Ceftibuten (original) (raw)
Abstract
Synopsis
Ceftibuten is an orally active third generation cephalosporin which has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity, encompassing the majority of Gram-negative pathogens and streptococci, and which shows greater stability than several other cephalosporins against bacteria producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases.
In clinical studies, ceftibuten (generally 400 mg/day in adults or 9 mg/kg/day in children, administered once daily) was effective in the treatment of acute uncomplicated or complicated urinary tract infections, demonstrating an efficacy similar to that of cefaclor (1500 mg/day), and similar or superior to that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; 8/40 mg/kg/day) in children. The majority of patients with acute or chronic lower respiratory tract infections responded to treatment with ceftibuten, and response rates were similar to those achieved with cefaclor (750 or 1500 mg/day). Ceftibuten 9 mg/kg/day was at least as effective as cefaclor and as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (both 40 mg/kg/day) in children with acute otitis media, and was superior to phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V; 25 mg/kg/day) in children and adolescents with streptococcal pharyngitis or scarlet fever caused by Group A β-haemolytic streptococci.
Ceftibuten was well tolerated in most patients, with adverse events (mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances) generally occurring in 5 to 10% of patients.
Thus, ceftibuten, with a once- or twice-daily oral dosage regimen, good tolerability profile and activity against a wide range of bacterial organisms, offers a promising alternative to other agents (including cefaclor, cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, bacampicillin and phenoxymethylpenicillin) for the treatment of patients with urogenital and respiratory tract infections. Its place in therapy will be more clearly defined following further large comparative trials, in which it is likely to prove most useful in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing pathogens.
Antibacterial Activity
In this review, bacterial organisms were considered susceptible to ceftibuten if the minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of tested strains in vitro was ≤ 8 mg/L.
Most strains of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftibuten, including Citrobacter diversus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, K. pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, P. vulgaris, Providencia rettgeri, P. stuartii, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp. and Yersinia enterolitica. Morganella morganii and Serratia marcescens were moderately susceptible, whereas the majority of strains of C. freundii, Enterobacter aerogenes and E. cloacae were resistant. The activity of ceftibuten was generally greater than that of cefaclor and cefuroxime and comparable with that of cefixime, against tested strains of Enterobacteriaceae.
Other Gram-negative pathogens, including β-lactamase positive and negative strains of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis (formerly Branhamella catarrhalis), Neisseria gonorrhoea and N. meningitidis, were all susceptible to ceftibuten; however, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Bordetella spp. were resistant.
b-Haemolytic streptococci groups A (Streptococci pyogenes), C, F and G were highly susceptible to ceftibuten, whereas Group B (S. agalactiae) were generally resistant. Ceftibuten inhibited penicillin-susceptible strains of S. pneumoniae but was inactive against penicillin-resistant strains, and was also inactive against staphylococci, enterococci and Listeria spp. Anaerobic organisms including Bacteroides spp., Clostridium spp. and Peptostreptococcus magnus were generally resistant to ceftibuten, although some strains of Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter jejuni were moderately susceptible.
Ceftibuten was stable to hydrolysis by the majority of extended-spectrum β-lactamases produced by E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Its stability was generally greater than that of cefaclor, cefoxitin, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime, cefuroxime and cefalexin, and similar to that of cefixime and cefotaxime. Ceftibuten and other cephalosporins tested were not stable to hydrolysis by β-lactamases produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp., or the plasmidmediated CHO and MIR-1 enzymes produced by isolates of K. pneumoniae.
Ceftibuten showed high affinity for penicillin binding protein (PBP) 3 of E. coli and PBPs 2, 4 and 5 of H. influenzae. Minimum bactericidal concentrations of ceftibuten against most susceptible bacteria were generally similar to, or within 4-fold, of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), and ceftibuten showed a postantibiotic effect ranging from 1 to > 10 hours against the respiratory pathogens S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. Increasing the inoculum size (by approximately 102 to 103 colony forming units/ml) increased MIC values for ceftibuten against selected organisms, whereas increasing the medium pH (from 5.5 to 8) reduced MIC values.
Ceftibuten had a moderate effect on the intestinal microflora in healthy volunteers, causing an overgrowth of enterococci and decreasing numbers of E. coli and anaerobic cocci.
Pharmacokinetic Properties
The bioavailability of ceftibuten following oral administration is between 75 and 90%. In healthy Western volunteers, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) ranging from 9.9 to 23.3 mg/L were reached approximately 1.7 to 2.6 hours after administration of ceftibuten 200 to 800mg. Cmax values of between 1.9 and 11.6 mg/L were reached within 2 to 3 hours in Japanese volunteers administered ceftibuten 25 to 200mg. No significant drug accumulation was evident during administration of multiple doses of up to 300mg twice daily. The rate and/or extent of absorption of ceftibuten was decreased when administered in doses > 400mg, and when administered with food.
The apparent volume of distribution in healthy volunteers was about 0.2 to 0.25 L/kg and approximately 60 to 64% was bound to plasma proteins. The drug penetrated well into blister fluid and middle ear fluid, achieving concentrations similar to those in plasma within about 4 hours. Ceftibuten penetrates into lung tissue and nasal, tracheal and bronchial secretions, but has shown little penetration into sputum.
About 60 to 70% of an administered dose of ceftibuten was recovered unchanged in the urine of healthy volunteers over 24 hours, and an additional 10 to 20% as the trans isomer, which has about 8-fold less antibacterial activity than the active cis form. Renal clearance ranged from about 3.5 to 4.4 L/h and from 2.7 to 3.1 L/h in Japanese and Western volunteers, respectively, and the mean elimination half-life (t1/2β) of ceftibuten ranged from 1.5 to 2.2 hours and 2.0 to 2.8 hours, respectively.
In elderly individuals (> 65 years), Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were slightly increased compared with those in younger persons, renal clearance was lower (about 1.65 L/h) and the time to reach peak plasma concentrations (tmax) was slightly delayed (3.2 hours). The pharmacokinetic properties of ceftibuten in healthy children and adolescents (6 months to 17 years) were similar to those seen in adults.
Total serum and renal clearance were reduced in patients with renal impairment and t1/2β was was prolonged, from 2.7 hours in healthy persons [creatinine clearance (CLcr) > 4.8 L/h] to 13.4 hours in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr < 1.8 L/h). Haemodialysis removed about 39% of the drug from the body within 3 hours at a rate of 4.6 L/h. The pharmacokinetic properties of ceftibuten were unchanged in patients with chronic liver disease.
Clinical Efficacy
Ceftibuten has shown clinical and bacteriological efficacy in adults and children with urogenital or respiratory tract infections following once- or twice-daily oral administration.
In noncomparative studies ceftibuten 100 or 200mg twice daily or 400mg once daily achieved clinical responses (cure or improvement, or ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ responses) in 93 to 100% of adult patients with acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections, and in 65 to 83% of patients with complicated or recurrent infections. Bacteriological eradication of causative pathogens, which included E. coli, Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp., was generally achieved in 60 to 90% of patients with acute or complicated infections. The efficacy of ceftibuten 200mg twice daily was similar to that of cefaclor 500mg 3 times daily in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Clinical cure was achieved in 90% of infants and children with complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections following treatment with ceftibuten 9 mg/kg/day for 10 days, which was similar to the response rate achieved with cotrimoxazole 8/40 mg/kg/day. However, ceftibuten eradicated pathogens from significantly more patients than cotrimoxazole (98 vs 88%).
Ceftibuten 400mg once daily or 200mg twice daily demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in patients with acute or chronic lower respiratory tract infections, similar to that of cefaclor 500mg 3 times daily. Clinical responses were achieved in all patients with acute bronchitis in one study, and in 69 to 79% of patients with chronic infections (bronchitis, or infected bronchiectasis) in noncomparative studies. Bacteriological eradication occurred in 77 to 91% of ceftibuten recipients vs 65 to 89% in cefaclor recipients.
In 2 studies in children with acute otitis media, ceftibuten 9 mg/kg/day for 10 days showed clinical and bacteriological efficacy which was similar to that of cefaclor or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 40 mg/kg/day (clinical and bacteriological response rates approximately 90%). Ceftibuten 9 mg/kg/day was significantly more effective than phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) 25 mg/kg/day administered in 3 divided doses in children and adolescents with Group A β-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis or scarlet fever, achieving clinical response and bacteriological eradication in 97 vs 89% and 91 vs 80% of patients, respectively. Clinical responses occurred in all patients with bacterial sinusitis (clinical cure in 68%) treated with ceftibuten 400mg once daily, which was similar to the response rate in patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500mg 3 times daily.
Satisfactory clinical responses were achieved in 80 to 100% of patients with obstetric or gynaecological infections, and bacteriological eradication rates ranged from 50 to 73% following administration of ceftibuten 100 or 200mg 2 or 3 times daily. Ceftibuten showed efficacy similar to that of bacampicillin 250mg 4 times daily in this indication.
In other preliminary studies, ceftibuten showed variable clinical efficacy in patients with bacterial prostatitis (30 or 70% response rate), and was effective in the treatment of patients with cotrimoxazole-resistant bacillary dysentery caused by either Shigella spp. or enteroinvasive E. coli.
Tolerability
Ceftibuten was well tolerated in both adult and paediatric patients in clinical trials. Adverse events were generally reported in about 5 to 10% of patients, and mostly consisted of mild to moderate gastrointestinal disturbances. Diarrhoea was the most common event, but was only severe in a small number of patients, and rarely necessitated discontinuation of therapy. In children, diarrhoea and vomiting each occurred in 3% of patients. Nausea, dyspepsia, abdominal pain and loose stools have also been reported in adults and children, but relatively infrequently (< 2%). Dizziness and rash were reported in 2% of patients, and headache, fungal infection and rhinitis were reported rarely (< 1%).
Laboratory abnormalities (increased levels of eosinophils, liver enzymes and blood urea nitrogen, and decreased levels of haemoglobin and platelets, and decreased white blood cell count), observed in a small proportion of patients (≤ 5%), were generally mild and transient, and ceftibuten did not affect platelet aggregation or vitamin K-dependent blood coagulation parameters.
The tolerability of ceftibuten was generally similar to that of cefaclor, bacampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and phenoxymethylpenicillin and better than that of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in comparative studies.
Dosage and Administration
The recommended dosage of ceftibuten in adults with acute or complicated urinary tract infections is 400mg administered orally once daily for 5 to 10 days. The same dosage, given for 5 to 14 days, is recommended in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, whereas a dosage of 200mg twice daily for 5 to 14 days is recommended in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Ceftibuten should be administered in a once-daily dosage of 9 mg/kg/day for 10 days to children with recurrent or complicated urinary tract infections, acute otitis media or pharyngitis.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Anon. Criteria for the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of antimicrobial agents on urinary tract infections (3rd edition). Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 40: 2149-2191, 1987
- Banfi A, Gabriele G, Hill-Juarez JM, Kaufman A, Moens E, et al. Multinational comparative trial of ceftibuten and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of children with complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S84–S91, 1993
Google Scholar - Barr WH, Affrime M, Lin C-C, Batra V. Pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten in children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S55–S63, 1993
Google Scholar - Barr WH, Lin C-C, Radwanski E, Lim J, Symchowicz S, et al. The pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten in humans. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 93–100, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Barry AL, Fuchs PC, Pfaller MA. Susceptibilities of β-lactamaseproducing and -nonproducing ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefotaxime and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 37: 14–18, 1993
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Barry AL, Jones RN, The Collaborative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Group. Interpretive criteria and quality control limits for ceftibuten disk susceptibility tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28: 605–607, 1990
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Bauernfeind A. Comparative antimicrobial spectrum and activity of ceftibuten against clinical isolates from West Germany. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 63–74, 1991a
Article CAS Google Scholar - Bauernfeind A. Ceftibuten and bactericidal kinetics. Comparative in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae producing extended spectrum β-lactamases. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 89–92, 1991b
Article CAS Google Scholar - Biemond A, de Fijter CWH, Oe PL, Meulen J v.d., Zambon JV, et al. Oral treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: Ceftibuten (Sch39720) versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). Abstract. Netherland Journal of Medicine 39: A43, 1991
Google Scholar - Blumer JL, McLinn SE, DeAbate CA, Kafetzis DA, Perrotta RJ, et al. Multinational multicenter controlled trial comparing ceftibuten with cefaclor for the treatment of acute otitis media. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S77–S83, 1993
Google Scholar - Braga PC, Piatti G. Kinetics of filamentation of Escherichia coli induced by different sub-MICs of ceftibuten at different times. Chemotherapy 39: 272–277, 1993a
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Braga PC, Piatti G. Sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of ceftibuten reduce adherence of Escherichia coli to human cells and induces formation of long filaments. Microbiology and Immunology 37: 175–179, 1993b
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Braga PC, Piatti G, Dal Sasso M, Maci S, Blasi F. The in vitro effects of ceftibuten on the host defence mechanism. Chemotherapy 40: 37–41, 1994
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Bragman SGL, Casewell MW. The in vitro activity of ceftibuten against 475 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli, compared with cefuroxime and cefadroxil. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 25: 221–226, 1990
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Brismar B, Edlund C, Nord CE. Effect of ceftibuten on the normal intestinal microflora. Infection 21: 373–375, 1993
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Chin N-X, Huang HB, Neu HC. Postantibiotic effect of ceftibuten on respiratory pathogens. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S45–S48, 1993
Google Scholar - Chirurgi VA, Edelstein H, Oster SE, Karp R, Cassano KB, et al. Ceftibuten versus cefaclor for the treatment of bronchitis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 28: 577–580, 1991
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Cho N, Fukunaga K, Kunii K, Kimura T. 7432-S in the obstetric and gynecological field. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl.): 570–578, 1989
Google Scholar - De Abate CA, Perrotta RJ, Dennington ML, Ziering RM. The efficacy and safety of once-daily ceftibuten compared with coamoxiclav in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Journal of Chemotherapy 4: 358–363, 1993
Google Scholar - Debbia EA, Pesce A, Chiesa M, Ricotta N, Schito GC. Microbiological profile of ceftibuten, a new oral cephalosporin. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 18: 129–139, 1992
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Debbia EA, Schito GC, Pesce A. Antibacterial activity of ceftibuten, a new oral third generation cephalosporin. Journal of Chemotherapy 3: 209–255, 1991
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Doern GV. In vitro activity of ceftibuten against Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 75–77, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Dornbusch K, Kronvall G, Göransson E, Mörtsell E. Comparative in vitro activity of the penem FCE 22101 against recent European blood culture isolates. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 23 (Suppl. C): 43–52, 1989a
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Dornbusch K, Kronvall G, Göransson E, Mörtsell E. In-vitro activity of FCE 22101 against respiratory tract pathogens with reference to production of β-lactamases. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 23 (Suppl. C) 31–41, 1989b
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Fassbender M, Lode H, Schaberg T, Borner K, Koeppe P. Pharmacokinetics of new oral cephalosporins, including a new carbacephem. Clinical Infectious Diseases 16: 646–653, 1993
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Georgopoulos A, Breyer S, Graninger W, Georgopoulos N. Chemotherapeutic activity of ceftibuten and cefaclor against experimentally induced pneumonia in rats. 28th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Los Angeles, October 23-26, 1988. Abstract no. 462, p. 190, 1988
- Hashimoto H, Yamaguchi S, Yachiku S. Clinical studies of ceftibuten in the field of urology. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 53:355–361, 1990
Google Scholar - Hayashi I, Onuma K, Hasuike M, Ishii T. Clinical examination of ceftibuten in acute bronchitis. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 53: 761–767, 1990
Google Scholar - Hoppe JE, Müller J. In vitro susceptibilities of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis to six new oral cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34: 1442–1443, 1990
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Inamatsu T, Fukayama M, Kato A, Ohura M, Shimada K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of 7432-S (a new oral cephem) in elderly patients. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl.): 217–230, 1989
Google Scholar - Jacoby GA, Carreras I. Activities of β-lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli strains producing extended-spectrum βlactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34:858–862, 1990
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Jones RN. Ceftibuten: a review of antimicrobial activity, spectrum and other microbiologic features. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S37–S44, 1993
Google Scholar - Jones RN, Barry AL. Antimicrobial activity, spectrum, and recommendations for disk diffusion susceptibility testing of ceftibuten (7432-S; SCH 39720), a new orally administered cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 32: 1576–1582, 1988b
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Jones RN, Barry AL. In vitro evaluation of ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720), a novel orally administered cephalosporin. Chemioterapia 7: 283–286, 1988a
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Kammer RB. Worldwide safety experience with ceftibuten pediatric suspension. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12: S92–S94, 1993
Google Scholar - Jones RN, Barry AL, The Collaborative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Group. Ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): comparative antimicrobial activity against 4735 clinical isolates, beta-lactamase stability and broth microdilution quality control guidelines. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 7: 802–807, 1988
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kammer RB, Ress R. Randomised comparative study of ceftibuten versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 101–105, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kearns GL, Reed MD, Jacobs RF, Ardite M, Yogev RD, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten (SCH 39720) in infants and children. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 35: 2078–2084, 1991
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Kelloway JS, Awni WM, Lin CC, Lim J, Affrime MB, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten-cis and its trans metabolite in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 35: 2267–2274, 1991
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Kitzis M-D, Liassine N, Ferre B, Gutmann L, Acar JF, et al. In vitro activities of 15 oral β-lactams against Klebsiella pneumoniae harboring new extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34: 1783–1786, 1990
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Kumazawa J, Matsumoto T, Kumamoto Y, Hirose T, Tsuchida S, et al. A double-blind comparative study of ceftibuten and cefaclor for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Nishinihon Journal of Urology 52: 921–937, 1990
Google Scholar - Lin C, Radwanski E, Lee L, Smith D, Symchowicz S, et al. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten (SCH 39270) in young adults and geriatric volunteers. 30th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Georgia, October 21—24, 1990. Abstract no. 1172, p. 281, 1990
- Matsuda S, Shimizu T, Maki M, Chimura T, Yajima A, et al. Comparative double-blind clinical trial of ceftibuten (7432-S) and bacampicillin (BAPC) against gynecological infections. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl. 1) 667–700, 1989
Google Scholar - Mazzulli T, Simor AE, Jaeger R, Fuller S, Low DE. Comparative in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones and β-lactam antimicrobial agents against community isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34: 467–469, 1990
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - McCabe R, Rumans L, Perrotta R, Mogabgab W. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ceftibuten and cefaclor in the treatment of pneumonia and bronchiectasis. Journal of Chemotherapy 5: 124–132, 1993
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - McLinn SE, McCarty JM, Perrotta R, Pichichero ME, Reidenberg BE, et al. Multicenter controlled trial comparing ceftibuten with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the empiric treatment of acute otitis media. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S70–S76, 1993
Google Scholar - Mendelman PM, Henritzy LL, Chaffin DO, Lent K, Smith AL, et al. In vitro activities and targets of three cephem antibiotics against Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 33: 1878–1882, 1989
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Mizutani S, Nishimura K, Yoshimura K, Miyoshi S, Iwao N, et al. Clinical experience with ceftibuten in complicated urinary tract infections. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 53: 779–789, 1990
Google Scholar - Nakashima M, Uematsu T, Takiguchi Y, Mizuno A, Iida M, et al. Phase I clinical studies of 7432-S, a new oral cephalosporin: safety and pharmacokinetics. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 28: 246–252, 1988a
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Nakashima M, Uematsu T, Takiguchi Y, Mizuno A, Uchida K, et al. Phase I clinical studies of 7432-S on platelet aggregation and blood coagulation. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 28: 253–258, 1988b
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Nasu M, Saitoh A, Ohizumi K, Hayashi I, Kobayashi H, et al. Comparative clinical study of 7432-S (ceftibuten) and cefaclor in chronic respiratory tract infections by a double-blind study. Abstract. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl.) A126, 1989
Google Scholar - NCCLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard, M2-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pennsylvania, 1990
- NCCLS. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards publication M7-A2, NCCLS, Villanova, Pennsylvania, 1992
- Neu HC. Ceftibuten: minimal inhibitory concentrations, postantibiotic effect, beta-lactamase stability — a rationale for dosing programmes. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S49–S54, 1993
Google Scholar - Oguma T, Shimamura K, Ushio Y, Yamada H, Takahashi K, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of discontinuous absorption process of ceftibuten in humans. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 63: 101–111, 1990
Article CAS Google Scholar - Papanicolaou GA, Medeiros AA. Ability of ceftibuten to induce the class-I β-lactamases of Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Enterobacter aerogenes. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 85–87, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Pichichero ME, McLinn SE, Gooch III WM, Rodriguez W, Goldfarb J, et al. Ceftibuten vs phenoxymethylpenicillin in group A betahemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 12 (Suppl.): S64–S70, 1993
Google Scholar - Prado D, Lopez E, Liu H, Devoto S, Woloj M, et al. Ceftibuten and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli disease. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 11: 644–647, 1992
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Rosenfeld RM, Doyle WJ, Swarts JD, Seroky J, Greene I. Efficacy of ceftibuten for acute otitis media caused by Haemophilus influenzae: an animal study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102: 222–226, 1993
CAS Google Scholar - Rosenfeld RM, Doyle WJ, Swarts JD, Seroky J, Pinero BP. Thirdgeneration cephalosporins in the treatment of acute pneumococcal otitis media. An animal study. Archives of Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery 118: 49–52, 1992
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Shawar R, LaRocco M, Cleary TG. Comparative in vitro activity of ceftibuten (Sch 39720) against bacterial enteropathogens. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 33: 781–784, 1989
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Stein GE, Christensen S, Mummaw N. Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with ceftibuten. Infection 19:124–126, 1991
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Suzuki K, Horiba M, Nagata Y, Naide Y, Shinoda M, et al. Clinical studies on 7432-S, a new oral cephem antibiotic in urological infections. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl. 1): 434–447, 1989
Google Scholar - Suzuki K, Nagata Y, Horiba M. Clinical studies on ceftibuten in the urinary field infection. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 53: 2003–2010, 1990
Google Scholar - Takasugi M, Matsumoto K, Shishido H, Nagatake T, Rikitomi N, et al. Basic and clinical studies on 7432-S, a new oral cephem. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl. 1) 298–313, 1989
Google Scholar - Thabaut A, Meyran M. Comparative antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten (SH 39 720) on 150 K. pneumoniae strains producing varying beta-lactamases. In French. Pathologie Biologie 38: 347–351, 1990
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Verbist L, Jacobs J, Hens K. Comparative antimicrobial activity of ceftibuten against multiply-resistant microorganisms from Belgium. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14:53–61, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Watanabe A, Oizumi K, Motomiya M, Yoshida T, Ito T, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of ceftibuten in chronic respiratory tract infections. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 43: 768–778, 1990
PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Westblom TU, Gudipati S, Midkiff BR. In vitro susceptibilities of Helicobacter pylori to the new oral cephalosporins cefpodoxime, ceftibuten and cefixime. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 9: 691–692, 1990
Article CAS Google Scholar - Wise R, Andrews JM, Ashby JP, Thornber D. Ceftibuten — in vitro activity against respiratory pathogens, β-lactamase stability and mechanism of action. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 26: 209–213, 1990a
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Wise R, Andrews JM, Ashby JP, Thornber D. Ceftibuten: a new orally absorbed cephalosporin. In vitro activity against strains from the United Kingdom. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 14: 45–52, 1991
Article CAS Google Scholar - Wise R, Nye K, O’Neill P, Wostenholme M, Andrews JM. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ceftibuten. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 34: 1053–1055, 1990b
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Yamamoto T, Yasuda J, Kanao M, Okada H. Basic and clinical studies on 7432-S in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl. 1): 600–606, 1989
Google Scholar - Yamasaku F, Suzuki Y, Uno K. Absorption and excretion of 7432-S. Chemotherapy 37 (Suppl. 1): 110–114, 1989
CAS Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Adis International Limited, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland 10, New Zealand
Lynda R. Wiseman & Julia A. Balfour
Authors
- Lynda R. Wiseman
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Julia A. Balfour
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by: A. Banfi, Pediatric Department, Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, Santiago, Chile; A. Bauernfeind, Max von Pettenkofer-Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany; P.C. Braga, Centro di Farmacologia Respiratoria, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; C.A. De Abate, Medical Research Center, Metairie, Louisiana, USA; E. Debbia, Istituto di Microbiologia, Università Degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy; K. Dornbusch, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; R.N. Jones, Department of Pathology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; H. Lode, Pneumologie I, Lungenklinik Heckshorn, Berlin, Germany; T. Mazzulli, Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; M.E. Pichichero, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Strong Children’s Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiseman, L.R., Balfour, J.A. Ceftibuten.Drugs 47, 784–808 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199447050-00006
- Published: 12 October 2012
- Issue Date: May 1994
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199447050-00006