Contested pleasures: The sociopolitical economy of disability and sexuality (original) (raw)
References
Armer, W. (2005). In the shadow of genetics: An analysis of eugenic influences on twentieth century social policy for disabled people in European and North American societies. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
Bacchi, C., & Beasley, C. (2002). Citizen bodies: Is embodied citizenship a contradiction in terms? Critical Social Policy, 22, 324–352. Google Scholar
Beail, N., & Warden, S. (1995). Sexual abuse of adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 382–387. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (1997). The queen of America goes to Washington City: Essays on sex and citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Binding, K., & Hoche, A. (1920). Die freigabe der vernichtung lebensunwertem lebens [Permitting the destruction of unworthy life]. Leipzig, Germany: K. Felix Meiner Verlag. Reprinted (W. E. Wright, Trans.) in Issues in Law and Medicine 1992, 8, 231–265. Google Scholar
Browne, J., & Russell, S. (2005). My home, your workplace: People with physical disability negotiate their sexual health without crossing professional boundaries. Disability & Society, 20, 375–388. Article Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2002). Is kinship always already heterosexual? In W. Brown & J. Halley (Eds.), Left legalism/Left critique (pp. 229–258). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Carlson, L. (2001). Cognitive ableism and disability studies: Feminist reflections on the history of mental retardation. Hypatia, 16(4), 124–146. Google Scholar
Curry, M., Hassouneh-Phillips, D., & Johnston-Silverberg, A. (2001). Abuse of women with disabilities: An ecological model and review. Violence Against Women, 7, 60–79. Article Google Scholar
Dowbiggin, I. (2002). A rational coalition: Euthanasia, eugenics, and birth control in America, 1940–1970. Journal of Policy History, 14, 223–260. Article Google Scholar
Earle, S. (1999). Facilitated sex and the concept of sexual need: Disabled students and their personal assistants. Disability & Society, 14, 309–323. Article Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979a). Governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5–29. Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1979b). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Allen Lane. Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–77 (C. Gordon, Trans.). Brighton, England: Harvester Press. Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In J. Bernauer & D. Rasmussen (Eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Friedlander, H. (1995). The origins of Nazi genocide: From euthanasia to the final solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar
Furner, B. (2006, December 6). Introduction. The Guardian (Independent living: Making equality a reality, supplement to SocietyGuardian section), pp. 1–8.
Gatens, M. (1996). Imaginary bodies: Ethics, power, and corporeality. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Gerodetti, N. (2006). From science to social technology: Eugenics and politics in twentieth century Switzerland. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 13, 59–88. Article Google Scholar
Glover, J. (2000). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Job, J. (2004). Factors involved in the ineffective dissemination of sexuality information to individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 264–273. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Keywood, K. (2001). “I’drather keep him chaste.” Retelling the story of sterilisation, learning disability and (non)sexed embodiment. Feminist Legal Studies, 9, 185–194. Article Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror. An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.
McRuer, R. (2003). As good as it gets: Queer theory and critical disability. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 9, 79–105. Article Google Scholar
Mostert, M. P. (2002). Useless eaters: Disability as genocidal marker in Nazi Germany. Journal of Special Education, 36, 157–170. Article Google Scholar
Nosek, M. A., Howland, C., Rintala, D. H., Young, M. E., & Chanpong, M. S. (2001). National study of women with physical disabilities: Final report. Sexuality and Disability, 19, 5–39. Article Google Scholar
Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14, 597–610. Article Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, D. (1994). Eugenics and disability discrimination. Disability & Society, 9, 481–499. Article Google Scholar
Phelan, S. (2001). Sexual strangers. Gays, lesbians, and dilemmas of citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
Price, J., & Shildrick, M. (2001). Bodies together: Touch, ethics, and disability. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernism: Embodying disability theory (pp. 62–75). London: Continuum. Google Scholar
Razack, S. (1994). From consent to responsibility, from pity to respect: Subtexts in cases of sexual violence involving girls or women with developmental disabilities. Law & Social Inquiry, 19, 891–922. Article Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2000). Constructing sexual citizenship: Theorizing sexual rights. Critical Social Policy, 20, 105–135. Article Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (2004). Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexualities, 7, 391–411. Article Google Scholar
Seidman, S. (2001). Fromidentity to queer politics: Shifts in normative heterosexuality and the meaning of citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 5, 321–328. Article Google Scholar
Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Shakespeare, T. (2000). Disabled sexuality: Toward rights and recognition. Sexuality and Disability, 18, 159–166. Article Google Scholar
Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., & Davies, D. (1996). The sexual politics of disability: Untold desires. London: Cassell. Google Scholar
Sherry, M. (2004). Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability & Society, 19, 769–783. Article Google Scholar
Shildrick, M. (2004b). Silencing sexuality: The regulation of the disabled body. In J. Carabine (Ed.), Sexualities: Personal Lives and Social Policy (pp. 123–157). Bristol, England: Open University/Policy Press. Google Scholar
Shildrick, M. (2005). The disabled body: Genealogy and undecidability. Cultural Studies, 19, 755–770. Article Google Scholar
Shildrick, M., & Price, J. (1996). Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & Society, 2(4), 93–113. Article Google Scholar
Shue, K., & Flores, A. (2002). Whose sex is it anyway? Freedom of exploration and expression of sexuality of an individual living with a brain injury in a supported independent living environment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 59–72. Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, R. (2002). Defusing the adverse context of disability and desirability as a practice of the self for men with cerebral palsy. In M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernism: Embodying disability theory (pp. 112–126). London: Continuum. Google Scholar
Snyder, S., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Re-engaging the body: Disability studies and the resistance to embodiment. Public Culture, 13, 367–389. Article Google Scholar
Stiker, H. (1999). A history of disability. (W. Sayers, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Originally published as Corps infirmes et sociétiés, 1982, Paris: Editions Aubier Montaigne) Google Scholar
Tremain, S. (2001). On the government of disability. Social Theory and Practice, 27, 617–636. Google Scholar
Tremain, S. (Ed.). (2005). Foucault and the government of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Valios, N. (2001, September). Desire denied. Community Care, (1391), 20–21.
Weeks, J. (1998). The sexual citizen. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 35–52. Article Google Scholar