Differentiation of Composition C-4 Based on the Analysis of the Process Oil (original) (raw)
Technical Notes
1
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Forensic Science Laboratory
,
Ammendale, MD
.
Search for other works by this author on:
1
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Forensic Science Laboratory
,
Ammendale, MD
.
Search for other works by this author on:
MR Reardon, MSFS
1
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Forensic Science Laboratory
,
Ammendale, MD
.
EC Bender, BS
1
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Forensic Science Laboratory
,
Ammendale, MD
.
J. Forensic Sci.. May 2005, 50(3): 1-7 (7 pages)
Published Online: May 1, 2005
Abstract
United States military Composition C-4 explosive contains 91% cyclotrimethylene trinitramine (RDX), 5.3% dioctyl sebacate or adipate (DOS or DOA), 2.1% polyisobutylene (PIB), and 1.6% oil. The original military specification required low viscosity engine oil, but this has since been changed to a specially manufactured mineral oil, also called “process oil.” Differentiation of military and commercial Composition C-4 may be possible by analyzing the oil. In this study, samples of Composition C-4 were taken from various lots of U.S. military M112 demolition blocks from two commercially manufactured brands sold in the U.S. The oil and plasticizer were extracted with pentane, and the plasticizer was removed using silica solid phase extraction cartridges. The oil was then analyzed by high-temperature gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (HTGC/MS). Results indicated that HTGC/MS is an excellent discriminating technique for oil comparisons; however, differentiation of Composition C-4 is limited by manufacturer production and distribution practices.
References
1.
http://holston-aap.com/hsaap/history.htm,
03
2004
.
2.
Composition C-4. United States Army-AR
;
1963 Sept. Military Specification: MIL-C-45010A (MU)
.
3.
Fedoroff
B T
,
Sheffield
O E
.
Encyclopedia of explosives and related items
, PATR 2700, Vol.
3
.
Dover
:
Picatinny Arsenal
,
1966
;
C484
–
8
.
4.
Polyisobutylene binder. Ordnance Corps
;
1957 Jun. Military Specification: MIL-P-14536 (Ord)
.
5.
Keto
R O
.
Improved method for the analysis of the military explosive Composition C-4
.
J Forensic Sci
0022-1198
1986
;
31
:
241–9
.
6.
Peimer
R E
,
Washington
W D
,
Snow
K B
.
On the examination of the military explosive, C-4
.
J Forensic Sci
0022-1198
1980
;
25
:
398
–
400
.
7.
Midkiff
C R
,
Washington
W D
.
Systematic approach to the detection of explosive residues. IV. Military explosives
.
J AOAC
1976
;
59
:
1357
–
74
.
8.
Keto
R O
.
Analysis of the Eastern Bloc explosive Semtex-H
. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Analysis and Detection of Explosives; 1989 Jul 10–13;
Mannheim-Neuostheim (Germany)
.
Fraunhofer-Institut for Chemische Technologie
,
1989
;
11-1
–
11-20
.
9.
Hobbs
J R
.
Analysis of Semtex explosives
. In:
Yinon
J
, editor.
Advances in analysis and detection of explosives
.
Netherlands
:
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
1993
;
409
–
27
.
10.
Buyten
J
,
Duvekot
J
,
Peene
J
,
Mussche
Ph
.
A capillary column for hightemperature gas chromatography
.
Am Lab
1991
;
13
–
8
.
11.
Brumley
W C
,
Jones
W J
,
Grange
A H
.
A survey of potential applications of high-temperature capillary gas chromatography for environmental analysis
.
LC-GC
1995
;
13
:
228
–
36
.
12.
van Lieshout
HP M
,
Janssen
H G
,
Cramers
C A
,
Improvements in hightemperature PTV injection for HT-CGC
.
Am Lab
1995
;
38
–
44
.
13.
Tipler
A
,
Johnson
G
.
Optimization of conditions for high temperature capillary gas chromatography using a split-mode programmable temperature vaporizing injection system
.
J High Res Chromatogr
1990
;
13
:
365
–
70
.
14.
Lawrence
J F
,
Iyengar
J R
,
Page
B D
,
Conacher
HB S
.
Characterization of commercial waxes by high-temperature gas chromatography
.
J Chromatogr
0021-9673
1982
;
236
:
403
–
19
.
15.
Barker
A
.
The chromatographic analysis of refined and synthetic waxes
. In:
Adlard
E R
, editor.
Chromatography in the petroleum industry
.
Amsterdam
:
Elsevier
,
1995
;
55
–
93
.
16.
Kuk
R J
.
Analysis of artificial fireplace logs by high temperature gas chromatography
.
J Forensic Sci
0022-1198
2002
;
47
:
1288
–
93
.
17.
Giles
J J
.
The analysis of waxes and greases using high resolution gas chromatography
.
J For Sci Soc
0015-7368
1987
;
27
:
231
–
9
.
18.
McCormack
A J
,
McCann
J M
,
Bohler
R J
.
Determination of motor oil volatility using high-temperature gas chromatography
.
LC-GC
1991
;
9
:
28
–
32
.
19.
Roehner
R M
,
Fletcher
J V
,
Hanson
F V
,
Dahdah
N F
.
Comparative compositional study of crude oil solids from the Trans Alaska Pipeline System using high-temperature gas chromatography
.
Energy and Fuels
2002
;
16
:
211
–
7
.
20.
Gallegos
E J
,
Fetzer
J C
,
Carlson
R M
,
Peña
M M
.
High-temperature GC/MS characterization of porphyrins and high molecular weight saturated hydrocarbons
.
Energy and Fuels
1991
;
5
:
376
–
81
.
21.
Speight
J G
.
The chemistry and technology of petroleum
. 3rd rev. ed.
New York
:
Marcel Dekker
,
1999
.
22.
Ammunition lot numbering and ammunition data card. Picatinny Arsenal (NJ): U. S. Army TACOM-ARDEC
;
1998 Jun. Department of Defense Standard Practice: MIL-STD-1168B
.
23.
Ammunition manufacturers and their symbols. Rock Island (IL): U. S. Army Armament Munitions and Chemical Command
;
1990 Nov. Military Standard: MIL-STD-1461E
.
24.
Convention on the marking of plastic explosives for the purpose of detection
.
Montreal, Canada
:
International Civil Aviation Organization
,
1991
.
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.