Medical Diagnosis Versus Legal Determination of Death (original) (raw)
Research-Article
1
Visiting lecturer, formerly visiting professor
,
College of Law, Arizona State University
,
Tempe
.
Search for other works by this author on:
WF Gorman, M.D.
1
Visiting lecturer, formerly visiting professor
,
College of Law, Arizona State University
,
Tempe
.
J. Forensic Sci.. Jan 1985, 30(1): 150-157 (8 pages)
Published Online: January 1, 1985
Abstract
This summary of the medical and legal descriptions of death notes that the physician makes a medical diagnosis of death, the physician then makes the legal pronouncement of death, and that statute or the courts make the legal determination of death. Medical diagnosis of death follows either the common law standard of total cessation of cardiac and respiratory function or the medically accepted standards of brain death, the latter being based on irreversible loss of brain function. Cessation of cardiorespiratory function inevitably causes brain death; similarly, brain death inevitably causes cessation of cardiac function. The common law definition of death has been redefined: death is brain death which inevitably causes cessation of the cardiorespiratory functions. Legal determination of death, since the advent of cadaver organ transplantation, has been made by case law, which is briefly summarized, or by statute in most jurisdictions. The history of the Uniform Determination of Death Act is briefly summarized; this observer joins those recommending adoption of this Act. A table gives the rules or statutes that determine death in 36 U.S. jurisdictions.
References
1.
“
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research Defining Death
,”
Library of Congress 81-600150
,
U.S. Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC 20402
.
2.
Physicians' Handbook on Medical Certification: Death, Birth, Fetal Death
, PHS 78-1108,
U.S. Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC, 20402
,
1978
.
3.
“
Guidelines for the Determination of Death
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
246
,
04
1981
, pp.
2184
-
2186
.
4.
Edwards v. United States
519 F.2d, 1137 (5th Cir.
1975
).
5.
Price v. Neyland
320 F.2d (DC Cir.
1963
).
6.
18 Am Jur 2d §14 Coroners and Medical Examiners.
7.
Veith
,
F. J.
, “
Brain Death and Organ Transplantation
,” in
Brain Death: Interrelated Medical and Social Issues
, Vol.
315
,
J.
Korein
, Ed.,
New York Academy of Sciences
,
1978
.
8.
Veith
,
F. J.
, et al, “
Brain Death: II. A Status Report of Legal Considerations
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
238
,
11
1977
, p. 1744.
9.
Korein
,
J.
, Ed.,
Brain Death: Interrelated Medical and Social Issues
, Vol.
315
,
New York Academy of Sciences
,
1978
.
10.
Brennan
,
S. L.
, “
Death: Multiple Definitions or a Single Standard?
,”
Southern California Law Review
0038-3910, Vol.
54
,
1981
, p. 1323.
11.
Black's Law Dictionary
,
West, St. Paul
,
1968
, p. 488.
12.
Black's Law Dictionary
,
West, St. Paul
,
1979
, p. 170.
13.
Korein
,
J.
, “
Brain Death
,” in
Anesthesia and Neurosurgery
,
J.
Cottrell
and
H.
Turndorf
, Eds.,
Mosby
,
St. Louis
,
1980
, pp. 282, 284, 292–293.
14.
Black
,
P. McL.
, “
Brain Death, Part 1
,”
New England Journal of Medicine
0028-4793, Vol.
299
,
05
1978
, pp.
338
-
345
.
15.
Black
,
P. McL.
, “
Brain Death, Part 2
,”
New England Journal of Medicine
0028-4793, Vol.
299
,
05
1978
, pp.
393
-
401
.
16.
Kramer
,
W.
, “
From Reanimation to Deanimation
,”
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Supplementus
, Vol.
39
,
01
1963
, pp.
139
-
153
.
17.
Coe
,
J. I.
, “
Definition and Time of Death
,” in
Modern Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Forensic Science
,
W. J.
Curran
, et al, Eds.,
Davis
,
Philadelphia
,
1980
.
18.
Jennett
,
B.
, “
Brain Death—Editorial
,”
British Journal of Anaesthesia
0007-0912, Vol.
53
,
10
1981
, pp.
1111
-
1119
.
19.
Schneck
,
S. H.
, “
Brain Death and Prolonged States of Impaired Responsiveness
,” 58 Denver L.R. 609,
1981
.
20.
Lovato v. District Court
601 P.2d 1072 (CO
1979
).
21.
Plum
,
F.
and
Posner
,
J. B.
,
The Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma
,
Davis
,
Philadelphia
,
1980
.
22.
Jennett
,
B.
, “
Severity of Brain Damage
,”
Progress in Neurological Surgery
, Vol.
10
,
1981
, pp.
164
-
197
.
23.
In the Matter of Karen Ann Quinlan
, 355 A.2d 1647 (NJ
1976
).
24.
Chatrian
,
G. I.
, “
Electrophysiologic Evaluation of Brain Death
,” in
Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology
,
M. J.
Aminoff
, Ed.,
Churchill
,
New York
,
1980
.
25.
Welfare of Bertha Colyer
660 P.2d 738 (WA
1983
).
26.
Gonzalez
,
E. R.
, “
The Kidney Deficit: A Lingering Problem
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
244
,
05
1980
, p. 539.
27.
Waltzer
,
W. C.
, “
Procurement of Cadaveric Kidneys for Transplant
,”
Annals of Internal Medicine
0003-4819, Vol.
98
,
05
1983
, pp.
536
-
539
.
28.
Schoone
,
A. P.
, “
Expanding and Limiting Damages for Pecuniary Injury Due to Wrongful Death
,”
Wisconsin Bar Bulletin
, Vol.
45
,
1972
.
29.
Beecher
,
H. C.
, “
A Definition of Irreversible Coma
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
205
,
03
1968
, pp.
337
-
340
.
30.
Capron
,
A. M.
and
Kass
,
L. R.
, “
A Statutory Definition of the Standards for Determining Human Death
,”
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
, Vol.
87
, No.
12
,
1972
.
31.
61 Amer Bar Assoc J 463 (
1975
).
32.
12 Uniform Law Ann 15 (Suppl
1981
).
33.
“
Definition of Death
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
227
,
18
02
1974
, p. 728.
34.
“
Definition of Death
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
244
,
08
08
1980
, p. 540.
35.
Uniform Anatomic Gift Act §7 (b).
36.
State v. Johnson
295 N.E.2d 361, (OH
1977
).
37.
Kadish
and
Paulson
,
Criminal Law and Its Processes
,
Little Brown
,
Boston
,
1969
, pp.
218
-
223
.
38.
Cranmore v. State
271 N.W.2d 402, 428 (Wis ApP
1978
).
39.
People v. Olson
377 N.E.2d 371 (IL
1978
).
40.
State v. Fierro
603 P.2d 74 (AZ
1979
).
41.
State v. Brown
491 P.2d 1193 (OR
1971
).
42.
Commonwealth v. Golston
366 N.E.2d 744 (MA
1979
).
43.
Tucker v. Lower
#2832 Richmond VA L and Eq. Ct. 5/23/72 (Trial Court).
44.
NY City Health v. Sulsona
367 N.Y.S.2d 686 (Sup.Ct.
1975
).
45.
In Re Bowman
617 P.2d 731, 738 (WA Sup. Ct.
1980
).
46.
State v. Schaffer
574 P.2d 205 (KA
1977
).
47.
People v. Vanderford
258 N.W. 2d 502 (MI
1977
).
48.
No. Carolina v. Holsclaw
257 S.E.2d 650 (NC
1979
).
49.
Bass
,
M.
, “
Definition of Brain Death
,”
Journal of the American Medical Association
0098-7484, Vol.
242
,
12
1979
, p. 1850.
50.
Starr
,
A.
, “
Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Brain Death
,”
Brain
0006-8950, Vol.
99
,
06
1976
, p. 543.
51.
Chiappa
,
K. H.
and
Ropper
,
A. H.
, “
Evoked Potentials in Clinical Medicine
,”
New England Journal of Medicine
0028-4793, Vol.
306
,
07
1982
, pp.
1140
-
1149
and 1205–1211.
52.
State v. Robaczynski
#578-23001, Criminal Ct. of Baltimore,
1979
.
53.
Fabro
,
I.
, “
The Bacchiochi Case—Continued
,”
Connecticut Medicine
0010-6178, Vol.
45
,
1981
, pp. 267 and 334.
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.