Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: a survey (original) (raw)

References

• Abeshu A, Chilamkurti N, 2018. Deep learning: the frontier for distributed attack detection in fog–to–things computing. IEEE Commun Mag, 56(2):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2018.1700332
  Article Google Scholar
• Akhtar N, Mian A, 2018. Threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision: a survey. IEEE Access, 6:14410–14430. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807385
  Article Google Scholar
• Akhtar N, Liu J, Mian A, 2018. Defense against universal adversarial perturbations. IEEE/CVF Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.3389–3398. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00357
  Google Scholar
• Arulkumaran K, Deisenroth MP, Brundage M, et al., 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: a brief survey. IEEE Signal Process Mag, 34(6):26–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2743240
  Article Google Scholar
• Aygün RC, Yavuz AG, 2017. A stochastic data discrimination based autoencoder approach for network anomaly detection. Proc 5th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conf, p.1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2017.7960410
  Book Google Scholar
• Bonawitz K, Ivanov V, Kreuter B, et al., 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy–preserving machine learning. Proc ACM SIGSAC Conf on Computer and Communications Security, p.1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982
  Book Google Scholar
• Bost R, Popa RA, Tu S, et al., 2015. Machine learning classification over encrypted data. Network and Distributed System Security Symp, p.331–364. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2015.23241
  Book Google Scholar
• Chowdhury MMU, Hammond F, Konowicz G, et al., 2017. A few–shot deep learning approach for improved intrusion detection. Proc 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conf, p.456–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON.2017.8249084
  Book Google Scholar
• Cisse M, Adi Y, Neverova N, et al., 2017. Houdini: fooling deep structured prediction models. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1707.05373
  Google Scholar
• Cubuk ED, Zoph B, Schoenholz SS, et al., 2017. Intriguing properties of adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.02846
  Google Scholar
• Dada EG, 2017. A hybridized SVM–kNN–pdAPSO approach to intrusion detection system. Faculty Seminar Series, p.1–8.
  Google Scholar
• Deng L, Yu D, 2014. Deep learning: methods and applications. Found Trend Sig Process, 7(3–4): 197–387. https://doi.org/10.1561/2000000039
  Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Feinman R, Curtin RR, Shintre S, et al., 2017. Detecting adversarial samples from artifacts. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1703.00410
  Google Scholar
• Gao W, Morris T, Reaves B, et al., 2010. On SCADA control system command and response injection and intrusion detection. eCrime Researchers Summit, p.1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ecrime.2010.5706699
  Google Scholar
• Gebhart T, Schrater P, 2017. Adversary detection in neural networks via persistent homology. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.10056
  Google Scholar
• Golovko VA, 2017. Deep learning: an overview and main paradigms. Opt Memory Neur Netw, 26(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X16040081
  Article Google Scholar
• Goodfellow IJ, Pouget–Abadie J, Mirza M, et al., 2014. Generative adversarial networks. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661
  Google Scholar
• Goodfellow IJ, Shlens J, Szegedy C, 2015. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572
  Google Scholar
• Gu SX, Rigazio L, 2015. Towards deep neural network architectures robust to adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1412.5068
  Google Scholar
• Guan ZT, Li J, Wu LF, et al., 2017. Achieving efficient and secure data acquisition for cloud–supported Internet of Things in smart grid. IEEE Internet Things J, 4(6): 1934–1944. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2690522
  Article Google Scholar
• Hatcher WG, Yu W, 2018. A survey of deep learning: platforms, applications and emerging research trends. IEEE Access, 6:24411–24432. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2830661
  Article Google Scholar
• He W, Wei J, Chen XY, et al., 2017. Adversarial example defenses: ensembles of weak defenses are not strong. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1706.04701
  Google Scholar
• Kokila RT, Selvi ST, Govindarajan K, 2014. DDoS detection and analysis in SDN–based environment using support vector machine classifier. Proc 6th Int Conf on Advanced Computing, p.205–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoAC.2014.7229711
  Book Google Scholar
• Korczak J, Hernes M, 2017. Deep learning for financial time series forecasting in a–trader system. Proc Federated Conf on Computer Science and Information Systems, p.905–912. https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F449
  Book Google Scholar
• Krotov D, Hopfield J, 2018. Dense associative memory is robust to adversarial inputs. Neur Comput, 30(12): 3151–3167. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01143
  Book Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G, 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature14539
  Article Google Scholar
• Lee H, Han S, Lee J, 2017. Generative adversarial trainer: defense to adversarial perturbations with GAN. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.03387
  Google Scholar
• Li GL, Wu J, Li JH, et al., 2018. Service popularity–based smart resources partitioning for fog computing–enabled industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 14(10):4702–4711. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2845844
  Article Google Scholar
• Li LZ, Ota K, Dong MX, 2018a. Deep learning for smart industry: efficient manufacture inspection system with fog computing. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 14(10):4665–4673. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2842821
  Article Google Scholar
• Li LZ, Ota K, Dong MX, 2018b. DeepNFV: a light–weight framework for intelligent edge network functions virtualization. IEEE Netw, in press. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2018.1700394
  Google Scholar
• Liang B, Li HC, Su MQ, et al., 2017. Detecting adversarial image examples in deep networks with adaptive noise reduction. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.08378
  Google Scholar
• Loukas G, Vuong T, Heartfield R, et al, 2018. Cloud–based cyber–physical intrusion detection for vehicles using deep learning. IEEE Access, 6:3491–3508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2782159
  Article Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Boix X, Roig G, et al., 2015. Foveation–based mechanisms alleviate adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1511.06292
  Google Scholar
• Lyu C, Huang KZ, Liang HN, 2015. A unified gradient regularization family for adversarial examples. IEEE Int Conf on Data Mining, p.301–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2015.84
  Book Google Scholar
• Manning CD, Surdeanu M, Bauer J, et al., 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Proc 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, p.55–60. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-501.
  Book Google Scholar
• McMahan HB, Moore E, Ramage D, et al., 2016. Communication–efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1602.05629
  Google Scholar
• Meng DY, Chen H, 2017. MagNet: a two–pronged defense against adversarial examples. Proc ACM Conf on Computer and Communications Security, p.135–147. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134057
  Book Google Scholar
• Meng WZ, Li WJ, Kwok LF, 2015. Design of intelligent KNNbased alarm filter using knowledge–based alert verification in intrusion detection. Secur Commun Netw, 8(18): 3883–3895. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.1307
  Article Google Scholar
• Meng X, Shan Z, Liu FD, et al., 2017. MCSMGS: malware classification model based on deep learning. Int Conf on Cyber–Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, p.272–275. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberC.2017.21
  Google Scholar
• Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, et al., 2015. Human–level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
  Article Google Scholar
• Moon D, Im H, Kim I, et al., 2017. DTB–IDS: an intrusion detection system based on decision tree using behavior analysis for preventing APT attacks. J Supercomput, 73(7):2881–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1604-8
  Article Google Scholar
• Moosavi–Dezfooli SM, Fawzi A, Frossard P, 2016. DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks. IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.2574–2582. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.282
  Google Scholar
• Moosavi–Dezfooli SM, Fawzi A, Fawzi O, et al., 2017. Universal adversarial perturbations. Proc IEEE Conf on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p.86–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.17
  Book Google Scholar
• Mopuri KR, Garg U, Babu RV, 2017. Fast feature fool: a data independent approach to universal adversarial perturbations. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1707.05572
  Google Scholar
• Nayebi A, Ganguli S, 2017. Biologically inspired protection of deep networks from adversarial attacks. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1703.09202
  Google Scholar
• Olalere M, Abdullah MT, Mahmod R, et al., 2016. Identification and evaluation of discriminative lexical features of malware URL for real–time classification. Int Conf on Computer and Communication Engineering, p.90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCE.2016.31
  Book Google Scholar
• Ota K, Dao MS, Mezaris V, et al., 2017. Deep learning for mobile multimedia: a survey. ACM Trans Multim Comput Commun Appl, 13(3S), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3092831
  Book Google Scholar
• Papernot N, McDaniel P, Jha S, et al., 2016. The limitations of deep learning in adversarial settings. IEEE European Symp on Security and Privacy, p.372–387. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2016.36
  Book Google Scholar
• Phong LT, Aono Y, Hayashi T, et al., 2018. Privacypreserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption. IEEE Trans Inform Forens Secur, 13(5): 1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987
  Article Google Scholar
• Ren SQ, He KM, Girshick R, et al., 2017. Faster R–CNN: towards real–time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 39(6): 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross AS, Doshi–Velez F, 2017. Improving the adversarial robustness and interpretability of deep neural networks by regularizing their input gradients. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1711.09404
  Google Scholar
• Sabour S, Cao YS, Faghri F, et al., 2015. Adversarial manipulation of deep representations. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1511.05122
  Google Scholar
• Shahid N, Aleem SA, Naqvi IH, et al., 2012. Support vector machine based fault detection & classification in smart grids. IEEE Globecom Workshops, p.1526–1531. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477812
  Book Google Scholar
• Shokri R, Shmatikov V, 2015. Privacy–preserving deep learning. Proc 53rd Annual Allerton Conf on Communication, Control, and Computing, p.1310–1321. https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2015.7447103
  Google Scholar
• Syarif AR, Gata W, 2017. Intrusion detection system using hybrid binary PSO and K–nearest neighborhood algorithm. 11th Int Conf on Information & Communication Technology and System, p.181–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2017.8265667
  Book Google Scholar
• Vinayakumar R, Soman KP, Poornachandran P, et al., 2018. Detecting Android malware using long short–term memory (LSTM). J Int Fuzzy Syst, 34(3):1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-16942.
  Google Scholar
• Vollmer T, Manic M, 2009. Computationally efficient neural network intrusion security awareness. Proc 2nd Int Symp on Resilient Control Systems, p.25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRCS.2009.5251357
  Book Google Scholar
• Vuong TP, Loukas G, Gan D, et al., 2015. Decision tree–based detection of denial of service and command injection attacks on robotic vehicles. IEEE Int Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/WIFS.2015.7368559
  Book Google Scholar
• Wu J, Dong MX, Ota K, et al., 2018. Big data analysis–based secure cluster management for optimized control plane in software–defined networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag, 15(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2018.2799000
  Article Google Scholar
• Xie CH, Wang JY, Zhang ZS, et al., 2017. Adversarial examples for semantic segmentation and object detection. IEEE Int Conf on Computer Vision, p.1378–1387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.153
  Book Google Scholar
• Xin Y, Kong LS, Liu Z, et al., 2018. Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity. IEEE Access, 6:35365–35381. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2836950
  Article Google Scholar
• Xu WL, Evans D, Qi YJ, 2017. Feature squeezing mitigates and detects Carlini/Wagner adversarial examples. https://doi.org/arxiv.org/abs/1705.10686
  Google Scholar
• Yuan XY, 2017. PhD forum: deep learning–based real–time malware detection with multi–stage analysis. IEEE Int Conf on Smart Computing, p.1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP.2017.7946997
  Google Scholar
• Zhao GZ, Zhang CX, Zheng LJ, 2017. Intrusion detection using deep belief network and probabilistic neural network. IEEE Int Conf on Computational Science and Engineering and IEEE Int Conf on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, p.639–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSE-EUC.2017.119
  Book Google Scholar
• Zhu DL, Jin H, Yang Y, et al., 2017. DeepFlow: deep learning–based malware detection by mining Android application for abnormal usage of sensitive data. IEEE Symp on Computers and Communications, p.438–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2017.8024568
  Google Scholar
• Zolotukhin M, Hämäläinen T, Kokkonen T, et al., 2016. Increasing web service availability by detecting application–layer DDoS attacks in encrypted traffic. Proc 23rd Int Conf on Telecommunications, p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT.2016.7500408
  Google Scholar

Download references