Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Selective Pharmacodynamics of New Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (original) (raw)
Kelly JG, O’Malley K. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the newer ACE inhibitors: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 1990; 19: 177–96 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Kubo SH, Cody RJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: a review. Clin Pharmacokinet 1985; 10: 377–91 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Kaiser G, Ackermann R, Brechbuhler S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, benazepril HCl (CGS 14824A), in healthy volunteers after single and repeated administration. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1989; 10: 365–76 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Dieterle W, Ackermann R, Kaiser G. Pharmacokinetics of benazeprilat after intravenous administration in healthy volunteers [abstract]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 9 Suppl.: A303 Google Scholar
Williams PEO, Brown AN, Rajaguru S, et al. The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of cilazapril in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 27: 181S–8S ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Shionoiri H, Yasuda G, Ikeda A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and depressor effect of delapril in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41: 74–9 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Onoyama K, Nanishi F, Okuda S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (delapril) in patients with deteriorated kidney function and in normal control subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 43: 242–9 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Singhvi SM, Duchin KL, Morrison RA, et al. Disposition of fosinopril sodium in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 25: 9–15 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Ulm EH, Hichens M, Gomez HJ, et al. Enalapril maleate and a lysine analogue (MK521): disposition in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1982; 14: 357–62 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Rakhit A, Hurley ME, Tipnis V, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pentopril, a new angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in humans. J Clin Pharmacol 1986; 26: 156–64 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Rakhit A, Kochak GM, Tipnis V, et al. Pharmacokinetics of pentopril in the elderly. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 24: 351–7 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Kochak GM, Rakhit A, Thompson TN, et al. Pentopril-cimetidine interaction caused by a reduction in hepatic blood flow. J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 28: 222–7 Google Scholar
Rakhit A, Radensky P, Szerlip HM, et al. Effect of renal impairment on disposition of pentopril and its active metabolite. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44: 39–48 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Lees KR, Green ST, Reid JL. Influence of age on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perindopril. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44: 418–25 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Ferry JJ, Cetnarowski AB, Sedman AJ, et al. Multiple dose cimetidine administration does not influence the single-dose pharmacokinetics of quinapril and its active metabolite (CI-928). J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 28: 48–51 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Neub M, Vollmer K, Anderson J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the ACE-inhibitor quinapril in young and elderly volunteers [abstract]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36 Suppl.: A222 Google Scholar
Eckert HG, Badian MJ, Gantz D, et al. Pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of 2-(N-((S)-1-ethoxycarboxyl-3-phenylpropyl)-L-alanyl)-(1S, 3S, 5S)-2-azabicyclo (3.3.0) octane-3-carboxylic acid (Hoe 498) in rat, dog, and man. Arzneimittelforschung 1984; 34: 1435–47 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Witte PU, Irmisch R, Hajdu P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel orally active angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (Hoe 498) in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 27: 577–81 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Thuillez C, Richer C, Giudicelli JF. Pharmacokinetics, converting enzyme inhibition and peripheral arterial haemodynamics of ramipril in healthy volunteers. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 38D–44D ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Meyer BH, Muller O, Badian M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of ramipril in the elderly. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 33D–7D ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1429–35 Article Google Scholar
Cohn JN, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. A comparison of enalapril with hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 303–10 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 293–302 Article Google Scholar
Garg G, Yusuf S, Collaborative Group on ACE Inhibitor Trials. Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. JAMA 1995; 273: 1450–6 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Hobbs RE. Results of the ATLAS Study. High or low doses of ACE inhibitors for heart failure? Cleve Clin J Med 1998; 65: 539–42 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’infarcto Miocardico. GISSI-3: effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1994; 343: 1115–22 Google Scholar
The Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival (ISIS-4) Collaborative Group. ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995; 345: 669–85 Article Google Scholar
Chinese Cardiac Study Collaborative Group. Oral captopril versus placebo among 13 634 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: interim report from the Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-1). Lancet 1995; 345: 686–7 Article Google Scholar
Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekshus J, et al. Effects of the early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II). N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 678–84 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
ACE Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. Indications for ACE inhibitors in the early treatment of acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of individual data from 100,000 patients in randomized trials. Circulation 1998; 97: 2202–12 Article Google Scholar
Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, et al., for the SAVE Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 669–77 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 1993; 342: 821–8 Google Scholar
Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Carlsen JE, et al., Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) Study Group. A clinical trial of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1670–6 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, et al. The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1456–62 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Marre M, Chatellier G, Leblanc H, et al. Prevention of diabetic nephropathy with enalapril in normotensive diabetics with microalbuminuria. BMJ 1988; 297: 1092–5 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
The EUCLID Study Group. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of lisinopril in normotensive patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria. Lancet 1997; 349: 1787–92 Article Google Scholar
Ravid M, Savin H, Jurtin I, et al. Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 577–81 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Rose M, McMahon FG. Some problems with antihypertensive drug studies in the context of the new guidelines. Am J Hypertens 1990; 3: 151–5 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Goa KL, Wagstaff AJ. Losartan potassium: a review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability in the management of hypertension. Drugs 1996; 51: 820–45 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Ellis ML, Patterson JH. A new class of antihypertensive therapy: angiotensin II antagonists. Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16: 849–60 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Reid IA. Vasoactive peptides. In: Katzung BG, editor. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 7th ed. Stamford (CT): Appleton and Lange, 1998: 287–91 Google Scholar
White CM. Pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and therapeutic differences among ACE inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy 1998; 18: 588–99 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Edling O, Bao G, Feelisch M, et al. Moexipril, a new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor: pharmacological characterization and comparison with enalapril. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 275: 854–63 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Chevillard C, Brown NL, Mathieu MN, et al. Differential effects of oral trandolapril and enalapril on rat tissue angiotensin converting enzyme. Eur J Pharmacol 1988; 147: 23–8 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Pinto YM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Tjon-Ka-Jie RT, et al. Dose-finding study of imidapril, a novel angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, in patients with stable chronic heart failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 50: 265–8 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Delacretaz E, Nussberger J, Puchler K, et al. Value of different clinical and biochemical correlates to assess angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 24: 479–85 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Unger TH, Gohlke P, Paul M, et al. Tissue renin-angiotensin-systems: fact or fiction? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991; 18 Suppl. 2: 20–5 Google Scholar
Hoogkamer JF, Kleinbloesem CH, Nokhodian A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of imidapril and its active metabolite imidaprilat following single dose and during steady state in patients with chronic renal failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 54: 59–61 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Delacretaz E, Nussberger J, Puchler K, et al. Value of different clinical and biochemical correlates to assess angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 24(3): 479–85 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Bardelay C, Mach E, Worcel M, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme in rat brain and extraneural tissues visualized by quantitative autoradiography using 3H-trandolaprilate. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1989; 14: 511–8 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Sybertz EJ, Watkins RW, Ahn HS, et al. Pharmacologic, metabolic, and toxicologic profile of spirapril (SCH 33844), a new angiotensin converting inhibitor. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987; 10 Suppl. 7: S105–8 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Friehe H, Ney P. Pharmacological and toxicological studies of the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor moexipril hydrochloride. Arzneimittelforschung 1997; 47(2): 132–44 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Wiseman LR, McTavish D. Trandolapril: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in essential hypertension. Drugs 1994; 48: 71–90 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Arner P, Wade A, Engfeldt P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of trandolapril after repeated administration of 2mg to young and elderly patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 23 Suppl. 4: S44–9 PubMed Google Scholar
Brown NL, Batel M-Y, Benzoni F, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, anti-hypertensive activity and hemodynamic profile of trandolapril (RU 44570). Eur J Pharmacol 1988; 148: 79–91 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Lenfant B, Mouren M, Bryce T, et al. Trandolapril: pharmacokinetics of single oral doses in healthy male volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 23 Suppl. 4: S38–43 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Danielson B, Querin S, LaRochelle P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of trandolapril after repeated administration of 2mg to patients with chronic renal failure and healthy control subjects. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 23 Suppl. 4: S50–9 PubMed Google Scholar
Stimpel M, Bonn R, Koch B, et al. Pharmacology and clinical use of the new ACE-inhibitor moexipril. Cardiovascular Drug Reviews 1995; 13: 211–29 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Stimpel M, Cawello W. Pharmacokinetics and ACE-inhibition of the new ACE-inhibitor moexipril: is coadministration with food of clinical relevance? [abstract]. Hypertension 1995; 25: 1384 Google Scholar
Grass P, Gerbeau C, Kutz K. Spirapril: pharmacokinetic properties and drug interactions. Blood Press 1994; 3 Suppl. 2: 7–13 Article Google Scholar
Stein G, Sierakowski B, Grass P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of spirapril and spiraprilat in patients with chronic renal failure. Blood Press 1994; 3 Suppl. 2: 47–53 Article Google Scholar
Hayduk K, Kraul H. Efficacy and safety of spirapril in mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1999; 34 Suppl. 1: S19–23 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Puchler K, Sierakowski B, Roots I. Single dose and steady state pharmacokinetics of temocapril and temocaprilat in young and elderly hypertensive patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 363–7 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Harder S, Thurmann PA, Ungethum W. Single dose and steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the ACE-inhibitor imidapril in hypertensive patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 45: 377–80 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Meyer BH, Muller FO, Badenhorst PN, et al. Multiple doses of trandolapril do not affect warfarin pharmacodynamics. S Afr Med J 1995; 85: 768–70 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Pritchard G, Lyons D, Webster J, et al. Indomethacin does not attenuate the hypotensive effect of trandolapril. J Hum Hypertens 1996; 10: 763–7 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Hutt V, Michaelis K, Verbesselt R, et al. Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 51: 339–44 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Van Hecken A, Verbesselt R, Depre M, et al. Moexipril does not alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 45: 291–3 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Drugdex ®. Spirapril Drugdex Drug Evaluation. Colorado: Micromedex, Sep 2001. Google Scholar
Johnson BF, Wilson J, Johnson J, et al. Digoxin pharmacokinetics and spirapril, a new ACE inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 31: 527–30 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Sierakowski B, Puchler K, Witte PU, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of temocapril and temocapril diacid in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 53: 215–20 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Puchler K, Eckl KM, Fritsche L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of temocapril and temocaprilat after 14 once-daily oral doses of temocapril in hypertensive patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 44: 531–6 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Suzuki H, Kawaratani T, Shioya H, et al. Study on pharmacokinetics of a new biliary excreted oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, temocapril (CS-622) in humans. Biopharm Drug Dispos 1993; 14: 41–50 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Shionoiri H, Naruse M, Minamisawa K, et al. Fosinopril: clinical pharmacokinetics and clinical potential. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32: 460–80 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Hoogkamer JF, Kleinbloesem CH, Nokhodian A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of imidapril and its active metabolite imidaprilat following single dose and during steady state in patients with impaired liver function. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 51: 489–91 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Harder S, Thurmann PA. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction trial after repeated oral doses of imidapril and digoxin in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 43: 475–80 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413–46 Article Google Scholar
Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 611–6 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Pitt B, Segal R, Martinez FA, et al., for ELITE Study Investigators. Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly study, ELITE). Lancet 1997; 349: 747–52 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
White CM. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in heart failure or after myocardial infarction. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000; 57 Suppl. 11: S18–25 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Vitamin E supplementation and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 154–60 Article Google Scholar
Manley HJ. Role of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in patients with renal disease. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2000; 57 Suppl. 1: S12–8 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Johnston GD. Dose-response relationships with antihypertensive drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 55: 53–93 CAS Google Scholar
Corea L, Cardoni O, Fogari R, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60: 341–6 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Salvetti A, Arzilli F. Chronic dose-response curve of enalapril in essential hypertensives. An Italian multicenter study. Am J Hypertens 1989; 2: 352–4 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Gomez HJ, Cirillo VJ, Sromovsky JA, et al. Lisinopril dose-response relationship in essential hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 28: 415–20 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Anderson RJ, Duchin KL, Gore RD, et al. Once-daily fosinopril in the treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 1991; 17: 636–42 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Pool JL. Antihypertensive effect of fosinopril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor: findings of the fosinopril study group II. Clin Ther 1990; 12: 520–33 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Chrysant SG, McDonald RH, Wright JT, et al. Perindopril as monotherapy in hypertension: a multicenter comparison of two dosing regimens. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 479–84 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Drayer JM, Stimpel M, Fox A, et al. The antihypertensive properties of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor moexipril given alone or in combination with a low dose of a diuretic. Am J Ther 1995; 2: 525–31 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Vandenburg MJ, Mackay EM, Dews I, et al. Dose finding studies with imidapril-a new ACE inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 37: 265–72 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Sedman AJ, Posvar E. Clinical pharmacology of quinapril in healthy volunteers and in patients with hypertension and congestive heart failure. Angiology 1989; 40: 360–9 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Weinberger MH, Black HR, Lasseter KC, et al. Diurnal blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension treated with once-daily benazepril. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990; 47: 608–17 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Guyenne TT, Bellet M, Sassano P, et al. Crossover design for the dose determination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in hypertension. J Hypertens 1989; 7: 1005–12 Article Google Scholar
Bellet M, Whalen JJ, Bodin F, et al. Use of crossover trials to obtain antihypertensive dose-response curves and to study combination therapy during the development of benazepril. J Hypertens 1990; 8 Suppl. 4: S43–8 CAS Google Scholar
Meredith PA, Elliott HL. FDA guidelines on trough: peak ratios in the evaluation of antihypertensive agents. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994; 23 Suppl. 5: S26–30 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Zannad F, Matzinger A, Larche J. Trough/peak ratios of once-daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 633–43 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Staessen JA, Thijs L, Bijttebier G, et al. Determining the trough-to-peak ratio in parallel-group trials. Hypertension 1997; 29: 659–67 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar