, Perez R, Robinson JN, Antolin E, et al. Fetal thymus size in uncomplicated twin and singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:302–7.10.1002/uog.7578 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] De Leon-Luis J, Santolaya J, Gamez F, Pintado P, Perez R, Ortiz-Quintana L. Sonographic thymic measurements in Down syndrome fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:841–5.10.1002/pd.2783 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Musilova I, Hornychova H, Kostal M, Jacobsson B, Kacerovsky M. Ultrasound measurement of the transverse diameter of the fetal thymus in pregnancies complicated by the preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013;41:283–9.10.1002/jcu.22027 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Olearo E, Oberto M, Ogge G, Botta G, Pace C, Gaglioti P, et al. Thymic volume in healthy, small for gestational age and growth restricted fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:662–7.10.1002/pd.3883 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Chaoui R, Heling KS, Lopez AS, Thiel G, Karl K. The thymic-thoracic ratio in fetal heart defects: a simple way to identify fetuses at high risk for microdeletion 22q11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:397–403.10.1002/uog.8952 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Warby AC, Amler S, Jacobi AM, Hammer K, Mollmann U, Falkenberg MK, et al. Imaging of fetal thymus in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases. J Perinat Med. 2014;42:635–9.10.1515/jpm-2013-0314 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Chaoui R, Heling K, Mielke G, Hofbeck M, Gembruch U. Quality standards of the DEGUM for performance of fetal echocardiography. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:197–200.10.1055/s-2008-1027302 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Raffaelli R, Bergamini V, Siesto G, Bolis P. Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: a marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:421–6.10.1002/uog.6320 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Mohamed N, Eviston DP, Quinton AE, Benzie RJ, Kirby AC, Peek MJ, et al. Smaller fetal thymuses in pre-eclampsia: a prospective cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:410–5.10.1002/uog.8953 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Yinon Y, Zalel Y, Weisz B, Mazaki-Tovi S, Sivan E, Schiff E, et al. Fetal thymus size as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:639–43.10.1002/uog.4022 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Pearse G. Histopathology of the thymus. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:515–47.10.1080/01926230600978458 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Edwards A, Springett A, Padfield J, Dorling J, Bugg G, Mansell P. Differences in post-mortem findings after stillbirth in women with and without diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:1219–24.10.1111/dme.12272 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Bradley RJ, Brudenell JM, Nicolaides KH. Fetal acidosis and hyperlacticaemia diagnosed by cordocentesis in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1991;8:464–8.10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01633.x Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Taricco E, Radaelli T, Rossi G, Nobile de Santis MS, Bulfamante GP, Avagliano L, et al. Effects of gestational diabetes on fetal oxygen and glucose levels in vivo. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:1729–35.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02341.x Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Teramo K, Kari MA, Eronen M, Markkanen H, Hiilesmaa V. High amniotic fluid erythropoietin levels are associated with an increased frequency of fetal and neonatal morbidity in type 1 diabetic pregnancies. Diabetologia 2004;47:1695–703.10.1007/s00125-004-1515-3 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Gabbay-Benziv R, Baschat AA. Gestational diabetes as one of the “great obstetrical syndromes” – the maternal, placental, and fetal dialog. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29:150–5.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.025 Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Vambergue A, Fajardy I. Consequences of gestational and pregestational diabetes on placental function and birth weight. World J Diabetes. 2011;2:196–203.10.4239/wjd.v2.i11.196 Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central