Effects of Early Visual Experience and Diurnal Rhythms on BDNF mRNA and Protein Levels in the Visual System, Hippocampus, and Cerebellum (original) (raw)

ARTICLE, Development/Plasticity/Repair

, Elizabeth Vernon, M. Elizabeth Forbes, Qiao Yan, Yun-Tao Ma, Ted Hsieh, Regine Robichon, Douglas O. Frost and James E. Johnson

Journal of Neuroscience 1 June 2001, 21 (11) 3923-3931; https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-11-03923.2001

Loading

Abstract

The expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA and the secretion of BDNF protein are tightly regulated by neuronal activity. Thus, BDNF has been proposed as a mediator of activity-dependent neural plasticity. Previous studies showed that dark rearing (DR) reduces BDNF mRNA levels in the primary visual cortex (V1), but the effects of visual experience on BDNF protein levels are unknown. We report that rearing in constant light or DR alters BDNF mRNA and protein levels in the retina, superior colliculus (SC), V1, hippocampus (HIPP), and cerebellum (CBL), although the changes in mRNA and protein are not always correlated. Most notably, DR increases BDNF protein levels in V1 although BDNF mRNA is decreased. BDNF protein levels also undergo diurnal changes. In the retina, V1, and SC, BDNF protein levels are higher during the light phase of the circadian cycle than during the dark phase. By contrast, in HIPP and CBL, the tissue concentration of BDNF protein is higher during the dark phase. The discrepancies between the experience-dependent changes in BDNF mRNA and protein suggest that via its effects on neuronal activity, early sensory experience alters the trafficking, as well as the synthesis, of BDNF protein. The circadian changes in BDNF protein suggest that BDNF could cause the diurnal modulation of synaptic efficacy in some neural circuits. The fluctuations in BDNF levels in nonvisual structures suggest a potential role of BDNF in mediating plasticity induced by hormones or motor activity.

During ontogeny, the distribution and strength of neural connections are modified by the level and pattern of neuroelectric activity (Cowan et al., 1984; Katz and Shatz, 1996). Consequently, sensory experience exerts a powerful influence on the sculpting of developing neural circuits. This process is widely studied in the mammalian visual system (Sherman and Spear, 1982;Fregnac and Imbert, 1984; Frost and Innocenti, 1986). Visual experience regulates the growth, stabilization, and elimination of immature thalamocortical connections representing each eye and the response properties of cortical neurons (Hubel et al., 1977; Sherman and Spear, 1982; Fregnac and Imbert, 1984).

Developing cortical synapses can be strengthened or weakened, depending on the level of presynaptic axonal activity and postsynaptic neuronal depolarization (Bienenstock et al., 1982; Miller et al., 1989). Neurotrophins, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), have been proposed as retrograde signaling molecules that contribute to the bidirectional synaptic communication that modulates the efficacy and stability of connections (Domenici et al., 1991; Snider and Lichtman, 1996; Shatz, 1997). These molecules control many other developmental events, including neuronal survival and differentiation (Lewin and Barde, 1996). Neurotrophins also selectively modify the growth of developing axons (Cabelli et al., 1995; Cohen-Cory and Fraser, 1995;Inoue and Sanes, 1997; Cohen-Cory, 1999) and dendrites (McAllister et al., 1995; Schwartz et al., 1997; Horch et al., 1999; Lom and Cohen-Cory, 1999; Xu et al., 2000) and the density of synapses (Causing et al., 1997). BDNF and its high-affinity receptor trkB are highly expressed in the mature hippocampus and cerebral cortex, regions of the mature brain notable for experience-dependent synaptic plasticity (Thoenen, 1995). BDNF mRNA expression within these regions is rapidly induced by various forms of neural activity [membrane depolarization (Zafra et al., 1992; Ghosh et al., 1994), activation of excitatory neurotransmitter receptors (Zafra et al., 1990, 1992; Lindefors et al., 1992; Bessho et al., 1993; Ghosh et al., 1994; Knipper et al., 1994;Lindholm et al., 1994), seizures (Gall, 1993; Gall et al., 1995), and stimuli that induce long-term potentiation (Patterson et al., 1992)]. Antagonization of neuronal depolarization or augmented hyperpolarization (Zafra et al., 1991; Lindefors et al., 1992; Knipper et al., 1994; Lindholm et al., 1994) decreases BDNF mRNA expression. Alterations of visual experience, via their effects on neural activity, regulate BDNF mRNA synthesis. BDNF mRNA expression is reduced in the primary visual cortex (V1) of rodents and carnivores after dark rearing (DR) (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995; Lein et al., 1997) or retinal impulse blockade by intraocular injection of tetrodotoxin (Castrén et al., 1992; Bozzi et al., 1995; Lein et al., 2000). In rodents, deprivation of pattern vision by eyelid suture reduces BDNF mRNA by ∼55% (Bozzi et al., 1995); DR reduces BDNF mRNA by 25–40% (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995). The rapid increase of cortical BDNF mRNA induced in V1 of DR animals that are later exposed to light (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995) shows that BDNF synthesis in V1 is tightly regulated by sensory experience.

Because BDNF is a secretory protein (Mowla et al., 1999) that can be distributed by axonal transport in the retrograde (von Bartheld et al., 1996; Ma et al., 1998) or anterograde (Zhou and Rush, 1996; Altar et al., 1997; Conner et al., 1997; Fawcett et al., 1997, 1998; Smith et al., 1997; Haubensak et al., 1998) directions, we reasoned that the effects of early visual experience on local levels of BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein might not be the same. This is important for understanding the role of BDNF in mediating effects of sensory experience on neural structure and function, because protein, not mRNA, is the effector molecule. Measurements of activity-dependent changes in BDNF protein and comparisons of the effects of neural activity on BDNF mRNA and protein have been made in only a few instances (Nawa et al., 1995;Elmer et al., 1998). Therefore, we compared the effects of rearing in constant light and constant darkness on the levels of BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein in several visual and nonvisual neural structures.

Previous studies have demonstrated diurnal modulation of BDNF mRNA (Bova et al., 1998; Berchtold et al., 1999; Schaaf et al., 2000) and trkB mRNA (Bova et al., 1998) levels. Thus, we investigated whether these changes are sufficient to produce circadian variations in the tissue concentrations of BDNF protein.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects and experimental rearing. Our initial BDNF protein measurements were made in Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) because the CNS of this mammal is one of the least mature at birth and it has proven a valuable model of visual system development. All of our combined mRNA and protein measurements were made in pigmented rats (Long–Evans) because we were unable to generate a reliable probe for the measurement of hamster BDNF mRNA. Rats and hamsters were born and reared either in a normal light cycle (14/10 hr light/dark cycle), constant light (LR), or constant darkness (DR). The cages of the DR animals were serviced in total darkness. DR animals were killed in total darkness, so they were never exposed to light. All protocols were approved by our institutional animal care and use committees and follow National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Preparation of samples for BDNF protein measurement. All rats were killed with an overdose of Nembutal and decapitated on postnatal day 21 (P21) (day of birth, P0) for consistency with previous studies (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995). Hamsters were killed on P29 when BDNF protein levels in the retina and superior colliculus (SC) have reached mature values (Ma et al., 1997, 1998) (D. O. Frost, Y.-T. Ma, T. Hsieh, M. E. Forbes, and J. E. Johnson, unpublished observations). All normally reared animals were killed during the morning, in the middle of the light phase of the circadian cycle. All LR and DR animals were killed at the same time of day so that the only difference in environmental conditions at the time of their death was their history of light exposure. Additional adult (P90 or older) hamsters reared on a normal light cycle were killed in the middle of the light or dark phase of the diurnal cycle. The brains of all animals were rapidly removed from the skull. The V1, SC, hippocampus (HIPP), cerebellum (CBL), and retinas were rapidly dissected in cold PBS (4°C), pH 7.4, and snap frozen in isopentane cooled by dry ice. Tissue samples were stored at −85°C before homogenization. BDNF was extracted from brain tissue by homogenization in 100 mm PIPES homogenization buffer, pH 7.0, containing 500 mm NaCl, 2% BSA, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1% NaN3, and fresh protease inhibitors (2 μg/ml aprotinin, 2 mm EDTA, 10 μmleupeptin, 1 μm pepstatin, and 200 μm PMSF) and homogenized using ground-glass Dounces. Homogenates were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min to pellet insoluble material. Supernatants were collected and stored at −85°C before BDNF electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA).

The dilution of the tissue in homogenization buffer (milligrams per microliter) varied with species and tissue. Tissue dilution affects the efficiency of BDNF recovery (Ma et al., 1998) (J. E. Johnson, M. E. Forbes, and Q. Yan, unpublished observations). Thus, our measurements of BDNF protein accurately reflect differences among rearing conditions (or diurnal phases) in a single tissue, but comparisons among brain regions or between species are not warranted. In our original experiments comparing normally reared, DR, and LR hamsters with respect to BDNF protein levels in V1 and SC, the dilutions used were 1:75. Other experiments showed a linear increase in extracted BDNF over a range of tissue dilutions (1:25–1:200) (Ma et al., 1998). Our extraction method results in ∼80% recovery of an exogenous recombinant human BDNF spike at 1:200 (Ma et al., 1998). Higher dilutions were not tested because of the resulting decrease in signal. Thus, in the studies of normal, LR, and DR hamsters, our BDNF protein measurements in V1 and SC were adjusted to reflect the values expected for a 1:200 dilution of SC (2.205×) and should be regarded as minimum estimates of BDNF tissue concentrations. In our studies of circadian modulation of BDNF protein levels, tissues fromV1, SC, and CBL were diluted at 1:75, the hippocampus was diluted at 1:100, and the retina was diluted at 1:200. Dilutions for rat tissue were as follows: 1:150 (V1), 1:200 (SC), 1:75 (CBL and retina), and 1:100 (HIPP). Accurate measurements of relative BDNF protein are highly reproducible in tissues homogenized at identical dilutions. Additional details of sample preparation and control experiments are described elsewhere (Ma et al., 1998) (Johnson, Forbes, and Yan, unpublished observations).

ECLIA measurement of BDNF protein. Immunoassays used an affinity-purified BDNF-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody (Rab-BDNF) (Yan et al., 1997) in an immunomagnetic sandwich assay with a detection limit of ∼0.835 pg of BDNF per milligram of tissue and a dynamic range of ∼103 (Johnson, Forbes, and Yan, unpublished observations). BDNF is captured from tissue homogenate supernatants via Rab-BDNF-biotinylated antibodies bound to streptavidin-coated Dynal 2.8 μm magnetic beads. In the same one-step reaction, signal TAG-labeled (Igen, Inc., Rockville, MD) Rab-BDNF antibodies bind to the BDNF homodimer. BDNF protein is then measured by the electrochemiluminescence (ECL) signal emitted from current stimulation of Rab-BDNF-TAG bound to beads captured by a magnet in an Origen analyzer (Igen, Inc.). One hundred fifty microliters of ECLIA reaction mixture (12.5 ng of biotinylated Rab-BDNF, 25 ng of Rab-BDNF-TAG, and 10 μg of Dynal 2.8 μm M-280 streptavidin magnetic beads diluted in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free Dulbecco's PBS, pH 7.2, containing 3% BSA, 1.5% Tween 20, and 0.05% NaN3) were added to 100 μl of tissue supernatant unknowns aliquoted in 12 × 75 mm polypropylene tubes. Sample reaction mixtures were vortexed for 90 min using the Origen Analyzer carousel. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 250 μl of Origen Assay Buffer (Igen, Inc.) per tube. ECL counts were measured sequentially from each sample using the Origen Analyzer. Counts from homogenization buffer (blanks) were subtracted from all values. BDNF concentrations for tissue supernatants were calculated from regression analysis of a human recombinant BDNF standard curve (diluted in homogenization buffer) run in each assay.

Total RNA isolation. Fifteen to 20 animals per condition were killed. For each tissue region, we pooled blocks from three to five animals (depending on the weight of the region) to obtain the 200–300 mg of tissue required to produce 200–300 μg of RNA for each sample. Four to five RNA samples for each region were prepared using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's procedures.

Ribonuclease protection assay . BDNF mRNA levels were measured using a Riboquant Multiprobe RNase protection assay (RPA) system and a rat neurotrophin multiprobe template set (which also measures RNA constitutively expressed by the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and L32 genes) according to the manufacturer's (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) instructions. RNase-protected fragments were size-fractionated using the Quickpoint precast 6% polyacrylamide and 7 m urea gel system (Novex, San Diego, CA). Gels were exposed to PhosphorImager plates (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and scanned using a Molecular Dynamics Storm 840 system. Average pixel densities of protected band fragments were measured and analyzed using Molecular Dynamics Imagequant, version 5.0 for Windows. Background pixel densities were subtracted from protected fragment band intensities and normalized according to the densities of L32 fragments (see Statistical analysis).

Statistical analysis. In our measurements of BDNF protein, for each tissue region, samples from LR, DR, and normal animals were processed in parallel in the same ECLIA run. Thus, for each region, we determined the statistical significance of differences in BDNF protein levels between LR or DR animals and normal animals (or light-phase and dark-phase animals) using a Mann–Whitney U test, two-tailed. Because of intergel variability and the intrinsic variability in the quantity of RPA products loaded in each lane on a gel, the PhosphorImager data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, covarying for the L32 signal and adjusting for differences among gels. All quantitative mRNA values reported are corrected according to the variability of the L32 signals in each gel.

RESULTS

In the visual cortex, dark rearing decreases BDNF mRNA but increases BDNF protein levels

In agreement with previous studies (Castrén et al., 1992;Schoups et al., 1995), DR induced a downregulation of BDNF mRNA in rats to ∼65% of normal values (p = 0.003; Figs.1B,2; Table1). Surprisingly, in both hamsters and rats we observed the highest concentration of BDNF protein in V1 when the animals were born and reared in complete darkness (Fig.1A). In V1 of DR hamsters, the concentration of BDNF protein (mean ± SD) was 56 ± 12 pg/mg, 2.2× the concentration in V1 of normally reared hamsters (p = 0.0062; Fig. 1A) and 1.3× the concentration in hamsters reared in constant light (p = 0.0472; Fig. 1A). In rats, DR induced an ∼35% increase (p = 0.025) in BDNF protein (8.7 ± 1.5 pg/mg) as compared with normal (6.4 ± 0.3 pg/mg). The magnitude and direction of the change in BDNF protein concentration were unexpected based on the DR-induced depression in BDNF mRNA expression observed by us and by others (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995). These results indicate that a substantial accumulation of BDNF protein occurs in V1 of DR animals despite the reduction of BDNF mRNA in the same region.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A, ECLIA measurements of BDNF protein concentrations in the SC, V1, retina, HIPP, and CBL of rats born and reared in a normal light cycle (NR; 14/10 hr light/dark cycle), constant darkness (DR), or constant light (LR). Similar measurements for SC and V1 are presented for hamsters at the right. All values are expressed as the percentage of normal. Error bars show SD. _Numbers above each bar_indicate the number of independent samples from which data were obtained (see Materials and Methods). B, RPA measurements of BDNF mRNA concentrations in rats in the same structures and under the same rearing conditions shown in A. All values are expressed as the percentage of normal. Numbers above each bar indicate the number of independent samples from which data were obtained (see Materials and Methods). Means and SEs of PhosphorImager pixel densities are indicated in Table 1.C, Scatter plot summarizing the relationship between changes in BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein induced in rats by DR (filled symbols) and LR (open symbols). Asterisks in A and _B_indicate values in LR or DR animals that differ significantly from normal.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Protected mRNA fragments corresponding to BDNF and the L32 housekeeping protein, obtained by performing the ribonuclease protection assay on mRNA from rat V1 (top) and rat SC (bottom). Two cases are shown for each tissue for each of the three rearing conditions (NR, DR, and LR). Gels were aligned using labeled standards (data not shown). Densitometric data were corrected as described in Materials and Methods for variations in mRNA loading, as measured by the L32 signal.

Light rearing increases visual cortical BDNF levels

In hamster V1, constant light rearing elevated BDNF protein levels to ∼38 ± 12 pg/mg as compared with 25 ± 3 pg/mg in animals reared on a normal light cycle (p = 0.0285; Fig. 1A). This increase, of ∼50%, was expected because of the tight regulation of visual cortical BDNF mRNA by sensory experience (Castrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995). However, in rat V1, LR induced only weak increases in BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein that were not statistically significant (p > 0.05; Figs. 1A,B, 2; Table 1). Whereas we cannot exclude a species difference, the more robust increases in BDNF protein in hamsters than in rats might be caused by the longer periods of LR and DR in our hamster experiments.

In the SC, light rearing and dark rearing induce changes in BDNF mRNA and protein levels that are not correlated

To determine whether LR or DR modify the concentrations of BDNF mRNA or protein in other visual system structures, we also measured the concentration of BDNF mRNA and protein in SC. In both hamsters and rats, there were no significant intergroup differences in the collicular concentration of BDNF protein (p > 0.05; Fig. 1A). LR increases BDNF mRNA levels in the rat by 27% (p = 0.002; Fig.1B; Table 1), whereas DR has no significant effect on BDNF mRNA expression.

In hamsters, LR and DR both increase BDNF protein levels in V1 but produce no change in SC. This similarity of effect raises the possibility that LR might induce photoreceptor degeneration, as in albino rats (O'Steen et al., 1974). Three observations argue against this. (1) Our rats and hamsters were pigmented, and in pigmented rats, constant light does not induce photoreceptor degeneration (LaVail, 1980; Johnson et al., 1999). (2) We compared the histological appearance of paraffin-embedded, cresyl-stained sections of the retinas of our normal and LR hamsters. Retinas from these two groups were indistinguishable and showed no evidence of photoreceptor degeneration (data not shown). (3) In our pigmented rats, LR and DR differed with respect to the combinations of mRNA and protein changes that they induced in the retina, SC, V1, and CBL (Fig. 1; Table2).

Table 2.

Summary of LR- and DR-induced changes in BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein in the retina, V1, SC, CBL, and HIPP

In the retina, light rearing and dark rearing alter BDNF mRNA and BDNF protein levels

As in V1, in the rat retina (the hamster retina was not studied), DR reduced BDNF mRNA levels [by ∼54% (_p_ = 0.001); Fig. 1B; Table 1]. BDNF mRNA tended to be supernormal in LR rats, although this change did not achieve statistical significance (p > 0.05; Fig.1B; Table 1). BDNF protein was decreased by ∼27% in DR rats (Fig. 1A; normal, 1.3 ± 0.1 pg/mg; DR, 0.9 ± 0.1 pg/mg; p = 0.009) and, in LR rats, was increased by ∼24% (Fig. 1A; 1.6 ± 0.18 pg/mg; p = 0.016).

In the hippocampus and cerebellum, light rearing and dark rearing induce changes in BDNF mRNA and protein levels that are not correlated

To determine whether LR or DR alter the concentrations of BDNF mRNA or protein in nonvisual structures, we measured these parameters in the HIPP and CBL of the rat. Neither LR nor DR caused significant changes in BDNF mRNA levels in the HIPP (p > 0.05; Fig. 1B; Table 1). In the CBL, LR induced a 9% increase in BDNF mRNA levels (p = 0.012), whereas DR had no significant effect. Despite the stability of hippocampal BDNF mRNA levels, BDNF protein was reduced (from its normal value of 24 ± 1 pg/mg) by both rearing conditions (by 36% after DR, p = 0.0495; by 47% after LR, p = 0.0495). In the CBL, BDNF protein is increased (from its normal value of 0.9 ± 0.2 pg/mg) by both rearing conditions (by 90% after DR,p = 0.0495; by 54% after LR, p = 0.0495), although DR had no significant effect on BDNF mRNA (Fig.1B; Table 1).

The effects of LR and DR on BDNF mRNA and protein are specific

The absence of significant LR- or DR-induced changes in collicular BDNF protein levels demonstrates that the changes observed in the retina, V1, CBL, and HIPP are not caused by global abnormalities in BDNF protein metabolism. LR- and DR-induced changes in BDNF mRNA levels exhibit a similar tissue specificity (Fig. 1B; Table1). In each structure studied in these experiments, the pattern of LR- and DR-induced changes varies among the mRNAs for NGF, BDNF, neurotrophin 3 (NT3), and CNTF (G. S. Pollock and D. O. Frost, unpublished observations). Therefore, the LR- and DR-induced changes reported here for BDNF mRNA are not caused by nonspecific effects on mRNA metabolism.

BDNF protein levels undergo diurnal modulation

In all the structures we examined, there is diurnal modulation of BDNF protein levels. In V1, SC, and retina, the tissue concentration of BDNF protein is greater in the middle of the light phase of the circadian cycle than in the middle of the dark phase [Fig.3; 1.45× (p = 0.0143), 2.18× (p = 0.003), and 1.53× (p = 0.009), respectively]. By contrast, in the CBL and HIPP, BDNF protein levels were less in the middle of the light phase of the diurnal cycle than in the middle of the dark phase [Fig.3; 0.82× (p = 0.0433) and 0.75× (p = 0.0204), respectively].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Circadian modulation of BDNF protein levels.A, Tissue concentrations of BDNF protein in hamster SC, V1, retina, HIPP, and CBL in the middle of the light and dark phases of the diurnal cycle. Numerals above each bar indicate the number of independent samples from which data were obtained (see Materials and Methods). B, Ratios of the mean BDNF protein concentration in the middle of the light phase of the diurnal cycle to the concentration in the middle of the dark phase.Asterisks indicate the level of statistical significance for differences between light- and dark-phase measurements in_A_ (*p < 0.015; **p < 0.05).

These data suggest that our measures of the LR- and DR-induced increases in BDNF protein in V1 and retina are conservative. In our studies of the effects of LR and DR, we killed our animals in the morning, during the light phase of the cycle (i.e., when the BDNF protein concentration in V1 of the normally reared control animals is relatively high). This would bias our data toward a minimum estimate of the magnitude of increases because of experimental rearing. For similar reasons, our measures of the LR- and DR-induced decreases in BDNF protein in HIPP are also conservative.

DISCUSSION

Why does BDNF protein accumulate in V1 of dark-reared animals?

LR and DR each produce discrepant changes in BDNF mRNA and protein (Fig. 1C; Table 2). Most provocative is the DR-induced increase in cortical BDNF despite a decrease in BDNF mRNA (see alsoCastrén et al., 1992; Schoups et al., 1995). Discrepancies between BDNF mRNA and protein levels also occur in normal brains and after seizures (Nawa et al., 1995; Elmer et al., 1998). BDNF and trkB are found in the retina, LGN, SC, and V1 during development and at maturity (Allendoerfer et al., 1994; Schoups et al., 1995; Ma et al., 1997, 1998) (Frost, Ma, Hsieh, Forbes, and Johnson, unpublished observations). BDNF can be (1) secreted by neurons and removed by afferent axons by retrograde axonal transport (von Bartheld et al., 1996; Ma et al., 1998), (2) packaged within vesicles for anterograde delivery and release from axon terminals (Zhou and Rush, 1996; Altar et al., 1997; Conner et al., 1997; Fawcett et al., 1997; Haubensak et al., 1998; Mowla et al., 1999), and (3) secreted locally to act by autocrine or paracrine pathways (Ghosh et al., 1994). This suggests several mutually compatible hypotheses involving BDNF trafficking as explanations for discrepancies between changes in the levels of BDNF protein and BDNF mRNA.

(1) DR-induced changes in neuronal activity might, by various mechanisms, reduce the removal by afferent axons of BDNF synthesized in V1 (Fig. 4A). Because BDNF secretion is modulated by electrical activity (Griesbeck et al., 1995, 1999; Androutsellis-Theotokis et al., 1996; Goodman et al., 1996;Balkowiec and Katz, 2000), DR might reduce the secretion of BDNF by V1 neurons, causing it to accumulate within them. Because neuronal activity modulates trkB mRNA expression (Gall, 1993; Okazawa et al., 1994) and trafficking (Tongiorgi et al., 1997; Righi et al., 2000) and insertion of trkB protein into membranes (Meyer-Franke et al., 1998; Du et al., 2000), DR could alter the density or type (full-length vs truncated) of trkB receptors on afferent axon terminals, thus reducing the capacity of afferent axons to bind BDNF secreted by V1 neurons. [Qualitative analysis of LGN and V1 of rats reared with monocular eyelid suture reveals no apparent change in the amount or distribution of trkB mRNA (Bozzi et al., 1995). The influence of visual activity on the number, type, or distribution of trkB receptors on cortical afferents is unknown.] Because BDNF increases axonal branching (Cohen-Cory and Fraser, 1995; Inoue and Sanes, 1997) and selectively modifies the growth of cortical neuron dendrites (McAllister et al., 1995, 1999), diminished BDNF secretion or axonal binding might further reduce the density of afferent connections with cortical neurons and, consequently, the access of the afferent axons to cortically derived BDNF. Finally, DR might reduce retrograde BDNF transport within axons afferent to V1.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Mechanisms that might account for the accumulation of BDNF protein in V1 of dark-reared animals. A, A reduction in the removal of BDNF by LGN or other afferents (arrow across the synapse). Only axodendritic synapses are depicted, but axosomatic connections are also present.B, An accumulation of BDNF delivered to LGN or other afferent presynaptic terminals by anterograde axonal transport.C, An increase in the retention of locally synthesized BDNF within cortical networks by transsynaptic, autocrine, or paracrine secretion (arrows between cells). Increased cortical BDNF could also arise by reduced anterograde transport or increased retrograde transport in the axons of cortical efferent neurons (arrow in axon).

(2) BDNF might accumulate in afferent axon terminals as a consequence of DR-induced changes in neuronal activity (Fig. 4B). This could occur if BDNF made in LGN or other sources of afferents is anterogradely transported to V1 and if DR either reduces BDNF release from axon terminals or increases the efficiency of anterograde transport of BDNF. Anterograde BDNF transport accounts for the discrepancy between BDNF protein and mRNA levels in the corpus striatum (Altar et al., 1997).

(3) BDNF might increase in V1 by enhanced retention within local cortical circuits because of DR-induced changes in neuronal activity (Fig. 4C). An increase in the “domestic consumption” of cortical BDNF via transsynaptic, autocrine, or paracrine pathways (Ghosh et al., 1994) could occur by increasing the relative access or binding of BDNF protein by local circuits. Reduced anterograde or increased retrograde axonal transport of BDNF by cortical efferent neurons could also cause its accumulation (Fig. 4C).

The DR-induced accumulation of BDNF in V1 is probably not caused by increased cortical BDNF protein synthesis. Increased production of BDNF protein despite diminished mRNA would require a substantial change in translation efficiency. There are eight variants of BDNF mRNA that can arise via the transcriptional regulation of different promoters. Although increases in specific mRNA transcripts and protein synthesis have been correlated with neural activity (Metsis et al., 1995;Lauterborn et al., 1996), BDNF translation is not increased by a reduction in transcription (Kolbeck et al., 1999), and no increase has been reported as a consequence of neural activity changes.

All of the structures examined in this study contain multiple neuronal populations that differ with respect to their connectivity and their responses to visual stimulation. Our techniques measure only net tissue concentrations of mRNA and protein and provide no information concerning the cellular or subcellular concentrations of either. Therefore, experience-dependent changes in BDNF mRNA or protein levels might vary among different neuronal populations in the same structure.

Other determinants of BDNF mRNA and protein levels

LR- and DR-induced alterations in BDNF mRNA and protein levels in HIPP and CBL, two structures that receive indirect visual input but that are not primarily sensory, suggest additional regulatory influences. LR and DR could change the level or pattern of motor activity of rat pups. Changes in motor activity alter BDNF mRNA levels in HIPP (Neeper et al., 1996; Oliff et al., 1998); similar changes might also take place in CBL. LR and DR could also alter circulating hormone levels, which influence neurotrophin expression and signaling (Lindholm et al., 1994; Toran-Allerand, 1996; Gibbs, 1998;Toran-Allerand et al., 1999).

Significance of BDNF trafficking for circuit development and synaptic plasticity

In many mammals, mature, eye-specific afferent axons from LGN segregate in “ocular dominance columns,” within which cortical neurons respond preferentially to the corresponding eye (Hubel et al., 1977; Sherman and Spear, 1982). Immature LGN axons representing different eyes initially overlap and then segregate (Hubel et al., 1977; LeVay et al., 1978). This process depends on electrical activity (Katz and Shatz, 1996) and is modulated by visual experience during a postnatal “critical period” when, if one eye is deprived of pattern vision, LGN axon arbors representing the deprived eye narrow excessively and arbors representing the normal eye widen abnormally (Hubel et al., 1977; Sherman and Spear, 1982). The ability of the deprived eye to excite cortical neurons diminishes, and that of the normal eye increases (Hubel et al., 1977; Sherman and Spear, 1982;Fregnac and Imbert, 1984; Gordon and Stryker, 1996). DR reduces the eye-specific segregation of LGN axon arbors in carnivores and prolongs the critical period in rodents and carnivores (Cynader and Mitchell, 1980; Mower et al., 1985; Stryker and Harris, 1986; Swindale, 1988;Fagiolini et al., 1994).

BDNF contributes to these processes. Infusion of V1 with BDNF or NT4 (another high-affinity trkB ligand) blocks the developmental segregation of LGN axons (Cabelli et al., 1995). Cortical infusion with trkB-Fc receptor bodies that deplete endogenous BDNF and NT4 has a similar effect (Cabelli et al., 1997). BDNF and NT4 also modulate the effects of early monocular deprivation on neurophysiologically determined cortical ocular dominance (Galuske et al., 1996; Gillespie et al., 1996) or on the distribution of geniculocortical axons (Hata et al., 2000). The mechanism by which DR-induced increases in cortical BDNF may contribute to the reduced segregation of LGN axons and to changes in the visual response properties of cortical neurons depends on whether or not afferent axon terminals have access to the extra BDNF (Frost, 2001).

Changes in BDNF trafficking could explain other neurophysiological effects of DR. DR decreases the selectivity of V1 neurons for orientation and direction of movement (Fregnac and Imbert, 1984;Benevento et al., 1992; Fagiolini et al., 1994) and increases their spontaneous activity (Benevento et al., 1992). These effects, and comparison of the structural and functional consequences of DR, suggest that DR reduces the efficacy of GABAergic inhibition in V1 (Mower et al., 1985; Swindale and Cynader, 1986; Gabbott and Stewart, 1987; Ramoa et al., 1987; Tsumoto and Freeman, 1987; Swindale, 1988; Fagiolini et al., 1994). DR reduces the number of GABAergic neurons in V1 (Benevento et al., 1995), many of which express trkB (Cellerino et al., 1996). BDNF is necessary for the activity-dependent establishment of GABA-mediated inhibition among V1 neurons in vitro(Rutherford et al., 1997) and for the expression of neuropeptide Y, calbindin, and parvalbumin by cortical GABAergic neurons in vivo (Jones et al., 1994). BDNF acts on GABAergic differentiation by activity-dependent (Marty et al., 1996a) and activity-independent (Marty et al., 1996b) means. Constitutive overexpression of BDNF accelerates the maturation of visual cortical inhibitory circuitry (Hanover et al., 1999; Huang et al., 1999) and thereby regulates the critical period for vision-induced plasticity (Hanover et al., 1999;Huang et al., 1999; Fagiolini and Hensch, 2000). Thus, a DR-induced reduction in the availability of BDNF to GABAergic neurons could explain the reduced GABAergic tone and prolonged critical period in V1 of DR animals. Reduced BDNF availability could also shift upward the threshold at which the effect of presynaptic activity changes from synaptic depression to potentiation (Bienenstock et al., 1982; Bear et al., 1987). This would reduce the stimulus selectivity of cortical neurons by diminishing the specificity of activity-dependent elimination of immature connections.

Circadian changes

In mature hamsters, BDNF protein levels in the retina, V1, and SC are ∼1.5–2.2 times greater in the middle of the light phase of the diurnal cycle than in the middle of the dark phase. Similarly, retinal BDNF mRNA is rapidly downregulated in the chick retina when chicks are moved from light to dark (Karlsson and Hallböök, 1998). These data are consistent with the regulation of BDNF mRNA expression by neuronal activity (see introductory remarks), which in these structures is elevated by visual stimulation. Why do cortical BDNF protein levels decrease during the dark phase of the diurnal cycle but increase after DR? Chronic, DR-induced reductions in BDNF secretion or changes in BDNF trafficking could cause BDNF protein to accumulate in V1 (see above). The regular modulation of BDNF protein secretion and trafficking during a normal light/dark cycle would prevent such an accumulation, thus revealing the relatively small decrease in BDNF protein during the dark phase.

We found that in HIPP and CBL, BDNF protein is elevated during the dark phase of the diurnal cycle, consistent with the increase in BDNF mRNA in HIPP during the dark phase (Bova et al., 1998; Berchtold et al., 1999; Schaaf et al., 2000). Hippocampal BDNF mRNA levels are increased by motor activity (Neeper et al., 1996; Oliff et al., 1998). Because rodents are active during the dark phase of the diurnal cycle and sleep during the light phase, the circadian modulation of BDNF protein in the CBL and HIPP is probably caused, in part, by elevated nocturnal motor and cognitive activity. Diurnal changes in hormone levels could also contribute to the circadian modulation of BDNF mRNA and protein (Lindholm et al., 1994; Toran-Allerand, 1996; Gibbs, 1998;Toran-Allerand et al., 1999). Because of the profound effects of BDNF on synaptic efficacy (Thoenen, 1995; Schuman, 1999), our data suggest that circadian changes in BDNF levels could contribute to diurnal fluctuations in synaptic function in some neural circuits.

Footnotes

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
  2. ↵
  3. ↵
  4. ↵
  5. ↵
  6. ↵
  7. ↵
  8. ↵
  9. ↵
  10. ↵
  11. ↵
  12. ↵
  13. ↵
  14. ↵
  15. ↵
  16. ↵
  17. ↵
  18. ↵
  19. ↵
  20. ↵
  21. ↵
  22. ↵
  23. ↵
  24. ↵
  25. ↵
  26. ↵
  27. ↵
  28. ↵
  29. ↵
  30. ↵
  31. ↵
    Frost DO (2001) BDNF/trkB signaling in the developmental sculpting of visual connections. Prog Brain Res, in press.
  32. ↵
  33. ↵
  34. ↵
  35. ↵
  36. ↵
  37. ↵
  38. ↵
  39. ↵
  40. ↵
  41. ↵
  42. ↵
  43. ↵
  44. ↵
  45. ↵
  46. ↵
  47. ↵
  48. ↵
  49. ↵
  50. ↵
  51. ↵
  52. ↵
  53. ↵
  54. ↵
  55. ↵
  56. ↵
  57. ↵
  58. ↵
  59. ↵
  60. ↵
  61. ↵
  62. ↵
  63. ↵
  64. ↵
  65. ↵
  66. ↵
  67. ↵
  68. ↵
  69. ↵
  70. ↵
  71. ↵
  72. ↵
  73. ↵
  74. ↵
  75. ↵
  76. ↵
  77. ↵
  78. ↵
  79. ↵
  80. ↵
  81. ↵
  82. ↵
  83. ↵
  84. ↵
  85. ↵
  86. ↵
  87. ↵
  88. ↵
  89. ↵
  90. ↵
  91. ↵
  92. ↵
  93. ↵
  94. ↵
  95. ↵
  96. ↵
  97. ↵
  98. ↵
  99. ↵
  100. ↵
  101. ↵
  102. ↵
  103. ↵
  104. ↵
  105. ↵
  106. ↵
  107. ↵
  108. ↵